Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: SexyMimi18 - Northolt  (Read 14415 times)


27 review(s) for SexyMimi19 (17 positive, 5 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline mr man

Well when I saw Mimi she was very clean and fresh. I don't believe the feedback on AW regarding her not "cleaning her teeth" as she seemed to be a girl who looks after herself at least. You can tell that some people are just plain racist towards Romanians.
I'll admit she's not the most engaging person. Through conversation she told me she's going to be around for a while because she needs the money. So she's not doing it because she loves sex with strangers. If you're after a girl who will treat you like a long lost lover you'll be disappointed.
She was fairly quiet but as the hour went on she relaxed more and even made a few moans of pleasure after I'd been f@cking her for a while, (unlike her friend Tina who didn't even try to enjoy herself on a separate occasion) I didn't ask for owo. The covered oral she gave was really nice.

I probably will return as she's very very cute with an amazing body, amazing tits and very tight down below.
She kissed when asked and was good at it and tasted fresh.
For me when I'm paying under 100 per hour I don't expect the full gfe, although it does Sometimes happen. I admit when punting I can be a bit shallow as great looks go a long way so I was happy with having a gorgeous 19 yr old on top of me and she was pleasant enough and didn't mind the fact I couldn't leave her tits alone, I think she was a little amused by the effect they had on me.

I don't like bad attitude or rudeness and thankfully she was nothing but "nice" with me, just a bit quiet.
My only slight problem was she didn't allow filming of her face despite emails before hand saying she would but i don't think her profile is run by her, she still let me leave the camera filming on one side of the room and she made sure her long hair covered her face whenever she faced that way.
I'm also doubtful about the "Mimi" leaving comments here but you never know.

I can understand some expecting more from her, I guess I kind of put myself in her shoes and imagine what I would be like if someone twice my age and waay below my league got intimate with me. I think given the circumstances she did an ok job. I know she didn't fancy me but she was friendly enough.





Offline joshwinkers

The girl has been poorly reviewed, by a respected contributor. She has joined to offer a rebuttal.
Even if we are more likely to believe a regular poster, what sort of person would start using words like "lowlife" and "skank" to describe a woman they do not even know.
The worst thing that can be said about this WG, after reading the OP, is that she offered all advertised services, but without any enthusiasm. Fair enough, punters can choose to avoid her.
The moderators should be involved here. Surely, this is a forum for reviewing WGs, not airing vile, unwarranted personal abuse (with trademark brainless xenophobia thrown in).  :thumbsdown:

+1

This whole Romanian bashing is getting very very tiring.  :(

Offline vorian

The girl has been poorly reviewed, by a respected contributor. She has joined to offer a rebuttal.
Even if we are more likely to believe a regular poster, what sort of person would start using words like "lowlife" and "skank" to describe a woman they do not even know.
The worst thing that can be said about this WG, after reading the OP, is that she offered all advertised services, but without any enthusiasm. Fair enough, punters can choose to avoid her.
The moderators should be involved here. Surely, this is a forum for reviewing WGs, not airing vile, unwarranted personal abuse (with trademark brainless xenophobia thrown in).  :thumbsdown:

Indeed,  what I fail to realise is when a prossie has a bad review right or wrong.  She logs on here and acts in an accusing aggressive manner and often makes herself look like a fool.  That is then linked to the review and makes it 10 times worse for her.

What would impress me if following a bad review a WG log on and said sorry you were not happy. Please PM me as I would love to here how I can improve my services.  Thing is if she had the sense to do that the review probably would not have been bad in the first place.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Jimmyredcab


For me when I'm paying under 100 per hour I don't expect the full gfe.

I can understand some expecting more from her, I guess I kind of put myself in her shoes and imagine what I would be like if someone twice my age and waay below my league got intimate with me. I think given the circumstances she did an ok job. I know she didn't fancy me but she was friendly enough.

You my friend are part of the problem, too easily pleased ----------- OK, she only charges £90 an hour but that is an awful lot of money for some people.

As for being "Racist" that is total cobblers, far too many Romanians give a fourth rate service, they deserve to get slated. :thumbsdown:

Offline london

I am not fan of Romanian girls but Mimi is one of my fav as she has nice pussy and she always trying to be better time with me , owo is great and worse is £10 more
Tina has nice face but she is like a robot , I told her last time I will bring her some newspaper and she can read while I am fk her ,
« Last Edit: January 20, 2014, 08:02:36 AM by london »

Offline mr man

You my friend are part of the problem, too easily pleased ----------- OK, she only charges £90 an hour but that is an awful lot of money for some people.

As for being "Racist" that is total cobblers, far too many Romanians give a fourth rate service, they deserve to get slated. :thumbsdown:
Don't see how i'm part of the problem As long as I list all the highlights of an encounter, good and bad. she was very clean, pleasant with no bad attitude. Once she relaxed she seemed to enjoy herself at least a bit. She was a nice kisser too. Amazing body, really really tight.
My only negative was she didn't let me film her face when her emails (sent from her pimp/maid) said she would, even then her profile now States u can't film her face so she's corrected that.
She was fairly quiet but then her English isn't the best. I'm not easily pleased as such but as long as a girl makes me feel welcome and treats me well then I would return. She was nice to me so I'll be back. Her friend Tina didn't particularly make me feel welcome so I won't see her again.
Personally I'd say around 20% of punts are sub standard REGARDLESS of nationality. The vast majority of escorts In London are Romanian so chances are bad punt will be from there but not BECAUSE she's from there

Offline Steve2

The thing is it's probably not even her that you're talking to - it'll be her pimp.  That might explain the lies since he doesn't know the whole story and is just making things up as he goes along!

100% she does NOT answer the phone, the same as the other girls who have worked in the same flat

The phone is answered by a "receptionist" who will tell you anything you want to hear

IMHO a flat to be avoided. I walked away and posted on here maybe 4 months ago to AVOID


Offline punk

In that case, since he is reading this:

You sad fluffy cunt.

i second that if you want to waste your hard earned cash,who ever phoned her thats up to you,please do not waste the other punters money on here, thank you. :hi:

Offline punk

100% she does NOT answer the phone, the same as the other girls who have worked in the same flat

The phone is answered by a "receptionist" who will tell you anything you want to hear

IMHO a flat to be avoided. I walked away and posted on here maybe 4 months ago to AVOID

agree, most maids,receptionists will tell you whatever you want as long as you bring £££.

You my friend are part of the problem, too easily pleased -----------
Imposing standards, as regards what should be a positive, neutral or a negative punt, is fraught with difficulty.
Punters should leave a clear description of what occurred and let others make their minds up. If reviews do not seem clear, balanced or detailed enough then readers can ask for more info from the OP
Making statements like yours, quoted above, can come across as patronising and unfair. They will ultimately discourage punters from posting, if they feel they are likely to get abuse for simply stating SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2014, 10:46:00 PM by dickdanger2005 »

Offline vorian

Imposing standards, as regards what should be a positive, neutral or a negative punt, is fraught with difficulty.
Punters should leave a clear description of what occurred and let others make their minds up. If reviews do not seem clear, balanced or detailed enough then readers can ask for more info from the OP
Making statements like yours, quoted above, can come across as patronising and unfair. They will ultimately discourage punters from posting, if they feel they are likely to get abuse for simply stating SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS.

It is very important imho,  that members are not put off regarding reviews but one of the great things about reviews on UKP is the interactive way reviews can be discussed. However constructive is always the best way to go. Whatever the circumstances.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Imposing standards, as regards what should be a positive, neutral or a negative punt, is fraught with difficulty.
Punters should leave a clear description of what occurred and let others make their minds up. If reviews do not seem clear, balanced or detailed enough then readers can ask for more info from the OP
Making statements like yours, quoted above, can come across as patronising and unfair. They will ultimately discourage punters from posting, if they feel they are likely to get abuse for simply stating SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS.

I totally agree with this. Although, I can't believe members are writing positive comments about Mimi18. Everyone has different opinions, and people should be encouraged to share their experiences.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Imposing standards, as regards what should be a positive, neutral or a negative punt, is fraught with difficulty.
Punters should leave a clear description of what occurred and let others make their minds up. If reviews do not seem clear, balanced or detailed enough then readers can ask for more info from the OP
Making statements like yours, quoted above, can come across as patronising and unfair. They will ultimately discourage punters from posting, if they feel they are likely to get abuse for simply stating SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS.

Some punters, especially newbies are very easy to please, that is a simple fact.

I have seen reviews where the girl was described as mechanical and refused to kiss but somehow got a POSITIVE, that is sheer madness.

Punting costs a lot of money, we are ENTITLED to receive a good service.    :hi:

Some punters, especially newbies are very easy to please, that is a simple fact.
My point is that if a punter leaves sufficient information, then his view of what is +ve, N or -ve is largely irrelevant.
Readers will judge the information against their own personal standards.
Also, surely we are here to offer information and reviews on WGs, not to comment on each others personal tastes in services.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2014, 11:12:25 PM by dickdanger2005 »

Offline akauya

You my friend are part of the problem, too easily pleased ----------- OK, she only charges £90 an hour but that is an awful lot of money for some people.

As for being "Racist" that is total cobblers, far too many Romanians give a fourth rate service, they deserve to get slated. :thumbsdown:

You really are a sick puppy aren't you? What happened when you were little Jimmy didn't mummy love you?

The funny thing  is you are always slating other people for taking offence on behalf of others now you do the same here. Since you have never punted a Romanian and have no intention of doing so why the fuck do you care? Why are you getting offended on behalf of others?

Didn't you say it makes you sick people getting offended on behalf of others... so are you making yourself sick now?


Offline Jimmyredcab

You really are a sick puppy aren't you? What happened when you were little Jimmy didn't mummy love you?


When this forum was born -------------- with just 6 members, I can remember someone saying that quality members were more important than huge numbers.

Where did it all go wrong.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Offline akauya

When this forum was born -------------- with just 6 members, I can remember someone saying that quality members were more important than huge numbers.

Where did it all go wrong.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Come on Jimmy be brave for once, stop changing the subject and answer the question. 

"The funny thing  is you are always slating other people for taking offence on behalf of others now you do the same here. Since you have never punted a Romanian and have no intention of doing so why the fuck do you care? Why are you getting offended on behalf of others?

Didn't you say it makes you sick people getting offended on behalf of others... so are you making yourself sick now?"



Offline Tonyleung

Come on Jimmy be brave for once, stop changing the subject and answer the question. 

"The funny thing  is you are always slating other people for taking offence on behalf of others now you do the same here. Since you have never punted a Romanian and have no intention of doing so why the fuck do you care? Why are you getting offended on behalf of others?

Didn't you say it makes you sick people getting offended on behalf of others... so are you making yourself sick now?"


+1

Offline random

My point is that if a punter leaves sufficient information, then his view of what is +ve, N or -ve is largely irrelevant.
Readers will judge the information against their own personal standards.
Also, surely we are here to offer information and reviews on WGs, not to comment on each others personal tastes in services.

Very true, it's not necessarily about whether the review was rated positive or not but more about giving the details of what happened that way anyone reading can form their own opinion of whether it would be a positive or not for them. Ironically I seem to remember Jimmy stating he wouldn't go into details in any reviews of his own for his own selfish reasons. Imagine if everyone did that.

I don't have any problem with someone objecting to the rating of a review though, that can be discussed and more can come out of it. 

Offline Steve2

When this forum was born -------------- with just 6 members, I can remember someone saying that quality members were more important than huge numbers.

Where did it all go wrong.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

6 is an unlucky number. Maybe it would have been a whole lot better with 5

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

... I can remember someone saying that quality members were more important ...
Again, passing judgement on others for no apparent reason  :unknown:

Offline ciscoxxx69

My point is that if a punter leaves sufficient information, then his view of what is +ve, N or -ve is largely irrelevant.
Readers will judge the information against their own personal standards.
Also, surely we are here to offer information and reviews on WGs, not to comment on each others personal tastes in services.

+1

Offline ciscoxxx69

6 is an unlucky number. Maybe it would have been a whole lot better with 5

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:   :drinks:

Offline vorian

When this forum was born -------------- with just 6 members, I can remember someone saying that quality members were more important than huge numbers.

Where did it all go wrong.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Interesting I had no idea about these six members may I ask who they were and how many of them still post. I have read some of the early threads and a lot of them seem to be based around getting auto-censored members to come to UKP.  May I please ask what criteria was used to define who were the quantity ones you wanted at the time. Would be fascinating to see how that has changed over the years. Thanks.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Jimmyredcab

Interesting I had no idea about these six members may I ask who they were and how many of them still post.

Yes, you can ask.    :rolleyes:

Back on topic.

This review was posted by a member with 16 reviews, I personally believe his account of how the punt went, I honestly think that the members who are singing the praises of Romanians are in denial ------------- or it could be that they simply wish to prove me wrong.    :rolleyes:




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)