Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: How Many "Gold Standard WG's" Are There In The UK  (Read 9769 times)

Offline vorian


But then as many have pointed out, its very subjective and a matter of taste.

Agreed which is why I was kind of thinking about the WG's with multiple reviews from different UKP respected members. That way at least some of the subjectivity, particularly based around looks as opposed to customer service, effort and professionalism should be flattened out and give a more balanced view.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online Jimmyredcab

Agreed which is why I was kind of thinking about the WG's with multiple reviews from different UKP respected members.

I respect quite a few members on here ---------------- but there are others who I would not want in the back of my cab.  :hi:

Offline jackdaw



When I say "Gold Standard" I'm talking about not only looks (Subjective) but professionalism, effort and a dedication to providing great customer service at all times. Price of course needs to be perceived as VFM.

I think the UKP members on the whole would be educated and knowledgeable regarding what makes a "Gold Standard" so when these few names come up again and again it makes me think how many are there really in the UK.

10,20,30,40. When you look at how many prossies are working it seems like a very small percentage of top class "Gold Standard" girls.

What would you include in professionalism?

If you just include performance once the meeting starts,I think there might be low hundreds of gold medal WG. But if you include stuff like arranging meeting, providing top class environment, etc... Then probably less than a hundred. And certainly less than a hundred in range I can afford.

Offline vorian

I respect quite a few members on here ---------------- but there are others who I would not want in the back of my cab.  :hi:

Would you say there is any memeber in particular who's reviews you would trust Jimmy.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline vorian

What would you include in professionalism?

If you just include performance once the meeting starts,I think there might be low hundreds of gold medal WG. But if you include stuff like arranging meeting, providing top class environment, etc... Then probably less than a hundred. And certainly less than a hundred in range I can afford.

Yes I'm kind of getting that 50 to 100 feeling now, which is scary compared to how many WG there are apparently working in the UK and how many punts take place every year. Thinking of how much money just UKP members fork out alone is just crazy.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online Jimmyredcab

A "gold standard" prostitute has to have more skills than just sucking cock. Suppose a CEO of a major company needs a girl to take to the Royal enclosure at Ascot, he will not resort to Adultwork.

Online Jimmyredcab

Would you say there is any member in particular who's reviews you would trust Jimmy.

That would have to be NIK without a doubt, we have very similar tastes plus I have met him face to face on a number of occasions.    :hi:

Offline vorian

A "gold standard" prostitute has to have more skills than just sucking cock. Suppose a CEO of a major company needs a girl to take to the Royal enclosure at Ascot, he will not resort to Adultwork.

See your point however I personally believe a very, very small number of AW WG's could fit in well to that environment the fact that I think they could, to me is an indication of their "Gold Standard"ness. Imho the number who could perhaps do this is very small and in percentage terms tiny. Which is why I asked the original question in this thread. Just how many do you think are that "Gold Standard".
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online Jimmyredcab

Yes I'm kind of getting that 50 to 100 feeling now, which is scary compared to how many WG there are apparently working in the UK and how many punts take place every year. Thinking of how much money just UKP members fork out alone is just crazy.

True, but the vast majority of us are mere peasants (under £50K a year).

A pro footballer would earn that in a day.      :scare:

Offline vorian

That would have to be NIK without a doubt, we have very similar tastes plus I have met him face to face on a number of occasions.    :hi:

Thank you so NIK, seems a very good choice, as you said you have very similar tastes to NIK, so would that mean that you wouldn't trust any review if the WG reviewed was not to your particular taste irrespective to who the reviewer was, makes sense to me but would seem to limit the usefulness of reviews to a degree.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline smiths

A "gold standard" prostitute has to have more skills than just sucking cock. Suppose a CEO of a major company needs a girl to take to the Royal enclosure at Ascot, he will not resort to Adultwork.

So Alex who then became Chelsea who you highly rated as a WG and who had a profile on A/W or Seductive Scarlet who you highly rated and recommended who also had an A/W profile, it was your recommedation that alerted me to her and why i booked her and then had a good punt leading to me giving her a positive FR at the time. So these 2 WGs werent gold standard when you punted with them then is that right? :hi:

Offline vorian

True, but the vast majority of us are mere peasants (under £50K a year).

A pro footballer would earn that in a day.      :scare:

 My apologies I may have been unclear, I was talking in total the amount of money spent by UKP members not how much individual members spend. If every member say spent 2% of their income on prossies a year that figure  would still be enormous. How much the individual member earns is still proportional. So footballer or as you said a "Mere Peasant" (under £50K a year) would not matter.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online Jimmyredcab

So Alex who then became Chelsea who you highly rated as a WG and who had a profile on A/W or Seductive Scarlet who you highly rated and recommended who also had an A/W profile, it was your recommedation that alerted me to her and why i booked her and then had a good punt leading to me giving her a positive FR at the time. So these 2 WGs werent gold standard when you punted with them then is that right? :hi:

As much as I like Seductive Scarlet I am not sure she would be suitable for "escort duties" at Royal Ascot, Chelsea of Watford might just be able to pull it off.    :hi:

The sort of clients these "gold standard" pro$$ies see would not know the price of a pint of milk, let alone care.   :hi:

Offline vorian

As much as I like Seductive Scarlet I am not sure she would be suitable for "escort duties" at Royal Ascot, Chelsea of Watford might just be able to pull it off.    :hi:

The sort of clients these "gold standard" pro$$ies see would not know the price of a pint of milk, let alone care.   :hi:

I see the point you make Jimmy, I was thinking more about the WG as opposed to who they are or how much the punter earns, that is not really important to me as such.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline smiths

As much as I like Seductive Scarlet I am not sure she would be suitable for "escort duties" at Royal Ascot, Chelsea of Watford might just be able to pull it off.    :hi:

The sort of clients these "gold standard" pro$$ies see would not know the price of a pint of milk, let alone care.   :hi:

So in your view Chelsea could be even though she has or had an A/W profile then.

Also i dont agree with your definition of a gold standard WG here, the OPs opening post in my understanding of it was about good WGs, not just those that charge a lot and punt with rich guys. :hi:

Offline vorian

As much as I like Seductive Scarlet I am not sure she would be suitable for "escort duties" at Royal Ascot, Chelsea of Watford might just be able to pull it off.    :hi:

The sort of clients these "gold standard" pro$$ies see would not know the price of a pint of milk, let alone care.   :hi:

So you believe that Chelsea might be able to pull it off and thus by your personal standards could be considered "Gold Standard" interesting so one (Maybe so far) would that be across the whole UK or would it be fair to think if one exists then there might be more out there, who do indeed advertise on AW.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline vorian

So in your view Chelsea could be even though she has or had an A/W profile then.

Also i dont agree with your definition of a gold standard WG here, the OPs opening post in my understanding of it was about good WGs, not just those that charge a lot and punt with rich guys. :hi:

It indeed was Smiths, I never even considered those "Elite" rich punter type WG to me they are not really relevant to me personally or most members on this forum.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online Jimmyredcab

So in your view Chelsea could be even though she has or had an A/W profile then.


There are exceptions to every rule ---------------- Chelsea is one pro$$ie out of how many ------- tens of thousands.  :unknown:

Offline vorian

There are exceptions to every rule ---------------- Chelsea is one pro$$ie out of how many ------- tens of thousands.  :unknown:

Exactly that's the point I was making, of course everyone will have a different opinion, so your answer Jimmy is One. Thank you
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Online Jimmyredcab

It indeed was Smiths, I never even considered those "Elite" rich punter type WG to me they are not really relevant to me personally or most members on this forum.

But your original question was ----------

"How many "Gold Standard" WG's do we have in the UK."

The vast majority of those girls would be of no interest to most UKP members, including me, my absolute maximum would be £200 an hour ------------- no matter how attractive she was.

Offline smiths

There are exceptions to every rule ---------------- Chelsea is one pro$$ie out of how many ------- tens of thousands.  :unknown:

Indeed there are but you posted there were none on A/W, i see she is now called Chelsea Heart on her A/W profile. :hi:

Offline smiths

But your original question was ----------

"How many "Gold Standard" WG's do we have in the UK."

The vast majority of those girls would be of no interest to most UKP members, including me, my absolute maximum would be £200 an hour ------------- no matter how attractive she was.

But you are classing gold plated as expensive WGs who go to Ascot with rich punters which wasnt what Vorian was posting about in his OP and he has confirmed he wasnt in another post since. :dash:

You once told me when i paid £180 an hour to punt with Keira Pharrell that you would rather cut your arm off than pay that much. My absolute maximum is also £200 an hour. :hi:

Offline vorian

But your original question was ----------

"How many "Gold Standard" WG's do we have in the UK."

The vast majority of those girls would be of no interest to most UKP members, including me, my absolute maximum would be £200 an hour ------------- no matter how attractive she was.

I never mentioned price at all apart from perceived VFM and attractiveness is subjective anyway. For me price and "Gold Standard" or good WG are only related in so far as how much the punter can pay. I think there are "Gold Standard" at any price but for argument sake £100 to £175 covers many of them and £200 at a push.

To be clear imho, higher prices do not equal a good "Gold Standard" WG.

I have never linked the question to these "Elite" types I have no interest in them and I agree with you most UKP members would probably feel the same.

"Gold Standard" does not mean expensive but good.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Vivienne from Sindy Dolls Elite in Chester is the only GOld Standard girl I know working at the moment.  I have seen her about 5 times now (over 1 year) and she never disappoints.  Great looking, great personality, and great in bed.  She is phenomenal.  She's very sensual and great at GFE.  Pretty sure she doesn't go for PSE

http://www.sindydollschester.co.uk/doll/1162

https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=1187020

I have seen some more who were great at Sindy's too recently, but haven't seen them more than once so don;t know if it was a one of thing.  I tend to always be on the lookout for a new experience so it;s really unusual for me to go back to a girl more than a couple of times.

Offline smiths

I never mentioned price at all apart from perceived VFM and attractiveness is subjective anyway. For me price and "Gold Standard" or good WG are only related in so far as how much the punter can pay. I think there are "Gold Standard" at any price but for argument sake £100 to £175 covers many of them and £200 at a push.

To be clear imho, higher prices do not equal a good "Gold Standard" WG.

I have never linked the question to these "Elite" types I have no interest in them and I agree with you most UKP members would probably feel the same.

"Gold Standard" does not mean expensive but good.

Now thats what i call very clearly clarifying it. :D


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)