I set up my AW searches to exclude Romanians for this very reason.
I presume you're aware that whenever you exclude a specific nationality from your searches it excludes not only those who state that nationality but also all those who have no nationality listed. Of course many of those will also be Romanian but not all of them.
External Link/Members Only
Interesting reading and might explain some of the ROMS attitudes.
That is quite interesting, didn't know that.
Probably a cultural thing as well, offering great customer service is probably a concept that they don`t understand.
A lot of the Romanians that are not pimped, are 100% independent and that offer a good standard of service from the initial comms to the bedroom antics actually do quite well, but there`s not many of them about.
Probably why a lot of blokes give them a swerve when they see the word Romanian.
Yes, I agree (particularly with most of the gypsy Romanians that we actually up seeing). They also don't really need to consider customer service if they tour around a lot (although that can often be a sign of pimping but not always). As you say though, there are a few good properly independent Romanians out there, just not many.
Her profile says she`s 18 and 19.
Which is exactly why she's definitely at least 19 and not younger. Also, it's just her "Age" that's listed as 18, which is displayed by AW based on whatever she put as her date of birth which was done when she signed up and was probably a lie, whereas it says 19 in the text of her profile which is both probably more up to date and accurate because she had to consciously/deliberately type it out. There's a small chance it was a typo but that's very unlikely, especially given how common it is for girls to mention a different age in the text of their profile compared to the age AW shows. And in my experience, when you meet in person the girl always claims to be the older of the two ages (which itself is still probably a large understatement).
Quite right though, 18 year old prossies are quite rare and are probably a couple of years older.
Suppose part of the thrill is having barely legal sex with her.
That isn't really a thrill for me. The reason I prefer young girls is simply looks. Younger usually equals better looking. Of course there are still many young ugly girls out there and a small number of girls who get better with age (up to a point)/peak fairly late but that's quite rare. There are also plenty of things a girl can do to improve her appearance such as size/weight, make up, hair style, hair colour etc. Nonetheless, age is still a big factor. That's also not to say that I don't occasionally find myself in the mood for a MILF.
Here`s one, if it was legal for girls to be prostitutes at 16 - would you?
I don't have a problem with it in civvie life but of course that's different. If it was legal, I probably would. However, I wouldn't particularly support the law being changed and of course it would never happen anyway.
My issue isn't that girls aren't young enough, it's that there are absolutely nowhere near enough of them (18-25), particularly as proper escorts.
How about you (or anyone else)?