Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Tory (Diva) - Paddington  (Read 2018 times)

Offline Complete Novice

I should have seen this coming a mile off, I am a fool, and a fool and his money are soon parted. 

The Agency wouldn't give me any selfies as Tory doesn't allow it.  The second red flag was an EE agency girl with a service list as extensive as hers for £200 P/H with no extras, there had to be a catch, yes indeed there was and that was her looks.  I am ashamed to say that I should have walked on sight, I didn't, paid the price so I got exactly what I deserved.

External Link/Members Only

SKILLS - Average;
ATTITUDE – Ok, but there was I believe an attempt to waste my time; and
LOOKS & FIGURE – The photos are not close enough to be an accurate representation of her.

COST: £200 (No extras)
BOOKING LENGTH & TYPE: 1 hour, in-call

COMMS
Very straightforward, all arranged by a couple of texts with the Agency.

LOCATION
5-minute walk from Paddington underground/overground; residential street; reasonably discreet; the outside and communal areas of the building looked a little run down; 1st-floor apartment, clean and tidy; no concierge; no lift; en-suite bathroom; clean towel and toiletries were provided; water or champagne offered.

THE ESCORT
The bottom line is that the photo-shopper has well and truly overstepped the mark and the reality doesn't even come close for my money:

In her words, born in Ukraine, now lives in Russia, until recently and from memory, her profile stated size 6 and 29 years old. I thought more like mid 30s and a size 8, which her profile now more accurately reflects
5'4"
Long straight reddish/brown hair, no extensions that I could tell
Sporting a bit of a gut and abnormally large thighs for her frame, these wouldn't have looked out of place in the peleton on The Tour
She's enhanced and these probably were nicely proportioned when and if she was ever a size 6, now she's bigger, they actually liked quite small
No tattoos that I can recall
Clean with good teeth
Brazilian
Wearing red and light tan lingerie, suspenders and cheap looking tan stripper heels
Good English
She's a smoker and did a poor job of trying to mask it
Personality wise, easy to talk to, relaxed and down to earth

SERVICES REQUESTED & RECEIVED
FK (once I realised she was a smoker, I didn't persist)
RO
OWO
Protected sex
CIM

THE BOOKING
Warmly received, agreed services and paid.  Sadly Tory at this point then proceeded to try and waste my time with endless chat, in the end I had to ask to take a shower.

First up RO, cleanly presented, usual whimpers and twitching and that was it, she didn't overact it.

Tory's OWO technique I thought was very basic.  No attempt at DT, no gagging or spitting, mainly working the head with her mouth and shaft with her hand.  There was no eye contact but good attention to my nuts but none to my perineum.  I was a bit bored by it in truth and asked her politely to move on.

The penetrative side of things was just mish and was very middle of the road, but in Tory's defence my heart wasn't in it as when I looked down and saw what laid beneath me, I wasn't very inspired, and annoyed myself for not walking.  I've no idea whether Tory was dialled into this because I wasn't.  With about 5 minutes left on the clock I was asked "do you want to come in my mouth", this was alright I suppose, she stayed attentive, then trudged off to the bathroom to spit it out which I've no issue with whatsoever.

I was invited to take another shower to which I declined, I just wanted out of there.

WOULD I RETURN
No chance.
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I sent the Agency my 'constructive feedback', which they ignored.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Complete Novice,  Thanks for your review.  Forgive my ignorance; apart from HoD I have never booked through an agency but I thought those that do accept that they are going to get relatively poor value for less of the hassle of booking/ access to a premium end experience (at the £250 - £300 ph level).  From reading here seems you paid an entry-level agency price and had an entry-level agency experience.  Am I missing something?
« Last Edit: October 18, 2018, 10:20:30 am by mrhappypants »

Offline king tarzan

Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline Fully Sated

Thanks for the warning, Complete Novice I think that you have saved a few punters from wasting their cash!

Offline king tarzan

For fucks sake learn to walk away and save your money!  :dash:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Stanford97

For fucks sake learn to walk away and save your money!  :dash:
It’s the only way with shocking photoshopping. The recommended list on Diva has took an upturn though in the last few days: Kendall looks awesome, Twiggy is back and Kalia’s selfies look good. This Tory turd is still topping their list though.

In terms of photoshopping, I saw Augustine a couple of years ago and just thought she was a scrawny skank with crap tits, manky hair, tin ribs and a pasty gaunt face. I didn’t even want to finish off with the hand after 50 minutes as I found her so unappealing. 0 shots achieved. No negative reviews on Diva though (they deleted my last negative review within a few weeks).

External Link/Members Only

Offline Oh la la

Tory looks amazing in their gallery. Would love to be a fly on the wall in their photoshopping department.

Offline Freddo44

A good clue is to look at the age of reviews. I expect the photos are from the same time!

Offline Stanford97

It would be good if the OP looked through some other websites to see if she goes under any other names. I can’t find her anywhere which is strange and I was wondering if she has completely different photos elsewhere.

Offline king tarzan

on agency no selfie not interested..
all photoshopped pictures and no selfie must be reason which i presume is negative reason as to no selfie...
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

JAG4555

  • Guest
ive said this so many times. agency girls are shite, expensive. strictly for rich fools....
ive had 1 average punt out of 8, stick to adultwork that has reviews and ofcourse our ukpunting website.
use brain and stop thinking with dick.. i know we horny men get excited looking at the fake photoshopped pictures

Offline king tarzan

ive said this so many times. agency girls are shite, expensive. strictly for rich fools....
ive had 1 average punt out of 8, stick to adultwork that has reviews and ofcourse our ukpunting website.
use brain and stop thinking with dick.. i know we horny men get excited looking at the fake photoshopped pictures

I disagree...
I have found super honey's and there rate is slightly higher had they been independently on adultworks by £30 to £50 higher..
I have lust for beautiful women like any other man so I am prepared to pay that little bit extra within reason for physical gratification..

I do agree many are heavily Photoshopped but I look out for the selfies...
« Last Edit: October 20, 2018, 09:40:54 pm by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac