LushLucySexy - Glasgow

[davyjoneslocker]

External Link/Members Only

Hi,

I know this review isn't in the traditional style and I can't say too much although I would like to, but what I will tell you all is this:

I found her service and attitude to be appalling.

She is a heavy cocaine user.

She told me that she has done bareback in the past.

She rang me without checking to see if it was safe to do so.

For reasons that I wish I could go into but I cannot, I will tell you that she is an extremely untrustworthy woman, and I believe you should avoid her at all costs.

[pingug]

nothing about the meet (if there was one) did she offer bareback ? did she take cocaine while you were there ?  just telling us that she had a bad attitude doesn’t tell us anything

[stoogman]

External Link/Members Only
Hi,

I know this review isn't in the traditional style and I can't say too much although I would like to, but what I will tell you all is this:

I found her service and attitude to be appalling.

She is a heavy cocaine user.

She told me that she has done bareback in the past.

She rang me without checking to see if it was safe to do so.

For reasons that I wish I could go into but I cannot, I will tell you that she is an extremely untrustworthy woman, and I believe you should avoid her at all costs.

Without any salient info this just sounds like sour grapes to me.

I'd believe Clattys review over this any day, unless the OP would be willing to divulge the info hes somehow afraid to spill.

[auldie63]

Just registered yesterday to post a 'warning' to all on Clatty's review of this girl, and "I will post my own review soon".
First off if you think this constitutes a review you must have had a career in MI5, secondly you sound like someone who has a large axe to grind or a rival WG who has had a big fallout.
Know which review I believe, my Bullshit radar is going like the hammers on this one!

[Happyjose]

Jealous ex bf/pimp/obsessive/rival prossie all sound more likely

Registers, posts and fucks off, likely never to be seen again

If you do come back, contact Admin with some evidence instead of this nebulous shite

[Happyjose]

She says on her profile that she used to work for a busy agency....

[Clattypats]

Either the OP has a grudge against her, or possibly a returner with one against me...

It doesn't bother me if a WG has fake tits or not, so isn't really something I focus fully on...I commented to her during the meet, she had nice tits...I didnt personally, see any signs of scarring...Her reply was..."I'm getting them done soon" ....She didn't say she was getting them done "again"...I said this to Jock D in the comments after my review...

I don't do a lot of sucking/feeling tits in a booking (the odd time I do depending how I feel at the time)...I'm more an ass man, and if I'm lying on the bed and FK is happening, I'm more likely to be fingering her pussy than feeling tits...

As for the rest of his spiel...Well it seems she divulged a hell of alot to a punter in a first meet...I'm sure all girls go about telling clients they've barebacked,and get off their tits (fake or not  ) on coke...She was very pleasant in my booking...Maybe slightly distracted at the end as her bookings were running late(as I mentioned in review), and I think she was getting back to clients on here phone as I was getting dressed...She gave me a discount for my troubles, so I can't say fairer than that...

There is definitely some mischief making going on here...

[DickDiver]

External Link/Members Only

For reasons that I wish I could go into but I cannot

This is A Grade gaslighting. Dusty phoned hoor would be my guess why she cannot.

[Old enough to know better]

Never met her but she is on my ‘to do’ list. She often offers duos with her partner in crime ‘sexycheshirelouise’ (no link as on my phone atm).
They both hint at cocaine use and I’m pretty sure Cheshire Louise has said as much on her profile previously but, think that may be removed now.
Not sure if this review is legit or not, it’s a bit cloak and dagger.

[Clattypats]

Never met her but she is on my ‘to do’ list. She often offers duos with her partner in crime ‘sexycheshirelouise’ (no link as on my phone atm).
They both hint at cocaine use and I’m pretty sure Cheshire Louise has said as much on her profile previously but, think that may be removed now.
Not sure if this review is legit or not, it’s a bit cloak and dagger.

I'm well aware of her duo partner, and wouldn't see her...

I did all the relevant checks on Lucie on here...There wasn't much to go on, so I went with it...If I had seen anything about cocaine use I wouldn't have made a booking...I'm not into drugs, and never have been, so I wouldn't have went near...

[andymars19]

I know this review isn't in the traditional style and I can't say too much although I would like to, but what I will tell you all is this:

<SNIP>

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Old enough to know better]

Never said you were into drugs Clatty, I’m pretty sure she wouldn’t share with you even if you were. I’m not particularly interested in whether she does or doesn’t snort the odd line of cocain or has a bigger problem with it, what she does in her own time is up to her. If there were any signs she was a junkie or had a real problem with Coke is a different story. If it doesn’t affect her service, no problem.
Any kind of dependence on drugs could be problematic though, drugs and crime often go hand in hand (crime as in conning punters or even going on the game itself to support a habit). Most working girls I’ve met are in love with the cash and usually do what they do to support the handbag, shoe or holiday habit.
As I said, not sure if the OP is legit but, both Lucy and Louise are/were pretty blatant about drug use if you read between the lines. ‘Love to party...champagne etc’. What do you think the ‘etc’ means

[DaVINCI]

External Link/Members Only

Hi,

I know this review isn't in the traditional style and I can't say too much although I would like to, but what I will tell you all is this:

I found her service and attitude to be appalling.

She is a heavy cocaine user.

She told me that she has done bareback in the past.

She rang me without checking to see if it was safe to do so.

For reasons that I wish I could go into but I cannot, I will tell you that she is an extremely untrustworthy woman, and I believe you should avoid her at all costs.

You have practically thought of everything to discredit the SP but you say you can’t say to much but you would like to 

I have never meet or have any intention of meeting the SP but It seems to me you are either a WG or a punter with a grudge.

Your “review” doesn’t sit right with me   

[Clattypats]

Never said you were into drugs Clatty, I’m pretty sure she wouldn’t share with you even if you were. I’m not particularly interested in whether she does or doesn’t snort the odd line of cocain or has a bigger problem with it, what she does in her own time is up to her. If there were any signs she was a junkie or had a real problem with Coke is a different story. If it doesn’t affect her service, no problem.
Any kind of dependence on drugs could be problematic though, drugs and crime often go hand in hand (crime as in conning punters or even going on the game itself to support a habit). Most working girls I’ve met are in love with the cash and usually do what they do to support the handbag, shoe or holiday habit.
As I said, not sure if the OP is legit but, both Lucy and Louise are/were pretty blatant about drug use if you read between the lines. ‘Love to party...champagne etc’. What do you think the ‘etc’ means

I wasn't implying you said "I" was into drugs  ...To be honest, I didn't scrutinise her profile enough,(skim read it tbh)and the part you mention was an oversight on my part...Party girl would usually suggest that to me...

Think her Pics got the better of me and as it was about 3/4 weeks after me initially trying to book, when I got around to her again I didnt read through all the drivel...Just checked LL, age, size and rate then booked...No signs of drug use or hints of it when I seen her... and certainly nothing of BB...

[Old enough to know better]

She’s still on my list, messaged her recently but she says she’s away at the moment.
Think the OP is as described above, stirring the shit pot but, that’s up to him to give a bit more credibility to his ‘review’. There are a lot of ways to discredit a SP and seem credible yourself if you’re disturbed enough to list that as a hobbby. That wasn’t one.
As it stands, I’ll be looking to book a duo with them when they’re both back working together.

[Clattypats]

She’s still on my list, messaged her recently but she says she’s away at the moment.

Maybe she's getting that boob job she mentioned to me...

[Old enough to know better]

Hope not, I’m not a fan of falsies.

[Jock D]

Could it be that the dynamic duo/party girls...have fallen out

[Old enough to know better]

Crossed my mind too, bit ironic if it is one coke head telling on another for being a coke head (and worse).That’s the circles we move in though in the secret world of punting.
Paranoia and suspicion are rife, lol.

[Astarter]

Could it be that the dynamic duo/party girls...have fallen out

I did notice they stopped doing duos together and thought they might fallen out. May be I'm totally wrong here but the less than informative review left me thinking Unsexycheshirelouise in disguise.

[davyjoneslocker]

I just did my best to try to help others. You are all free to respond as you wish. No, she didn't offer bareback to me, yes she did take cocaine around me. I can't say too much as I do not wish to be identified due to things that transpired. I am sorry for this but I've done my best given the limiting circumstances.

edit: I'm sure you can appreciate that staying incognito is something that we all strive for... sorry but my hands are tied.

[davyjoneslocker]

And, to the people who are saying the Clattypats has reviewed loads and has over 3000 posts and I've posted twice and only reviewed once therefore I have no credibility - I would think that the people who only speak when they have something to say would be the most credible, but that's just my opinion...

[Happyjose]

Nothing for over 3 weeks, and then 4 rapid fire, rambling posts from the OP

Must be the coffee........

[DickDiver]

And, to the people who are saying the Clattypats has reviewed loads and has over 3000 posts and I've posted twice and only reviewed once therefore I have no credibility - I would think that the people who only speak when they have something to say would be the most credible, but that's just my opinion...

Yeah. That's how credibility works Davy. You hardly come across as Deep Throat, more Dusty Phone.

[Clattypats]

And, to the people who are saying the Clattypats has reviewed loads and has over 3000 posts and I've posted twice and only reviewed once therefore I have no credibility - I would think that the people who only speak when they have something to say would be the most credible, but that's just my opinion...

Business a bit slow "Louise"...You stupid bint...

[scutty brown]

OP's post reads to me as if something happened that made him involve the police, and that's why he can't say more. They've advised him to say nowt.
If so, it would have been better if he'd said nothing at all

[Matrix]

And, to the people who are saying the Clattypats has reviewed loads and has over 3000 posts and I've posted twice and only reviewed once therefore I have no credibility - I would think that the people who only speak when they have something to say would be the most credible, but that's just my opinion...

Clatty's legit, you're suspect. The reason he's legit is because he's posted so much information and reviews. Reviews that actually contain details, Dear. X

I would think that people who only post on one subject negatively and offer no details as to why, have zero credibility.

You also write like a woman. 

[Astarter]

Louise, fat, ugly and wasted when I saw you and now as spiteful as could be trying to give your old mate a bad name on here. Looking forward to seeing you get the old - (Banning Reason...) Followed by admins choice of words.

[Astarter]

OP's post reads to me as if something happened that made him involve the police, and that's why he can't say more. They've advised him to say nowt.
If so, it would have been better if he'd said nothing at all

What bit of OP's "Louise's" post made you think they had police involved in anything at all?

[scutty brown]

What bit of OP's "Louise's" post made you think they had police involved in anything at all?

All of it really......I've seen that pattern of speech before: he wants to tell us but he can't for unspecified reasons.
Of course it could just be bollocks