14,165 new reviews in 2016.
Where you say we that doesnt include me. Personally i dont like it when posters use we when they cant know if its true or not, it might be for some but not for others in my view.
I apologise for using the term we you are of course quite correct and I will be more careful about generalisations in the future.
You raise some good points and very well put. I agree with you regarding the implied hygiene issues and the reality of the situation. For me it is about a lack of thought put into the creation of the profile. It is not a porn site and yes I prefer to see porn, uncovered cock and cum the lot. When I watch porn I am not thinking about meeting the stars in real life and fucking them. However when I am reading a WG profile which is basically advertising, then I am assessing even if it it subconsciously the suitability of that WG for me. AW profiles are not porn (Too expensive for that). If she shows covered sex then she won't lose that many potential punters as protection is expected on the whole. By showing BB she many lose potential punters for no real gain.This to me shows a lack of thought of the part of the WG and hence an unprofessional profile.
Are we to assume that profiles are written in the main by the WG herself? You know what they say, to assume will only make an "Ass out of u and me"
Even if it is not written by the prossie herself, it is about her and her business and as such she should take responsibility for how is is presented. If it is not written by her and she is not bothered it is still an unprofessional approach and shows as such.
This should apply if the WG is truly independent. In reality, for many of those who aren't independent or offering a sexual service out of necessity or circumstances that they are in, I suspect that although the profile may appear to be written by them and about them, it is not a given that it is her business much less hers to control to that degree. Look at how many profiles are passed on, obviously written by the same person and cloned through cut and paste.
I hear what you say, if Tesco has bad advertising and enough consumers complain in the interest of commerce they will look to do something to improve it. If a pro$$ies profile is being written by a pimp and that pimp doesn't give a toss, then bringing the pro$$ie into focus for some stick will perhaps not result in a tightening up of the standard of her profile, even if she herself gives a good service to those who meet her. That being said, I do react in much the same way that Vorian does when I see a sloppy profile. There are many other things however that trigger my disinterest more than the quality of the prose.... "that's all I have to say about that"
As far as I'm concerned, all prossies do bareback. Whether it's with punters, partners, or one-nighters.I rubber up and don't worry too much about it.