Author Topic: Latifababy - Victoria  (Read 5141 times)


10 review(s) for ArabianKitten (8 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Waterhouse]

Offline Ron89

External Link/Members Only

Saw this one recently in Victoria after work. DFK from the outset, banging body, pretty much the perfect shape for my tastes. Arse plump (just short of bubble) and great tits. She’s pretty and would be even prettier if she wore make-up but doesn’t. I’d give her a 7.5/10 facially.

It soon became clear how much she loves sucking dick. Gagging on it relentlessly and obeying my orders - takes instruction well. Then span her into doggy, she really responds to rough sex and kept her in variations of this position for the duration. Her arse has a good amount of meat, claps back nicely.

To add some balance, her comms aren’t great. You can tell she’s really popular and I can envisage her messing punters around. She’s also overly theatric, fake moans etc. A good example of this is her making ridiculous gagging sounds when deepthroating my almost completely flaccid cock. Her kissing technique wasn’t my cup of tea either, quick and aggressive rather than sensual. She also doesn’t do OWO which will be a deal breaker for many, I’m an OW man these days so wasn’t fussed. All in all the positives largely outweigh the negatives, good VFM.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2018, 05:28:38 pm by Ron89 »

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
External Link/Members Only

Saw this one recently in Victoria after work. DFK from the outset, banging body, pretty much the perfect shape for my tastes. Arse plump (just short of bubble) and great tits. She’s pretty and would be even prettier if she wore make-up but doesn’t. I’d give her a 7.5/10 facially.

It soon became clear how much she loves sucking dick. Gagging on it relentlessly and obeying my orders - takes instruction well. Then span her into doggy, she really responds to rough sex and kept her in variations of this position for the duration. Her arse has a good amount of meat, claps back nicely.

To add some balance, her comms aren’t great. You can tell she’s really popular and I can envisage her messing punters around. She’s also overly theatric, fake moans etc. A good example of this is her making ridiculous gagging sounds when deepthroating my almost completely flaccid cock. Her kissing technique wasn’t my cup of tea either, quick and aggressive rather than sensual. She also doesn’t do OWO which will be a deal breaker for many, I’m an OW man these days so wasn’t fussed. All in all the positives largely outweigh the negatives, good VFM.

Cheers mate!!

It is interesting reading all the different nuances regarding this WG.

For instance, I did not receive DFK, but kissing was sensual initiated by her.

Finally, I was not over-enamoured with the DT sounds tbh. I never thought it was fake because how far she attempted to go down. Apart from the DT choking sounds there was no porn theatrics on her part.

Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline dezpow

She needs OW with takes a facial? Always find that interesting.

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
As stated on her profile she is now returning to outcalls in the main - for the time being  :(
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Ron89

External Link/Members Only

I saw Latifa again today despite the words of warning on here about her scamming people. I made the booking yesterday and only saw the negative review this morning but decided to go ahead anyway. I have seen her twice before, the accusations seemed out of character and I couldn’t imagine her doing it. Similar experience to the first meet with regards to her appearance so read that review if you want detail. Comms were a lot better this time around.

Handed her the money and she checked it in front of me, I didn’t bring up the allegations and wanted to see for myself. She does this while chatting and I wouldn’t have noticed if I wasn’t paying close attention as I was undressing. All good and we got straight into it.

The experience was great like last time. Long deepthroat and facefuck session which she really gets off on; she’s generally very very submissive. Again no Owo which will put some people off. Then I pounded her in a bunch of positions, she took it well and doesn’t restrict how hard you fuck; if anything she gets off on being fucked hard, especially in doggy.

We chatted for a while and I did end up asking her about the “scam”; she’s aware of what’s been said and is quite alarmed by it and has been receiving a lot of threats/abuse since. Importantly, she also confirmed she’s happy to check notes in front of clients going forward and would only turn someone away if she genuinely thought the notes were fake.

That’s all I wanted to say. Like I said, I found the recent review/allegations a little strange as she didn’t give me that vibe at all. I know multiple people have accused her of turning them away so can only inform of my experience and give some balance.

Offline Gentlelovemaking

Did she ask you to shower as soon as you got in ?

Offline Marlo_Stanfield

Thanks for the review Ron. I spoke to her this morning, but similar to you I was alarmed by the scamming review posted recently. I'm glad you brought it up to her and that way she's aware of what's being said. It could be pure slander, who knows but at the same time it is possible.

Offline Ron89

Did she ask you to shower as soon as you got in ?
Yeah after the money check, seems a routine, she’s offered the shower every time I’ve seen her.

Offline Ron89

Thanks for the review Ron. I spoke to her this morning, but similar to you I was alarmed by the scamming review posted recently. I'm glad you brought it up to her and that way she's aware of what's being said. It could be pure slander, who knows but at the same time it is possible.
No worries mate, hopefully the checking of the money in front of you offers some reassurance.

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Thanks for the review Ron. I spoke to her this morning, but similar to you I was alarmed by the scamming review posted recently. I'm glad you brought it up to her and that way she's aware of what's being said. It could be pure slander, who knows but at the same time it is possible.

Slander - x3  :scare:

This is a prime example of

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 03:39:02 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Marlo_Stanfield

Did you ask her to count it in front of you, or did she do it by herself?

No worries mate, hopefully the checking of the money in front of you offers some reassurance.

Offline Marlo_Stanfield

Lol not sure what you're implying but notice I said "could be". I just don't know for sure.

Slander - x3  :scare:

This is a prime example of

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Lol not sure what you're implying but notice I said "could be". I just don't know for sure.

I think you are so keen to punt with her that in spite of compelling evidence to the contray. You still hould out even if minimal that we could be slandering her.

This is the cognitive dissonance you will have to contend with.

The good thing about all this is now she will not attempt this stunt any more so you have this in your favour at least.

All the best!!
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
External Link/Members Only

I saw Latifa again today despite the words of warning on here about her scamming people. I made the booking yesterday and only saw the negative review this morning but decided to go ahead anyway. I have seen her twice before, the accusations seemed out of character and I couldn’t imagine her doing it. Similar experience to the first meet with regards to her appearance so read that review if you want detail. Comms were a lot better this time around.

Handed her the money and she checked it in front of me, I didn’t bring up the allegations and wanted to see for myself. She does this while chatting and I wouldn’t have noticed if I wasn’t paying close attention as I was undressing. All good and we got straight into it.

The experience was great like last time. Long deepthroat and facefuck session which she really gets off on; she’s generally very very submissive. Again no Owo which will put some people off. Then I pounded her in a bunch of positions, she took it well and doesn’t restrict how hard you fuck; if anything she gets off on being fucked hard, especially in doggy.

We chatted for a while and I did end up asking her about the “scam”; she’s aware of what’s been said and is quite alarmed by it and has been receiving a lot of threats/abuse since. Importantly, she also confirmed she’s happy to check notes in front of clients going forward and would only turn someone away if she genuinely thought the notes were fake.

That’s all I wanted to say. Like I said, I found the recent review/allegations a little strange as she didn’t give me that vibe at all. I know multiple people have accused her of turning them away so can only inform of my experience and give some balance.

Glad you had a good time mate!!.

As I said in my first review of her, she gave me the best punt in a very long while. She came across as being very friendly etc etc. So I agree with you in this respect. On her day she can be one of the very best SP as supported by Seasoned Vet and equally on her day can prove to be one of the worst as verified by my learned friend GLM and SS_1231  :hi: :wacko:

However, when SS_1231 left his own experience of being scammed on my initial review. The scam does not have to be financial it also involves wasting the punter's time and money . I found it hard to believe and commented:

Sorry to hear mate  :(

I know we are nearing the seasons of good will, Santa Claus and reindeers but some of the excuses WGs use to see punters borders on the  :dash:

So to clarify, you met her before, and today, so twice in a week? How was your initial experience?

Cheers!!

Little did I know I was to get the SS_1231 treatment even though she recognised who I was.

This is what I do not understand  :dash:

When I chose to replace the 'fake' note with another she could not accept it

This is what I could not understand

When I asked her please explain to me how she knows the note which by then became several of the notes were fake?

She came up with the biggest Xmas Waffle dish I have been served this festive season  :P

 :unknown:
« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 04:09:24 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Gentlelovemaking

Thanks for the review Ron. I spoke to her this morning, but similar to you I was alarmed by the scamming review posted recently. I'm glad you brought it up to her and that way she's aware of what's being said. It could be pure slander, who knows but at the same time it is possible.

Honestly Edward it could be slander, 3 punters have said its happened and all with £20 notes a commonly used note that hasn’t been modernised yet so an easy target for a switch.

Only 1 Punter PP has written a review stating this but myself and another punter have confirmed the exact same script (I believe patterns of behaviour over anything else, and this is such a pattern).

Question is who would you trust in this scenario 3 Punters who don’t have a history of slander or the SP? Surely an element of collusion would be necessary to come up with the same story which clearly isn’t the case here
« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 04:02:11 pm by Gentlelovemaking »

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Honestly Edward it could be slander, 3 punters have said its happened and all with £20 notes a commonly used note that hasn’t been modernised yet so an easy target for a switch.

Only 1 Punter PP has written a review stating this but myself and another punter have confirmed the exact same script (I believe patterns of behaviour over anything else, and this is such a pattern).

Question is who would you trust in this scenario 3 Punters who don’t have a history of slander or the SP? Surely an element of collusion would be necessary to come up with the same story which clearly isn’t the case here

Aye my learned friend :hi:
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25

We chatted for a while and I did end up asking her about the “scam”; she’s aware of what’s been said and is quite alarmed by it and has been receiving a lot of threats/abuse since. Importantly, she also confirmed she’s happy to check notes in front of clients going forward and would only turn someone away if she genuinely thought the notes were fake.

That’s all I wanted to say. Like I said, I found the recent review/allegations a little strange as she didn’t give me that vibe at all. I know multiple people have accused her of turning them away so can only inform of my experience and give some balance.

Out of interest did she say why she had to check punter's notes and did you inquire into the plausibility of what she was saying?

Forgive me here! I am afraid your review does not add balance because it does not help to explain why she behaves as she does. What your review does is shows is that she has the capability to be a good SP when she wants.

It is her contrary behaviour which we are trying to fathom and explain here

Any thoughts or comments on this??

Cheers!

« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 05:12:04 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Ron89

Out of interest did she say why she had to check punter's notes and did you inquire into the plausibility of what she was saying?

Forgive me here! I am afraid your review does not add balance because it does not help to explain why she behaves as she does. What your review does is shows is that she has the capability to be a good SP when she wants.

It is her contrary behaviour which we are trying to fathom and explain here

Any thoughts or comments on this??

Cheers!
I have no idea, I just felt the need to post that I had another good experience contrary to recent comments about her. We only touched on the topic for a minute or 2, I didn’t ask about any of that. Your right, my review doesn’t explain what’s happened to other punters, still felt it was worth posting.

She’s said she’ll do checks in front of clients which all but confirms it’s unlikely to be a financial scam, so that’s of some help nonetheless. It’s either that she genuinely believes the notes are fake or she’s using it as a way to turn away those she doesn’t want to see. As I’ve said, I’ve never had anything but good vibes so I’d like to say it’s the former.

Offline Gentlelovemaking

I have no idea, I just felt the need to post that I had another good experience contrary to recent comments about her. We only touched on the topic for a minute or 2, I didn’t ask about any of that. Your right, my review doesn’t explain what’s happened to other punters, still felt it was worth posting.

She’s said she’ll do checks in front of clients which all but confirms it’s unlikely to be a financial scam, so that’s of some help nonetheless. It’s either that she genuinely believes the notes are fake or she’s using it as a way to turn away those she doesn’t want to see. As I’ve said, I’ve never had anything but good vibes so I’d like to say it’s the former.

I was asked to shower shortly before I Walked into the room and after the money was handed over.

Be honest how many SP’s have ever counted the money in front of you ?

I can’t think of any that have sat in my presence and counted the money , just not the done thing is it. I honestly thought there was an issue at my end at first when this happened to me (benefit of the doubt maybe) but now I’m certain she’s up to something as the exact same thing has happened to 3 punters.

She informs us while in the shower naked, talk about vulnerability!

I reckon there are more punters who have experienced this but either haven’t said anything or aren’t on UKP.

If she counts the notes in front of every punter then fair enough but not sure how you can assure that will happen.

« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 06:07:28 pm by Gentlelovemaking »

Offline Moby Dick

Ron, your review is breaking UKP rules.

Offline Ron89

I was asked to shower shortly before I Walked into the room and after the money was handed over.

Be honest how many SP’s have ever counted the money in front of you ?

I can’t think of any that have sat in my presence and counted the money , just not the done thing is it. I honestly thought there was an issue at my end at first when this happened to me (benefit of the doubt maybe) but now I’m certain she’s up to something as the exact same thing has happened to 3 punters.

She informs us while in the shower naked, talk about vulnerability!

I reckon there are more punters who have experienced this but either haven’t said anything or aren’t on UKP.

If she counts the notes in front of every punter then fair enough but not sure how you can assure that will happen.
Maybe she does it in front of clients now because of the recent allegations.

I’m being very careful in that I don’t want to white knight the girl, but can only go off my 3 very good experiences. I agree it’s odd that it’s happened to 3 guys (that we know of) but it could just be that she thought they were fake in each instance. As I said there’s 2 possibilities, only she can know so we’re wasting our time guessing.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 06:23:13 pm by Ron89 »

Offline Ron89


Offline Dark_Gable

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 710
  • Likes: 5
  •  
  • Reviews: 71
How so?
Multiple positive reviews of the same SP within 12 months are against the rules IIRC.

Offline Gentlelovemaking

Maybe she does it in front of clients now because of the recent allegations.

I’m being very careful in that I don’t want to white knight the girl, but can only go off my 3 very good experiences. I agree it’s odd that it’s happened to 3 guys (that we know of) but it could just be that she thought they were fake in each instance. As I said there’s 2 possibilities, only she can know so we’re wasting our time guessing.

As she’s aware of UKP I won’t go into specifics about my encounter but I didn’t give her a fake note but revived one back from her.

I’m sure she only scams Punters she wants to based on whatever her agenda is. She seemed nice throughout with me even when I was asked to leave which I did without fuss.

I always give the benefit of the doubt which I did but you can not ignore a trend especially one which is executed in the same way 3 times.



Offline Moby Dick

Multiple positive review, plus you have written this to counter a recent negative. In your own words to give "balance".

Rules at bottom of page plus tips on writing reviews in wiki:


Review rather than advertise. Write a review in order to allow other punters to make an informed choice about whether they want to visit the WG, rather than in order to “promote” the girl because you think “she deserves it”. This is the most common mistake and there is nothing worse than a punter who assumes the role of a prostitute’s forum pimp. You are free to post your own review for your own experience. Do not reference other reviewers reviews to defend your position or post a review to white knight an escort.(example). Note the following forum rule. "No touting or advertising. You must disclose any link you have that may be seen as bias, even if you're just a past customer. Sharing info must be for the benefit of other punters and not to promote the business of others. Reviews that read like a marketing-written advert rather than genuine recommendation will be removed."
Do not blame other reviewers for misleading you about a punt due to their previous positive feedback about the girl. It is best practice not to refer to previous reviews at all. If you have reason to believe that the feedback they had given was fake, this is best discussed on their review. Have the following analogy in mind: Visiting an escort is like being a tourist visiting a certain place - a review is like taking one picture of the location. The usefulness of that picture (to others who consider visiting the same place) depends on the quality of the picture but, it is still one picture taken at a particular date and time. If something changes, it is not the fault of the previous reviewers. Many escorts have both positive and negative reviews - it does not mean one is right and one is wrong. If you are seeking guarantees in punting, then punting is not for you

How so?

Offline Ron89

I saw Latifa again today despite the words of warning on here about her scamming people. I made the booking yesterday and only saw the negative review this morning but decided to go ahead anyway. I have seen her twice before, the accusations seemed out of character and I couldn’t imagine her doing it. Similar experience to the first meet with regards to her appearance so read that review if you want detail. Comms were a lot better this time around.

Handed her the money and she checked it in front of me, I didn’t bring up the allegations and wanted to see for myself. She does this while chatting and I wouldn’t have noticed if I wasn’t paying close attention as I was undressing. All good and we got straight into it.

The experience was great like last time. Long deepthroat and facefuck session which she really gets off on; she’s generally very very submissive. Again no Owo which will put some people off. Then I pounded her in a bunch of positions, she took it well and doesn’t restrict how hard you fuck; if anything she gets off on being fucked hard, especially in doggy.

We chatted for a while and I did end up asking her about the “scam”; she’s aware of what’s been said and is quite alarmed by it and has been receiving a lot of threats/abuse since. Importantly, she also confirmed she’s happy to check notes in front of clients going forward and would only turn someone away if she genuinely thought the notes were fake.

That’s all I wanted to say. Like I said, I found the recent review/allegations a little strange as she didn’t give me that vibe at all. I know multiple people have accused her of turning them away so can only inform of my experience and give some balance.

Offline Ron89

Thanks guys, edited my old review with the new one added as a new post. Admin can get rid of this one.

Offline last_days_of_logan

why would you even mention UKP and "the scam"??  :unknown:

this place should be sacred , now people are warning WGs .... assholes threatening WGs... its all gone to   :manhater:

Offline last_days_of_logan

I saw Latifa again today despite the words of warning on here about her scamming people. I made the booking yesterday and only saw the negative review this morning but decided to go ahead anyway. I have seen her twice before, the accusations seemed out of character and I couldn’t imagine her doing it. Similar experience to the first meet with regards to her appearance so read that review if you want detail. Comms were a lot better this time around.

Handed her the money and she checked it in front of me, I didn’t bring up the allegations and wanted to see for myself. She does this while chatting and I wouldn’t have noticed if I wasn’t paying close attention as I was undressing. All good and we got straight into it.

The experience was great like last time. Long deepthroat and facefuck session which she really gets off on; she’s generally very very submissive. Again no Owo which will put some people off. Then I pounded her in a bunch of positions, she took it well and doesn’t restrict how hard you fuck; if anything she gets off on being fucked hard, especially in doggy.

We chatted for a while and I did end up asking her about the “scam”; she’s aware of what’s been said and is quite alarmed by it and has been receiving a lot of threats/abuse since. Importantly, she also confirmed she’s happy to check notes in front of clients going forward and would only turn someone away if she genuinely thought the notes were fake.

That’s all I wanted to say. Like I said, I found the recent review/allegations a little strange as she didn’t give me that vibe at all. I know multiple people have accused her of turning them away so can only inform of my experience and give some balance.

i think her getting threatened is real low (assuming that is even true, she could be lieing) and people doing that should really check themselves.

having said that ... a few established members have come through saying the same thing about the notes biz. i believe them quite frankly. The issue is why is she doing it?

watch how all of a sudden now there will not be fake notes for a loooooooong while

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25


She’s said she’ll do checks in front of clients which all but confirms it’s unlikely to be a financial scam, so that’s of some help nonetheless. It’s either that she genuinely believes the notes are fake or she’s using it as a way to turn away those she doesn’t want to see. As I’ve said, I’ve never had anything but good vibes so I’d like to say it’s the former.

Reading your posts makes very difficult reading. 3 punters have been scammed out of their money/time. Then there is the possibility that my learned friend GLM  :hi: who believes he was deliberately scammed out of £20, even if I do not believe this is the case. In spite of this what you write is as a defence of Latifa but not in favour of the punters.

She does not need defending, she is more than a good SP when necessary, but what is indefensible is her actions on 3 different separate occasion. This is the discussion here, not whether you had a good time with her, I had a good time with her, but rather why the need to pull this disingenuous act?

« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 09:50:08 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

Reading your posts makes very difficult reading. 3 punters have been scammed out of their money/time. Then there is the possibility that my learned friend GLM  :hi: who believes he was deliberately scammed out of £20, even if I do not believe this is the case. In spite of this what you write slikems as a defence of Latifa.

She does not need defending, she is more than a good SP when necessary, but what is indefensible is her actions, on 3 different separate occasion. This is the discussion here, not whether you had a good time with her, I had a good time with her, but rather why the need to pull this disingenuous act?

PP puts on his UKP cape.. ready to right wrongs in the realm of punters alienation!!!

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
i think her getting threatened is real low (assuming that is even true, she could be lieing) and people doing that should really check themselves.

having said that ... a few established members have come through saying the same thing about the notes biz. i believe them quite frankly. The issue is why is she doing it?

watch how all of a sudden now there will not be fake notes for a loooooooong while

I agree as one of the aggrieved that abuse and threats - if true is very low. There is no need for that. However, there are all sort of people who punt and many who
are not  :angelgirl: , but still totally unecessary. Best to vote with one's feet...

The good thing about this incident is as you said there will be no more money stunt. This suggestion that she is willing to count money in front of punters totally misses the mark. The issues are the notes per se and that she has the ability to look at them and spot a fake one.  :dash:
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
PP puts on his UKP cape.. ready to right wrongs in the realm of punters alienation!!!

 :lol:

 :thumbsup:

 :hi:
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Gentlelovemaking

PP have you checked your notes as being genuine ? Have a feel of them as the one she gave back to me was clearly fake

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
PP have you checked your notes as being genuine ? Have a feel of them as the one she gave back to me was clearly fake

I went to the Bureau de Change spoke to the personnel at great lengths. Two people checked visibly and then they put it in the machine. My notes had not been tampered with.

I didn't know you felt so sure that you were given a 'fake' £20. I thought it was just a possibility on your part.

Cheers for clarifying
« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 09:55:51 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

I personally think she has been rumbled and will cry to a sympathetic ear for damage control. Ron being the nice guy that he is just basically gave us the view he has of someone that has provided a good service for him...unfortunately that might as well be serving him up as a sacrificial lamb.

Ron , prob best you give this chick's topics a wide birth as far as talking about her on here till it all blows over.

Offline Gentlelovemaking

I went to the Bureau de Change spoke to the personnel at great lengths. Two people checked visibly and then they put it in the machine. My notes had not been tampered with.

I didn't know you felt so sure that you were given a 'fake' £20. I thought it was just a possibility on your part.

Cheers for clarifying

I take people on face value PP so once she said it was fake I just left despite withdrawing the cash from the ATM moments earlier. Apparently there is a very small chance of an ATM dispensing a fake note so just assumed that was the case.

Something is up either way PP, can’t put my finger on it but it’s dodgy af
« Last Edit: December 24, 2018, 09:47:04 am by Gentlelovemaking »

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
I take people on face value PP so once she said it was fake I just left despite withdrawing the cash from the ATM moments earlier. Apparently there is a very small chance of an ATM dispensing a fake note so just assumed that was the case.

Something is up either way PP, can’t put my finger on it but it’s dodgy af

Thanks for clarifying even further.

Yes my Learned Friend  :hi: the most strangest of behaviour.

As I said earlier, it is not that she is now willing to count the money in front of punters but rather, What is it that makes her believes the punter's notes to be fake in the first place?

Which in turn leads onto the next question, Unless she has one of those marker pens or machines, then how can she tell if the money is fake?

In my case she could not provide an answer, except by saying, 'It looks fake!!' which is not an answer - and now we know if there was any doubt  :P -- she does not possess the pen or magical superhero(ine) powers in this instance.  :P

Even though it is my loss now, hopefully, she will now stop this charade and return to giving punters a good service - which she is very capable of doing, which in turn will obviously stop all the abuse and threats she was receiving.

After all my Learned Friend  :hi: ....It is the season of good will to all men...and WGs too ;)
« Last Edit: December 24, 2018, 01:50:06 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Gentlelovemaking

I agree PP, if she is on this forum as suggested then counting the money in front of the Punter and using a marker pen to check authenticity wil help. All done prior to requesting Punters take a shower.

If this happens then transparency is restored to the transaction.

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
I agree PP, if she is on this forum as suggested then counting the money in front of the Punter and using a marker pen to check authenticity wil help. All done prior to requesting Punters take a shower.

If this happens then transparency is restored to the transaction.

Aye my learned friend  :hi:

Feels like we are running dos and don't in the life of a WG :P

I have one question about counting the money, have you any thoughts how doees one get round, if one note is dodgy then why cannot it be replaced by a genuine one, so the punt go ahead? In my instance Latifa refused to go ahead with the punt?

If she refuses to go ahead with the punt, do you think she is, in fact, questioning the integrity of the punter?

Better still...

Latifa...Would you like to come on down and join us to  say something on your own behalf? :hi:
« Last Edit: December 24, 2018, 11:56:24 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Gentlelovemaking

Aye my learned friend  :hi:

Feels like we are running dos and don't in the life of a WG :P

I have one question about counting the money, have you any thoughts how doees one get round, if one note is dodgy then why cannot it be replaced by a genuine one, so the punt go ahead? In my instance Latifa refused to go ahead with the punt?

If she refuses to go ahead with the punt, do you think she is, in fact, questioning the integrity of the punter?

Better still...

Latifa...Would you like to come on down and join us to  say something on your own behalf? :hi:

From an Integrity perspective it’s fair the punt ends of a fake note is handed over.

I believe most Punters to be genuine in their transactions and wouldn’t present a fake note and if they did would walk if called out.

Offline Gentlelovemaking


From an Integrity perspective it’s fair the punt ends if a fake note is handed over.

I believe most Punters to be genuine in their transactions and wouldn’t present a fake note and if they did would walk if called out.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2018, 12:28:23 am by Gentlelovemaking »

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
From an Integrity perspective it’s fair the punt ends if a fake note is handed over.

I believe most Punters to be genuine in their transactions and wouldn’t present a fake note and if they did would walk if called out.

I will be honest here if it is a WG that I did NOT 'like' then I would not mind the punt ending especially with my Punter's Alienation. However, if I did like the WG
then this just only adds to the alienation  :dash:

 :P
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

she might have been testing the scam ...and then started playing it later on. or did the scam....got caught / threatened ...knew it would get round so pulled the same caper but returned the real notes to make it seem she was authentic all along

just throwing some 007 scenarios here

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,297
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Various vids on the porn sites show the scout/punter/fakeagent paying the girls silly money which then turns out to be funny money.  It could be that there are some despicable punters about whether just trying to get free fucks or putting fake notes into circulation through an unregulated channel.  That said it seems more likely that the pimps are parts of gangs trying other scams on victims less likely to cause trouble (via Plod).