Noticed it for the first time on this profile External Link/Members Only , I had never seen that classification before. After reviewing the photos, I wondered if this was some new way of indicating that the pro$$ie might not have started out as a woman? Perhaps I am putting 2 and 2 together and getting 5. I guess that as she offers bareback, nobody here can comment on her gender for sure. This has led me to ask what might be a naive question, is vaginal sex with a "fully converted" female offering bareback equally as dangerous as with an original woman offering the same facility.... just idle curiosity as I believe fabricated vaginas are made from turning over scrotum skin etc, would the inside still be as germ retaining/transmitting? Told you it was a naive question.
Not too bad for 53, especially from the back. Not that I shall be partaking.