External Link/Members OnlyPrice:100 for 30 mins
Location:South Kensington
So after my recent experience decided to give the agency another chance, and picked a WG that was given a positive recently;while the WG was of higher quality and the experience was better, it still didn’t meet up to my experiences with highly reviewed indies on this site at the £80-£120 per 30 mins price point.
Appearance:7/10. Very slim petite hygienic WG who said she was Spanish, although on the website it says she is EE. Not my typical type as I prefer WG with some curves and more height, but I was TOFTT as an experiment;nevertheless still attractive. Dressed in bra and underwear.No B&S this time, but potential minor facial photoshop.
Services:6/10. To be honest I think agencies take a reasonable cut of the WG fees, maybe around 40%, so I understand that WG at this price point earn less than indies at £80-£100 per 30 mins;which might influence their motivation, but given the previous positive by another reviewer, I expected more enthusiasm and a more endearing encounter to motivate me to rebook. Requested b2b massage to start with, she complied but I could tell she was inexperienced with this, rubbed oil on my torso but none on my private area, also no genital stimulation. Secondly, she had some stubble in her private region and this hurt me when it came into contact with my private area, I asked her to stop and she said “I don’t have hair there”, I didn’t want to get into an argument so suggested we move onto owo. She tried saying she wanted to do ow because I complained about hair, I didn’t want to argue so again requested owo politely, she complied. Not as deep as I’d like with no scrotum stimulation but still adequate. Next doggy,cg,mish all fine, but she didn’t seem to last very long in cg. Finished with HR(me doing it and her stimulating erogenous zones with kissing), again lacked enthusiasm and kept stopping frequently which ironically prevented me from climaxing as she was warning me that we had very little time left and wanted me to finish.
Accomodation: Standard serviced apartment accommodation in South Kensington, I’m sure many of you punters know it.
Communication: I agree with the previous reviewer that she has a good command of English, but in my meeting I didn’t think she had a ‘bubbly’ personality and feel he ‘embellished’ her communication style and service skills.
Overall I am rating this a weak neutral because she provided services requested and was hygienic and attractive, however there was a lack of enthusiasm, experience and endearing behaviour during the meeting. She didn’t engage in FK(but I didn’t request it), I didn’t try to force it because I was getting the vibe that she wasn’t in the mood or didn’t like it.
I asked her name and she gave me a name for another agency and asked me what agency I booked with. She then belligerently said “Why? Are you going to give me a negative review?”.
Like I said weak-neutral, I partook in this ‘experiment’ after the semi-avalanche of positives for Diva, almost immediately after my negative;but the pertinent factor to consider is the potential vested interest of such reviewers.
I await the White-Knights and Diva shill rebuttals!
