Scarlett Sage of Adultwork and Premium Escorts - Gateshead

[AnthG]

And let me get this straight. You say you do not believe my reviews are credible. When you have only posted one negative review and that was for a no-show of your favourite girl.

"When I saw Sadie had returned to the world's oldest profession I was immediately enthused as she has been one of my personal favourite punts.... However at around 4pm I received a text from June informing me Sadie had cancelled her shifts.....All in all very disappointing."

And yet I have posted multiple negative reviews. Including ones for darlings of the north east. That have got me on the receiving end of no end of shit for doing over the years. And my reviews are not credible. Just because I post a glowing review of a girl who has got 23 reviews on the forum and not a single negative. So she has an ok batting average.

[Placebo88]

I think you're the only person in the world who thinks you stopped seeing Vicky and not that she finally decided that your money wasn't enough to keep up appearances and started to fob you off

Looking over the review it took a big wedge to get her to do the booking and she then fucked it up as bad as she could to put an end to any more of them.

[Sir Punt]

Fob me off, implies she rejected bookings? She accepted the bookings gladly and I felt it was bad. So I negatively reviewed it. What more do you want. I gave her more chances than people would as instead of fobbing me off. she was contacting me with very strong excuses that I believed each time.

If I had a bad booking today, I promise you I would have reviewed it as such. I have no reason to lie for either the girl in question, or the agency owner she now works for.

I have posted many negative reviews before now. And ones for girls who are deemed as golden girls of the north east. And these have got me right on the foul side of that girls team of fluffies. I post them how I see them.

Just for a moment imagine your posts regarding Scarlett recently but by another poster about another escort.
Its been almost touting frankly and as others have said does the girl no favours. Its seems like it's for the attention of the escort more than the benefit of other punters which is the essence of fluff.

[Sir Punt]

And let me get this straight. You say you do not believe my reviews are credible. When you have only posted one negative review and that was for a no-show of your favourite girl.

"When I saw Sadie had returned to the world's oldest profession I was immediately enthused as she has been one of my personal favourite punts.... However at around 4pm I received a text from June informing me Sadie had cancelled her shifts.....All in all very disappointing."

And yet I have posted multiple negative reviews. Including ones for darlings of the north east. That have got me on the receiving end of no end of shit for doing over the years. And my reviews are not credible. Just because I post a glowing review of a girl who has got 23 reviews on the forum and not a single negative. So she has an ok batting average.

Make your own mind up about my reviews mate..... I have yours

[vw]

And let me get this straight. You say you do not believe my reviews are credible. When you have only posted one negative review and that was for a no-show of your favourite girl.

"When I saw Sadie had returned to the world's oldest profession I was immediately enthused as she has been one of my personal favourite punts.... However at around 4pm I received a text from June informing me Sadie had cancelled her shifts.....All in all very disappointing."

And yet I have posted multiple negative reviews. Including ones for darlings of the north east. That have got me on the receiving end of no end of shit for doing over the years. And my reviews are not credible. Just because I post a glowing review of a girl who has got 23 reviews on the forum and not a single negative. So she has an ok batting average.

Just analysed positivism between you two. 

SirPunt 5/8  62.5 %  Positive

Anthg 28/37  75% positive

Just for a moment imagine your posts regarding Scarlett recently but by another poster about another escort.
Its been almost touting frankly and as others have said does the girl no favours. Its seems like it's for the attention of the escort more than the benefit of other punters which is the essence of fluff.

Territory marking IMO

[AnthG]

Make your own mind up about my reviews mate..... I have yours

Great. 8 reviews, one negative; just for a noshow of your favourite girl vs 37 reviews, and 8 negatives.

And I am the one posting fake positives. Yeah.

Just analysed positivism between you two. 

SirPunt 5/8  62.5 %  Positive

Anthg 28/37  75% positive

Territory marking IMO

Fuck off. 37 vs 8 with only one negative and you try this.

[Sir Punt]

Great. 8 reviews, one negative; just for a noshow of your favourite girl vs 37 reviews, and 8 negatives.

And I am the one posting fake positives. Yeah.

My favourite girl?

Or does it say, one of my favourite punts?

Don't twist my words to suit a failing argument please.

[AnthG]

My favourite girl?

Or does it say, one of my favourite punts?

Dobt twist my words to suit a failing argument please.

One of your favourite punts. Who was your only negative, as she fobbed you off and cancelled on you.

Which is what you are claiming is the only reason I would ever post a negative when infact I have posted multiple negatives for much more serious reasons.

[datwabbit]

For all the business the positive reviews will deliver, she actually doesn't want to see the guys reading them.

[Sir Punt]

One of your favourite punts. Who was your only negative, as she fobbed you off and cancelled on you.

Yes and I gave it a deserved negative.

Honestly Anth does my positive of her seem as fluffy as yours of scarlett?

[vw]

Great. 8 reviews, one negative; just for a noshow of your favourite girl vs 37 reviews, and 8 negatives.

And I am the one posting fake positives. Yeah.

Fuck off. 37 vs 8 with only one negative and you try this.

You can read the stats, you are  75% fluff vs his 62.5% fluff simple.     

Not sure why you are excluding neutrals,they are important reviews too.   

Good that you both have free will to find each other not credible.

[vw]

For all the business the positive reviews will deliver, she actually doesn't want to see the guys reading them.

Indeed



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[datwabbit]

And let me get this straight. You say you do not believe my reviews are credible. When you have only posted one negative review and that was for a no-show of your favourite girl.

"When I saw Sadie had returned to the world's oldest profession I was immediately enthused as she has been one of my personal favourite punts.... However at around 4pm I received a text from June informing me Sadie had cancelled her shifts.....All in all very disappointing."

And yet I have posted multiple negative reviews. Including ones for darlings of the north east. That have got me on the receiving end of no end of shit for doing over the years. And my reviews are not credible. Just because I post a glowing review of a girl who has got 23 reviews on the forum and not a single negative. So she has an ok batting average.

Your review of Hannah was great. Services and location.

I'm glad the exposure of her messages on here, and you were in that discussion, didn't affect the way she treated you in the booking.

[AnthG]

Yes and I gave it a deserved negative.

Honestly Anth does my positive of her seem as fluffy as yours of scarlett?

It was a deserved negative. That is not the issue. What you are suggesting is I would only give a negative for the same reason you gave your only negative for. Which doesn't add up at all. Given I have given multiple negatives for many forum darlings in the past. And you cannot suggest this about me, when you have not posted any serious negatives. Just one for a no-show. You cannot preach down on someone, from your high horse until maybe you have actually done it yourself.

And somehow, you also suggest the booking today was really bad, but I just faked a positive to try and get in the good graces of a girl I have seen now for only the second time in 12 months. And who is giving me "bad bookings" so why the fuck would I want in her good graces for??

I do not appreciate being accused of being dishonest. Nor would anyone else.

[Kev3773]

You could have saved yourself a lot of grief Anth ( unless you relish it) your review serves little purpose on here as she's not interested in seeing members of this forum !!!  In her words 

[Sir Punt]

It was a deserved negative. That is not the issue. What you are suggesting is I would only give a negative for the same reason you gave your only negative for. Which doesn't add up at all. Given I have given multiple negatives for many forum darlings in the past. And you cannot suggest this about me, when you have not posted any serious negatives. Just one for a no-show.

And somehow, you also suggest the booking today was really bad, but I just faked a positive to try and get in the good graces of a girl I have seen now for only the second time in 12 months. And who is giving me bad bookings??

I do not appreciate being accused of being dishonest. Nor would anyone else.

I have no doubt you had a good punt today Anth I'm also not suggesting anything I'm openly saying I believe you have very rose tinted glasses on when it comes to your current favourite whoever they may at the time

[AnthG]

I have no doubt you had a good punt today Anth I'm also not suggesting anything I'm openly saying I believe you have very rose tinted glasses on when it comes to your current favourite whoever they may at the time

Right fine, and I am saying the girl has 23 reviews on the forum, 22 of them positive (not even godlike Tori Taylor, Lidly Delphine and Eva Bello managed this). These 22 positives are from multiple "no shit taken" type punters. And infact it was a few of the "no shit taken" type punters, eg Rod Trotter, who actually told me Scarlett is the girl I should be seeing as she the exact type of girl I go for. And yeah they are right she is.

So I post a glowing review for her. That has got me trashed by everyone for doing. And deemed I am a total fluffy and not credible as a result..

When at the same time, I am being accused by a series of people of being a major misogynist by the posters on UKE. Who, not really relevant to you, but many of them use a different username on both forums, so they can (as they have admitted) post fluffy shit on one forum and post differently on this forum. which I have said I will not do I will keep the same attitude of both. which is a mix of fluffy and not taking shit from WGs (which is deemed as a misogynist by those people in fluffy poster mode).

And just to say it, if Scarlett had of upped her prices, I would have trashed her more than anyone, like I did to all the other girls who upped the prices. Given the reason that was given for them doing it...

[Kev3773]

It was a deserved negative. That is not the issue. What you are suggesting is I would only give a negative for the same reason you gave your only negative for. Which doesn't add up at all. Given I have given multiple negatives for many forum darlings in the past. And you cannot suggest this about me, when you have not posted any serious negatives. Just one for a no-show. You cannot preach down on someone, from your high horse until maybe you have actually done it yourself.

And somehow, you also suggest the booking today was really bad, but I just faked a positive to try and get in the good graces of a girl I have seen now for only the second time in 12 months. And who is giving me "bad bookings" so why the fuck would I want in her good graces for??

I do not appreciate being accused of being dishonest. Nor would anyone else.

Multiple negatives for forum darlings ???  Have you  ?

[vw]

So I post a glowing review for her. That has got me trashed by everyone for doing. And deemed I am a total fluffy and not credible as a result..

that was established by some long before this review.

[AnthG]

Multiple negatives for forum darlings ???  Have you  ?

Savannah, and Charlotte. Those two got me more abuse from their fluffy fans over the years than anyone can comprehend.

And to a much lesser extent Mia.

[AnthG]

that was established by some long before this review.

And you posting fake shit totally out of any context about the reason of a temp ban and why it was only temp.  A completely snidey thing to try and do.

[vw]

And you posting fake shit totally out of any context about the reason of a temp ban and why it was only temp.

Well temp or not the circumstances highlight why you have credibility issues.

The whole episode was lunacy taking way the tiny part involving Mia that i just read tonight.

Anth it took you an age before you went against Vicky and posted a "harsh" review even though many others thought you were obsessed and she was taking the piss. You couldn't see it, so it's no wonder others fail to take your reviews seriously. Just my take on it. 

Pure contempt by him for other punters IMO.

[datwabbit]

Right fine, and I am saying the girl has 23 reviews on the forum, 22 of them positive (not even godlike Tori Taylor, Lidly Delphine and Eva Bello managed this). These 22 positives are from multiple "no shit taken" type punters. And infact it was a few of the "no shit taken" type punters, eg Rod Trotter, who actually told me Scarlett is the girl I should be seeing as she the exact type of girl I go for. And yeah they are right she is.

So I post a glowing review for her. That has got me trashed by everyone for doing. And deemed I am a total fluffy and not credible as a result

You were trashed for your content not your rating. As I keep saying, Hannah is a great review. You look like you've treated Scarlett differently.

When you chatted at the beginning - the elephant in the room - did you discuss the screenshots? I'll believe whatever answer you give.

[AnthG]

Well temp or not the circumstances highlight why you have credibility issues.

The whole episode was lunacy taking way the tiny part involving Mia that i just read tonight.

Pure contempt by him for other punters IMO.

Ah so you want to keep trying twisting it you snidey bastard. The girl set me up. Over something, I did not even do. This is why I was unbanned And yet you post now 2 years later like I did it. Totally forgetting to mention the topic showing I didn't even do this and was setup by a malicious bitch. And still, after this gets pointed out to you by me and others, you keep trying to argue that I did this. Snidey bastard showing youir true colours.

[AnthG]

You were trashed for your content not your rating. As I keep saying, Hannah is a great review. You look like you've treated Scarlett differently.

As I enjoyed the booking with Scarlett a lot more. If I could score the bookings out of 10. The one with Hannah would be a 7, maybe 8 given I got Anal. Which either was is still a positive.

When you chatted at the beginning - the elephant in the room - did you discuss the screenshots? I'll believe whatever answer you give.

Not at the start of the punt, but it was mentioned in the booking near the end. It was actually brought up by me asking if she had any more proof of who did it yet. And me saying it was obvious who did it given one girl in the group really doesn't like her. That was all that was said on it.

She didn't seem to want to talk about negative things in the punt she wanted it to be positive things discussed. Which I guess if you are aiming gor a good review you would do.

[vw]

Ah so you want to keep trying twisting it you snidey bastard. The girl set me up. Over something, I did not even do. This is why I was unbanned And yet you post now 2 years later like I did it. Totally forgetting to mention the topic showing I didn't even do this and was setup by a malicious bitch. And still, after this gets pointed out to you by me and others, you keep trying to argue that I did this. Snidey bastard showing youir true colours.

your true colours are in most posts  , whether she set you up or not that was a tiny part of your dramatics on forum. 

Interesting comments on that thread daviemac posted though.   

[datwabbit]

She didn't seem to want to talk about negative things in the punt she wanted it to be positive things discussed. Which I guess if you are aiming gor a good review you would do.

That's something. She didn't try to get stuff out of you.

[AnthG]

your true colours are in most posts  , whether she set you up or not that was a tiny part of your dramatics on forum. 

Ah so it doesn't matter if I did what you initially suggested I had way back in the topic now or not. But you just want to say I did it even though you knew I hadn't done it. And even when it's proven, you still want to try and say I really did it or find ways to twist it like I really did something along those lines, as it suites your agenda.

Lets hope someone in two years time quotes this as an example of you doing that when you try it again.

[vw]

Ah so it doesn't matter if I did what you initially suggested I had way back in the topic now or not. But you just want to say I did it even though you knew I hadn't done it. And even when it's proven, you still want to try and say I really did it or find ways to twist it like I really did something.

Lets hope someone in two years time quotes this as an example of you doing that when you try it again.

People can quote and link to what they want. There are 1000's of your that can be linked, I wonder why so many?   

She didn't seem to want to talk about negative things in the punt she wanted it to be positive things discussed. Which I guess if you are aiming gor a good review you would do.

So she tried extra hard knowing  a reviewer was in the room.    :rolleyes

[AnthG]

People can quote and link to what they want. There are 1000's of your that can be linked, I wonder why so many?   

Yeah they can, but you are Mister quoter. You know everything. And what you did was post a link to deliberately say something that never even happened had happened two yeara ago

Which you knew that what you were doing at the time you posted that link and pretending what happened it was snidey and deliberately dishonest thing to do. But you still did it as it suited your agenda against me.

Then when you get told the truth, you don't say "sorry for being a snidey cunt there to anth" no you keep on trying to say I really did it. So then a link to Admins post is made. And still you try and argue I really did it. You're a picture you.

Now your position is, anyne can post a link totally out of context and pretend whatever they want has happened from that link. Oh and I am known for doing that too. Thats another one you are trying.

The simplest way to resolve this would have been, I fucked up, sorry Anth. But not you eh.

[AnthG]

So she tried extra hard knowing  a reviewer was in the room.    :rolleyes

Probably, so do you think maybe that is why I was knocked for six. As an attractive girl who has a perfect review score already, brought her absolute top draw "A game" to a punt with me. And that is why I was knocked for six after it.

[vw]

Yeah they can, but you are Mister quoter. You know everything. And what you did was post a link to deliberately say something that never even happened had happened two yeara ago

Which you knew that what you were doing at the time you posted that link and pretending what happened it was snidey and deliberately dishonest thing to do. But you still did it as it suited your agenda against me.

Then when you get told the truth, you don't say "sorry for being a snidey cunt there to anth" no you keep on trying to say I really did it. So then a link to Admins post is made. And still you try and argue I really did it. You're a picture you.

Now your position is, anyne can post a link totally out of context and pretend whatever they want has happened from that link. Oh and I am known for doing that too. Thats another one you are trying.

The simplest way to resolve this would have been, I fucked up, sorry Anth. But not you eh.

The whole saga was what i was hoping didn't happen again, i hope for scarlet's sake you have changed which i doubt. 

Lots of opinions about you on that thread, very few relate to mia but your loopy method of punting. 

Have a read, see what people thought of your punting style.   

Anyway I'm sure some people will thank you for the advert.   

[AnthG]

The whole saga was what i was hoping didn't happen again, i hope for scarlet's sake you have changed which i doubt. 

Yeah I know, I really don't want to ever again get stitched up by snidey cunts posting stuff totally and utterly out of context to try and get me in trouble by saying I had done something I hadn't even done and they knew I hadn't done it when they said it. But you in this topic have shown tonight. It is happening again with people trying to do this to me. And like her, you have been shown for what you are by trying it...

Most likely though you will not give up. And you will keep posting the same shit over and over again even though you know you are completely banged to rights on this one.

[datwabbit]

Probably, so do you think maybe that is why I was knocked for six. As an attractive girl who has a perfect review score already, brought her absolute top draw "A game" to a punt with me. And that is why I was knocked for six after it.

This score was before the messages came out. If she'd been crap for reviewers now, it wouldn't be good business on her part.

Besides, her ability to pleasure a man isn't in question. It's what happens after she says goodbye. That's the important bit. Her sexual performance isn't in question. Just some guys don't want to be thought of as a wallet.

[vw]

Yeah I know, I really don't want to ever again get stitched up by snidey cunts posting stuff totally and utterly out of context to try and get me in trouble by saying I had done something I hadn't even done and they knew it. But you in this topic have shown tonight. It is happening again with people trying to do this to me. And like her, you have been shown for what you are by trying it...

Most likely though you will not give up. And you will keep posting the same shit over and over again even though you know you are completely banged to rights on this one.

bullshit your vicky saga lasted for months, pure 100% lunacy.

Care to show my responses to that thread of yours that you claim i knew about?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=122896.msg1398480#msg1398480

 

Still wating for your indisputable proof that lydia wont let you post. BTW

[AnthG]

bullshit your vicky saga lasted for months, pure 100% lunacy.

Care to show my responses to that thread of yours that you claim i knew about?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=122896.msg1398480#msg1398480

 

Still wating for your indisputable proof that lydia wont let you post. BTW

Once again trying to twist it away from what you said at the start of this topic quoting your own post about me saying "for persuading punter not to do negative review for prossie punter us obsessed with. Hope the it here punter gets unpersuaded" and saying "I hope this doesn't happen again."

When none of that happened in the first place, that was just a snidey bitch like you are a snidey cunt, and you knew none of that happened. You just wanted to pretend it did to fit your agenda. And instead of just admitting that, you have tried to twist this every which way from Sunday like it really happened somehow. Or you didn't know that it didn't. Instead of just admitting you are a snidey cunt for saying that and it never even happened and you knew it.

I know for a fact you will never admit that, and this topic will go on for ever you keep saying "but you did it". Until I gave up. The topics on UKE recently show that. But at least others can see. As they can see what you have tried here. I hope they rememer it when you try and do it with them.

[vw]

Once again trying to twist it away from what you said at the start of this topic quoting your own post about me saying "for persuading punter not to do negative review for prossie punter us obsessed with. Hope the it here punter gets unpersuaded" and saying "I hope this doesn't happen again."

When none of that happened, and you knew none of that happened. You just wanted to pretend it did to fit your agenda. And instead of just admitting that, you have tried to twist this every which way from Sunday like it really happened somehow. Instead of just admitting you are a snidey cunt for saying that and it never even happned and you knew it.

Where did i quote a post i linked to a post but did not quote it.   

I posted a link about you being banned, I said i hope this doesn't happen again, you are twisting things out of context to suit your agenda.

You whole vicky love story led to that moment, without that saga there would be no temp a or anything.

Did you notice on that thread, that Mia wasn't banned, not sure what to make of that. 

I see you added more at the end of you posts again, something you have cried    about many times on UKE.   

[AnthG]

Where did i quote a post i linked to a post but did not quote it.   

I posted a link about you being banned, I said i hope this doesn't happen again, you are twisting things out of context to suit your agenda.

You whole vicky love story led to that moment, without that saga there would be no temp a or anything.

Did you notice on that thread, that Mia wasn't banned, not sure what to make of that. 

Still again trying to suggest it. Like a 5 year old stamping your feet saying the same thing over and over again till the other person just says fuck this and gives up.

The 5 year old tantrum way to win an argument you have to a tee. Be proud.

I am logging off as I have made my point. You can keep repeating over and over, "but you did it". Until you are blue in the face.

In relation to the question why wasn't Mia banned for being a snidey cunt. I don't know, it may not be in the rules of the forum that this gets you banned. I mean tonight you have been a snidey cunt. Do you think you should be banned for doing that. For the record, I personally don't, I just think people should note you did this to bring out 2 years later.

I am logging out, good luck with your feet stamping posts in this thread all night till 3am or something.

[vw]

Still again trying to suggest it. Like a 5 year old stamping your feet saying the same thing over and over again till the other person just says fuck this and gives up.

The 5 year old tantrum way to win an argument you have to a tee. Be proud.

I am logging off as I have made my point. You can keep repeating over and over, "but you did it". Until you are blue in the face.

In relation to the question why wasn't Mia banned for being a snidey cunt. I don't know, it may not be in the rules of the forum that this gets you banned. I mean tonight you have been a snidey cunt. Do you think you should be banned for doing that. For the record, I personally don't, I just think people should note you did this to bring out 2 years later.

I am logging out, good luck with your feet stamping posts in this thread all night till 3am or something.

As for mia, possibly broke this one

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

- Service providers
The site allows service providers to be members, but there is no tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters.[/color] Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. The site is not a chat platform between clients and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers. All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'. Transsexual service providers may be members, but not male service providers. Service providers are recommended to join External Link/Members Only instead.

I'm sure Premium Pimp will be grateful for the press release.   

[roboeggman]

So you are going to blame the girl over someone writing a fluffy review for her? That's fine that's up to you.

I know there's been a lot of stuff said between this post and now, and I know you and VW are busy grinding your axes but I thought I'd at least follow up.

To answer your question: I think she looks great in pics and seems like a decent lassie on the forums, so I'm blaming you and partly myself. Talking about a SP with such reverence is really fucking weird and off putting. Blaming myself because I should be able to look past it but I can't, at least for the time being.

[Looking4fun]

Good Lengthy detailed review,Sounds like you had a cracking time, got to say it was  fluffy as fuck which probably means you’ve found your replacement for Vicky, just be careful you don’t get taken for a ride again AnthG

[smiths]

Good Lengthy detailed review,Sounds like you had a cracking time, got to say it was  fluffy as fuck which probably means you’ve found your replacement for Vicky, just be careful you don’t get taken for a ride again AnthG

Great advice I hope for his sake Anth takes it, I don't want to be reading a repeat of the previous pile of shit on here.

[datwabbit]

Good Lengthy detailed review,Sounds like you had a cracking time, got to say it was  fluffy as fuck which probably means you’ve found your replacement for Vicky, just be careful you don’t get taken for a ride again AnthG

This will only happen if she puts up her rates or any negative messages about him are exposed.

[AnthG]

This will only happen if she puts up her rates or any negative messages about him are exposed.

And so it should do. If someone acts a cunt towards me. I am not going to shy away from posting about it. Unlike the suggestions, people seem to want to make saying I would. You better believe if someone fucks me over. I am posting about it.

[vw]

And so it should do. If someone acts a cunt towards me. I am not going to shy away from posting about it. Unlike the suggestions, people seem to want to make saying I would. You better believe if someone fucks me over. I am posting about it.

I hope it will not 8 months later, like the 8 months your worst punt ever took to get mentioned in a  review?   

I am going to leave a review for the outcall booking I had last week with this girl at a Newcastle Hotel. I actually had a booking at Christmas with her that was by far and away the worst ever booking I have ever had. But I crazily (and probably certifiably on my part) decided to give her another chance due to my really disliking the booking with Kayla (Reviewed above).

[Belgarion]

Just read this guff and the only thing going through my mind is "poor lass".

Hope she has good security.

[AnthG]

Just read this guff and the only thing going through my mind is "poor lass".

Hope she has good security.

Well unlike you, and the girls posting in these WhatsApp groups that has got everyone up in arms right now. I don't happen to think UKP members are security risks.

But its nice you show your true colours now too.

[AnthG]

Now watch you coming back with some clever arsey comment as like was shown only yesterday. You are physically incapable of letting anyone else have any last word. Which is you to a tee.

Complete pathetic really

External Link/Members Only

[simone_raven]

Jeeezus this is a bit boring FFS

[AnthG]

Jeeezus this is a bit boring FFS

I am getting absolutely fucking sick of TheOne and Belgarion quite frankly. Every single post I made these two come along like a double act trying to shit stir and cause drama. Every post. And they are physically incapable of letting anyone have the last word but them. They must have it and then when you give up and let them have that last word its constant digs over and over just to get the next wave of it starting again.

If you don't like me either ignore me, or report me to admin and try and shit stir to see if you can both get me banned for something you can make up about me like Mia did and TheOne has been trying to do with his snidey posts on here last night. As this fucking shit is getting tiring.