Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: How Many "Gold Standard WG's" Are There In The UK  (Read 9751 times)

Offline smiths

Some good names coming out here Smiths, just a shame they seem based around London and South East. I would presume that if some "Gold Standard" are around this area then logically some must be out in other regions. Perhaps not in such large numbers.

I have recommended the ones still working that i have posted about above on here before a number of times. Chelsea Heart was just Chelsea previously though, and Alex when i punted with her.

Offline vorian

Based on NEVER having had a bad punt with these girls, having met them all several times, short and long bookings, and all sorts of scenarios ;) I'd say:

Alex of Maxes Angels
Gabriella of Maxes Angels
KristenDD (of course! :D)
Lia Amelia - Eros
Nikki Devine - Haven't seen her for quite a while to be fair, but used to see her regularly when she was London based and never let me down.

Thanks hendrix, would love to get your input to the original question, how many of these "Gold Standard" WG would you guesstimate we have across the country. At the moment I'm leaning to 50 to 100 but people have a big difference of opinion.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline DaveMugabe

Going by my experience, I think its more like 10

Offline vorian

Going by my experience, I think its more like 10

Yes I get where your coming from for sure but we seem to have a rough consensus that there are a least ten in and around London. I would like to think we don't only have "Gold Standards" WG's in the UK based in this area. Hence why I pushing the number up to include to whole of the UK.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online hendrix

Thanks hendrix, would love to get your input to the original question, how many of these "Gold Standard" WG would you guesstimate we have across the country. At the moment I'm leaning to 50 to 100 but people have a big difference of opinion.

I don't have any experience outside London (more experience abroad) but I'd be pleasantly surprised if there were another dozen as good for my tastes as the ones I mentioned.

Offline vorian

I don't have any experience outside London (more experience abroad) but I'd be pleasantly surprised if there were another dozen as good for my tastes as the ones I mentioned.

So you're probably in the mid twenties sort of area Hendrix. Interesting.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Jvosta

I was actually thinking about this a few days ago vorian. Surely there must be more WGs of the same calibre as Madlin, Cindy and Dee....

It's herd behaviour though, one typically searches 'most popular/highest rated' on AW thus other gems will find it difficult to establish themselves?

Out of the thousands of WGs in London, I'd hazard a guess of at least 50? Furthermore, I notice Agency girls are very rarely reviewed on UKP

I really can't see any way of giving a meaningful answer to the original question. The only way it could be (sort of) done would be for a panel to evaluate every known working girl according to a tightly-defined set of pre-agreed criteria, rather as is done for the Michelin Guide. But it isn't going to happen. The most we can hope for is one punter's lifetime list of his girls graded from best to worst. And one person's views on this issue may not be the same as another's. Even though most punters would probably agree on the bad and useless, sorting the good from the excellent from the "gold medal" seems to me a wholly unrealistic task.
Sorry Vorian, I wish I could be more positive, I really do.

Offline vorian

I was actually thinking about this a few days ago vorian. Surely there must be more WGs of the same calibre as Madlin, Cindy and Dee....

It's herd behaviour though, one typically searches 'most popular/highest rated' on AW thus other gems will find it difficult to establish themselves?

Out of the thousands of WGs in London, I'd hazard a guess of at least 50? Furthermore, I notice Agency girls are very rarely reviewed on UKP

Makes a lot of sense in what your saying I agree so if you think 50 in London what about the total for the whole country. Still seems like we are looking at a very small percentage overall across the UK. As for the other Gem's I agree but I have seen one review on UKP kicj start interest in a girl then a number for punters go and see, like this current thread

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=23172.0

I'm not saying this WG is "Gold Standard" but new girls can become exposed on here.

So it seems it can happen, as far as agencies are concerned seems they are not too popular on here for a variety of reasons but of course there are always exceptions to the rule.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline vorian

I really can't see any way of giving a meaningful answer to the original question. The only way it could be (sort of) done would be for a panel to evaluate every known working girl according to a tightly-defined set of pre-agreed criteria, rather as is done for the Michelin Guide. But it isn't going to happen. The most we can hope for is one punter's lifetime list of his girls graded from best to worst. And one person's views on this issue may not be the same as another's. Even though most punters would probably agree on the bad and useless, sorting the good from the excellent from the "gold medal" seems to me a wholly unrealistic task.
Sorry Vorian, I wish I could be more positive, I really do.

No problem and of course you are right, when debating most aspects of punting it is impossible to come to any real conclusions due to the lack of defined standards or indeed reliable data, it is all a stab in the dark but getting peoples personal opinions does help stimulate the debate and get people thinking about punting in perhaps a slightly different way.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline smiths

I really can't see any way of giving a meaningful answer to the original question. The only way it could be (sort of) done would be for a panel to evaluate every known working girl according to a tightly-defined set of pre-agreed criteria, rather as is done for the Michelin Guide. But it isn't going to happen. The most we can hope for is one punter's lifetime list of his girls graded from best to worst. And one person's views on this issue may not be the same as another's. Even though most punters would probably agree on the bad and useless, sorting the good from the excellent from the "gold medal" seems to me a wholly unrealistic task.
Sorry Vorian, I wish I could be more positive, I really do.

I agree. You mention Michelin Guides, well in punting there are McCoys guides done by George McCoy who has spent many years travelling round the country visiting and sometimes being offered or asking for freebies off WGs. Not at all impartial.

So far there have been the opinions of a handful of punters, to even get a general idea as to anything factual it would have to be opinions of hundreds of punters from all parts of the UK in my view. The best we can do on here is give our own opinions and if others agree that might help other punters decision making whether to punt with that particular WG or not.

Offline vorian

I agree. You mention Michelin Guides, well in punting there are McCoys guides done by George McCoy who has spent many years travelling round the country visiting and sometimes being offered or asking for freebies off WGs. Not at all impartial.

So far there have been the opinions of a handful of punters, to even get a general idea as to anything factual it would have to be opinions of hundreds of punters from all parts of the UK in my view. The best we can do on here is give our own opinions and if others agree that might help other punters decision making whether to punt with that particular WG or not.

Absolutely smiths totally agree, all I hope is any thread gets people thinking and helps the next punter get a better punt. Of course don't forget we now have a personal recommendation from JRC and a link to his 2007 auto-censored FR well worth it imho :D
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline smiths

Absolutely smiths totally agree, all I hope is any thread gets people thinking and helps the next punter get a better punt. Of course don't forget we now have a personal recommendation from JRC and a link to his 2007 auto-censored FR well worth it imho :D

Indeed, its stimulated debate which is of course good. ;)

Offline Jimmyredcab

Absolutely smiths totally agree, all I hope is any thread gets people thinking and helps the next punter get a better punt. Of course don't forget we now have a personal recommendation from JRC and a link to his 2007 auto-censored FR well worth it imho :D

That is almost 7 years ago so I can't guarantee what she is like today.     :hi: :hi:

Offline vorian

That is almost 7 years ago so I can't guarantee what she is like today.     :hi: :hi:

Fair enough Jimmy  :hi: I will have to settle for that  :hi: :D
« Last Edit: January 26, 2014, 08:53:34 PM by vorian »
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline overhead

I have no knowledge of how top class pro$$ies get their clients, they would be out of my price range.

Could you imagine Silvio Berlusconi logging on to Adultwork for his next pro$$ie.     :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


This is one of the sites the up-market fraternity uses.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/main.asp

The prozzies also network with each other and keep tabs on the client base. They know the clients just like the clients think they know them, only much more so. It's fascinating to hear even just a few snippets of what goes on. Prostitutes at the top end of the scale know in detail the sexual habits of loads of public figures that they haven't even met. yet!

If someone like Berlusconi wants to meet a particular type of girl at a particular place and time, he only has to let one of his regular contacts know and she will arrange it for him. They do this for each other all the time. It's just like any other business that involves sales and marketing, if you're any good you know everything that is going on.




Offline Pippa723

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1
My posts obviously didn't pass the moderators ruling so instead I'll ask the valued opinion of the 'punter'.
Im with a reputable agency but I also have an AW profile. I didn't post my original replies to 'tout' or 'advertise', Im not looking to be exposed, discretion is also important to most WG's. Im getting the impression that AW is considered amongst some members as 'the bottom of the barrel'. Where would you gentlemen suggest I create a profile?

Regards

P x

Offline overhead

My posts obviously didn't pass the moderators ruling so instead I'll ask the valued opinion of the 'punter'.
Im with a reputable agency but I also have an AW profile. I didn't post my original replies to 'tout' or 'advertise', Im not looking to be exposed, discretion is also important to most WG's. Im getting the impression that AW is considered amongst some members as 'the bottom of the barrel'. Where would you gentlemen suggest I create a profile?

Regards

P x

AW gets the most attention. Someone else might have some other suggestions, and of course it's important for punters to know where to look too, so we shall all watch with interest. The problem with AW is because it's basically the busiest, it is also the main target for scams and idiots, and it's a constant battleground. Just read some of the older threads and you'll see.

Seriously, you will probably find you get better information on saafe. The girls there would have more experience on where they get the best results, A lot depends on your target market - overnights, quickies, touring, older, younger, massage, sex, oral etc etc. Extended discussion here might look too much like touting, although valid questions and observations help everyone.


Online Ali Katt

It does depend how you define gold standard, but I doubt there or any working in Sheffield or South Yorks.

Offline SirPhilipXX

My posts obviously didn't pass the moderators ruling so instead I'll ask the valued opinion of the 'punter'.
Im with a reputable agency but I also have an AW profile. I didn't post my original replies to 'tout' or 'advertise', Im not looking to be exposed, discretion is also important to most WG's. Im getting the impression that AW is considered amongst some members as 'the bottom of the barrel'. Where would you gentlemen suggest I create a profile?

Regards

P x

You might also consider registering as a provider with The Erotic Review -see recent post by Overhead on this thread.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/main.asp

cjkanye02

Good thread.

Gold standard is very rare as so much has to come together - looks, service, communication, enthusiasm, surroundings, price, profesionalism. I can only think of Dee who ticks all of those boxes though I haven't seen lots of the forum faves. Many girls seem to get close but then fall at one of these.

I don't think it's just a fan club going on with some of the names here. The members here aren't fluffy, they are the most demanding fuckers around and yet there is not a bad word said about the forum darlings!

Offline James999

My posts obviously didn't pass the moderators ruling so instead I'll ask the valued opinion of the 'punter'.
Im with a reputable agency but I also have an AW profile. I didn't post my original replies to 'tout' or 'advertise', Im not looking to be exposed, discretion is also important to most WG's. Im getting the impression that AW is considered amongst some members as 'the bottom of the barrel'. Where would you gentlemen suggest I create a profile?

Regards

P x

The term reputable and "Agency" don't go together, the reality is Pimps are illegal, it's a bit like asking about a reputable drug dealer  :dash:

As for advertising, that's interesting as if you are young, fit and offer a good service then repeat business and an AW profile alone should bring you more work than you can handle, the fact that you need a pimp to try and help and still don't have enough work is a clear indicator that something is not right with you / your service.  :hi:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)