Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: What Is It About This Profile That Doesn't Seem Right  (Read 1683 times)

Offline vorian

This profile has been discussed on South West Regional Information. I'm asking the main board for a bigger audience it is not right but I can't nail down exactly why. Fake, PG scam, academic research planted profile, written by a pimp (He is a bright one if it was).

https://www.adultwork.com/2302484 or https://www.adultwork.com/AmyJonesSchoolgirl

To save having to go through everything I will copy the link for the thread where it has been discussed.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=21869.0
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline jackdaw

Several indicators that it may well be a scam:-
Brand new profile, zero feedback.
Nobody in area has admitted to knowing WG...always a worrying sign when WG appears out of "thin air"
Unusually wide range of services, including some kinky ones
Private gallery

Against that...somebody has put more effort into creating profile than is usual for most AW scam profiles, and none of the signs are conclusive.

Own gut feeling? Scam, put together by somebody who knows what they are doing, and may well be going to use this as a template for further scam profiles...won't be surprised if we see more similar profiles in next few weeks.

Offline vorian

That was my thought but just had this posted on the regional thread.

I did send an e-mail yesterday and it was answered promptly. The party venue is a flat in Kingswood with plenty of parking and very discrete.

So now I'm even more confused, if you are going to B&S then I can't imagine a party is the best place to do it.

Glad I'm not the only one to think it is too well written, I must say if I was going to write a fake profile it would look a lot like this. Your template idea does make a lot of sense. However the error on outcalls being cheaper than incalls seems odd as well.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline smiths

That was my thought but just had this posted on the regional thread.

So now I'm even more confused, if you are going to B&S then I can't imagine a party is the best place to do it.

Glad I'm not the only one to think it is too well written, I must say if I was going to write a fake profile it would look a lot like this. Your template idea does make a lot of sense. However the error on outcalls being cheaper than incalls seems odd as well.

Desire Parties now gone i think and hope turned into a Bait and Switch outfit in 2009, they were using the pictures of an Indie i had punted with called Linzi D as partying for them and on their daily rota as doing so, well i know as fact she wasnt because i punted with her at LMP on one of the days she was down as partying at Desire. They were using her pictures without her agreement and continued to do so for well over a year if not a couple of years. They also had a couple of other LMP WGs down as partying for them who werent.

The host wasnt a smart guy, he was just relying on punters turning up and hoping they would punt anyway with whoever was their thinking with their dicks. A pity because in 2008 i partied at Desire myself and they were quite good then. I once had a 4 hour party for £100 with 2 WGs, one being the fabulous Keira Pharrell and for over half that i was the only punter their. Great for me, terrible for the WGs and host. 


Too many pg pics and a movie in a few days - as said bait and switch or pg scam

Offline vorian

Desire Parties now gone i think and hope turned into a Bait and Switch outfit in 2009, they were using the pictures of an Indie i had punted with called Linzi D as partying for them and on their daily rota as doing so, well i know as fact she wasnt because i punted with her at LMP on one of the days she was down as partying at Desire. They were using her pictures without her agreement and continued to do so for well over a year if not a couple of years. They also had a couple of other LMP WGs down as partying for them who werent.

The host wasnt a smart guy, he was just relying on punters turning up and hoping they would punt anyway with whoever was their thinking with their dicks. A pity because in 2008 i partied at Desire myself and they were quite good then. I once had a 4 hour party for £100 with 2 WGs, one being the fabulous Keira Pharrell and for over half that i was the only punter their. Great for me, terrible for the WGs and host.

Thanks, I haven't been to a party yet, (first one this Friday) I kind of assumed that a 121 B&S pisses off one punter who at best will walk out with his money but to piss of a bunch of punters (we all get brave in a group) would be a stupid thing to do.

Smiths you are very knowledgeable with regards to parties. I would love to get your take on this profile and it is so party orientated I just can't see an 18yo prossie writing this. I assume that party hosts are not normally the WG on whose profile the parties are advertised but men/punters/pimps take your pick. This I could see being written by a male host but not an 18yo newbie.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline smiths

Thanks, I haven't been to a party yet, (first one this Friday) I kind of assumed that a 121 B&S pisses off one punter who at best will walk out with his money but to piss of a bunch of punters (we all get brave in a group) would be a stupid thing to do.

Smiths you are very knowledgeable with regards to parties. I would love to get your take on this profile and it is so party orientated I just can't see an 18yo prossie writing this. I assume that party hosts are not normally the WG on whose profile the parties are advertised but men/punters/pimps take your pick. This I could see being written by a male host but not an 18yo newbie.

IMO its highly unlikely though not impossible she is running these parties if they are even occuring herself. If she is she has thought about the pricing quite well and added options for watching. A mature and smart 18 year old WG. I know from parties that it usually takes WGs of that age a while to get used to just working at parties let alone doing that AND running them. If she is doing both she is one organised young WG.

On her enjoys list apart from the obvious Hardsports she also says she enjoys Sybian and Machine Sex, Dogging and Car Meets. Why would she risk doing the latter two and is it likely she really has a Sybian machine. I certainly wouldnt trust her.

Offline vorian

IMO its highly unlikely though not impossible she is running these parties if they are even occuring herself. If she is she has thought about the pricing quite well and added options for watching. A mature and smart 18 year old WG. I know from parties that it usually takes WGs of that age a while to get used to just working at parties let alone doing that AND running them. If she is doing both she is one organised young WG.

On her enjoys list apart from the obvious Hardsports she also says she enjoys Sybian and Machine Sex, Dogging and Car Meets. Why would she risk doing the latter two and is it likely she really has a Sybian machine. I certainly wouldnt trust her.

Agreed on one hand the party aspect is very well written and well thought out, but basic mistakes on the escort part like the enjoys list you mentioned and the outcall cheaper than the incall indicate that part of the profile has been thought about less. Which again leads me to think at best a party organiser has written this profile.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Pauluk1

Agreed on one hand the party aspect is very well written and well thought out, but basic mistakes on the escort part like the enjoys list you mentioned and the outcall cheaper than the incall indicate that part of the profile has been thought about less. Which again leads me to think at best a party organiser has written this profile.

I've seen profiles where outcalls are cheaper than incalls.  Maybe the prossie uses hotels for incalls, so an outcall would save that expense.

Offline vorian

I've seen profiles where outcalls are cheaper than incalls.  Maybe the prossie uses hotels for incalls, so an outcall would save that expense.

Very good point didn't think of that, may well be the reason. I have never come across that before but it makes sense.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Daffodil

I've seen profiles where outcalls are cheaper than incalls.  Maybe the prossie uses hotels for incalls, so an outcall would save that expense.

Indeed. An incall environment will often cost a prossie more than the travel expense. Certainly outcall only prossies shouldn't be charging more than their incall peers.

Offline CoolTiger

Very good point didn't think of that, may well be the reason. I have never come across that before but it makes sense.

I know of a few ladies that operate "incall" from a Hotel only, hence hike up their rates for such incalls, to cover their costs. Some of them only went ahead and booked the hotel after getting a confirmed booking, in case they ended up with the cost of the hotel when no bookings came in.

Offline SirPhilipXX

Indeed. An incall environment will often cost a prossie more than the travel expense. Certainly outcall only prossies shouldn't be charging more than their incall peers.
Outcall rates are usually £20 more than incall rates to cover taxi charges. If they are higher, it normally means the WG much prefers incalls.



Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)