To review or not to review.

[Tiger63]

Without an argument starting, whats the general feeling about doing reviews for every booking you do.

Personally I dont see the point if its someone who is reviewed every week , such as a certain massage lady in Ch-Le-St, there is nothing to add so its a bit of a waste of time.
On the other hand, someone like Victoria offers a few different services so all reviews are helpful.

Also, if its someone new, as many reviews as possible will build up a picture to the WGs performance and theyll be useful.

[Superad]

Every review is useful!

You pick up different info from everyone.

[waynekerr600]

I would prefer to see as many reviews as possible. Even if it's another positive it shows that a SP is staying consistent or there might be a little nuance that would help someone else.

It only takes 5-10 min to do a review so the more the merrier fur me.

Negatives are even more important as it can save someone else from the same shit experience.

Also it is horses for courses. Some of my reviews I've rated very different to other members as we are all different in our tastes

We need both sides for balance.

[datwabbit]

Massage was a good point. I wrote mine because of the 90 minute booking option which might be useful for two pop. Nothing else was new.

[Kev3773]

I couldn't review every meeting as several are repeats and within the 12 month allowable period. If I see someone new to me whether I review depends on a few things. If she has mixed reviews I will to offer my opinions, if she has lots of recent and similar reviews I may not and if there have been no reviews for a while or none at all then I would.
We all like recent information, especially if going to see someone for the first time

[catweazle]

I always review either a) places/ladies l haven't been to before or b) new girls at places l have been before.

I don't review repeat visits within the 12 month purdah period.

[roboeggman]

I'll review under a few circumstances. If they've never been reviewed before, if they haven't been reviewed within the last week or so, if my experience differs greatly from other's, if I'm bored, or if it's a neg.

[Moresomes]

I don't review repeat visits within the 12 month purdah period.

I see two SP's on a fairly regular basis, and both provide me with a consistently good service,
I've reviewed them both, so unless this service changed I see no point in reviewing them again, either in or out of the one year period, as I would have nothing useful to add.

[The Outsider]

I review pretty much every girl I see for the first time.  I also appreciate seeing new reviews even when a girl has loads already.  It confirms she's still good/bad or may even add a snippet of information that didn't make it into the previous ones. 

You do start to to get an idea of the type of punt other reviewers like so you can try and gauge if you're likely to have a similar experience.  There's no guarantees though!

I don't think I've ever reviewed for a second time even outside of the 12 month window though.  If I'm still seeing somebody 12 months later, it's likely they've become a regular and the experience I have may not be typical of a first time encounter. 

[Druidtoad]

If I can help it, I'd give a review each time.  A WG might have many reviews, but their quality or prices may have changed since the previous review.  Feedback is good for other punters wanting to see this WG, and helps the WG to keep up the good work if she's good. 

[Disco dave]

If i see someone who has alot of reviews and i have something different to add then i will review. If there is nothing i can add then i will leave it.

[bushman]

Every review is useful!

You pick up different info from everyone.

Agree 100%.
I am guilty of not reviewing every punt but I should.

[Andy_707]

Apologies, but can't find the ruling on this...

Assuming both reviews are positive and you've reviewed someone within the last 12 months, but they have changed their name, should you review again?  Would appreciate people's opinions.



PS this does not relate to any review I've already made, but one that I could make soon.

[daviemac]

Apologies, but can't find the ruling on this...

Assuming both reviews are positive and you've reviewed someone within the last 12 months, but they have changed their name, should you review again?  Would appreciate people's opinions.



PS this does not relate to any review I've already made, but one that I could make soon.

Regardless of the name it's still the same escort, so I would think it would be better to post on your original review with the new name and have that name added to the title as an AKA. If she's on AW the number should be the same if not the new number can be added to the indexing. That way it keeps all her reviews together.   

[Andy_707]

Thanks Daviemac. 

She doesn't have an AW number.  All her previous reviews were positive, so there may be another reason for the name change.

As discretion is the better part of valour, I may just leave it this time if I do book her.

[daviemac]

Thanks Daviemac. 

She doesn't have an AW number.  All her previous reviews were positive, so there may be another reason for the name change.

As discretion is the better part of valour, I may just leave it this time if I do book her.

If it's a name change for discretion due to outing or something similar and no AW profile involved I would agree it would be best not to mention the new name.