EnglishRebecca121

[RustyShackleford]

External Link/Members Only

[Link added by admin]

Visited December 2013. Easy to find venue from nearest tube. Reverse booked for 2 hours for £200, stayed for 1 hour (see below)

POSTIVE
 - Cute face;
 - Nice and intelligent voice.

NEGATIVE
 - thin body - doesn't fill her (small) bra :-(
 - thrashes around with unnatural sounds during oral sex;
 - talked incecently about herself and her situation;
 - it took multiple bookings overe many months to eventually see her, and that one was curtailed from 2 hours to 1.

Could have been an excellent punt, but Rebecca kept talking about herself and her problems. Really not my concern or interest and infact a complete turn off. She appears not to have any management of her bookings as she didn't know how long I was staying for, and had a diner outing planned with friends for mid-way through.

Never again. Far better to be found elsewhere.

[James999]

So you paid for Two hours and decided to leave after one hour, didn't she offer a refund for the unused hour ?

[rudolph hucker]

Is this mad bitch still touting for business? Given the various feedback on previous posts and the fact she tried (in vain) to forcibly ingratiate herself to the members on UKP, she would be lower than the very bottom on my list of things to do in 2014.

[cjkanye02]

Shame as I am frequently tempted by her profile!

[Nimrod]

I wonder if some of these girls think we are all blind? I mean a moron can look at the photos and see she is not a "C" cup bra size. (That said, why go and see her and then complain about her lack of boobs when it was obvious this was the case before you even went?) Equally, there are endless girls who say they are a size 8 then have a photo of a girl who is clearly size 12-14. At least if you're going to lie, don't show show photographic evidence that contradicts yourself -- and an English girl like Rebecca doesn't even have "I don't understand the language" as an excuse to hide behind. More sloppy, third-rate shit compounded by a customer who if he had looked closely at the profile might have known better in the first place. Harsh, but my view.

[RustyShackleford]

So you paid for Two hours and decided to leave after one hour, didn't she offer a refund for the unused hour ?

Nope, that worked out well - only paid for the one hour (at half the RB price), so no big loss there.

[8a8ylon]

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Out of interest what problems did she go on about?

[RustyShackleford]

I wonder if some of these girls think we are all blind? I mean a moron can look at the photos and see she is not a "C" cup bra size. (That said, why go and see her and then complain about her lack of boobs when it was obvious this was the case before you even went?) Equally, there are endless girls who say they are a size 8 then have a photo of a girl who is clearly size 12-14. At least if you're going to lie, don't show show photographic evidence that contradicts yourself -- and an English girl like Rebecca doesn't even have "I don't understand the language" as an excuse to hide behind. More sloppy, third-rate shit compounded by a customer who if he had looked closely at the profile might have known better in the first place. Harsh, but my view.

I appreciate your candidness Nimrod.

I like all sizes of breast, but I like a bra (of whatever size) to be filled. It wasn't the size of Rebecca's breasts (nice as they were) - it was the size of the bra - to see potentially sexy underwear being part filled is a crime. I love to feel and squeeze breasts in a bra - but the bra has to fit the goods 

[RustyShackleford]

And the repy from the lovey Rebecca is....

Yep i do im nt to thin, and I do deal wih every booking myself. If u wernt hapy you shud have said before sex and left.

[RustyShackleford]

Yes, I did fuck off, right then. We did not have sex as I remember right then, and hand some lovely hand-hand from some locals :-)

[Daffodil]

And the repy from the lovey Rebecca is....

Yep i do im nt to thin, and I do deal wih every booking myself. If u wernt hapy you shud have said before sex and left.

Don't think it's really on to air private messages, particularly if they're not offensive.

[vorian]

And the repy from the lovey Rebecca is....

Yep i do im nt to thin, and I do deal wih every booking myself. If u wernt hapy you shud have said before sex and left.

And that's what the "High Class Companion" said. Yeah looks good on profile but that's an up her own arse give away for me.

 Has anyone every met a "High Class Companion" or an "Elite Courtesan" for real. For me the best WG's are never up their own arse enough, to describe themselves in such a ridiculous way. Understatement and honesty that's real class.

[Nimrod]

And that's what the "High Class Companion" said. Yeah looks good on profile but that's an up her own arse give away for me.

 Has anyone every met a "High Class Companion" or an "Elite Courtesan" for real. For me the best WG's are never up their own arse enough, to describe themselves in such a ridiculous way. Understatement and honesty that's real class.

Yes, but what did she say?

"Yep i do im nt to thin, and I do deal wih every booking myself. If u wernt hapy you shud have said before sex and left."

At least EE girls can speak English.

[finn5555]

She is as thick as fuck but I agree with daffodil private messages are not for here 

If you wish to share them do so by PM 

[Daffodil]

Visited December 2013. Easy to find venue from nearest tube. Reverse booked for 2 hours for £200, stayed for 1 hour (see below)

POSTIVE
 - Cute face;
 - Nice and intelligent voice.

NEGATIVE
 - thin body - doesn't fill her (small) bra :-(
 - thrashes around with unnatural sounds during oral sex;
 - talked incecently about herself and her situation;
 - it took multiple bookings overe many months to eventually see her, and that one was curtailed from 2 hours to 1.

Could have been an excellent punt, but Rebecca kept talking about herself and her problems. Really not my concern or interest and infact a complete turn off. She appears not to have any management of her bookings as she didn't know how long I was staying for, and had a diner outing planned with friends for mid-way through.

Never again. Far better to be found elsewhere.

Just out of interest, if you felt strongly enough to leave her a negative here then why did you leave her a glowing positive on adultwork?

'Easy to find and clean place. Very welcoming, friendly, and sexy Rebecca at the door. Very enjoyable, will be back :-)'

You say 'never again' here, but 'will be back' on adultwork 

[herbie007]

I saw Rebecca had a good time with her, she gives a great DTBJ.

Can't understand why the positive on AW and a negative on here. 

[password02]

Have to agree with herbie her =1 - I think i saw her after his recommendation last Junr/July 2013 - good DTBJ and CIm with swollow without asking - also decent looks and good alround body. Good english WG with a decent service in central London.

[James999]

Busty appears to have gone very quiet 

[James999]

Well Busty's been back on line and not responded to the points raised here, very odd 

[Bangers and Gash]

We all know our Bex is a bit flaky, but the OP comes out of this with little or no credibility. 

[AnthG]

Just out of interest, if you felt strongly enough to leave her a negative here then why did you leave her a glowing positive on adultwork?

'Easy to find and clean place. Very welcoming, friendly, and sexy Rebecca at the door. Very enjoyable, will be back :-)'

You say 'never again' here, but 'will be back' on adultwork 

Agree with Daffodil. If someone leaves a positive on AW and then leaves a negative here where the girl in question cannot reply as she has been banned I think is pretty poor show.

I know this is probably a weird thing to suggest, and hope its ok for me to do so, but when its been shown a positive review has been a self review it gets changed by Adam/Nik to negative. Given that this review has been shown to be either totally malicious on one note, or just way below par at the very least is there anyway this could be switched from negative to positive to be fair to Rebecca?

[James999]

I know this is probably a weird thing to suggest,

Anth, hold your horses, you have a habit of suggesting "solutions" without giving the person an opportunity to respond to the questions raised, no need to be so hasty, lets wait and hear what he says,

You may have noticed it's not something that will be "let drop" but FFS lets not start offering up solutions till we have the facts.

[OldAdmin]

This is not the first time I've seen members post a negative on UKP but have already left glowing positive feedback on AdultWork.
The likely reason is that they don't have the same fear on this site as they do with AdultWork, in that they risk receiving negative feedback in retaliation which ruins their own feedback history. But UKP there is no such fear so they are free to express their honest opinion. But that doesn't mean they should leave non-genuine positive on AdultWork and affect other punters.

[smiths]

Agree with Daffodil. If someone leaves a positive on AW and then leaves a negative here where the girl in question cannot reply as she has been banned I think is pretty poor show.

I know this is probably a weird thing to suggest, and hope its ok for me to do so, but when its been shown a positive review has been a self review it gets changed by Adam/Nik to negative. Given that this review has been shown to be either totally malicious on one note, or just way below par at the very least is there anyway this could be switched from negative to positive to be fair to Rebecca?

If this review is adjudged to be malicious then the OP cant be trusted of course but i dont see how it can be made a positive, to my logic it could get deleted though, although thats of course up to Adam.

Weird that the OP hasnt replied despite being online according to James, very strange indeed.

[vorian]

If this review is adjudged to be malicious then the OP cant be trusted of course but i dont see how it can be made a positive, to my logic it could get deleted though, although thats of course up to Adam.

Weird that the OP hasnt replied despite being online according to James, very strange indeed.

Agreed

[Daffodil]

This is not the first time I've seen members post a negative on UKP but have already left glowing positive feedback on AdultWork.
The likely reason is that they don't have the same fear on this site as they do with AdultWork, in that they risk receiving negative feedback in retaliation which ruins their own feedback history. But UKP there is no such fear so they are free to express their honest opinion. But that doesn't mean they should leave non-genuine positive on AdultWork and affect other punters.

Good post.

I have recently chosen to not leave a prossie feedback on AW (despite her trying to force me to) simply because I don't want her to retaliate maliciously. What I would never do us leave her positive on AW at the expense of other punters. I have negged her here.

[mattylondon]

Good post.

I have recently chosen to not leave a prossie feedback on AW (despite her trying to force me to) simply because I don't want her to retaliate maliciously. What I would never do us leave her positive on AW at the expense of other punters. I have negged her here.

I agree with Adam's reasoning and like you, believe that the public disclosure of PM chats is out of order. I do however, question the OPs motive for disclosing such info?

The only way one could be totally honest on AW and avoid a spiteful negative in return, is to disable the account afterwards for one month. And who would do that, without employing multiple accounts?

Rebecca had a reputation for telling giant porkie pies on this forum and it's right to take somebody to task over that. However, it's also fair to point out that she isn't here to defend herself with this review. A bit overpriced for me, considering the multitude of options in London but by all accounts she is a decent SP and is pretty enough, in my opinion.  Perhaps better to judge the girl on her service and general attitude towards punters, rather than test her memory about hospital appointments! 

[James999]

I agree with Adam's reasoning

Hmm, that's a bit fluffy 

Welcome back 

[whiterussian]

what a surprise, good to see you back Matty! 

[FootieMadJonny]

Why is this not linked to her other reviews?

[OldAdmin]

Why is this not linked to her other reviews?

Because the review is missing a link to her AW profile, have fixed now.

[mh]

Why is this not linked to her other reviews?

Because it took place in South East, not South West? 

[mh]

Because the review is missing a link to her AW profile, have fixed now.

Ah!

[nigel4498]

Why is this not linked to her other reviews?

Curious as to why you would bump a post made over two years ago?

[vw]

Curious as to why you would bump a post made over two years ago?

Maybe Because the review is missing a link and FootieMad is OCD and likes order !

Fantastic that punters care enough to investigate these oversights !

[EnglishRebecca121]

why search for a review on me thats so old? Im getting a bit sick of the trolling now

[mh]

why search for a review on me thats so old? Im getting a bit sick of the trolling now

You really didn't need to respond. Smacks of trying to get banned with such deep indignation over a trivial question. Would be a shame to see you go but you're probably testing Admin's patience!

It just makes absolute sense for a review of a particular WG to be linked to her others.

[FootieMadJonny]

I wasn't trolling at all and didn't intentionally search for it either. I found it and didn't understand why it's not linked to her other reviews.

[FootieMadJonny]

why search for a review on me thats so old? Im getting a bit sick of the trolling now

As I said, it wasn't linked when it should of been. That's not trolling.

[mh]

As I said, it wasn't linked when it should of been. That's not trolling.

I've only just noticed it was a Negative review! That would explain being upset to now find it linked to the others. 

[Sonny Crockett]

External Link/Members Only

[Link added by admin]

Visited December 2013. Easy to find venue from nearest tube. Reverse booked for 2 hours for £200, stayed for 1 hour (see below)

POSTIVE
 - Cute face;
 - Nice and intelligent voice.

NEGATIVE
 - thin body - doesn't fill her (small) bra :-(
 - thrashes around with unnatural sounds during oral sex;
 - talked incecently about herself and her situation;
 - it took multiple bookings overe many months to eventually see her, and that one was curtailed from 2 hours to 1.

Could have been an excellent punt, but Rebecca kept talking about herself and her problems. Really not my concern or interest and infact a complete turn off. She appears not to have any management of her bookings as she didn't know how long I was staying for, and had a diner outing planned with friends for mid-way through.

Never again. Far better to be found elsewhere.

I know this is an old review but sorry to hear about your experience. Nothing worse than a WG who doesn't care about what the punter wants or how long he wants to stay for.