SAAFE Discuss How To Remove Reviews

[Sailormack]

are you secretly HP under another name? thought he would be on to her like a dose of ????he does like the larger lady.

It was the royal marine haircut and celly arsecheecks that sealed the deal for me

[punk]

It was the royal marine haircut and celly arsecheecks that sealed the deal for me

ah, she Britons secret weapon? one of our new aircraft carriers?

[vorian]

ah, she Britons secret weapon? one of our new aircraft carriers?

You could land a whole squadron on that arse and still have room for marching band.

[xsw21]

ouch, you guys are harsh man…

[mattylondon]

I have viewed her "website" and she is right, it is offensive 

External Link/Members Only

Oh dear. Not quite what I was expecting, with that profile name? The peaches are clearly different in Walsall! 

Perhaps somebody should strap a plank to their arse and take one for the team? As long as JP isn't offended by any potential review!

[mattylondon]

Divine would most certainly disagree with all publicity is good publicity as he got caught out shagging one of his WGs who posted about it on here after his wife went ape-shit at both and online on their twitter account.

I wondered what had happened to that low life? I hope his shag was worth it! 

Mr Divine, the infamous pseudo-pimp, who sat there in the background, pulling the strings of the obnoxious Chloe Kisses and her ilk. It is well known that he actively encouraged that rabble to use Punternet as a marketing tool. To post and post often. The more you post, the more you will be seen. The more your profile increases, the more likely it is that people will look you over or think you're special and want to book you. To a degree, he was successful in at least establishing an MK section, to rank alongside Birmingham and London. That alone is patently absurd. How well it has worked for the dusty phone brigade, which includes Chloe Kisses, is highly questionable. 

[vorian]

Interesting thread on SAAFE regarding how to get reviews removed
External Link/Members Only

Just goes to show the growing influence of UKP and how more and more punters every day are using review sites when selecting WG's. I have seen the impact of TripAdvisor in the last few years and how that has had a positive influence on customer service.  Hopefully we will eventually see a general improvement in WG standards as well in the long term.

Didn't take long to get noticed,  below is the latest post on the SAAFE thread

"I really value this site and everything it stands for. HOWEVER...

There is a massive imbalance here. We are not "allowed" to talk about other forums. On the other hand, this has been posted in a section of the forum which is public for all to see - and lo and behold, there is now a thread about this thread on another forum! One where we are (largely) considered to be lying, cheating, overpaid, worthless scumbags.

Wouldn't this thread be more suited to a different section of our site? After all, this is supposed to be a forum for advice, not for a bunch of embittered old c**ts to slag us off at every opportunity."

Sometimes it is forgotten that punters are the customers,  I pretty sure that any successful business does not thrive by calling it's customers a bunch of bitter old cunts.

[James999]

To what post was this minger initially complaining about?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=23030.0 

[punk]

Didn't take long to get noticed,  below is the latest post on the SAAFE thread

"I really value this site and everything it stands for. HOWEVER...

There is a massive imbalance here. We are not "allowed" to talk about other forums. On the other hand, this has been posted in a section of the forum which is public for all to see - and lo and behold, there is now a thread about this thread on another forum! One where we are (largely) considered to be lying, cheating, overpaid, worthless scumbags.

Wouldn't this thread be more suited to a different section of our site? After all, this is supposed to be a forum for advice, not for a bunch of embittered old c**ts to slag us off at every opportunity."

Sometimes it is forgotten that punters are the customers,  I pretty sure that any successful business does not thrive by calling it's customers a bunch of bitter old cunts.

fuck that whore, were not all old or bitter, thats calling the kettle black,some prossies are man haters.

[Tailpipe]

The escort was asking how to remove comments due to potentially being outed by someone. I've asked for posts about me to be removed from forums before where I felt the post was too personal and could possibly identify me should anyone I know were to read it, on the couple of occasions I've asked to do this the comments in question were positive. As far as I'm aware most of the contributors on that thread were not advocating removing negative comments and reviews.

I have decided when and if I punt again that I should ask the WG if she would like a UKP review or not. As some react badly to even positive Reviews as they feel
they have enter into a "what goes on tour stays on tour type contract" with a punter.

However if she was a very bad punt a would post a comment to warn other punters.

[CatBBW]

I think she was on the worst AW picture thread understandably the posts were not over complementary. If BBW is a punters thing good for them but presentation always help no matter how big or small.

As a very large lady in the biz, I totally agree.

Back to the thread...What a lot of ladies don't understand is that negative comments/remarks/reviews will still drive traffic to their profile/site. If a link gets posted on here, with a negative OR positive comment, the lady's viewcount will shoot up, as will PG and movie sales. If she's also a cammer, she'll get more visitors. And Gawpers spend money too - I've had people come into my PAID cam room to call me a fat pig/dog/heffer/bitch/c**t/loser etc etc etc....but they're still PAYING me to point and laugh! 

So ladies need to start looking at prozzying in the longer term. If you (ladies) are worried you will ever be outed: don't use identifiable (OR FACE!) pics ANYWHERE, don't use your personal phone number, and don't work from home! Take each review or link posted/commented as free advertising (and of course up your game if your service is called into question). And don't spend too much time googling yourself to see where you're being discussed. The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about at all.

[Michelle Independent]

They usually tell lies about being stalked or threatened. 

Well to be honest after my first review with a bit too much detail i did have some problems. Happy Admin dealt with it rather quick.

[James999]

Well to be honest after my first review with a bit too much detail i did have some problems. Happy Admin dealt with it rather quick.

See it's all about HOW YOU ASK, if you're reasonable and make valid points Admin may listen, but so many make up stupid stories or demands they just get ignored 

Oh and in your case the fact that the Moderator fancies you may help 

[vorian]

See it's all about HOW YOU ASK, if you're reasonable and make valid points Admin may listen, but so many make up stupid stories or demands they just get ignored 

Oh and in your case the fact that the Moderator fancies you may help 

True and honest

[OldAdmin]

Well to be honest after my first review with a bit too much detail i did have some problems. Happy Admin dealt with it rather quick.

If I remember correctly, the punter who wrote the review wanted to edit out the description of your incall location. Not that it was that descriptive to figure out your exact address.

[Stealthshagger]

To be fair I know of one wg who never put face pics on her profile, but had some in her private gallery as aw said they can't be copied. Her face pictures were posted here, and she was quite shocked and alarmed by it, but had no idea what to do. In fairness to her she was alarmed as opposed to ranting or offensive etc.  so whilst it's not really a review, I can see why wgs might sometimes ask for things to be taken down. She had also gone to the effort of working in a different city from where she lived, so it must have been a big deal to her to remain anonymous in her city.

As for removing actual reviews...I just can't see why an accurate or legitimate review should be removed at all...? I assume we are all smart enough to not use real names, actuall full addresses, etc etc...?

[Daffodil]

See it's all about HOW YOU ASK, if you're reasonable and make valid points Admin may listen, but so many make up stupid stories or demands they just get ignored 

Oh and in your case the fact that the Moderator fancies you may help 

Exactly. I once wrote a review about a prossie and revealed a little too much about her in call location. She joined the site, sent me a polite pm, and I had one of the mods edit it for me.

If the request is reasonable and made in a polite manner then they might have more success.

[vorian]

SAAFE mods have moved the thread to a members only section now. I can only imagine the bile that is being posted as we speak.

[CatBBW]

To be fair I know of one wg who never put face pics on her profile, but had some in her private gallery as aw said they can't be copied. Her face pictures were posted here, and she was quite shocked and alarmed by it, but had no idea what to do. In fairness to her she was alarmed as opposed to ranting or offensive etc.  so whilst it's not really a review, I can see why wgs might sometimes ask for things to be taken down. She had also gone to the effort of working in a different city from where she lived, so it must have been a big deal to her to remain anonymous in her city.

As for removing actual reviews...I just can't see why an accurate or legitimate review should be removed at all...? I assume we are all smart enough to not use real names, actuall full addresses, etc etc...?

Anyone using the internet should know (or learn quickly) that NOTHING is anonymous, untraceable or uncopyable. This is especially important if anonymity is of utter importance. I started using tinternet back in mid-90s, and from the very first day I assumed anyone and everyone could see - or trace - my activity. I can understand why the lady above was alarmed, but it was a short sharp lesson and I hope she's learned from it.

[CatBBW]

SAAFE mods have moved the thread to a members only section now. I can only imagine the bile that is being posted as we speak.

It's been locked.

[Stealthshagger]

Yes, that's true. I do think we overstate how aware we are that the net is an open channel. We get annoyed at viruses on computers, we are outraged to be hacked, we do online banking, we have privacy settings on myface etc. if we were so sure and aware, genuinely, that the net is truly an open place, we wouldn't have myface twatter online banking, online credit card payments etc.

On the face of it, even using a registered prepaid card to get aw credits can be looked upon in hindsight with a sigh and the knowledge that along the line our identity was involved and it was a site where there are organised gangs and fakes, scammers etc mixed in with legitimate providers. The fact that we take a calculated risk does not mean we deserve the consequence of losing necessarily.

Despite our collective protestations or claims otherwise, we all act as if the internet is a private and/or secure place at some time. And we are outraged when reality shows otherwise.

[smiths]

Anyone using the internet should know (or learn quickly) that NOTHING is anonymous, untraceable or uncopyable. This is especially important if anonymity is of utter importance. I started using tinternet back in mid-90s, and from the very first day I assumed anyone and everyone could see - or trace - my activity. I can understand why the lady above was alarmed, but it was a short sharp lesson and I hope she's learned from it.

Absolutely right, if smart a WG will know this BEFORE she posts anything online regarding her being a WG. IMO a WG who puts a face photo in her PG but wants to remain anonymous is very stupid and/or naive.

[Stealthshagger]

I do agree,but I think there is one factor here. She doesn't want people she knows to know. Hence PG as you have to be a member to see that. It rules out the sisters or mother or father.

On a slightly separate note, I gather providers on AW can also make the profile only visible to people in certain countries etc, which is interesting.

[Strawberry]

The 'bile' that was posted was not too far away from opinion here, which is you have customers and they'll write reviews.

[smiths]

I do agree,but I think there is one factor here. She doesn't want people she knows to know. Hence PG as you have to be a member to see that. It rules out the sisters or mother or father.

On a slightly separate note, I gather providers on AW can also make the profile only visible to people in certain countries etc, which is interesting.

It doesnt definitely rule anyone out. Someone who knows her COULD be a punter and either out her to her family and friends or tell them they have seen her pictures and they could decide to join and pay to see if its true. I punted with a WG who was outed by another WG to her family so she told me, she was in a dreadful state. They were of the religious and easily morally outraged type.

[overhead]

To be fair I know of one wg who never put face pics on her profile, but had some in her private gallery as aw said they can't be copied. Her face pictures were posted here, and she was quite shocked and alarmed by it, but had no idea what to do.

It's very easy to copy pictures just by doing screen grabs. Girls - or anyone else for that matter - who don't want details and/or pics copied should be very careful indeed. Nothing on the web can be trusted.

[smiths]

It's very easy to copy pictures just by doing screen grabs. Girls - or anyone else for that matter - who don't want details and/or pics copied should be very careful indeed. Nothing on the web can be trusted.

I agree, if a WG really doesnt want to take ANY risk of family, friends or others finding out she is a WG from her pictures not showing her face and other very easy identifying marks like Tattoos is the smart thing to do. Having them only in a PG on A/W is still taking A risk of course. Its not then definite such people wont see those pictures one way or another at some future time.

[Ali Katt]

There's this thread as well, I don't think they like being discuss full stop, incase one gets called fat or is pulled up on providing piss-poor services:
External Link/Members Only

[James999]

There's this thread as well, I don't think they like being discuss full stop, incase one gets called fat or is pulled up on providing piss-poor services:
External Link/Members Only

So she's Fat and was in a shit mood, but she still took the guys money, and then get's worried about the customer noticing 

[Ali Katt]

So she's Fat and was in a shit mood, but she still took the guys money, and then get's worried about the customer noticing 

The main complaint was the pictures appeared too heavily airbrushed and hid a fat belly or maybe she had put on weight since. No DFK, covered oral although that wasn't issue but the oral was average, which was an issue. My opinion is (and this is my opinion only) he got a parlour punt for £130 an hour and no the review wasn't by me as I rarely punt in Leeds and wouldn't pay those prices. The scores aren't decided by the poster, but are based on services. In all honesty 64% is generous for me a punt like this would be 40%. So she calls him a skinny dweeb fckin childish.

[Tailpipe]

So she's Fat and was in a shit mood, but she still took the guys money, and then get's worried about the customer noticing 

She fell on her own sword here saying the punter was a skinny wanker , then moans
That he outed the fact that's she is heavier than her pictures.

I hate that site and only read when linked from here. But I suppose it provides an insight to
How a WG really sees her clients , hope this is just a bad example and not the norm.