Hornygirlnextdoor22 - Manchester

[NigelF]

Link: External Link/Members Only

Price: £100 for an hour (including DFK, OWO and sex).

This girl used to be called "Wookieforever95". I meant to do a review a while ago but I forgot. I've now seen her a couple of times so I'll include info from both meets (but clearly indicate which is which).

Comms: She didn't used to have a number up so this was initially arranged through AW. It was mostly good and I did find her "enthusiasm" to be reassuring. She sent info about exactly where she was staying well in advance/as soon as she knew, which was also nice. However she did also seem to want constant reassurance that I was still going to turn up and this was a bit annoying, especially when I was driving. Obviously she didn't do this when I arranged the second meet.

Location: She seems to use various incall locations around Manchester. She's often in Altrincham, Northenden and the city centre. I've seen her at a cheap hotel in both Northenden and the city centre (near Piccadilly Gardens) - both part of the same chain (you can probably guess which one). It's just about decent enough and usually does the job.

Looks: Let's start off with the negatives. She has lots of self-harm scars all over both her arms (forearms and uppers) and also on her thighs. They are healed and do seem fairly old, I certainly haven't found her to be crazy or anything (although when arranging the second meet she did seem a bit mental but no more so than the average girl). Body wise she has lots of noticeable stretch marks and loose skin around her stomach, hips and unfortunately arse and tits. I believe this is due to a large amount of weight loss so fair play to her. Nonetheless, they don't visually look great and particularly with her tits, when you go to grab them they turn to mush in your hand (due to relatively little substance but still a lot of skin). The same applies to her arse but to a lesser extent. She claims to be size 10 and this seem right (she's not bigger). She doesn't list a cup size (only chest of 34") and it's quite hard to say, I'd guess she's actually a B cup but they look like Cs/Ds due to "sag". Overall her body really isn't great but I didn't particularly mind too much. It's satisfactory for me and actually something a bit different.

Facially, I definitely thought she was cute/pretty and suited her "girl next door" name. I also liked her shoulder length reddy-brown hair and nice greenish eyes. She didn't wear much make up but I don't think she needed any even though presumably a little bit (but not a lot) would have made her look even better. She claims to be 22 and this seems right, I'd also say still around early 20s. Overall, despite the negative aspects, I was mostly happy with her appearance because she looks young and I was happy with her facial aesthetics which is usually the most important aspect of appearance for me (although of course that's also one of the most subjective areas).

Service: Excellent DFK and plenty of it throughout. Very good OWO with very good depth - she put in plenty of effort and gagged herself numerous times although didn't quite manage to get it all the way down (I'm only an average size). Good attention to the balls too. Onto sex and variety of positions were enjoyed and she was very enthusiastic.

On the 2nd meet she actually managed to improve the service and because we'd already seen each other (and so were comfortable etc), it really was top notch GFE and indeed it reflected poorly on some of my exes! The downside though was that she had noticeable fag breath. She might have had a slight amount on the first visit but it was either very little or none. It wasn't awful but it was off-putting. If she'd brought some mouthwash I probably would have politely asked her to use some but she didn't seem to have any (or at least not any in the bathroom for punters).

Throughout both meets she was friendly and pleasant and certainly didn't clock watch.

Overall: A good punt with mostly great service. I think she lives up to her name of "hornygirlnextdoor".

[freeze44]

Thanks for this. I want to see her now as comparing your review and her profile don't think be too many surprises and think it really helps prepare for a punt when expectations are realistic   

[NigelF]

Thanks for this. I want to see her now as comparing your review and her profile don't think be too many surprises and think it really helps prepare for a punt when expectations are realistic 

Cheers. Yeah, I forgot to say that her pics are accurate and probably recent. You can see the "smaller details" if you view the pics full size too although they are still a bit low res so you can't necessarily see the stretch marks with full clarity.

[Wheelman]

I tried to book her a few weeks ago but she got really weird and after agreeing to meet decided that she wouldn't as she was busy.

I chalked it up to a lucky escape.

MD.

[Heph]

Thanks for the write-up.

Good grief though... her arms! I'd imagined one or two light marks - but she's covered herself in them.

[jonko]

This was one of the lasses I emailsed last week to make a booking, I asked her for half an hour and just wanted to clarify the services included, would be ok as on her listing for some foreplay and touching, DFK, OWO, RO and Sex in the usual various positions. I thought that reasonable for 30 min. She replied back and accused me of trying to get a hours service out of her for 30 min fee and said I would have to extend at least to 45 mins. I messaged her back to tell her it is normally what I expect in 30 mins and I don't want any longer. I explained I never do longer than 30 mins bookings as I cannot really last more than 20, so depends on whether the girl does foreplay for 5 mins or so first, I am normally done easily between 20 and 25 mins. She wasn't having it so I never booked her. It's a shame cause I fancied a session with her and if I had had it , I probably wouldn't have had the worst punt ever later that very night (which I just posted).

[billygreen]

Thanks for this. I want to see her now as comparing your review and her profile don't think be too many surprises and think it really helps prepare for a punt when expectations are realistic 

Nicotine stained teeth as mentioned in one review would make it a no for me ever time

[opal]

great detailed report. definitely not for me I cannot comprehend why someone would self harm to that extent

[ElGuapo4]

Great review, pretty much mirroring my experience. In the immediate afterglow of the meeting, the level of service and her complimentary nature made me eager for another visit, but the more time that elapses, the less inclined I am to see her again due to some of those less aesthetically pleasing aspects of her appearance.

[billygreen]

Great review, pretty much mirroring my experience. In the immediate afterglow of the meeting, the level of service and her complimentary nature made me eager for another visit, but the more time that elapses, the less inclined I am to see her again due to some of those less aesthetically pleasing aspects of her appearance.

What are her teeth like please? Any stains?

[Heph]

A dental hygienist looking for a busman's holiday writes...

What are her teeth like please? Any stains?

[billygreen]

A dental hygienist looking for a busman's holiday writes...

Sorry mate not with you

[Scotpunter]

Thanks for this review. I was thinking of booking but fag breath is a real turn off.

[NigelF]

This was one of the lasses I emailsed last week to make a booking, I asked her for half an hour and just wanted to clarify the services included, would be ok as on her listing for some foreplay and touching, DFK, OWO, RO and Sex in the usual various positions. I thought that reasonable for 30 min. She replied back and accused me of trying to get a hours service out of her for 30 min fee and said I would have to extend at least to 45 mins. I messaged her back to tell her it is normally what I expect in 30 mins and I don't want any longer. I explained I never do longer than 30 mins bookings as I cannot really last more than 20, so depends on whether the girl does foreplay for 5 mins or so first, I am normally done easily between 20 and 25 mins. She wasn't having it so I never booked her. It's a shame cause I fancied a session with her and if I had had it , I probably wouldn't have had the worst punt ever later that very night (which I just posted).

That's absolutely ridiculous from her. You can easily fit all that in a 30 min booking and indeed I have. It sounds like she was just being greedy, certainly naive.

What are her teeth like please? Any stains?

Sorry, forgot to mention that, I usually don't notice. On the first visit, I didn't notice/pay attention but on the 2nd I did notice some stains and "yellowing". It's not major but they are there.

[NigelF]

Unfortunately, this girl is bat shit crazy.

A few weeks ago I messaged her trying to meet again (actually for a 4th meet) but she said she was booked up. I didn't try again but just today I see that she managed to figure out who I was (as a punter) based on this review but I suppose I knew it wouldn't be all that hard to do. I didn't expect though that she'd be really pissed off (even though though the review is totally accurate - except for saying I'd only seen her twice which was admittedly a poor attempt at throwing her off the scent), so much so that she'd posted malicious lies about me on SAAFE.

I won't link to it because it includes my main AW profile name (although it wouldn't really be a big deal as it's not my only one so I was a bit tempted). Interestingly she didn't even post a new topic, she just added to an existing one which was also mostly a lie but partially based on truth. It's shameful how many prossies are willing to post rubbish in a pathetic attempt to make things harder for a punter they don't like. None of them bothered to report my number to UglyMugs though, which they should have done if I really was so bad but obviously that would have been even worse and more shameful.

I tried messaging her on AW but unfortunately she replied by maintaining her lies, which was admittedly quite clever because I was hoping to screenshot an admission of guilt. However, her reply to me still contains big contradictions and isn't backed up by our previous messages or our texts. I did reply but she blocked me (message was automatically deleted when I sent it).

If she wants to come on here and stand by her lies, I'm more than happy to post ample evidence that proves she's lying. I don't think she'll be able to though because she is already banned for flooding the post reports with bollocks. Check them out here (her first/oldest two are particularly hilarious): https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=217121
(If you can't see any posts it's because you don't have permission to view post reports)

I'd be more than happy for her to be un-banned though. Or at least given ample time to "defend herself" if she wanted to create a new account and post on here. Of course it's not my decision and I'm not trying to tell admin what to do.

Naturally, I'm changing this review to a negative because of her malicious lies which she presumably posted to make it more difficult for me to make new bookings (although the first false/mostly false report did fuck all anyway so hers will probably have no effect either and obviously I can easily get round it if I do run into any issues). The content of this review is accurate though and she was a good punt, she's just clearly mentally unstable and vindictive, so is worth either avoiding or at least approaching with caution.

[kingM]

I see what you mean with the self harming. It's not the fact that she has done this in the past but the sheer extent of the self harm. Sad to see really.
Would make me question how mentally stable this girl is.
That for me is enough to make me feel uneasy and put me off.

[NigelF]

I see what you mean with the self harming. It's not the fact that she has done this in the past but the sheer extent of the self harm. Sad to see really.
Would make me question how mentally stable this girl is.
That for me is enough to make me feel uneasy and put me off.

Yes, unfortunately one should really take that as a warning sign.

I forgot to mention that she's now changed her name to "MeditativeBlissX" but her links are still the same.

I probably don’t need to make this post but since my previous post doesn’t include much context/it’s unclear what I was referring to, I think I should clarify. Also, hopefully this post will provide additional insight into what she’s like/her mindset, as well as provide some light entertainment.
This is what she initially posted on SAAFE, then she edited it after I messaged her on AW, however I was unaware of her edit when I made my last post. This is an unedited, direct copy & paste of what she said (her words are in red):

“Turned up tipsy and then became drunk (when the alcohol he had drank prior to the meeting caught up with him) on the second booking and overstayed. Left a very critical review about me despite me being nothing but generous and then when couldn't get a booking again started going in on me again.

Definitely one to avoid ladies as he will pick up on your every fault in the review, and make you feel low about yourself based on that

He's in the NW area but I know he travels around a bit

EDIT:  He contacted me on AW today claiming that this review is utterly false and what I wrote is shameless.

I would just like to say I have seen him three times. The second time was on a Saturday around six and he had been for drinks beforehand with friends and was tipsy. The alcohol caught up with him (as units do with your liver when you take a break) and he became drunk during. By overstayed, I mean he stayed for over an hour over the booking time and I missed a booking because of it. But I was a newbie at the time and I should have been firmer so this was my fault. I also gave him a discount which I rarely do for anyone on the second and third bookings. He was nice during the bookings (he definitely doesn't make you feel low during the bookings), but he left me a very critical review whereby he picked up on all my faults and it made me feel low. He described my body in the review in most unflattering terms, and then tried to book a while later. Obviously, knowing he finds my body so unflattering and unattractive, I didn't know why he tried to book again. I wasn't available anyway. A client of mine who reads the review boards told me he had replied to comments that were a few weeks old with yet more unflattering comments about me. This was after he had tried to book me for a fourth time. I have told no lies, as a Buddhist, I believe it best not to, this is the version of events as I see it.”

She edited her post and I think she might have changed some of it from what it initially said but possibly I just misread it. Anyway, she has based some of it in truth but much of it is just bullshit and the rest is just her coming to the wrong conclusions.

In addition, more recently, after my previous post in this thread, she posted the following (to which I’ve redacted small amounts of my personal info although not all that’s been redacted is true anyway because I’m not dumb enough to be so revealing/truthful to a WG) but is otherwise unedited:

“Very nasty, vindictive guy. Definitely one to avoid. After seeing this and despite him knowing that this is all the truth and him taking advantage of a newbie, he decides to update his review on UKpunting (he is a prolific punter and reviewer, he also states he has another Adult work profile separate to this so be careful ladies). He's [redacted personal/physical description], acts and sounds quite camp [left that in because it’s funny], claims he's a [redacted job/profession – fortunately not true but for a variety of reasons makes a good cover for me], he has a lot of free time on his hands and claims he never wanks as he punts so much, calls himself [redacted punting name], very demanding and asks you to do this, this and that. Made me massage him for a whole hour after the initial hour booking.

Now claiming on the review I'm 'bat shit crazy' despite him knowing I am telling the truth about him turning up tipsy and then becoming drunk as he has alcohol problems. (He told me gleefully several times that he is an alcoholic as a lot of [redacted profession] are). Will probably claim I'm lying about that too, definitely an immoral guy, only him and I know the truth and he's not afraid to lie to all his punting mates. Definitely one to avoid ladies, he is clearly unhinged - targets females with his nasty reviews when he doesn't get what he wants, really very very sad and pathetic

Stay safe ladies!”

As you can see, she’s kind of tried to “out” me (possibly in more ways than one  ), which is disgraceful behaviour. Anyway, to address her bullshit points, I’ll go through them one by one and also post screenshots which prove that I’m being honest and accurate. I've tried to avoid using "scroll capture" too much otherwise the screenshots come out too small/illegible.

Screenshots of meet 1:
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Note that the number shown is the number she used to use, not her current one. I'm sure other members here such as zonealarm can confirm that.

My review is not “very critical”, it’s entirely accurate and honest. I only mentioned her major flaws (not her “every fault”), nothing I said was minor or nit-picking. I also made it clear that overall, I personally wasn’t too fussed and I was happy. The review was not for her and if she felt low about it that’s her problem and she probably shouldn’t have read it. She has access to a mirror and her “every fault” is surely obvious to her. 

The 2nd meet was on Friday 22nd June at 8pm, not a Saturday at 6pm as she claimed. I’d watched a world cup game earlier in the day with a few mates and had had a couple of drinks but nothing that made me tipsy or drunk at any point afterwards or in the punt. I had mentioned what I’d been up to (when she asked about my day) and at the end I made a joke about being an alcoholic (I did not tell her several times), however I thought I delivered it in a way that was clearly humorous, but as per her texts, it turns out she took it very literally. Since I couldn’t be bothered to explain it and I didn’t want to offend her (given that she had actually had serious alcohol problems in the past), I just played along, as per my texts. You’ll notice that my texts clearly don’t seem like the words of someone who’s drunk:

Screenshots of meet 2:
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

Screenshot of meet 3:
Hidden Image/Members Only
Note that meet was on the 4th August. You can see my last text on the 30th but I also called her and her phone was seemingly off. Since I knew she had a new number I also texted her on that. See this screenshot (I've redacted what I said to describe/identify myself):
Hidden Image/Members Only

As I've said, I took her at her word. I didn't reply and I just moved swiftly onto my plan C.

I did not at all overstay. While it’s true all 3 of our meets have overran, they were never my fault. Since she’s talking about the 2nd meet in particular, it’s true that we overran by an hour as per the timestamps of the texts but not over an hour as she claimed. At no point did she say or even hint at our time being up and indeed I was never asked to finish up/leave, it was me who left voluntarily. If she wanted me to leave earlier, she should have hurried the punt and the sex along and said something. I’m also not an idiot and while I don’t keep an eye on the clock (unless I have somewhere to be afterwards), I do look out for any subtle hints that they want me to finish up. I had no idea she had a subsequent booking and indeed I don’t believe her because if I was an overstaying drunk who caused her to miss a booking then why the hell did she text me thanking me for the meet AND offering to give me a £30 discount on all future hour long bookings!

While overrunning and small discounts aren’t particularly uncommon, so much texting on her part and offering such a relatively large discount (especially given her low standard price) is uncommon and while I’m sure most of it was just aimed at encouraging me to book again even sooner, it certainly doesn’t seem like the actions of someone who was in any way unhappy to see me (like they surely would with most overstaying drunks).

She claims I “started going in on her again” and made more “unflattering comments” after I couldn’t get a booking. She is presumably referring to this post I made:

That's absolutely ridiculous from her. You can easily fit all that in a 30 min booking and indeed I have. It sounds like she was just being greedy, certainly naive.

Sorry, forgot to mention that, I usually don't notice. On the first visit, I didn't notice/pay attention but on the 2nd I did notice some stains and "yellowing". It's not major but they are there.

To be fair, technically I haven’t fit all that into a 30 minutes booking (like I said) because I never booked her for 30 mins but if I had it would definitely have been easily possible, just like it is with many other WGs. Anyway, that post was only in reply to another poster (not because I wanted to have a go at her) and it is still accurate. At that point I had no idea that she’d refused to see me, I thought she was genuinely booked up as she said to me and indeed I posted over a week after that.

Anyway, I’m sure the fluffy idiot who’s been telling her what’s been posted on here is getting a laugh/kick out of this and I suppose he probably enjoys an even bigger discount than what I got. Or maybe he’s this dumb member who was recently banned: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=222980.0

If I’m so “very demanding”, I have no idea why she saw me so many times or why she offered me a discount. She claims I made her give me a massage for a whole hour after the initial hour booking. Well first of all, I don’t “make” anyone do anything, I always politely ask and 2nd of all, if and when I do ask for a massage at the end (which isn’t usually very often), I always say “if we’ve got time”. As you can see from the texts, our initial hour booking only overran by no more than 15 minutes. Perhaps she was talking about the 2nd meeting but the massage was nowhere near an hour long. Note that our 3rd meet was booked for 2 hours (at £140) and I did pretty much end up having an hour long massage in that. I intended to cum twice but that didn’t happen (not her fault). On that meet she set an alarm 15 mins after the scheduled finish time but at that point I was literally already getting off the bed anyway!

If I really intentionally took advantage of her time, I wouldn’t waste it with a bloody massage (which certainly wasn’t amazing although it wasn’t bad either). And if I wanted a proper massage, I’d go to one of the many specialists out there.

I clearly don’t “target girls with nasty reviews” when I don’t get what I want. This review was a positive and was posted before I tried to see her for a 4th time. Any subsequent comments are entirely accurate and I’m very justified in turning this into a negative, since it’s her who’s been vindictive (and rather sad) by making up crap in a pathetic attempt to get some sort of “revenge”. Indeed, a negative is definitely warranted since she’s somewhat tried to out me. If I really wanted to be vindictive I’d post a fresh negative review (which I’m perfectly entitled to do) but I don’t see much point and I’ve already put way more effort into this post than necessary.

Let’s also bear in mind she already has form for outright lies, such as her post reports on here where she claimed her first review was, among other things, “not true”. See here:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204189
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204188

Obviously, I wasn’t there when zonealarm had his punt but it definitely stacks up with my experiences and is almost certainly not in any way untrue.

She even had the cheek to complain about disclosure of her personal details, even though the reviewer did no such thing, see her post report here:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204191
That’s particularly ironic, considering she’s tried to expose my personal details on SAAFE for no good reason.

All in all, she claims she’s told no lies but that’s clearly bullshit. I do wonder though, if she’s so deluded that she actually believes her own bullshit. That might actually be the case, hence calling her “bat shit crazy” is definitely rather apt.

I was naive to think I’d be able to disguise who I was by pretending I’d only seen her twice, especially since I said stupidly revealing stuff like “I don’t wank, mainly because I punt so much”. I’ll definitely watch what I say more carefully from now on.

So, what have we learnt from this:
- This WG is mental, can't read and way too sensitive.
- I’m a massive gaylord, who’s camp and really into cocktails and fragrances! (And of course I see TS escorts, indeed I should probably get some more TS reviews up).

Edit: It's bloody hard work uploading multiple pics. I also made a big cock up at one point, to be honest it'd be funny if someone noticed but I've corrected it now.

[westeros]

For the life of me, I can  never understand why punters feel the need to tell WG about ukp and what's said about them

This site is for punters not WG. I'm  sure this small fact had been mentioned before. How long before it sinks in? You do yourself no favours by telling a WG, you just make it harder for everyone else

Nigel is an absolute legend on here. What he says about a WG may just be his opinion but the majority of times he's bang on. Saved me a fair few bucks anyway.

[freeze44]

For the life of me, I can  never understand why punters feel the need to tell WG about ukp and what's said about them

This site is for punters not WG. I'm  sure this small fact had been mentioned before. How long before it sinks in? You do yourself no favours by telling a WG, you just make it harder for everyone else

Nigel is an absolute legend on here. What he says about a WG may just be his opinion but the majority of times he's bang on. Saved me a fair few bucks anyway.

Agree Nigel is v helpful. The turd who is running back to the wg is just a cunt. Could even be the wg herself lurking. Thinking it's going to help by slagging of the likes of Nigel and making up crap will back fire. I was interested in seeing this wg but would't go near her now seeing this!

[NigelF]

For the life of me, I can  never understand why punters feel the need to tell WG about ukp and what's said about them

This site is for punters not WG. I'm  sure this small fact had been mentioned before. How long before it sinks in? You do yourself no favours by telling a WG, you just make it harder for everyone else

Nigel is an absolute legend on here. What he says about a WG may just be his opinion but the majority of times he's bang on. Saved me a fair few bucks anyway.

+1

It's very surprising and really weird. To be honest, I imagine most WGs think that too but their curiosity probably gets the better of them so they allow the punter to feedback to them what's said on UKP. I'm sure though that most WGs end up trusting that punter less because it's clearly an odd thing to bring up and they'll wonder what his ulterior motive is. Perhaps those punters just like to see the reaction of the WG/see them get upset, while obviously pretending to be horrified about what was written and enjoying "giving comfort" to the WG.

Nigel is an absolute legend on here. What he says about a WG may just be his opinion but the majority of times he's bang on. Saved me a fair few bucks anyway.

Cheers, glad to hear it 

Agree Nigel is v helpful. The turd who is running back to the wg is just a cunt. Could even be the wg herself lurking. Thinking it's going to help by slagging of the likes of Nigel and making up crap will back fire. I was interested in seeing this wg but would't go near her now seeing this!

Cheers. If it is the WG herself I strongly recommend she make a post on here. Of course technically having a second account is against the rules but hearing "her side" (even though it's been rubbish so far) would be of benefit to punters (if only to further expose her bullshit). As I've previously said, I hope admin doesn't ban her if she is on here again.

Thinking it's going to help by slagging of the likes of Nigel and making up crap will back fire. I was interested in seeing this wg but would't go near her now seeing this!

I know right? Apart from that, she's literally a good escort! She shouldn't have got offended by my review (she should have read what I said more closely and more objectively, not taken it so personally and paid more attention to the overall message) but of course it is still fairly understandable that she got at least a little upset. If she'd just just said she was offended by my review and didn't want to see me again or even if she just blocked/ignored me, I wouldn't have said anything on here. Indeed, I've had a previous WG get upset at a positive review (a very strong positive I might add) and refuse to see me but I never said anything on here.

Even if I did post saying that she'd refused to see me, no punter would care and I'm sure most would see it as understandable from the WG. The only thing they'd take from it is to be careful about what they say to her and to be careful if they ever review her. But since she's decided to make shit up and "get revenge", clearly punters would be concerned about that because who knows what she's capable of.

Anyway, she's changed her name again to AmorousJessica, either she or her fluffy are really on the ball, shame it doesn't work for them.

[OakTree]

I’m sorry to say this Nigel but I think you’ve gone far too deep into damage limitation mode on this. By highlighting what was said on SAAFE you’ve compromised a large part of your anonymity. Nothing you have said is going to change the minds of those on there regardless of what you say. You’ve basically gone out on a limb to convince like minds on here who would of supported you anyway and at the same time guided everyone to information about you they never would of been aware of. Surely it would of been easier to ditch the sim and the AW profile and never see this WG again and just keep schtum. I’m pretty sure most people on here would have had no idea she’d gone bitching about you on SAAFE and if they did wouldn’t of made the link to you...but they do now. You’re  a prolific, big fish punter on here and I’m sure there are a number of fanboys and WGs only too keen to get info on you. I know if it was me I’d have just kept my head down.

If I’ve got it wrong then apologies. I can understand why you want to fight your corner but sometimes discretion is the better part of valour especially in this game.

[Zonealarm]

Quote " Note that the number shown is the number she used to use, not her current one. I'm sure other members here such as zonealarm can confirm that "

I can confirm this was her number at that time and used to be called wookieforever.  I think I did the first review here .. and gave a neutral " suggesting she took a bit more care with her appearance /  lingerie" 

 some one from UKPunting obviously showed her my post . .. and she some how worked out who I was .

Any way ..few weeks later I see her new aw pics with nice lingerie
... So when I contacted her for a meet .. she said I was writing misleading posts and she would never see me ..

.... Which brings me to a more important point ....
I know most of us have a different AW profile and  UKPunting ID.
For those of us who don't punt prolifically.. it's is easy to match up posts here with feedback pattern on AW ...
And work out who you are !

[NigelF]

I’m sorry to say this Nigel but I think you’ve gone far too deep into damage limitation mode on this. By highlighting what was said on SAAFE you’ve compromised a large part of your anonymity. Nothing you have said is going to change the minds of those on there regardless of what you say. You’ve basically gone out on a limb to convince like minds on here who would of supported you anyway and at the same time guided everyone to information about you they never would of been aware of. Surely it would of been easier to ditch the sim and the AW profile and never see this WG again and just keep schtum. I’m pretty sure most people on here would have had no idea she’d gone bitching about you on SAAFE and if they did wouldn’t of made the link to you...but they do now. You’re  a prolific, big fish punter on here and I’m sure there are a number of fanboys and WGs only too keen to get info on you. I know if it was me I’d have just kept my head down.

If I’ve got it wrong then apologies. I can understand why you want to fight your corner but sometimes discretion is the better part of valour especially in this game.

I totally know what you mean, in fact I pretty much agree with you, it was a mostly a pointless post but unfortunately I couldn't help myself. While you're certainly right that I won't convince any WGs that I'm a decent punter, hopefully my post might convince one or two that the WG on SAAFE was talking shit. Anyway, I already consider that punting identity to be totally compromised. It's not hard to find the thread on SAAFE but anything that is there isn't actually particularly revealing or is inaccurate. Besides, I know there are a number of WGs who I've positively reviewed who've figured out who I am, indeed probably most them have, as illustrated by the posts from WGs such as Rochelle and Midori Chan in this thread: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=225546

And certainly almost all of the ones I've reviewed negatively will, mainly because I tend to review very soon after seeing them, in order to "warn" other punters as quickly as possible. Given that plenty of WGs talk to each other and they have various methods of communicating including WhatsApp groups, secret Facebook groups (with many hundreds of members) and hidden sections of SAAFE etc, I'm sure my "details" are in the hands of many WGs, if only because of disgruntled WGs who I've reviewed.

However, you're right about making it easier for punters who want to do me harm or make things more difficult for me and I know for a fact some exist given some of the messages I know about that have been sent to both WGs I've seen and who I've not seen (e.g. the guy who messaged Teacola Rose about me and MrFishyFoo : https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=200981.msg2085243#msg2085243).

I'm sure there are others too (some who know more about me than that guy because he clearly knew very little). Unfortunately there are lots of sad and potentially dangerous fluffy/deranged punters out there but I'm still pretty safe due to the various precautions I take. Also, I'm not afraid to bump into any of them, indeed it might be rather fun for me but obviously I'd rather not. And as I said, I consider the identity that was exposed on SAAFE to be totally compromised so I'll not be using it again. Although admittedly, I have just to see if the report made any difference and as far I can tell, it's been just as easy for me to book new girls so either many WGs don't check SAAFE or they just didn't care. Anyway, I will be using a different account (unlinked) and phone number from now on. I usually book via phone anyway. Cheers for your concern/advice though.

Quote " Note that the number shown is the number she used to use, not her current one. I'm sure other members here such as zonealarm can confirm that "

I can confirm this was her number at that time and used to be called wookieforever.  I think I did the first review here .. and gave a neutral " suggesting she took a bit more care with her appearance /  lingerie" 

 some one from UKPunting obviously showed her my post . .. and she some how worked out who I was .

Any way ..few weeks later I see her new aw pics with nice lingerie
... So when I contacted her for a meet .. she said I was writing misleading posts and she would never see me ..

.... Which brings me to a more important point ....
I know most of us have a different AW profile and  UKPunting ID.
For those of us who don't punt prolifically.. it's is easy to match up posts here with feedback pattern on AW ...
And work out who you are !

+1

There was definitely nothing misleading in your review.

[Joe Tortolano]

Doing my research as she is coming up to Edinburgh in a few weeks. Not sure what I’ve stumbled into. The review was good and helpful, think i’ll give her a miss as a smoker is a no no for me and the scars and stretch marks are offputting.

The thread then takes a bizarre tangent where she comes across as vindictive and you Nige as “intense”. The truth being probably somewhere in the middle.

[NigelF]

Doing my research as she is coming up to Edinburgh in a few weeks. Not sure what I’ve stumbled into. The review was good and helpful, think i’ll give her a miss as a smoker is a no no for me and the scars and stretch marks are offputting.

The thread then takes a bizarre tangent where she comes across as vindictive and you Nige as “intense”. The truth being probably somewhere in the middle.

Cheers. The truth isn't "somewhere in the middle" though, I've stated everything accurately. I haven't lied (except initially about how many times I saw her but that's unimportant especially since I saw her more than I actually claimed) nor have I twisted things or deliberately omitted anything that's relevant. Where do you think I've been misleading and where do you think she's been accurate?

Anyway, except the review, pretty much everything else I've said is only relevant as a fairly minor warning. This thread can easily be summarised as:
- A punt with her is likely as per the review.
- If you review her and mention things she doesn't like (and presumably if you do anything that really pisses her off) she might try to get back at you by making stuff up but if you take good punting precautions it shouldn't matter much anyway.

[Steady Eddy]

Sorry for the bump.

But the descriptions in the reviews (loss of weight and saggy tits and bum) don't seem to match the current photos on the profile.

Can you say if the photos below are of the same woman?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[NigelF]

Sorry for the bump.

But the descriptions in the reviews (loss of weight and saggy tits and bum) don't seem to match the current photos on the profile.

Can you say if the photos below are of the same woman?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Looking at those and the other ones currently on her profile - I'm very confident they are of the same girl. Her photos have definitely improved a hell of a lot but they're now also misleading. They're clearly now professionally taken, cleverly posed and crucially, definitely airbrushed/photoshopped. They've not made her any thinner but they've smoothed out her skin (making it look more flawless) and blurred her self harm scars. With regard to her saggy tits and fairly saggy arse, even with her old photos it was hard to tell and that's still the case here, just a little more so.

To be clear, even in person, her arse looks fine (albeit a bit flat and small) it's just that when you touch it, the skin is surprisingly loose and the arse is soft. It's even more pronounced with her tits (as I said, they turn to mush when you grab them) and her wearing a bra in the photos helps disguise that although even in person with her bra off, you'll likely think they are saggy but not too bad but then when you have a feel you'll probably be surprised.

As I say in the review though, I personally didn't mind too much about any of that (although others may well differ) and I definitely thought she was cute facially. Her claimed age and size were also accurate (and that still seems to be the case).

[Count Duckula]

the last pic has definitely been retouched. the "glow" on the left arm is a giveaway probably use of blur brush and repair/clone tool)

[Steady Eddy]

Thanks NigelF. I was wondering if the profile had been transferred.

Cheers

[sinbad52]

 IgelF. Your posts on here are always very detailed and must be helpful to a vast number of punters(my fa days are long gone). Reading your original post I thought despite the negatives it greatly recommended her and I think could well have persuaded some to see her. She has done herself no favours as most readers will no longer consider giving her theory hard earned.
One more point in her Q and A column she claims to be a non smoker. Anyway thanks for the interesting reads

[NigelF]

IgelF. Your posts on here are always very detailed and must be helpful to a vast number of punters(my fa days are long gone). Reading your original post I thought despite the negatives it greatly recommended her and I think could well have persuaded some to see her.

Cheers, yes you're definitely right. All the negatives weren't big issues for me and I'm sure that would be the case for others too. The key aspects of her face, age and particularly service were all good. It did help that her photos at the time were accurate though.

She has done herself no favours as most readers will no longer consider giving her theory hard earned.

Yes, if she'd just refused to see me or ignored me it would've been totally fine (just slightly annoying). However, spreading lies and trying to reveal personal information is just bang out of order. For those considering her, it makes her a risky proposition as even if you don't review her or anything, if you do piss her off for whatever reason in a punt, she may try to take similar "revenge". To be fair, that might be unlikely and even if she does, as long as you don't say anything genuine/truly revealing to her, it may well not have an impact. For example, out of curiosity I have subsequently used the AW account that she reported on SAAFE and literally noticed no difference in my ability to book WGs.

One more point in her Q and A column she claims to be a non smoker. Anyway thanks for the interesting reads

I don't really remember but I don't think she used to say that on her profile. Since she definitely was a smoker when I last saw her, my guess is she's lying but she may actually have quit recently.

[Durch69]

Thanks for the info Nigel , I’ve always found your reviews refreshing and honest. Keep them coming