Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Emily Bird - Lithuanian in Victoria - Quite good  (Read 9406 times)


5 review(s) for Emily_Bird (3 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]
5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5793446) (3 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline JamesRockford

External Link/Members Only

£110 for 1 hour incall

Arranged via phone and sms

Location: Smart flat in Victoria/Westminster.  I went there by tube and it was easy.  Decent bathroom and shower.

Girl: Age as described (28), size 8-10, height 5'6".  Face is 6/10 in a girl next door way.  Medium length blonde hair, not the thickest.  Cute smile, teeth a little off white but fine.  Skin a little dry. Really friendly and spoke English well. Body was good, but not mind-blowing. Natural tits but nipples a little too sensitive.  She chats a lot and didn't clock watch, I was there 1:15 including showers.  She's confident and I get the feeling that she really enjoys sex.  These Baltic lasses!

Services: DFK, owo, protected sex.

Would I visit again? Ma---a--aybe, but the extra £20 advertised for CIM makes it not the best VFM.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2018, 04:36:46 pm by JamesRockford »

Offline Fuzzyduck

Cheers for the review. The £20 extra for CIM had bumped her down the list for me.
How was the kissing, any smokers' breath?

Offline JamesRockford

e.
How was the kissing, any smokers' breath?

Kissing was 6/10. A little hint of beer was what I detected.

Offline Fuzzyduck

Kissing was 6/10. A little hint of beer was what I detected.

Classy!  :drinks:

Offline bonapati

She’s only just arrived in the scene I think courtesy of Veronica69. Her in quick before she gets a long queue ;)


Offline Redindian1234

Could swear I recognise these pics...
« Last Edit: November 16, 2018, 09:49:41 pm by Redindian1234 »

Offline Fuzzyduck

Could swear I recognise these pics...SP was advertising  bareback at that time I remember..if it’s the same one

I'm not saying I don't believe you but it's a little unfair IMO to make that connection if you can't verify it.

Offline Redindian1234

Ok fair enough. I’ve amended my post as I agree with you.

« Last Edit: November 16, 2018, 09:50:12 pm by Redindian1234 »

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Redindian, is there a chance that it could have been a pre op/post op profile?

OP, in reflection...is there any chance that this could be a heshe?
FYI, I'm asking due to true reasons per se (I viewed vid on profile, and for a split second the face shows...I think I may loosely know him/her from civvy life)...not just on a whim.

Offline JamesRockford

I detected nothing masculine about her but I’m no expert on post op clues, so I’m scratching my head (and my nuts) now.

She has strong muscular legs, small ass and not a pronounced feminine waist. But on the other hand many of the girls I’ve seen have much bigger waists than i do, and meaty thighs. 

Towards the end of our meet, after lots of foreplay, she jumped on my dick and seemed to come pretty violently, and her clitoris felt and responded pretty normally imho. As I say I’m no expert and I really don’t want to research the matter on the internet.

Fuck knows, I certainly don’t know!
« Last Edit: November 18, 2018, 11:21:44 pm by JamesRockford »

DylanPerry

  • Guest
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=230170.0;topicseen

Some interested developments on the other thread.

Reactiveness (or should I say, non reactiveness) of a post op vag is a myth.
I remember reading somewhere that 85% of post ops can orgasm. Which is probably a greater percent than married "cis" women   :sarcastic:

Offline JamesRockford

This site obviously needs someone like Axelrod to educate us on key points to look out for, and keep us on our toes.  Not nice... Emily Bird  should declare honestly that she's post op. I should ask her for my money and time to be refunded.  No wonder she makes that unusual reference to her "vagina" in the profile.

Offline tantric talents

This site obviously needs someone like Axelrod to educate us on key points to look out for, and keep us on our toes.  Not nice... Emily Bird  should declare honestly that she's post op. I should ask her for my money and time to be refunded.  No wonder she makes that unusual reference to her "vagina" in the profile.

Thanks for the review JR
I have to say I am getting somewhat ambivalent about this whole post op thing and am determined not to get paranoid every time I see a new WG or should that now be WP?

At the end of the day you had a satisfactory punt which you rated positive. Does it really matter if the person was post op or not?

Without trying to get inside the head of a post op, I can sort of see why they would not want to advertise their sexual state. They are of course trying so hard to be the woman they always felt they were and want to be treated as one and surely don’t want to start attracting side show gawpers who may just only be after a curiosity fuck?  :unknown:
The sexual world is certainly becoming a strange and interesting place...
« Last Edit: November 19, 2018, 01:33:17 pm by tantric talents »

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Credit to you Mr Rockford for not getting on the defensive like most forum members when they have been unlucky enough to find themselves in such a predicament.
Lol the vagina line on profile, which I read after you mentioned, does strike as a bit odd. The other positive review on her also mentions her saying boobs and vag sensitive. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I know a few things, possibly more than the average bloke, mainly due to one of my best friends being a cosmetic surgeon (lipo and breast implants, but he's obviously clued up on sister and cousin(?  :lol:) fields of practice). Have had a few interesting conversations with him, usually while a few units down, in light of the recent/modern gender transition culture. The post Bruce Jenner era if you like.
I also had a Latina secretary who used to have some pretty random and deep conversations about such surgeries and she really enlightened me about just how good they are becoming, both here and in her home of Brazil in particular. Perhaps the scariest thing is that Emily not-a-bird is in relative terms, quite an 'obvious' case due to extent of scarring. Apparently, the best can have most to all scarring fade after 6 months or so!

I am similar to tantric talents in my view on this as a whole.
At the end of the day they have transitioned to female, and identify as a female, etc etc. Therefore at the most simple level, they are doing nothing wrong.
There is a whole thread on this forum dedicated to such cases as Emily not-a-bird ("TSs advertising as female," something along those lines). The funny thing is, if they still have a cock, or it's just a bloke in drag, etc, there generally is little-to-no issue if they advertise as F...as obviously we know what's what. The issue is the fully transitioned ones who come across very convincingly female. But it's just reality of where we're at in 2018, that they are within their rights to call themselves F and say no more.
I do however feel that the sex industry is one area within which there should be full transparency, though.
In fact, I believe I'm correct in saying that in porn, you have to declare/prove your birth gender. I think the way they get around this not being discriminatory in the eyes of the law, is due to the higher STD risk etc etc. Food for thought, that.

- So yes, I know a few things, but even I don't have a particularly bona fide  blueprint. Some can clear the hoops of standard giveaways.
There was one WG who I wouldn't suspect judging by photos etc. There was some debate as a few members remembered when heshe advertised pre op...something along those lines. One member gave a positive review and declared "100% woman."
Shortly thereafter, before and after pics were found of the SP...where it was tattoos of all things that made it an open and shut case. I'm sure that without them, that particular OP and many others probably would have insisted it was not the same person. & I would get where they're coming from...the post transition was certainly very good looking.
In fact, off Emily not-a-bird's three main profile pics, and video, I wouldn't suspect a thing either. Remember, it was simply the face and realising I know himher, that alerted me. In fact, hisher video is most odd...as it seems heshe has a feminine stomach?! No masculine V shape, and seems to have a bit of that female/motherly podge? I wonder if that was cosmetically imposed. As I've said many times before, these surgeons can work wonders.

- What's certain is the old "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck." now has more emphasis on probably.

- As for the you had a good time so what's the issue argument...boy, the jury is out on that type of attitude. Some, or dare I say most, of us men...simply don't want to fuck a being that used to be a man (or some would say, is still a man). Simples. & it is deceptive.

- Lastly, has Emily not-a-bird actually been introduced onto the scene by Veronica69 as bonapati said? If so, not a good look for such a well reviewed WG to be linked to such an SP. Shows her to be out of touch with a lot of punters, her clientele.

Offline Fuzzyduck

Thanks for the pragmatism, Axelrod.

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Thanks for the pragmatism, Axelrod.

You never said, could the old profile you recall have been a pre op/post op?
Hence in your head you just earmarked "something bad," hence you assumed it was bareback when trying to recall?
Or is there a possibility that we had a tranny offering BB  :scare:
STD galore.


EDIT: Scratch that. It was redindian, not fuzzyduck.
Hmmm, redindian, waiting for you to give some input after all this. lol
« Last Edit: November 20, 2018, 12:19:41 pm by DylanPerry »

Offline JamesRockford

It's a pity that I can't edit my review, particularly the title, to alert potential punters. Most of us skim through the reviews rather than reading the rest of the thread and it's pretty important in this case.

holland

  • Guest
It's a pity that I can't edit my review, particularly the title, to alert potential punters. Most of us skim through the reviews rather than reading the rest of the thread and it's pretty important in this case.
I was thinking the same.
It would be good to add TS warning in the title to inform future punters.

Offline JamesRockford

Admin: if you're reading this up in the heavens, would you advise us mortals on this one? How do we alert punters in cases like this after the review has been written, so that they can make an informed decision?
« Last Edit: November 20, 2018, 02:06:15 pm by JamesRockford »

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Admin: if you're reading this up in the heavens, would you advise us mortals on this one? How do we alert punters in cases like this after the review has been written, so that they can make an informed decision?

 :hi:

Offline JamesRockford

Cheers Admin or whoever did that!  That was quick.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2018, 03:16:31 pm by JamesRockford »

Offline bonapati

Damn! That was close. Thank heavens I had a busy week I missed the booking.
Thanks chaps.

Offline v I r G I n

So is she confirmed as definitely being a TS? I sent a few questions to her via AW and she has denied ever having surgery etc.
Banned reason: Persistent white knighting on negative review
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lewishamguy

So is she confirmed as definitely being a TS? I sent a few questions to her via AW and she has denied ever having surgery etc.

What made you think that she would admit of being a TS, Post-OP?  :unknown:

Some very reasonable grounds have been pointed out to suspect that she's a Post-OP. Make your own mind.

Offline lovemachine

Its not always easy to detect now days. As a result I have not yet taken the plunge with a brazilian girl as I am never convinced they are genuine. But this photo to me definatly is a bloke

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline v I r G I n

I haven't had a chance to look at all the details in the other thread. Can anyone me if it is way too graphic? I saw a couple of illustrations which sent me packing straight away. I mean I don't know alot about people who are TS and/or are pre or post op.
Banned reason: Persistent white knighting on negative review
Banned by: daviemac

Offline v I r G I n

Its not always easy to detect now days. As a result I have not yet taken the plunge with a brazilian girl as I am never convinced they are genuine. But this photo to me definatly is a bloke

Hidden Image/Members Only
No hips?
Banned reason: Persistent white knighting on negative review
Banned by: daviemac


Offline ManOFSteel

I feel sorry for her if she is a biological woman. The only thing now that would clear her name is if she posted a video of her on her reds, or got pregnant.

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Man, her naked pics are as close to an open and shut case as you'll ever get in this modern heshe game.
If blokes are still trying to convince themselves that this one is a woman, God help them.

Offline Fuzzyduck

Man, her naked pics are as close to an open and shut case as you'll ever get in this modern heshe game.
If blokes are still trying to convince themselves that this one is a woman, God help them.

If you're going to punt her, it's better to be in complete denial or ignorant, than to have that question in your mind. That said, there will be many others who don't care, are open-minded and intrigued, or are even are looking for that kind of SP. Imagine seeing the negative review from a pissed-off punter who went expecting a TS and got a woman. :lol:

Offline Chris1966

She has now been in Bath for awhile
Thought I would take a gamble and hope that no waist and small tits were her natural look and not a sign of manliness !
She is a pain to deal with.
Arranged a meeting by text for the next day and she asked me to call her after 10 in the morning which I did .
She didn't answer so I left a voicemail to which she did not reply
When I politely chased her by text she said she didn't listen to voicemails and asked me to text . Obviously far too taxing for her  !
So I sent her a text and she said she'd just woken up and didn't really want to talk . Again must have been too taxing .
I suggest she ought to be given a very wide berth - very up herself .

Offline Londonpunter30

She has now been in Bath for awhile
Thought I would take a gamble and hope that no waist and small tits were her natural look and not a sign of manliness !
She is a pain to deal with.
Arranged a meeting by text for the next day and she asked me to call her after 10 in the morning which I did .
She didn't answer so I left a voicemail to which she did not reply
When I politely chased her by text she said she didn't listen to voicemails and asked me to text . Obviously far too taxing for her  !
So I sent her a text and she said she'd just woken up and didn't really want to talk . Again must have been too taxing .
I suggest she ought to be given a very wide berth - very up herself .

You need to do this as a separate review not add it onto another one

Offline JamesRockford

To be fair, they didn’t agree a booking so he can’t write a review.

Offline Chris1966

Thanks JR
I thought the best way to record my experience was to add to a previous , albeit old , post .
It's suspicious that she does not have very much feedback despite being around for a while .
Only trying to flag up a concern about her