Author Topic: _Submissive Lauren_ - ANGEL ISLINGTON, EC1R - SUMMER 2018  (Read 5378 times)


41 review(s) for _Submissive Lauren_ (35 positive, 2 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline PatMacGroin

AW Profile Name - _Submissive Lauren_

External Link/Members Only

Previous Profile - External Link/Members Only _Tamara Tease_

(WARNING - LONG REVIEW! - The main points below have been highlighted for those that prefer to skim read)

I added this stunner to my HL after reading her previous UKP reviews. I'm not sure who's review I spotted first, but thanks to all of you that have taken the effort to post.

TBH, she wasn't actually at the top of my "most wanted" hot list, but it seems like I picked the week that most WG's choose to take their holidays. After a lot of radio silence I decided to widen my usual budget range and travel radius.

Much of what I say in this review is probably not going to be new or original, but I've decided to recognise that my reviewing style is overly long and repetive verbal diarrhoea and just accept it for what it is.


COMMS:

Quick and to the point. We must have agreed and confirmed all the relevant details within 10 minutes of my first text to her. I book in advance so sent a double check text on the day, and again her responses were rapid, clear and concise.

VENUE:

A flat on an estate walking distance from Angel tube station. I'm not familliar with Angel beyond a few of the bars along and just off Upper St. A previous review mentioned she's located on an estate, and that was one of the factors that pushed her lower down my list. I imagined walking through a warren of stairs and terraces to reach the flat, passing a group of smirking school kids or a loitering gang. Infact the flat is easily accessed and much more discrete than I was expecting. I didn't even get a good look at the estate, so no idea if it's a rough one or not.

Inside the flat looks like it may have been nicely decorated at some point in the past, but it hasn't been maintained over the years and the wear and tear is obvious in a number of places making the place look a bit grotty. However, the room was big and bright enough to see everything clearly. The bed was solid, with bedding that looked, smelled and felt clean. The bathroom had usable washing facilities, and the towel provided was also clean and fresh. So the basics are adequately provided, but personally I'd prefer a more presentable venue.

Another negative factor in my opinion is that the flat is shared. I didn't get the impression there were any other punters present, but I could tell there was another woman moving around the flat while I was there. Lauren also mentioned her flatmate was in.

APPEARANCE:

Blonde little fuck doll that can look both cute and sexy.

Face - 9/10 - The pictures are acurate and I'd say they must be pretty recent. One previous review said this photo from her gallery is the best likeness...

Hidden Image/Members Only

I think both the photo's of her wearing the black cat suit make her look stern and make her face look quite round. Maybe that is a look she has for those that like a bit of Dom roleplay? I do find that, in general, polish WG's often seem to include photo's in their gallery that make them look harder, or bitchier, than they are in person.

Personally, I'd say these next two photo's from her gallery are more like how she looked to me. Maybe she could tell that is more like what I was looking for, so she was pulling a wide eyed innocent look for my benefit?

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Her complexion looked good, no blemishes that I could notice. She was wearing plenty of make-up, but well applied not a caked on look. I'd say her blonde hair is dyed, and it was cut shorter when I saw her, just touching her shoulders in bob style parting. I'd guess the quoted age of 23 is accurate, definitely no older than 25. Basically, her profile photo's do give a good idea of what to expect. 

Body - 9/10 - She is petite. Much shorter than my 5' 11", so the 5' 3" quoted on her pofile interview could well be right. She also has a very slight frame with slender arms. She looked trim to me, I didn't notice any flabby bits. The pussy was shaved smooth, looked good some labia lips to suck on, but not full on kebab. Smelt good, tasted good.

Tits - 9/10 - Big in the hand and to the eye, especially on her small frame, so D cup is probably right. hard and smooth, with not a huge amount of give, so clearly enhanced. No obvious sign of scarring that I noticed. Nice little nubbin nipples that respond to sucking/licking/being tweaked teasefully. I liked them.

Arse - 8/10 - Nice bum with very gropeable cheeks. Soft and smooth. I wouldn't say she's a PAWG type, for those into that.

Attire - 8/10 - She wore what I had requested for the most part. My request was not totally specific in it's requirements. She looked good in what she was wearing and had clearly made an effort.

Overall - 8.5/10 - She is exactly the blonde baby doll cutie type with big, blue eyes that I'm a total softie for. No EAS, but I won't be suprised if I get calls of fluffy for my description of her facial looks. Plus, she has a body built for fucking.


NATIONALITY:

Polish. Said she's spent a total of two years in the UK but has only been back a couple of months so far this time. Speaks good english and can hold a general chit-chat convrsation well.


SERVICES:

- I paid her advertised rate of 2hrs for a total of £300.
- The following services enjoyed, included in the hourly rate with no mention of extras DFK, OWO, CIM, Facial(covering her eyes with her hands), Reverse Oral, 69, Protected Penetration in Multiple Positions, Toys. I popped twice which is about my limit.

French Kissing Superb, with lots and lots of it. Might not be the "Deep" FK some of you guys look for, because I don't try to see how far I can ram my toungue down her throat. Otherwise, responsive with plenty of toungue.

Massage - Lauren massaged my back with oil (she asked if oil was ok) between rounds. It was very pleasant, but I wasn't paying attention enough to note if it was professional standard. I lost track of time and she asked if we should stop the massage and try round two.

RO and 69 - As noted above she was fresh and tasted good. I spent a fair bit of time going down on her, using fingers on the outside (she didn't tell me not to put my fingers inside, but I realised i had forgotten to trim my nails before the punt so I decided against it). I asked her to play with herself for a bit while I watched, she started with her fingers then used one of her toys. looked hot, but didn't give an indication of any techniques she favours. I possibly didn't spend as long giving her oral as I usually do, she was making appreciative noises but i knew I wasn't hitting the spot. In 69, it was much the same, as she is so much shorter than me I didn't really feel like I was getting in there at the right angle. Although it felt like she was really going to town on me. I could feel er head bobbing up and down at a furious rate with her hair lashing against my thighs. One of those occassions during a 69 where you wish you could see the action from an external perspective while also being in the middle of it.

DT, OWO with CIM - Very enthusiastic, a range of good techniques and takes instruction well. Quickly went into deep throat, taking pretty much the whole length and gagging onit (I'm not particularly big, I'd say I'm about avergae or just over on a good day). Personally, I don't enjoy the sound of someone gagging so told her she didn't have to take it that deep if thats what it made her do. She quickly adjusted what she was doing and turned off the sound effects. She was also good with her hands, from reading reviews it seems alot of guys see that as somehow cheating, but once she got the fella good and sloppy, then popped my balls in her mouth one at a time while working the tip with her hand it felt fantastic! Finally, when I came in her mouth she didn't rush to the bathroom to spit it out. She kept on sucking to take the full load, letting it spill out of her mouth and dribble down my cock when finished she cleaned me up with wet wipes and only then did she go to the bathroom to clean herself up. Throughout all of it (except maybe when she had her face burried in my stoamch during DT) she maintained eye contact with those gorgeous big blue eyes. Good girl! If there was any criticism, I think I prefer a girl with a softer mouth, hers felt quite hard at times.

Protected Penetration - Again, enthusiastic and puts in the effort. She looked great in cowgirl, as well as being energetic with it. We tried lots of other positions too, Lauren was happy to take any direction I suggested, but she wasn't totally passive and uninterested as some girls can be. She picked up on when I wasn't getting comfortable in one position or another and suggested a few that I don't usually attempt. Unusually for my fat, lazy ass I enjoyed missionary the most so we used that 80% of the time. I must have had alot more energy than usual, because I didn't seem to get as knackered out as quickly as I do most of the time. Maybe be because that position gave the best access for lots of kissing. And she maintained eye contact throughout any position where we were facing each other, even using the large mirror in the room to maintain eye contact for positions where that's harder to do. She also has a wonderful habit of being able to get her hand through in almost any position to stroke your balls during penetration too!


ATTITUDE:

Very professional and willing to please. Paid attention to what I was enjoying or not and adjusting what she was doing accordingly. Not particulalrly chatty, except during the massage when she could hold a conversation on the usual small talk. Still managed to be friendly and encouraging with plenty of smiles.

CONCLUSION:

Lauren is exactly the kind of cute blonde that always catches my eye. The sort that I am helpless against in real life and could wrap me round her little finger if she tried. Luckily, she focused on satisfying what I wanted.

She looked stunning. She clearly makes an effort with her hair, make-up and outfits. She delivered all services expected with top quality skills and attitude. In those area's there's not much I can really fault her on at all.

Would I Recommend _Submissive Lauren_? Yes, I would.

Would I Re-visit _Submissive Lauren_? Yes, I would. BUT... I probably wont. There's nothing wrong with the girl or the services she provides. I would only pay £300 for 2hrs again if none of the better value providers were available, and there are others at that price I'd like to meet first. Her venue in Angel is not a convenient location for me, and it's grottier than i would expect for girl of that standard and price.[/b]

P.P.S. I drafted this review shortly after seeing Lauren. Checking out her profile again before posting just now, I noticed she has some new pics in her gallery. The French maids outfit now has me seriously tempted for a return visit. I've got to be strong and try out some of the lower budget options first!

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 17, 2018, 12:41:20 pm by PatMacGroin »

Offline MajorPayne

Nice review, I certainly didn't mind it being long.

I would be interested but she is out of my budget.

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,614
  • Likes: 132
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Thanks for the review. I'd decided after claretandblue's review earlier today that I was going to go see her, but your review supports that.

Offline Fully Sated

PatMacGroin, Thanks for posting that comprehensive review.

Offline Zach77

Great review. Added to HL. Might be the one to tempt me back after a stinker last time out

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,303
  • Likes: 181
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Excellent, full fat review  :thumbsup:   :drinks:

I am very tempted but wouldn't want to start a habit I couldn't maintain fairly regularly.  Christmas soon though.  Fuck it, any reason to celebrate and I might just call dibs.

Offline Harry1993

Yes. Great review. She has been on my HL but I haven't made a booking because I was worried about the location. But now I know it's safe. I am sure I will arrange a visit soon!

Offline tantraman

A stellar review, PatMacG :thumbsup: ... ramping Lauren right up my HL!


Offline Bassman

Hard toys are enough to remove her from my hotlist. What’s with the 80,s style solid Implants!

Good review though OP.

Offline PatMacGroin

Yes. Great review. She has been on my HL but I haven't made a booking because I was worried about the location. But now I know it's safe. I am sure I will arrange a visit soon!

To be absolutely clear, in light of the other review thread about a punter getting mugged visiting a WG on an estate:

- I was there during the day. Might look a whole lot different at night, but I still don't think it would be intimidating.

- The flat was discrete in that I didn't have to walk past a bunch of neighbouring flats to get to the door. In neighbourhoods like that there usually seems to be atleast one neighbour hanging around their open front door watching the world go by while smoking a fag.

- Anyone that knows what goes on in the flat could hang around and observe it from a few spots nearby, if that was their intention. But that is the same for any WG's venue. You can be at the door and in before anyone pays attention to you. You could be seen on the way out. However, if you are worried about being mugged, by that point you should have spent all or most of the cash you were carrying so no longer a target.

- Details provided in some of the other reviews should suggest to you, as they did to me, the best direction to approach from.

Offline thecat250

Great report! thank you for the detailed review. Long write ups are only tedious when they are padded out fluffy waffle, yours is well written and contains all the pertinent information required. :thumbsup:

I seldom punt at the £150/hr range but added to HL!

Offline longtimefan

Great review.  I really want to see her but the estate does put me off.  Never liked going to house parties in these places or cutting through when I lived in North London.

Offline dfg

Great review.  I really want to see her but the estate does put me off.  Never liked going to house parties in these places or cutting through when I lived in North London.

It’s really safe. A few yards from busy public roadside pavement to her door. No cutting through anywhere dodgy. Yes, know I need to write a review...but hope this reassures you in the meantime.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Excellent, full fat review  :thumbsup:   :drinks:

I am very tempted but wouldn't want to start a habit I couldn't maintain fairly regularly.  Christmas soon though.  Fuck it, any reason to celebrate and I might just call dibs.

Treat yourself... good to be self indulgent... :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline sexisjustgreat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 38
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Great review.  I really want to see her but the estate does put me off.  Never liked going to house parties in these places or cutting through when I lived in North London.

It’s really not a problem, get what you mean but it’s so easy to get to her
Banned reason: Slagging off site
Banned by:

Offline PatMacGroin

Just noticed this new photo in Laurens gallery with the caption "New Boobies ;)" :

Hidden Image/Members Only

When I saw her she already had enhanced breasts, I described them then as:

"Big in the hand and to the eye, especially on her small frame, so D cup is probably right. hard and smooth, with not a huge amount of give, so clearly enhanced. No obvious sign of scarring that I noticed. Nice little nubbin nipples that respond to sucking/licking/being tweaked teasefully. I liked them."

The photo looks like they could be new bigger implants, but it could also just be the bra or the way the photo has been posed/taken. I don't mind implants but there seems to be a disappointing tendency to go too far with surgical enhancements, turning natural beauties into grotesque parodies.

Has anyone been to seen her recently and can confirm if she has had them re-done? If so, has she over done it?
« Last Edit: June 08, 2019, 07:46:15 pm by PatMacGroin »

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,614
  • Likes: 132
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Just noticed this new photo in Laurens gallery with the caption "New Boobies ;)" :

I'm sure some on here will be frothing from every orifice about this but, personally, yuk.