Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Busty Ebony KimCindy  (Read 13240 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 2286592) (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


So why does my mentioning the heavily photoshopped images upset you so much ?

It doesn't. You think in upset over images, but I'm not. I'm annoyed that you are allowed to post almost 10,000 pieces of troll-filled bullshit without being banned.

Password- I really am not sure if she's the GFE type, as she DFK'd my face off before I could even pay or discuss what I wanted from our session. She naturally seems to go for the dirty, full-on porn approach (I didnt ask for this so im guessing this is her standard approach). On the plus side, she's excellent with comms and very open to ideas, so perhaps talking to her over the phone and stating you want your booking to go a certain way, and for her to tone it down with the cock-slapping, gagging, and porn moans, it might yield better results.

Offline Jimmyredcab

It doesn't. You think in upset over images, but I'm not. I'm annoyed that you are allowed to post almost 10,000 pieces of troll-filled bullshit without being banned.

There is more chance of the Pope being banned from the Vatican.      :hi: :hi:

Offline ciscoxxx69

So why does my mentioning the heavily photoshopped images upset you so much ?

Because it's so f*cking predictable you moron.

Don't you think we can ALL see that the pictures are photoshopped?  :unknown:
Do you think that WGs will change because of what James says? (Obviously they might I suppose, given how much esteem you are probably held in by them!)

Nearly all girls trying to sell themselves in a competitive market may photoshop their pictures. That will work for as many as it doesn't.
I don't like photoshopped images myself either, but it won't stop me seeing a girl, as I tend to take more notice of the informative first hand reviews written by posters who have actually seen the girls and are therefore in a position to make a critical and worthy comment, than some tiresome bore like you.

You, on the other hand, obviously just hate all women. There is no other reason for you posting the shite you do. You need to get out more mate. I know......you could go and see a WG !
This is a PUNTING forum isn't it....? Only, I can't see anywhere on here that YOU have actually ever punted. :unknown:

I eagerly await the next hilariously amusing(???? FFS) pic and put down you post .  :hi:

Again, thanks for the review JJ

Jesus.

You shot yourself in the foot when you said this ---------

" Yes, they're heavily photoshopped, but it's an accurate representation."

Not really, grandpa. They're professional photos, but facially and body-wise, what you see is what you get in my view. Perhaps in some of the shots her skin tone has been lightened and smoothed out (she had some very minor blemishes on her upper arm) but I stand by what I said- they are an accurate representation of what she looks like. The photshopping isn't hiding anything horrible like a fat belly, stretch marks or tats/scars.

Cisco et all, thanks guys. It is a relief that there are genuine contributes on this forum.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2013, 10:51:54 PM by jesus_jones »

Offline Jimmyredcab



Don't you think we can ALL see that the pictures are photoshopped?  :unknown:


Photoshop is a curse in this industry, just behind bait and switch.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Offline iPad3

Not really, grandpa. They're professional photos, but facially and body-wise, what you see is what you get in my view. Perhaps in some of the shots her skin tone has been lightened and smoothed out (she had some very minor blemishes on her upper arm) but I stand by what I said- they are an accurate representation of what she looks like. The photshopping isn't hiding anything horrible like a fat belly, stretch marks or tats/scars.

Cisco et all, thanks guys. It is a relief that there are genuine contributes on this forum.

My next question answered without my even asking it, thanks again JJ your contributions are exactly what I am looking for as a new member here!!

Offline ciscoxxx69

Photoshop is a curse in this industry, just behind bait and switch.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

I agree....
Bait and switch is the ultimate curse.

Photoshopping? Nah....if you can see a profile pic is photoshopped you have the ultimate veto. You go or you don't. I tend to trust iPhone/ Gonzo pics more now, but like I said, I will take more notice of the reviews on here.

Offline ciscoxxx69

she DFK'd my face off before I could even pay or discuss what I wanted from our session. She naturally seems to go for the dirty, full-on porn approach (I didnt ask for this so im guessing this is her standard approach). On the plus side, she's excellent with comms and very open to ideas,


...Mmmmm. She seems like my kinda Gal  :P :wacko:

Photoshop is a curse in this industry, just behind bait and switch.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Yet you bang your drum about the quality of HoD and other establishments that use Photoshop, and blast a quality girl (Michelle Independent) when she posts honest, nonprofessional photos.

In fact, Cindy/Kim's photos are the same ones she had up when she was at HoD.

I would say punters that tell wg's to put their rates up are much worse than photoshopped pictures.

Offline ciscoxxx69


Yet you bang your drum about the quality of HoD and other establishments that use Photoshop, and blast a quality girl (Michelle Independent) when she posts honest,


Was going to say the same.
All agencies use photoshopped pictures. The point is, we can see they are.....it's then a gamble you take or you don't. The clue is in the title....PUNTING.

Can we go back to talking about Kim/Cindy .....far more interesting!
« Last Edit: December 26, 2013, 11:12:07 PM by ciscoxxx69 »

Offline Jimmyredcab

Yet you bang your drum about the quality of HoD and other establishments that use Photoshop, and blast a quality girl (Michelle Independent) when she posts honest, nonprofessional photos.



I simply told her that her photos could be improved ---------------------- she took my advice, the current photos are excellent.

Funny how other people got offended on her behalf.      :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Jimmyredcab



In fact, Cindy/Kim's photos are the same ones she had up when she was at HoD.


When you could have seen her for 45 minutes at £100.      :music: :music:

Thanks for the review jesus_jones. Her rate's are a bit pricy, but she does all her services and gives a very energetic service. Would she be comparable to Hot Ameera?  ;) Glad you had a good punt.

When you could have seen her for 45 minutes at £100.      :music: :music:

And be ushered in past other punters, have several minutes chopped off from the start and end of my booking, and see her after she's had back-to-back bookings all day, no thanks. I don't like HoD, if you actually read my review, I already explained why.

My booking was much more relaxed; I was there well over my allotted time.


Thanks for the review jesus_jones. Her rate's are a bit pricy, but she does all her services and gives a very energetic service. Would she be comparable to Hot Ameera?  ;) Glad you had a good punt.

Hi dude, I suppose that is a fair comparison. Ameera doesn't do anal though (even though Cindy only does it 'at discretion'). I would say Ameera is a slightly more convincing performer, had to stop her biting me! Ameera literally only works at one pace, like a sex-starved ex-girlfriend demon. With Cindy it feels more like a porn star doing her thing- she kind of stops for small breaks during her performance to ask questions (shall we move to the bed, what do you want to do now etc) whereas Ameera will just jump you onto the bed and take the lead.

Hope that makes sense. Basically Ameera is more of a natural slutty teenage girlfriend, and Cindy is like fucking a porn star with big plastic tits and pouty lips.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2013, 11:54:12 PM by jesus_jones »

Hi dude, I suppose that is a fair comparison. Ameera doesn't do anal though (even though Cindy only does it 'at discretion'). I would say Ameera is a slightly more convincing performer, had to stop her biting me! Ameera literally only works at one pace, like a sex-starved ex-girlfriend demon. With Cindy it feels more like a porn star doing her thing- she kind of stops for small breaks during her performance to ask questions (shall we move to the bed, what do you want to do now etc) whereas Ameera will just jump you onto the bed and take the lead.

Hope that makes sense. Basically Ameera is more of a natural slutty teenage girlfriend, and Cindy is like fucking a porn star with big plastic tits and pouty lips.

Ameera sounds awesome. I had the chance to see her when see was called Sabrina in North Harrow for £90ph. She opened the door and ask me if I wanted to see her and I said no I've booked to see Nikkii. - not too many regrets because Nikkii was a very good punt. Ameera is on my hotlist. KimCindy is too expensive and I'm not keen on black girls. Thanks for the review JJ

Thanks for the review mate.  I'd also like to see a black girl as I've never shagged one before!  I'm looking for one a bit cheaper though, around £70 for 30 mins.

Millie at HOD

Offline booblord

https://www.adultwork.com/2286592 or https://www.adultwork.com/Busty+ebony+kimcindy

A lot of people will know her as Cindy from HoD and I was always tempted to see her there, but I'm not keen on the place because of the high traffic of punters coming and going. She was working alone from a flat in South Kensington before Christmas, so I paid her a visit.

Definitely not a girl to see if you are after a soft GFE. She was full-on from the start, sticking her tongue down my throat before I had even made my way through the hallway. She is just as the photos, slim with a great pair of enhanced tits. Great owo- very porn style, lots of spitting and deep throat with good eye contact. Lovely tit wank with oil, then on to the bed. Very vocal during reverse oral, happily took a few fingers but annoyingly stopped me before she came.

Took an A-level pounding with no problem, and actually seemed to get off from it, although she could only really do it from doggy. Sex was very good, she has lots of energy, she rides hard and fast. I finished sitting on top of her, fucking her tits, then came in her mouth and on her tits. I did enjoy watching her spit it over her tits and suck the last drops out. She's an excellent PSE performer.

I left feeling very satisfied. No Clockwatching or pestering, I even had to prompt her to take my money halfway through. If I had to be pedantic, my only slight negatives would be her wet-wiping me down despite the fact I arrived freshly showered, and also her stopping RO abruptly. Also, she's very chatty, which isn't really my thing, but she's happy for you to quieten her mouth by kissing.

Certainly pricey, but excellent service. Don't think I will be back, as personally I don't go for black girls (she was my first) but I had a great time trying something new.

hey jesus, how tall is she and how big is her arse.. I love tall black woman with huge arsee... thanks for review. I just need these two ticks before I make my way to see her hehe


3 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Online James999

Because it's so f*cking predictable you moron.

Tut Tut, I wasn't talking to you  :dash:

interesting how you have had to resort to insults  :wacko:
« Last Edit: December 27, 2013, 09:22:39 AM by James999 »

Online James999

I simply told her that her photos could be improved ----------------------

This ones photos could be improved if she was the same colour in them for a start, in some she's a dark choloclate and in others a milk chocolate, I know a lot of blacks want to be lighter in colour, but FFS she'll be posting Michael Jackson pics next, but some idiots will think that's ok as it's obvious because we know he's dead  :hi:

Offline harms

I sent her a message last night regarding DFK and got this response:

"hello,
thanks for your email, i will get back to you asap"

hmmmmm

Online Anadin

This ones photos could be improved if she was the same colour in them for a start, in some she's a dark choloclate and in others a milk chocolate, I know a lot of blacks want to be lighter in colour, but FFS she'll be posting Michael Jackson pics next, but some idiots will think that's ok as it's obvious because we know he's dead  :hi:

Looks the same colour in her pics to me, Do white ladies have to be the exact same colour in their pics or is that just a criticism reserved for the 'blacks'?

Online James999

Look at the 1st 3rd 5th pictures in her gallery then, liek a fucking dulux colour chart  :sarcastic:

The point being due to the high level of photoshop you have no idea what you are actually being offered  :hi:
« Last Edit: December 27, 2013, 11:15:26 AM by James999 »

Online Anadin

She has marginally different skintone from what looks like different photoshoots to me, happens to everyone.

The point being due to the high level of photoshop you have no idea what you are actually being offered  :hi:

Fair point.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2013, 11:17:40 AM by Anadin »

Offline iPad3

This ones photos could be improved if she was the same colour in them for a start, in some she's a dark choloclate and in others a milk chocolate, I know a lot of blacks want to be lighter in colour, but FFS she'll be posting Michael Jackson pics next, but some idiots will think that's ok as it's obvious because we know he's dead  :hi:

I'm sorry James I have treid not to pitch in on the more ridiculous posts in this thread but can resist no longer, Mr Jackson is indeed dead that's obvious, if you re read your posts on this thread though something else is also very obvious, I'm not going to say it but to all of us with a brain will know what I mean!!! Merry Christmas and I await your first review of 2014 with bated breath!!




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)