Just to clarify and prevent the review being hi jacked This particular tart is way overpriced for your liking however the Op is entitled to write his own review so long as that review is agreeable to your opinion on this particular tart. Or am I way off the mark
Way off. My interpretation of this is that you're implying I only value his review if I agree with it, which is bollocks. I've never at any point said anything here that could be construed as this. As I already said, the point of being a member of this forum is not only to review girls you've shagged, but also give your perspective on the reviews of others. Just because I don't agree with a review doesn't mean I consider it having no value.
I'd very likely go nowhere near her as I simply couldn't enjoy a punt, knowing it's very poor value for money. But I could win the lottery this week and therefore fancy an expensive shag ASAP. This one might not be top of my list, but she might be the only one available at the time when my first millionaire stauner stands to. I might not like the idea in principle of paying "elite" London, baws-deep anal, pornstar prices for a standard Glasgow vanilla punt. But at the time I could very well say, "Fuck it, what's 100 quid when I've just won 100 million and I want to stick my dick in something hot now?" At least I'll know from this review she's a reasonable shag, if still overpriced. Point is, there's value in every review, as I'm sure someone else with money to burn will read this, pay it, shag her and enjoy it - even if for pure convenience as it happens to suit them, if nothing else.
Alternatively, he could write glowing a review saying how much he enjoyed paying a grand to watch a morbidly obese, ugly bird eat a giant bag of crisps, as he wanked for an hour before blowing his muck into the empty packet. I'd guess most of us would tell him he's mad, but it's his right to pay it, do it, write it, and it's our right to say what we think of it. It's why we're all members.
The glitz, glamour, expensive clothing etc I’m sensing doesn’t do it for you, but it may well be important to others. As is the allure of a more upmarket escort. I’m not saying she’s upmarket how’ve er, I’ve mever met her.
For an escort to call herself a courtesan. I’d expect her to be cultured, educated, experienced to a high level in her craft and glamorous and a great hostess. Physical appearance is subjective however. But all that would matter.
If he thinks she was good and worth the money. Who are we to disagree? The expensive underwear Could we’ll be a must for him. For many people lingerie is a massive turn on, a kink even. Some even have fetishes for certain items of clothing. We don’t know his back story.
She may not be worth it to us, but this is a game with very varied tastes, expectations and requirements.
I wouldn’t pay a score to take a piss on her dial, after seeing that attitude, but hey, that’s just my take on her. The OP is his own man.
That’s the beauty of this site. So many types of punter.
On the contrary, I love a bit of sexy lingerie - sometimes even being a must - but is always certainly a turn-on and can only add to proceedings. But even as a fan of it, I doubt I could tell the difference between Ann Summers and Agent Provocateur most of the time. The point is that girls don't need to need to spend 50 quid on a string of material that goes up their arse crack and pass the charge onto the punter, when they could spend a fiver, given he isn't going to know the difference.
Nor does this one need to charge what she does, when I'd expect better looking girls offering more services for 100 quid less to still provide a refined, professional, classy, memorable experience to the absolute best of their ability. Are you honestly going to tell me her service and attitude was 100 quid better than others who charge 150 an hour? I know you aren't, but my point is that nothing in his review suggested it was. Bet the cow buys her pants at Ann Summers as well. However, I simply reinforce the fact, as it's the one you seem to be missing, that - just like us - he'd likely never have considered her, had he already had what the rest of us would consider to be a great punt at 150. But once more, it's his right it pay it, his right to positively review it and our right to disagree.
Based on what the OP has said himself in his review, I would definitely say there is better out there and for far less money...I'll stick with them thanks 
...But hey ho...To each their own... 
Exactly this, as I've already said. Amen
