Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: x-amber-x - Amber (ex SS) Manchester  (Read 2320 times)


48 review(s) for x-amber-x (45 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by FCB]

Offline CoreyTrevor

Link: Link to this Profile Page using External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only - Get QR Code

Intro: There's previously been a lot of Hype about this girl from her ex-Sandys days and now indie (I think mainly because of the huge tits), for some reason (I honestly don't know why!) I've always been sceptical about sseing her (maybe the price), but she's remained in my HL and a few recent reviews re-ignited my curiosity. Added to that, her location (before planned roadworks, mentioned in a thread on the NW board) and availability suits me down to the ground, so I thought "why not" and I'm glad I did.

Date: Early June 2018
Price: £160.00 for 1 hour - incall - no extras.
Location: Good new(ish) apartment block in M5 (Manchester/Salford) just off Regent Road, easy free parking at the nearby Casino or Sainsburys within spitting distance. Easy and discrete access and apartment and bathroom absolutely spotless!

Comms: Great, nice and slick and no messing when I arrived. Started off with AW emails, responded to in decent time, then to text for confirmation, address, arrival etc. Can't fault her on this.

Looks: Stunning facially IMHO. She carries a little bit of weight (not quite gym toned) but still in VERY good shape (profile and pics VERY accurate, including age, I would say) and MASSIVE tits, false but look and feel great, especially when slapping your thighs during fierce DT OWO  :D Overall I think she's bloody gorgeous! I'm not usually one for dropping-in lookalikes, but in this case I would say she looks a little bit like Marnie Simpson (reality TV "star"). Also immaculately clean, well made up and well groomed. Top quality and exactly what you would be expecting for the given price point.

Attitude: Excellent. Really nice girl, easy to get on with, very eager to please and very enthusiastic and convincing with everything that took place. Could not fault her attitude one bit!

Services: GFE service including DFK, OWO (with DT), RO and sex in all the usual positions, nothing declined, good alround service. It's mentioned in her profile that she doesn't cater for the PSE service, but the GFE service she delivers is spot on in my book.

Action: Entered the apartment to be confronted by a stunning face, long jet black hair, a big naughty smile and a whopping pair of tits bursting out of some classy lingerie. Quick kiss, paperwork filed and off to the bathroom, closed the door behind me and thought yes, I've made a good choice, I knew I was going to enjoy this. Showered then onto the bed for brief chat and then DFK and groping. The DFK was good and plenty of it and more provided when prompted. It was open-mouthed and plenty of tongue involved, not quite "snog-your-face-off" material but still very good. Final garments removed and on to OWO. Now the OWO was the highlight and probably worth the £160 alone. The best blowjob I've ever encountered, I almost felt abused, in a good way. I can only describe it as a hands-free, tooth-free, slobbering, gagging, deep-throating jack hammer! And plenty of it, it was relentless and I'm not sure how I didn't blow (many thoughts of Maggie Thatcher on a cold day had to be conjured), it was pretty intense! Followed by sex in CG and doggy to finish. A bit of RO in between 2 pops in the hour (got the full hour with no rushing or clock watching). One additional thing to note is that she cut short the RO when I would have been happier to continue, then I realised it was to ensure I got a second pop, so I'll actually give credit for that. Many other SPs would happily let you soak up the time doing this and not allow for the second pop, so that for me is further evidence of a good attitude and eagerness to please.

Conclusion: I would say this punt/WG falls within NigelF's "Holy Trinity" of punting category (looks, service & attitude all spot on for me). Fair enough, some will say for £160 she should do this, that and the other extra, but I'm into really good looking girls and a good GFE service, I'm shallow when I'm paying for it and I make no apologies!

Recommend? YES without hesitation. High end price, but worth it IMO, a quality experience.

Re-visit? Absolutely YES, already planning and saving the hard-earned!

CT
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline JammyD

You’ve sold it to me!  :thumbsup: great review

Offline CoreyTrevor

You’ve sold it to me!  :thumbsup: great review

Thanks JD  :hi: glad to be of service, hope you enjoy if you book in!
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline McMuffin1

Cheers fella. I have find memories of Amber's oral - can relate to the violated feeling. You have to catch your breath initially don't you!

One question though please, how tanned is she at the moment?

Online smit1234

Deep throating jack-hammer!!! Wow.....i can picture it now

Offline CoreyTrevor

Cheers fella. I have find memories of Amber's oral - can relate to the violated feeling. You have to catch your breath initially don't you!

Yes you do! I’d obviously read reviews referring to it, but still wasn’t quite expecting the ferocity  :D
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline CoreyTrevor


One question though please, how tanned is she at the moment?
[/quote]

Well that’s the funny thing, I was expecting her to be very tanned or even mixed race looking. It is mentioned on her profile that she’s mixed ethnicity, that she’s 100% British, but with “a bit of something in there,” but I didn’t detect that at all. Certainly not heavily tanned, just looked like a standard English Caucasian girl, complexion wise. The only thing that stood out to me was dark features and jet black hair, maybe that’s it?  :unknown:
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline wild thing

Given that her profile says mixed ethnicity, I don't think I'm compromising her privacy by saying that she's told me in the past that she has ancestry from the Middle East.

A very beautiful young woman, as stated above, going on my recollection from her days at Sandy's.

Offline wild thing

She also told me that she's had several younger clients who have blown their load as soon as she took her bra off and before she'd even touched them :). May sound like bs but with her I can believe it!

Online Vanbarn

I can agree amber is a top punt
Remember her well from various parlour and booked at her new apartment a few months back. Defo worth the money

Offline freeze44

I can agree amber is a top punt
Remember her well from various parlour and booked at her new apartment a few months back. Defo worth the money

Who cares what you think?? Reckon you get off on coming on here, giving opinions without reviewing or contributing  and baiting.Your opinion carries no credibility  :thumbsdown:

Offline McMuffin1

One question though please, how tanned is she at the moment?


Well that’s the funny thing, I was expecting her to be very tanned or even mixed race looking. It is mentioned on her profile that she’s mixed ethnicity, that she’s 100% British, but with “a bit of something in there,” but I didn’t detect that at all. Certainly not heavily tanned, just looked like a standard English Caucasian girl, complexion wise. The only thing that stood out to me was dark features and jet black hair, maybe that’s it?  :unknown:

Nah, she normally is pretty tanned too, and says as much on her description but I think she's just laying off it a bit at the moment. She wears a tan so bloody well so I'm just waiting until she's a warmer shade again!

I can believe it about guys blowing the load when those bad boys come out. I don't like fake boobs as a rule - Amber is my one exception as they are exceptional.

Online Vanbarn

Who cares what you think?? Reckon you get off on coming on here, giving opinions without reviewing or contributing  and baiting.Your opinion carries no credibility  :thumbsdown:

What the fuck up with you. I was simply agreeing with the guts review. Bellend

Offline freeze44

What the fuck up with you. I was simply agreeing with the guts review. Bellend

As said you add nothing so why do you think you commenting is of any interest?

The review is helpful but you 'commenting' detracts from it  :hi:

Offline Moby Dick

Your insults are not welcome.
I agree with Mr Freeze. A review would be more appropriate.
What the fuck up with you. I was simply agreeing with the guts review. Bellend

Offline CoreyTrevor

As said you add nothing so why do you think you commenting is of any interest?

The review is helpful but you 'commenting' detracts from it  :hi:

Indeed, whilst I appreciate you trying to back up my review and add further confirmation, it would be more helpful if you posted some reviews of the WGs you have seen. That way you would be treated with more credibility. Just a piece of friendly advice  :hi:
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline CoreyTrevor

Your insults are not welcome.
I agree with Mr Freeze. A review would be more appropriate.

Another piece of friendly advice, if you go hurling insults at a seasoned reviewer, when you have no reviews to your name yet, it’s probably not going to be well received. Although again, I do appreciate your original intentions.
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline lewisjones23

Think you are quoting the wrong people ....

Offline CoreyTrevor

Think you are quoting the wrong people ....

Ah yes, well pointed out, I’ve buggered that up! :dash: thanks for pointing that out LJ. I was supposed to be adding to their quotes rather than responding to them!
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline CoreyTrevor

I should’ve been quoting vanbarn himself, I’m sure the points are taken in the correct context though :unknown:
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline freeze44

I should’ve been quoting vanbarn himself, I’m sure the points are taken in the correct context though :unknown:

 :thumbsup: yeah got the context.

Thanks for the review...perked up my interest in this wg! Cheers.

Offline CoreyTrevor

:thumbsup: yeah got the context.

Thanks for the review...perked up my interest in this wg! Cheers.

No problem, glad to be of assistance!  :hi:
Banned reason: Rule 5 - Creating multiple identities will result in the banning of all accounts
Banned by: Iloveoral

Online Vanbarn

Without being funny I was supporting the original positive reviews
I have seen lady many times over the last probably 6 years and I've not reviewed due to the fact once I've seen a girl my first instinct is not to describe it. Or without double checking I mate have reviewed on other site.
Either way I'm not sure how my opinion becomes instantly irrelevant??

Offline lewisjones23

Without being funny I was supporting the original positive reviews
I have seen lady many times over the last probably 6 years and I've not reviewed due to the fact once I've seen a girl my first instinct is not to describe it. Or without double checking I mate have reviewed on other site.
Either way I'm not sure how my opinion becomes instantly irrelevant??

What do you mean your first instinct is not to describe it?

Why?