Fair point, but fyi I did see them again, you don’t have to believe me but as you said if you consider the time stamps they DID respond and have NOT blocked/blacklisted me. 
Whether myself or others believe you is irrelevant. Strangers on the net should mean sod all to you.
A somewhat side note-- why do so many of these English WGs around that £200-250 range have no UKP reviews? Her current profile has been up almost one year to the date. Is it because a lot of punters think like me and are apprehensive to do reviews as these types are the ones who are usually savvy enough to check UKP (and actually care about what's put out there and often come on here to contribute and rebut)?
I find it odd that so many of this type of profile have no reviews on UKP, yet quite a few on aw (as the SP mentioned herself). It really does play into the take aw feedback with a pinch of salt rhetoric...
Then inversely, so many EE types have no aw reviews but a dozen or so on here.
If a punter goes through the somewhat tedious process of aw bookings (that's the only way you can leave reviews there)...why wouldn't they also just pop a review on this site? Meh.
If he has not had any sex with you, then you should have done a refund and asked him to walk out. 150 for 30 mins mean more professionalism, from what you have said, if you were really upset you should have atleast done a partial refund and asked him to walk. I smell a rip off here
Like most two sided stories, the truth is probably somewhere in the middle.
FFS you have just got yourself involved with the police...
If she hasn't reported you and lied that she has then all you have gone and done is reported yourself.
Pps be snitching on themselves these days
