Is she really incredibly attractive? Can you not make this sound somewhat subjective considering this is a forum for punters of all walks of life and not some method of coming across as either Mr Charming or just someone appealing to a specific demographic?
As someone who’s been on-and-off visiting HOD for the last decade and can’t be bothered wasting money on another very average looking person who can barely give me an erection, I feel like copy and pasting these comments on every OTT review that expresses no degree of SUBJECTIVITY. I might be incorrect now and again, but as a punt, such a course of action would have a success rating of at least 80%.
For anyone who has their back up about these comments, I’d say the HOD model is tired and dated. They need to introduce variable pricing and lose the frosted facing. The place needs to introduce a greater degree of variability unless it’s completely satisfied with the place in the market that it’s catering to and as such it needs to be more clear (especially by forum reviewers) that it is catering to such a place in the market.
Excellent point about subjectivity, as an experienced ‘service user’ I was underwhelmed by her appearance but very pleased with her services and professionalism/politeness. However, as I said in my neutral review...I found her to have unappealing cellulite deposits all over her body; while this may appeal to some men who like ‘meatier’ women(I don’t mind ‘meatier’ figures, as long it is ‘thick’ or gym toned with at least a semblance of an hourglass silhouette ; like Jailyn at HOD), but when they are clear deposits from a lack of self care or potential metabolism/thyroid issues I rate lower for physical attractiveness.
Had I seen her before I found this great forum
, I would have been very satisfied paying £70 for a WG who provides a good service, even if I had issues with appearance. But given the high quality finds I have had at similar price points with indies and 2 other WG at HOD( Jailyn, Apple), I have higher standards now.
