Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Ever done bareback?  (Read 10213 times)

Offline vorian

I would suggest that all pro$$ies bareback, even if only with their partner. Who knows the health of that partner. So carefully avoiding those pro$$ies who say they offer bareback is no guarantee that with your condom on you are not having sex with someone who barebacks. If sex with a condom is low risk enough for you to take a chance at punting then to a great extent aren't other considerations moot?

Agreed 100% wearing a condom reduces the chance but there are no guarantees.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline CBPaul

You are quite right but one should never only use single pieces of information when assessing the quality or suitability of a prossie but look at many factors before making a choice. No BB is just one indicator.

According to a profile, if bareback is clearly on offer then I choose not to pursue a booking with that WG any further. If it is not an option then I will consider the WG further.


Offline CBPaul

I would suggest that all pro$$ies bareback, even if only with their partner. Who knows the health of that partner. So carefully avoiding those pro$$ies who say they offer bareback is no guarantee that with your condom on you are not having sex with someone who barebacks. If sex with a condom is low risk enough for you to take a chance at punting then to a great extent aren't other considerations moot?

Of course, the vast majority of us have unprotected sex at some point. It is all about reducing risk.

What other considerations are you referring to as being debatable ?

Offline Gordo987

A few years ago I had a condom split during a punt, and apart from the enhanced sensation, I didn't really notice until I had cum. I didn't catch anything. I remember at around the same time, I saw the same girl three times in the same month (very unusual for me) and on the third time she told me I could do her bareback next time "because you are a regular now". I was tempted because she was just my type, but I didn't see her again.
Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

Offline hollysbeenabadgirl

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 340
A certificate is of course out of date as soon as the tests are done, you have no idea what a WG might be getting up to from when she had the tests to when you punted with her so i wouldnt rely on them.



Certificate? Unless you need it for IVF, travel or work purposes they are not issued and even then there is a fee.

Not only is it out of date immediately, but the results are an indication of what your health was at 3 weeks to 3 months before in many cases ie HIV.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2014, 01:59:23 PM by hollysbeenabadgirl »

Offline smiths



Certificate? Unless you need it for IVF, travel or work purposes they are not issued and even then there is a fee.

Not only is it out of date immediately, but the results are an indication of what your health was at 3 weeks to 3 months before in many cases ie HIV.

I am aware of that, i didnt feel the need to post anymore than i did as i got my point across as i wanted to.

Offline hollysbeenabadgirl

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 340
I am aware of that, i didnt feel the need to post anymore than i did as i got my point across as i wanted to.

I presume you were from other things you have posted if I recall correctly. It was more for others benefit :)

Of course, the vast majority of us have unprotected sex at some point. It is all about reducing risk.

What other considerations are you referring to as being debatable ?
Not that other considerations are debatable or not, just that if someone has sex with a condom with some pro$$ie who offers bareback, he knows he is having sex with a pro$$ie who offers a bareback service, he might therefore take extra care, not kiss or have oral sex or touch anything uncovered (or choose not to have sex). If he is having sex with a condom with some pro$$ie who doesn't offer a bareback service why should he not be as cautious? If she says she loves him and he is the best sexmiester ever, does he believe that too? A pro$$ie will say she offers a bareback service to oil the wheels of commerce for a certain type of punter and she will say she doesn't to do the same with some others. Pro$$ies are past masters at telling you what you want to hear, what you choose to believe only you can determine. We all have to take individual responsibility for our decisions and actions. One thing is sure a punter will not be the first to do that to a pro$$ie.....whatever that is and most times whatever you do to/with her will have been done to her as recently as a few minutes prior. Punters must realise that they are consuming a bodily based recycled services.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2014, 03:01:36 PM by Rickrabbit »

Offline overhead



Certificate? Unless you need it for IVF, travel or work purposes they are not issued and even then there is a fee.

Not only is it out of date immediately, but the results are an indication of what your health was at 3 weeks to 3 months before in many cases ie HIV.

I'm glad someone else has pointed this out.

There is a lot of bullshit talked about certificates. You see it frequently. Basically they don't exist. Not on the NHS.

To get any kind of STI screening certificate you'd have to go for private tests. Which if it includes HIV would not leave much change out of £500.

Offline overhead

A pro$$ie will say she offers a bareback service to oil the wheels of commerce for a certain type of punter and she will say she doesn't to do the same with some others. Pro$$ies are past masters at telling you what you want to hear, what you choose to believe only you can determine. We all have to take individual responsibility for our decisions and actions.

Exactly.

I know very well this is quite widespread, because I have been offered it more than once myself, and I am not particularly active as a punter, and I only see what I perceive as low risk SW's. It always surprises me and when I've related this to prossies that wouldn't dream of doing it, they are usually quite shocked.

What is it they say - buyer beware!

People who think it's just a minority activity are kidding themselves. It is a minority, but my guess is that around 5% or so of prossies do it at some point if not regularly.

Offline CBPaul

Not that other considerations are debatable or not, just that if someone has sex with a condom with some pro$$ie who offers bareback, he knows he is having sex with a pro$$ie who offers a bareback service, he might therefore take extra care, not kiss or have oral sex or touch anything uncovered (or choose not to have sex). If he is having sex with a condom with some pro$$ie who doesn't offer a bareback service why should he not be as cautious? If she says she loves him and he is the best sexmiester ever, does he believe that too? A pro$$ie will say she offers a bareback service to oil the wheels of commerce for a certain type of punter and she will say she doesn't to do the same with some others. Pro$$ies are past masters at telling you what you want to hear, what you choose to believe only you can determine. We all have to take individual responsibility for our decisions and actions. One thing is sure a punter will not be the first to do that to a pro$$ie.....whatever that is and most times whatever you do to/with her will have been done to her as recently as a few minutes prior. Punters must realise that they are consuming a bodily based recycled services.

OK, I'm with you now, just wondered what the 'moot' considerations were. 

Offline dayton123

Had a booking with Holly Dee back in Jan 2012 :

http://www.xvideos.com/video1715412/holly_dee_-_inked_and_hopping_for_semen

She advertised for people willing / wanting to film.

I went for owo / cim, presuming I would film on my camera.

Nope - it was on her camera.

She basically wanted me to hold her camera, and film as I jizzed on her face. and she sat on me bareback, more than once, to move things along.

Offline punk

Agreed 100% wearing a condom reduces the chance but there are no guarantees.

We'll I have fucked a lot of women an 99% use condoms,100% with wg's and never had sti and get check regularly. Not rocket science.

We'll I have fucked a lot of women an 99% use condoms,100% with wg's and never had sti and get check regularly. Not rocket science.

I  am impressed by those stats of course. I am equally curious about why we never hear of anyone who has had BB sex and caught some disease ....even where the condom has burst or slipped off by accident nobody has reported catching anything. Can this be true...a 100% score for bareback yet infection free encounters?

Offline punk

I  am impressed by those stats of course. I am equally curious about why we never hear of anyone who has had BB sex and caught some disease ....even where the condom has burst or slipped off by accident nobody has reported catching anything. Can this be true...a 100% score for bareback yet infection free encounters?

Of course they get sti you just have see how many idiots are at the clinc waiting for the doctor.no one on here who bb will state that they have caught an sti.

Offline RobertOF

I've done it, although it was many years ago and was worried for about a month, i was eased when my test results come back.

Never again!

Offline Gordo987

I  am impressed by those stats of course. I am equally curious about why we never hear of anyone who has had BB sex and caught some disease ....even where the condom has burst or slipped off by accident nobody has reported catching anything. Can this be true...a 100% score for bareback yet infection free encounters?

I can only speak for myself.
Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin


Offline Gordo987

about what?

 :dash: Er, about this:

I  am impressed by those stats of course. I am equally curious about why we never hear of anyone who has had BB sex and caught some disease ....even where the condom has burst or slipped off by accident nobody has reported catching anything. Can this be true...a 100% score for bareback yet infection free encounters?

As in : "nobody has reported catching anything" Like I said, I can only speak for myself. :unknown:




Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

Offline punk

:dash: Er, about this:

As in : "nobody has reported catching anything" Like I said, I can only speak for myself. :unknown:

I thought you was going to say you had caught some thing I misread your previous post.

Offline Gordo987

I thought you was going to say you had caught some thing I misread your previous post.

Oh, I see, no problemo  :hi:
Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

Offline Jedi Apprentice

Continuing the OP's theme ...2- Girl bareback gang bang.
https://www.adultwork.com/1705019 or https://www.adultwork.com/LDN+Fun

Condoms available if preferred...so who wants to go join the fun?

For the record, I'm passing on this one

Continuing the OP's theme ...2- Girl bareback gang bang.
https://www.adultwork.com/1705019 or https://www.adultwork.com/LDN+Fun

Condoms available if preferred...so who wants to go join the fun?

For the record, I'm passing on this one
So tempting...but, I think I'll pass on that one.

Offline tony allen

i did it a couple of months back when i met a WG i got in wiht really well socially.  one thing led to another and we ended up having sex (unexpectedly) and didnt have condoms.  i real worry afterwards and i felt terrible about it.  not good at all  :scare:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)