Author Topic: Rochelle - Feline, Nottingham  (Read 1079 times)

Offline Fly Ryder

External Link/Members Only

Been punting a while but my first review so please be kind!

Agency: Felines - comms via calls and text to arrange a meet with Rochelle for Friday, arranged time easily.

Location: City centre apartment easy to find, but bit of a maze when you get there!

Price: £80 for half an hour

Rochelle: I found her to look nothing like the pictures on the website, big tits yes, but not firm. Face wise she was OK about 5/10. I know pics are airbrushed but I expected some kind of resemblance.

Meet: I confirmed services I wanted, massage and OWO on FS on the phone to the agency girl, asked her to confirm this was Ok, she said no problem.

Got to the apartment, Rochelle is petite girl wearing a black fishnet type dress, I was quite underwhelmed, expecting to see someone closer to the pics.

Started with massage which wasn't great, then asked for OWO - to which she told me she doesn't do OWO any more as she has a 6 week old child and since he was born she uses condom. It all went downhill from there as I made it clear the services I was wanting and this was agreed.

I decided to carry on as I was there, oral was OK, but with condom you can never really enjoy it. Asked her to go on top after a few mins and she started riding me. I read on a previous review that she is quite tight, well not since popping a sprog out she's not. Went on to missionary, doggy and reverse cowgirl. I really wasn't feeling it, all I could think about was what I'll be having for my dinner.

Went back to her on top and her phone alarm went, telling me time was up! In the end just had a wank with her rubbing my balls, this was the highlight, but I could have wanked at home for free.

She wasn't very confident in anything she was doing and was very apologetic about the confusion with OWO and blamed the agency for not telling her my requirements. Nice enough girl with good chat, but I didn't go for good chat.

All in all very disappointed, the girl was not as good looking as I expected, body was OK but did not offer services I agreed and the sex was boring.

Offline HailWood

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,962
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 53
Oh dear sounds like having a child has not been kind to Rochelle. Red card to the agency for not flagging that OWO is off the menu.
Thanks for the review OP, I was considering but now I won’t be visiting her.

Offline simon07

It is a shame they do bait and switch. If the pics are photo-brushed, distorted and the age an exaggeration, well that is a trick. Not going to this place.

Offline PepeMAGA

Sounds very different to pre-baby reviews.

Offline Dipper

Agree.

One man’s neg is another’s pos. Just have to see what others say.

Offline Barabus

It’s not a bait and switch but I wouldn’t have gone near her just 6 weeks after her having a baby, gob smacking that she’s back in the job so soon after, wide berth me thinks

Offline RogerBoner

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,836
  • Likes: 23
  •  
  • Reviews: 56
I wouldn’t have gone near her just 6 weeks after her having a baby, gob smacking that she’s back in the job so soon after, wide vaginal canal methinks

Offline Picti

Sorry to hear this. Especially as I was previously interested in seeing her.

It may be that OWO isn't available for a while if she's breast feeding, as that would be a sensible precaution. However, a return to escorting 6 weeks following giving birth seems premature and ill-advised.

The agency are also culpable as they should be accurate on her current services, etc. Her association with an agency is primarily the reason I hadn't seen her previously. I don't trust them!

Offline Barabus