Lucy - FBSM only - Nottingham

[rhub9]

(This is my first review so go easy on me please!)

Exec summary: Petite stunner, very skilled body-to-body massage. Full service NOT on offer. £80/hour

Having fallen foul of Thai Barbie's terrible timekeeping, I decided to give this one a try:

Lucy21yo! **07494724751** sensual body to body massage !
External Link/Members Only

Comms: Easy to understand on the phone, texted address and directions. Flat number provided on arrival.

Venue: Apartment in trendy area of Nottingham, just up the road from one of the common Thai venues. One negative is that you have to get buzzed in by the building supervisor, not sure if this is the usual arrangement, but it was a bit off-putting. Fantastic shower, which is needed to wash off the oil afterwards!

Looks: Petite, cracking yoga body, great smooth skin and very pretty/naughty face. Italian/Polish mix apparently. Picture is accurate and I would estimate her age to be close to the claimed 21 years. Good English with a nice soft accent.

Service: Showered first. What followed by very sensual full body massage. Warmed massage oil used. Fully nude body slides, lots of use of boobs and great feeling her venus mons sliding up and down your lower back! Definitely more of a "sensual massage" than a sports one. Flipped over for more body slides, and an expertly delivered HJ finish.

Cons: Limited touching (no fingers inside), and nothing more than massage+HR on offer.

VFM: At £80 for an hour it is on the more expensive side for a massage-only service, but the quality of the lady's looks and service tilts this into a positive review. She clearly enjoys her work.

Would I see again? Probably, although only when I next get stood up by the latest Thai offering!

Hidden Image/Members Only

[PepeMAGA]

Looks hot from the picture. Was it a good HJ?

[rhub9]

Looks hot from the picture. Was it a good HJ?

Yes, it was. One where you could lie back and just enjoy rather than having to continually adjust her speed for fear of her ripping it off... Ball cupping, etc. with the other hand. I got the impression she might actually be quite good at edging, will enquire next time unless someone else gets there before me.

[HailWood]

Nice review. 
Cracking body. If only she did FS.

[simon07]

If it is the same managed flat where there were some Polish girls, usually 2 at a time, who else is there?

[KC66]

What is parking like in that area, will be nearby later this week but don’t know the area and won’t have lots of spare time for traffic and parking?

Cheers

[pull88]

I'm pretty sure that picture is Yanet Garcia... the mexican weather girl
Hidden Image/Members Only

[Dipper]

 

[TrapLordNg]

I'm pretty sure that picture is Yanet Garcia... the mexican weather girl
Hidden Image/Members Only

Yanet and Lucy have incredibly similar tastes in fashion and bedroom decor!

[Gethin_Thomas]

Indeed.

External Link/Members Only

[TrapLordNg]

OP, are you sure the pic is accurate 

[HailWood]

OP, are you sure the pic is accurate 

It’s obviously not accurate but is it a fair reflection of what you will see if you meet her.  While not condoning use of fake pictures, I understand why FAF lasses prefer to use them for privacy reasons.

[vw]

It’s obviously not accurate but is it a fair reflection of what you will see if you meet her.  While not condoning use of fake pictures, I understand why FAF lasses prefer to use them for privacy reasons.

Persoally think  this is cuntish to the person whose photo was stolen.

As for privacy reasons why are FAF a special case?   

[Donkey]

Sorry if this is a silly question but how tall would you say she is?

[Theman1]

I was gonna go see this bird but now reconsidering. If she was FAF why not put your own body pic up.

[HailWood]

As for privacy reasons why are FAF a special case?   

You misunderstand, again.

A FAF lass would have no reason to hide her body other than privacy.

And I opened my post  not condoning the practice but that I understood why it may happen for that circumstance.

[vw]

You misunderstand, again.

A FAF lass would have no reason to hide her body other than privacy.

And I opened my post  not condoning the practice but that I understood why it may happen for that circumstance.

Or hide imperfections/insecurities, every one has them.   

Anyway thanks for being so understanding to those that use these lowlife practices.   

[Picti]

It’s obviously not accurate but is it a fair reflection of what you will see if you meet her.  While not condoning use of fake pictures, I understand why FAF lasses prefer to use them for privacy reasons.

Noooooo! Photos should always be an accurate and current depiction of the WG who's trying to sell us sex. A punter's decision to pay is partly based on attraction, preferred appearance / body type, etc. You can only discern that from photos that are actually of her; anything else is deception.

If she wants that type of privacy then paid sex work isn't the right way to make money. The only privacy exceptions should be face shots and obscuring tattoos, etc.

[vw]

Noooooo! Photos should always be an accurate and current depiction of the WG who's trying to sell us sex. A punter's decision to pay is partly based on attraction, preferred appearance / body type, etc. You can only discern that from photos that are actually of her; anything else is deception.

If she wants that type of privacy then paid sex work isn't the right way to make money. The only privacy exceptions should be face shots and obscuring tattoos, etc.

vivastreet saw sense and deleted the advert it seems.

[HailWood]

Noooooo! Photos should always be an accurate and current depiction of the WG who's trying to sell us sex. A punter's decision to pay is partly based on attraction, preferred appearance / body type, etc. You can only discern that from photos that are actually of her; anything else is deception.

If she wants that type of privacy then paid sex work isn't the right way to make money. The only privacy exceptions should be face shots and obscuring tattoos, etc.

Did I say that I condoned it?
Understanding it is very different.

All I was asking is if the girl in question has a similarity to the girl the OP met.

TBH - it’s irrelevant to me anyway because unless she offers FS in the future, I won’t be booking her.

[vw]

TBH - it’s irrelevant to me anyway because unless she offers FS in the future, I won’t be booking her.

So how can you proclaim this?

It’s obviously not accurate but is it a fair reflection of what you will see if you meet her.

It reads like you have met her.

[HailWood]

So how can you proclaim this?

It reads like you have met her.

Read it again VW.

“is it” as written is a question not “it is” which would have been a proclamation.

[vw]

Read it again VW.

“is it” as written is a question not “it is” which would have been a proclamation.

You are right, this once   

Do me a favour put a question mark on when asking questions.   

Anyway all irrelevant, advert has gone.   

[HailWood]

You are right, this once   

Do me a favour put a question mark on when asking questions.   

Fuck me, I just fell off my chair. 

Noted re question mark.

[Theman1]

Based on the misleading picture I won't be going I had based my initial punt based on review and those very toned thighs.

[Fly Ryder]

Noooooo! Photos should always be an accurate and current depiction of the WG who's trying to sell us sex. A punter's decision to pay is partly based on attraction, preferred appearance / body type, etc. You can only discern that from photos that are actually of her; anything else is deception.

If she wants that type of privacy then paid sex work isn't the right way to make money. The only privacy exceptions should be face shots and obscuring tattoos, etc.

This

[rhub9]

Guess this is why Yanet is working in Nottingham...

External Link/Members Only

More seriously, the photo isn't of "Lucy", although is accurate enough that I thought it was. I'll leave it up to the next reviewer to decide if I need a new glasses prescription.

[Donkey]

External Link/Members Only

New link. She removed the fake photo so I guess she reads this forum.
OP do you know who her housemate is and if they offer 4 hands?

[Donkey]

External Link/Members Only

New link. She removed the fake photo so I guess she reads this forum.
OP do you know who her housemate is and if they offer 4 hands?

Sorry i noticed it wasn’t the OP who said she has a housemate

[Donkey]

Ok so I got round to visiting Lucy in her city centre apartment. I don’t know if it’s worth me doing a review for her, since we can’t index Vivastreet. And my experience was similar to the OP. The girl’s body is very similar to the one in the deleted photo. Nice enough girl, looks really young and is petite with a great ass, and has very soft skin.

Limited touching. Didn’t even try to kiss her body but you can do what you want to her feet

She gets many foot fetish clients apparently because of her ad, and she has the cutest manicured tiny feet.

Paid £80 and was in there for 1 hour 15 minutes. She also insists you shower before the appointment. I had already showered before going but she said ‘I need you to be really clean for when I touch your bum’

Positive from me and definitely going again

[onaleash]

Hi, sorry for resurrecting an old thread but does anybody know if Lucy is still working? I'm up in nottingham this week so was going to give her a try if she is. I can't find an ad though.. cheers

[Donkey]

Hi, sorry for resurrecting an old thread but does anybody know if Lucy is still working? I'm up in nottingham this week so was going to give her a try if she is. I can't find an ad though.. cheers

She removes the ad on the days she’s not working. So keep an eye on this link. She’ll activate it when she’s working

External Link/Members Only

Or you could always try texting her phone number, available in this review

[Maverick1138]

No disrespect to the OP as he obviously thought that the photo was real enough.
However, I am always peeved at the girl as to why they need to do that. If its THAT close enough, then just effin use your own photo!! Privacy or no privacy, having photo that similar resemblance does no harm to privacy then does it?!

[tradsweet]

I found that this link currently works External Link/Members Only or do a Google search on her phone number

[CoolTiger]

VS Profile
External Link/Members Only

07494724751
07494 724751
+447494724751

[NottsThaiLover]

She's currently doing a £20 off offer

40 for 30 mins and 60 for 1 hr

Dusty phone maybe

[debcase111]

Have you a new link??

[MajorPayne]

VS Profile
External Link/Members Only

Is this the link you want?  mobile is 07507832881

For £60/hour, at last someone with reasonable prices.

[debcase111]

thanks for that