Don't even understand why you feel the need to point out what others may have done review wise. He isn't the others, he did his own and unless he is her all due respect to the guy.
The fact everyone on here tends to toe the line with regards certain wg's doesn't mean anything and I'm glad he gave a different perspective.
Recent example - As much as I couldn't ever recommend French Magalie, it was interesting to see her get a bit of positive recently without reviewers getting batted back down.
A prossie promoting herself with false pics is clearly an issue for many punters and deserves to be highlighted. My observation was not limited to this prossie, but was meant to give a new member some insight into forum norms
This from the wiki:
“Give a negative rating as a warning to other punters about the provider. There is a range of opinion about how you should treat dishonesty, misrepresented services, fake pictures and poor value in terms of the overall rating. In these instances, pointing out how you arrived at your rating will leave the punter better informed about whether they want to visit”
This is after all a punters site. Perhaps you disagree that false advertising shouldn’t be rewarded with a recommendation (positive review) on here? Or even be queried by another member.
You seem to assume that a consensus of opinion by members on here is more to do with toeing the line, than honest and objective reporting
