Author Topic: Lily Star - Upper Edmonton  (Read 6805 times)


5 review(s) for Lily Star (1 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by tynetunnel]

Offline MLawro93

Communication: I messaged her on the day, a couple of hours before the preferred time. She responded quickly and a booking was made. Fairly straightforward.

Location: Upper Edmonton, a flat on Brettenham Road. Plenty of parking available. Flat was easy to find, she clearly just rents out the room. Hence her profile location seems to move around a fair bit.

Cost: £120 in total. £100 for the hour, £10 each for facial and CIM.

Appearance: Girl in pictures, but definitely not the age stated on her profile. I'd say late 20s.

Meet: The meet took place last Friday. Took CIM like a champ, facial was more on the side of her face inside of me plastering it all over her face. Not fussy at all, so my hands were all over her body. Kissing was on the lips, nothing full on and no french kissing at all. She does have a decent OWO technique, plays with the head well, doesn't take the whole lot in her mouth though. Her English is good, fairly easy to talk to. The bed is utter shit though, so anyone who enjoys a good session of cowgirl will be let down. However, her profile is set to a different location in London at the moment, so lets hope the bed is better at the new location.

Link: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Offline pumps

Thanks for reviewing its helpful

Can you go into more detail about her owo, she doesn't take the whole lot into her mouth?

 So is it a dry spit lacking shallow bj she gives?


Offline marcello

Woo, she has a beautiful face.
Thanks OP for the review.
Are the pics recent and a fair idea or what you see in real life or is she any fatter, etc?

Offline MLawro93

Thanks for reviewing its helpful

Can you go into more detail about her owo, she doesn't take the whole lot into her mouth?

 So is it a dry spit lacking shallow bj she gives?

It was a fairly decent OWO, not dry at all. More sloppy really. In terms of taking it all in her mouth, as in she couldn't take my entire dick into her mouth. Went about halfway down the shaft. I forget not all girls can take the whole lot in their mouth without gagging.

Woo, she has a beautiful face.
Thanks OP for the review.
Are the pics recent and a fair idea or what you see in real life or is she any fatter, etc?

I'd say her face is better in the photos. In real life, I'd give her 6 facially. Her body is exactly as you see it in the photos.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2018, 12:22:40 am by MLawro93 »

Offline pumps

It was a fairly decent OWO, not dry at all. More sloppy really. In terms of taking it all in her mouth, as in she couldn't take my entire dick into her mouth. Went about halfway down the shaft. I forget not all girls can take the whole lot in their mouth without gagging.

I'd say her face is better in the photos. In real life, I'd give her 6 facially. Her body is exactly as you see it in the photos.

So it was sloppy? Thanks I might have to visit her.

Offline JayEZ2K

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,960
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 276
Appearance: Girl in pictures, but definitely not the age stated on her profile. I'd say late 20s.
Thanks for reviewing. I tried to see her a couple weeks ago but got radio silence on arrival, wasting about an hour and a half of my time.

Too bad she's older than stated. The early 20s would be such a huge turn on.

Offline nigel4498

Cheers for the heads up  :hi:
She is at Euston, KC and Warren St now so handy as a plan B.

Offline earlgreyman

Awesome, this girl's been on my HL recently, so thanks for the review!

I believe, last check on AW she's in Kings Cross.

Offline ash78

Isn't this the one that used to have a profile picture of her in the bathroom with her face blurred out?
I think she used to go by Emily21, Eve_21 & Little_princes

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=adultwork;id=2393451

Is it the same person?

Offline lebon121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 243
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Isn't this the one that used to have a profile picture of her in the bathroom with her face blurred out?
I think she used to go by Emily21, Eve_21 & Little_princes

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=adultwork;id=2393451

Is it the same person?
the same person indeed.
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline MLawro93

Isn't this the one that used to have a profile picture of her in the bathroom with her face blurred out?
I think she used to go by Emily21, Eve_21 & Little_princes

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=adultwork;id=2393451

Is it the same person?

That's a good catch.  :thumbsup:

Offline lebon121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 243
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
That's a good catch.  :thumbsup:
6 negatives  and 1 neutral . Read old reviews  please !!!!!
Does not offer Fk or dfk.
Does charge  for CIM and even OWO.
She already collected 1 negative on her new profile.

These type of SPs do not  want to learn.

Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:


Offline lebon121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 243
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
« Last Edit: November 01, 2018, 09:16:59 pm by lebon121 »
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Profile not active anymore .
It is hers
Now lily star

Yups added it here so punters can see the rating at the bottom of the post.

Offline lebon121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 243
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Yups added it here so punters can see the rating at the bottom of the post.
Thanks Sinz
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Profile not active anymore .
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=996
Now lily star

I am bit confused I have punted Lil_Princes and rated her Negative, don't remember her looking anything like Lily Star.

How are you sure it's the same SP ?

Stortford

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Lily star she is definitely the girl in the picture with other women on the other little  princess  thread wouldn't recommend not as cute as the photos peck kissing weird blow job technique.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2018, 09:30:16 pm by Stortford »

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Lily star she is definitely the girl in the picture with other women on the other lily star thread wouldn't recommend not as cute as the photos peck kissing weird blow job technique.

What are you on about ? What other lily star thread ?

Edit: right, now that you have edited your comment it makes sense.

Again how do you know that ? What is the link ?
« Last Edit: November 01, 2018, 09:34:57 pm by Sinz »

Stortford

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline lebon121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 243
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
What are you on about ? What other lily star thread ?

Edit: right, now that you have edited your comment it makes sense.

Again how do you know that ? What is the link ?
Read this one Sinz  . The photo of  her with other SP in here
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=97709.0
 
She was reviewed in 2016. You were not registered on ukpuntibg yet sinz. That's why you could not remember.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2018, 09:51:15 pm by lebon121 »
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Read this one Sinz  . The photo of  her with other SP in here
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=97709.0
 
She was reviewed in 2016. You were not registered on ukpuntibg yet sinz. That's why you could not remember.

Again no connection and the description in the review does not match the WG I punted. How have u established Little_princes is Lily_star ?

Offline ash78

Again no connection and the description in the review does not match the WG I punted. How have u established Little_princes is Lily_star ?

Actually I asked this question if they are the same person as I noticed the similarities between Eve and Lily

Offline lebon121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 243
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Again no connection and the description in the review does not match the WG I punted. How have u established Little_princes is Lily_star ?
Unless  you punted someone else . May be you were a victim of B&S.
Easy way to know it is to call her ask her.
Say hello eve or little princess .
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline JayEZ2K

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,960
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 276
Thanks Ash and Lebon, the two photos look like an exact match facially. And as MLawro93 said in his review, she is closer to 30 year old, as the picture on the left (taken over two years ago) would indicate.

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

I'm glad OP had a good time, but given she's significantly older than her new photos indicate, and given her poor reviews, I'm definitely not taking a day off to see her.

Stortford

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Did she work at Earls Court 3 or 4 years ago i had a hideous punt there with a blonde pole called eve big tits were very similar?

Offline pumps

Thanks Ash and Lebon, the two photos look like an exact match facially. And as MLawro93 said in his review, she is closer to 30 year old, as the picture on the left (taken over two years ago) would indicate.

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

I'm glad OP had a good time, but given she's significantly older than her new photos indicate, and given her poor reviews, I'm definitely not taking a day off to see her.


Wow major deception

Stortford

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
They airbrushed 6-8 years off her.

Offline lebon121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 243
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Unless  you punted someone else . May be you were a victim of B&S.
Easy way to know it is to call her ask her.
Say hello eve or little princess .

She has changed her name for a reason. Don't think thats going to wotk, unless you have already tried.

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Thanks Ash and Lebon, the two photos look like an exact match facially. And as MLawro93 said in his review, she is closer to 30 year old, as the picture on the left (taken over two years ago) would indicate.

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

I'm glad OP had a good time, but given she's significantly older than her new photos indicate, and given her poor reviews, I'm definitely not taking a day off to see her.

That makes more sense. Thanks JayEZ2k

Offline Rook_ee

WELL EVEN IF SHES OVER 30 IS GOOD SHE LOOKED BEARLY 18 IN THAT PIX..MUST HAVE BEEN SUCKING DICK FOR SOME TIME!!!

Offline ash78

WELL EVEN IF SHES OVER 30 IS GOOD SHE LOOKED BEARLY 18 IN THAT PIX..MUST HAVE BEEN SUCKING DICK FOR SOME TIME!!!

Hah, well it could be airbrush or the skin healing properties of cum after lots of facials!  :lol:

Offline bedhedred

Bumping this one:

The girl behind this profile is Lily Star.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I've just had a neutral punt with her. Her face seemed familiar and I've worked out who. I should've walked but I stayed. The real gripe was that the owo was really just a hand job.

I didn't see her but the other girl in the flat is probably

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Offline MLawro93

Bumping this one:

The girl behind this profile is Lily Star.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I've just had a neutral punt with her. Her face seemed familiar and I've worked out who. I should've walked but I stayed. The real gripe was that the owo was really just a hand job.

I didn't see her but the other girl in the flat is probably

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

So the profile is a bait and switch? As the girl in that profile looks nothing like her. I've also looked at the PG (only 0.6 credits), there is a clear unblurred face photo and it most definitely isn't her.

Offline bedhedred

Definitely b&s. I nearly walked but she smiled and said "I'll give you owo for the entire half hour if you like". She was pretty, and seemed willing at the outset.

Really, the claim about owo was the biggest lie she told.

Offline MLawro93

Definitely b&s. I nearly walked but she smiled and said "I'll give you owo for the entire half hour if you like". She was pretty, and seemed willing at the outset.

Really, the claim about owo was the biggest lie she told.

Ah, that explains it. Was confused when I looked at the PG. Was gonna recommend a trip to the opticians!  :lol:


The photo below is what I was looking at on the girls profile. Clearly a bait and switch. Bit odd why she wouldn't just use her old profile.  :unknown:

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: December 18, 2019, 10:00:44 pm by MLawro93 »

Offline bedhedred


The photo below is what I was looking at on the girls profile. Clearly a bait and switch. Bit odd why she wouldn't just use her old profile.

Hidden Image/Members Only

I think that pic you've just uploaded is the girl I was half expecting to meet. That pic was on the profile a day or two before, but removed now.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I think that pic you've just uploaded is the girl I was half expecting to meet. That pic was on the profile a day or two before, but removed now.

I do at times say to them that you are the hottie in the pictures
They obviously say yes..
And I do say also if your not I'm leaving immediately regardless..
No prizes to guess they will send me postcode which never arrives.
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline JayEZ2K

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,960
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 276
Definitely b&s... the claim about owo was the biggest lie she told.
She's dishonest. B&S, lied about the OWO. Several negative reviews. She majorly wasted hours of my time on a booking, and I found out later that she doesn't even look like the picture. She also parks her profile in various regions to generate PG gallery income, without actually being available in said area (scam).