Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Pointless FRs  (Read 1129 times)

Offline Taggart

Sometimes I wonder why guy waste their time writing FRs are are not the least bit helpful or descriptive.

In particular, I refer to this: https://www.adultwork.com/ViewFieldReport.asp?FRID=84832

Chloe doesn't have a likes lots    She doesnt list any

I'm not going to write a chapter from 50shades but I will say she will certainly make you feel amazing and give you the best GFE in the area.    Utterly useless and unhelpful comment, and a matter of personal opinion.

I've never felt the need to write one of these before but after seeing Chloe on several occasions I felt I had to.   To be honest, wish you hadn't bothered either.

She greeted me dressed in a satin basque that she filled to perfection Is this a euphemism for she's a porker?

The FR does not elaborate as to whether she kissed, allowed RO, fingering, rimming, anal, whether he even had penetrative sex, whether oral was with or without, did she allow CIM, etc, etc  And the profile leaves many questions unanswered too, which is a shame as the photos are tempting.

Plue he was only there for 30 mins. Frankly, I wouldnt have bothered with an FR.

Why cant people be more descriptive?

Offline vorian

Sometimes I wonder why guy waste their time writing FRs are are not the least bit helpful or descriptive.

In particular, I refer to this: https://www.adultwork.com/ViewFieldReport.asp?FRID=84832

Chloe doesn't have a likes lots    She doesnt list any

I'm not going to write a chapter from 50shades but I will say she will certainly make you feel amazing and give you the best GFE in the area.    Utterly useless and unhelpful comment, and a matter of personal opinion.

I've never felt the need to write one of these before but after seeing Chloe on several occasions I felt I had to.   To be honest, wish you hadn't bothered either.

She greeted me dressed in a satin basque that she filled to perfection Is this a euphemism for she's a porker?

The FR does not elaborate as to whether she kissed, allowed RO, fingering, rimming, anal, whether he even had penetrative sex, whether oral was with or without, did she allow CIM, etc, etc  And the profile leaves many questions unanswered too, which is a shame as the photos are tempting.

Plue he was only there for 30 mins. Frankly, I wouldnt have bothered with an FR.

Why cant people be more descriptive?

Another example of the uselessness of AW Feedback and FR, maybe he was so overcome by her dazzling beauty he forgot what happened.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Zeusthedoc

or, and I could be entirely wrong....

maybe - there is something in it for him - but that's damn-near unheard of....

Offline Taggart

Since my opening comment, he's seen her on previous occasions so should be forthcoming in his comments, but in fairness her FB is very complementary, but I'd still like to know what is on offer, rather than book and be disappointed.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2014, 09:52:08 PM by Taggart »

Offline maz98

I hate the "what goes on between (punter) and (escort) will remain private" line, for godsakes why write a report then?

Offline trb91

'please treat her with respect' well actually i was planning to go round there & beat her up & steal her phone. Another pointless comment, do they think they're somehow a step above other punters?

Offline Ali Katt

'please treat her with respect' well actually i was planning to go round there & beat her up & steal her phone. Another pointless comment, do they think they're somehow a step above other punters?
The newest one is "don't take the mick, lads" or equivalent. I think these men are truly embarrassed about paying to fuck so, express their insecurities by playing the alleged nice guy. More psychological rhetoric next week.

Offline vorian

The newest one is "don't take the mick, lads" or equivalent. I think these men are truly embarrassed about paying to fuck so, express their insecurities by playing the alleged nice guy. More psychological rhetoric next week.

Think you might be on to something there
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline NIK

The newest one is "don't take the mick, lads" or equivalent. I think these men are truly embarrassed about paying to fuck so, express their insecurities by playing the alleged nice guy. More psychological rhetoric next week.

Well at least it makes a change from 'treat her with respect.'

As I've often said the most common word in AWank reports seems to be 'Wow!'

I thought you only got that in American comics?

Offline joshwinkers

It is pretty pointless, I don't mind if someone chooses not to write erotic fiction, but confirming various things (great owo, dfk, sex, etc) at the very least needs to take place or it's of no help at all.

I have had some girls ask me not to go in to the details if choosing to write a review, which is fair enough I guess, but most of the time I then haven't bothered (unless it was someone previously unreviewed / unknown on here).

Offline Ali Katt

It is pretty pointless, I don't mind if someone chooses not to write erotic fiction, but confirming various things (great owo, dfk, sex, etc) at the very least needs to take place or it's of no help at all.

I have had some girls ask me not to go in to the details if choosing to write a review, which is fair enough I guess, but most of the time I then haven't bothered (unless it was someone previously unreviewed / unknown on here).

It depends on the reasons why. Some prossies say that because they don't offer the same services to all punters, unless the man has a cheesy dick or bad breath I can't see why that should be the case. If they are embarrassed about someone talking openly about their sexual experiences then there are toilets that need scrubbing.

Offline vorian

It is pretty pointless, I don't mind if someone chooses not to write erotic fiction, but confirming various things (great owo, dfk, sex, etc) at the very least needs to take place or it's of no help at all.

I have had some girls ask me not to go in to the details if choosing to write a review, which is fair enough I guess, but most of the time I then haven't bothered (unless it was someone previously unreviewed / unknown on here).

The more details the best for both punters and prossies, no point being coy about it.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline smiths

Sometimes I wonder why guy waste their time writing FRs are are not the least bit helpful or descriptive.

In particular, I refer to this: https://www.adultwork.com/ViewFieldReport.asp?FRID=84832

Chloe doesn't have a likes lots    She doesnt list any

I'm not going to write a chapter from 50shades but I will say she will certainly make you feel amazing and give you the best GFE in the area.    Utterly useless and unhelpful comment, and a matter of personal opinion.

I've never felt the need to write one of these before but after seeing Chloe on several occasions I felt I had to.   To be honest, wish you hadn't bothered either.

She greeted me dressed in a satin basque that she filled to perfection Is this a euphemism for she's a porker?

The FR does not elaborate as to whether she kissed, allowed RO, fingering, rimming, anal, whether he even had penetrative sex, whether oral was with or without, did she allow CIM, etc, etc  And the profile leaves many questions unanswered too, which is a shame as the photos are tempting.

Plue he was only there for 30 mins. Frankly, I wouldnt have bothered with an FR.

Why cant people be more descriptive?

FRs are done for various reasons, not all to in anyway help other punters. For example the punter might get a discount off the SP as i know happens or did with some of the Divines punters at HOD and in MK. One told me years ago he got £20 an hour off, at that time i thought he was boasting to be honest, turned out he wasnt.

Another reason is to impress the WG, the punter might think it will endear him to her and he decides saying she rimmed his arse might not be that endearing so doesnt specify any detail, pure fluffiness of course. For some others its a thank you to the WG, they have zero interest in what other punters think of it.

Offline vorian

FRs are done for various reasons, not all to in anyway help other punters. For example the punter might get a discount off the SP as i know happens or did with some of the Divines punters at HOD and in MK. One told me years ago he got £20 an hour off, at that time i thought he was boasting to be honest, turned out he wasnt.

Another reason is to impress the WG, the punter might think it will endear him to her and he decides saying she rimmed his arse might not be that endearing so doesnt specify any detail, pure fluffiness of course. For some others its a thank you to the WG, they have zero interest in what other punters think of it.

Damn it feels like some days all I do is follow you around this forum agreeing, Yes I do agree 100%. Which is why I personally give AW FR zero importance.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)