Author Topic: Frankie from Welsh Bunnies escorts - Cardiff (bait and switch)  (Read 2938 times)


2 review(s) for LouissaLush (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline buddywilson

Comms: I’d tried to reach Louissa Lush via AdultWork but when she didn’t respond after three days I decided to try to book her via Welsh Bunnies instead. At the time they were using the same photos that appear on Louissa’s AW profile:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Savvy responded quickly to assure me she would try to reach Frankie. After a couple of hours I txted her again and she confirmed the booking and gave me directions to the location.
Location: an apartment in the Bay. I went by Uber so can’t comment on ease of getting there. There was no lift in the building, but it didn’t seem particularly dodgy or unsafe.
Looks: and this is where things took a turn for the worse. The girl I met was Welsh and she had a lovely accent and a reasonably pretty face, but she clearly wasn’t Louissa Lush. She was not 5’11” and didn’t have those big DD boobs I’d been dreaming of, or the advertised tan. Her red hair was a wig and her tummy (I feel bad for saying this cos my own tummy is no oil painting) was a bit of a mess, lots of fat and possibly the results of a pregnancy or two. She was not the girl in the new photos on the Welsh Bunnies site:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Services: I paid £150 for an hour, which was to include DFK, OWO, and CIM to finish. She was a nice girl-next-door but her heart wasn’t really in it and I decided to get off and get going quick smart. I didn’t bother with the kissing but played with her a bit (and regretted that, my fingers stunk for days!) before moving on to OWO, a bit of fucking, and more OWO before CIM finish in front of the mirror.
I was back on the street within about 35 minutes, including two quick showers. 

Overall: I only have myself to blame. I knew the likelihood of bait and switch with Savvie’s agency and I took the risk anyway. It was a few minutes before I was 100% sure she wasn’t Louissa and by that time I’d handed over the cash and the little head had taken over from the more sensible big head and I was committed to going ahead with the booking.
And that’s the reason this review is Neutral rather than Negative – I chose to stay and so accept the blame for my poor judgement.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
More bait as switch from the lowlife pimp Savvy.   :bomb: :bomb:

Since when was bait and switch a neutral.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Your self blaming is pathetic get a grip, it was this lowlife cunts fault for ripping you off.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2018, 11:59:40 am by vw »

Offline Mil 34

Definitely a negative. I would have walked out

np500

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
stinky fingers for days  :vomit: negative in its self, wig ! :unknown:  belly :thumbsdown:  B & S  :dash: out in 35 mins including 2 showers   :manhater: get it changed to a negative while you can, refund in my book ,  savvy, sort your shit out, or is it a case of not realy giving a toss ? 


Offline clevertrevor

I used this agency quite a few times in the past and yes I've reviewed under a different name which I had to change due to privacy issues.   Mostly had good times but would never use again,.  There's girls still advertised on there that left ages ago, hence the bait n switch tactics no doubt

Offline Grumpy Pumpy

Sorry to hear this Buddy. This agency deserves the very widest of berths   :thumbsdown:

Offline Steelworker

I punted the owner, Savvy and had a very good time. Never used the agency and won’t either. I’d much prefer an honest, ‘we can’t get this girl, would you like to see xyz who looks like this?’. Providing someone else without warning smacks of wanting a quick buck rather than a reputation for service.

Buddy, sorry you had this. At least with your other punt you knew you were getting a big horny woman who delivered.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2018, 08:51:03 pm by Steelworker »

Offline buddywilson

External Link/Members Only
Is it correct to index this as Louissa Lush? My review is specifically about how I saw someone else and not Louissa. Or am I being naive assuming that she wasn't part of the b&s? :)

SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Is it correct to index this as Louissa Lush? My review is specifically about how I saw someone else and not Louissa. Or am I being naive assuming that she wasn't part of the b&s? :)

If they were using the same pictures on the AW profile than you would have more than likely been B&S’d which ever way you booked.

This agency is an absolute joke, very rare you see anything good said about them. And the times I have come across someone who talks well about them they have been cuntstruck.

They have a couple of good looking girls on there but I won’t be trying them again as you never know what you’ll get.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Is it correct to index this as Louissa Lush? My review is specifically about how I saw someone else and not Louissa. Or am I being naive assuming that she wasn't part of the b&s? :)

Both are scum ad you are a it sad  :crazy: for putting a neutral for this, no offence.   

Offline MRCB8888

I saw Frankie when I was in Cardiff back in March.
She seemed OK to me.

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,623
  • Likes: 530
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
I saw Frankie when I was in Cardiff back in March.
She seemed OK to me.

What is the point of reopening an eleven month old thread? Just makes you look like a tout attempting damage limitation. Is your name Savvy?

If you really saw her in March, then post your own review, don't try negating someone else's - unless you want a "white knight" label, and they tend not to be here for long

Offline iverthickone

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,816
  • Likes: 21
  •  
  • Reviews: 79
I saw Frankie when I was in Cardiff back in March.
She seemed OK to me.

Hi Savvy,

Agency a bit dead is it?

Offline buddywilson

Funny to see this thread pop back up nearly a year later!
I eventually got a reply from Louissa Lush via AW, advising that she was the same girl I'd seen.
So I guess I wasn't baited and switched after all.
I stand by my comments re her hygiene and misleading photos though.

Offline Proton

 There is something repeatedly odd about "WB" I have booked three girls over the last few years. One who I really had a good time and saw twice before she left for university, the other two were definitely the correct girls, but totally wrong in their attitude & application as an escort especially at £170 ph.   :scare:
 I did a review on SKYLAR at the beginning of 2019, also I phoned the agency "I will not be using their services anymore & my reasons why" the operator didn't seem to be phased at all   :mad: