MarleyMagnificent - Edinburgh

[LittleMac]

External Link/Members Only

This was from was a few months back but thought I'd throw it up anyway.
This was my second time with Marley and it was even better than the first.
1 hour - £200

Comms
Quick and painless. Booked a day in advance through aw and had a few texts back and forth.

Location
Leith area. Private flat area. Parking was a bit weird at first as I thought it might be private but it was all good. Might have been more difficult if I had went at another time of day.

Marley herself
Very pretty and well made up girl. Great body with plenty to play with. I asked her to wear something just felt sexy in and she wore nice black lace top with black thong. Really nice girl, great to chat to.

Services
I didn't specify anything in the comms. DFK (tons of it), OW, RO, toys, anal, sub.

The meet
 Since this was my 2nd meet with Marley I knew what she was into and decided fully go with being dominant as she is really submissive.
A quick chat and then I had her legs around me, dfk up against the wall.
After ripping each others clothes off, I pushed her down to her knees where she went to town with a great BJ.
I then grabbed her and hauled her onto the bed and proceeded to tie her up. Her wrists together and to the bed.
I went on to make her cum (and scream) with a combination of her toys, fingers and tongue while she was tied up.
I untied her, got the bag on and we fucked like rabbits, mish, up against the wall before finishing in doggy.
Had a chat and cuddle as we rest for a bit before her hand went back to my cock and I started playing with her pussy. Gave her a good spanking and used her hitachi to have her cum for a 3rd time.
Once I was fully recovered she jump on and rode me. During as we were kissing she whispered "I want you to fuck me in the ass." I wasn't going to say no to that now was I. She was super wet as I slipped inside her and we both came again during anal.
We then shared a shower (she was a mess by this point) where we continued to kiss and play with each other.
After putting my clothes back on we continued to kiss and I had he up against the wall again. I felt like she was enjoying herself as much as I was and she was reluctant to call time, she never even asked for the money I gave it to her at the end. We were all over each other all the way out the door.

Verdict
Marley is an amazing punt. Hot and horny as fuck. She's expensive but I was there for 1.5 hours and only booked 1 so I got my moneys worth. If you don't punt often and want a submissive girl who loves to cum, Marley would be my recommendation for you.

[Courtney]

she never even asked for the money

...you would think at £200 that would be her priority.

[Name Not Found]

That's a hell of a set of legs and an ass, but I'm not sure I'd stretch to 200 notes for a go.

Glad you enjoyed yourself nonetheless.

[Third Man]

major load of  cash for an hour. however if she looked as good as her limited number of pics I might be tempted at some point. but their in lies the problem, any profile that says 5'6 and size 10 is usually a bigger lass, and not height wise. it seems her legs go on for ever, but 5'6 is not tall, and if it was possible a tall leggy lass is what I go for. so Id guess her limited pics are deliberately misleading.

[loser]

...we both came again during anal.

Does she have a clitoris up her arse?

[TKovac]

Does she have a clitoris up her arse?

There is more to life than the clitoris

[RandyRob69]

Sounds like a great punt - lucky you! Have always been drawn to her - lovely legs and an ass that you'd just luv to bang!

However £200 / hour is OTT as far as I'm concerned - magnificent or otherwise

[The Man With No Name]

Does she have a clitoris up her arse?

Fuckwit. 

Why would any woman voluntarily engage in anal sex for her own pleasure, if there was no sexual stimulation resulting from having a dick in her ass?

Starting to think you actually are your avatar. 

[LittleMac]

Sounds like a great punt - lucky you! Have always been drawn to her - lovely legs and an ass that you'd just luv to bang!

However £200 / hour is OTT as far as I'm concerned - magnificent or otherwise

I agree it’s a steep price but it more like £200 for 1.5hours. I’ve seen her twice and it’s been the same both times. Don’t quote me on that cause it will probably depend how well you get on and if she’s busy or not.

As someone who doesn’t punt often, I feel like I’m paying for the quality. I’d rather pay extra and have an amazing time than simply a good time for less. Regardless, it’s still expensive anyway you look at it.

[LittleMac]

Does she have a clitoris up her arse?

Nah, my cocks just so big I hit it regardless which hole I use. 

[loser]

Why would any woman voluntarily engage in anal sex for her own pleasure, if there was no sexual stimulation resulting from having a dick in her ass?

£200 an hour perhaps? Would you care to answer to answer your own question?

[Name Not Found]

£200 an hour perhaps? Would you care to answer to answer your own question?

Seem like you're just trying to cause an argument for your own entertainment, but if you actually read the sentence you have quoted you'll see your reply makes absolutely no sense.

[loser]

No, I have legitimate concerns about this review, which I can expand upon, and which the original poster took in good humour. I do not find arguing entertaining,  I merely responded to pointless abuse from a troll. The original question does not make much sense either, especially in the context of a prostitution forum. I am not sure what he means, and with a sense of him being not the sharpest tool, neither does he.

[Clattypats]

No, I have legitimate concerns about this review, which I can expand upon,

Can you expand upon it then, instead of talking in riddles!...

[SI2018]

The timing of the original post is a bit suspect.

Marley used to tour Edinburgh every month. Then a while back her profile said she was retiring and she was off the radar a while. Then retirement was taken off her profile and she was back in action in Swindon only - no touring.

Now, on the day an Edinburgh tour goes up on her profile for the first time in ages, a review from a 'months ago' punt pops up.

Surely his is either Marley promoting herself to raise interest in her tour.. or getting someone to do it for her.

[Happy99]

Also highly suspect is:

1. According to this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=95415.0   it seems she changed her AW profile name after getting negative feedback on here. Was then seemingly banned from here after spouting off and allegedly threatened to 'out' certain punters who gave her negatives. She is described in the thread as 'unhinged'.

2. She has 400 AW escort feedback over 2yrs which is a ridiculously suspect amount.  Many of them are by same user names, including 2 with 'biro' in name. Sounds like offering some incentive for positives or else fakes.

3. Claims to be 20, but if you do the maths on date of her 1st negative review on here, that age is bull.

4. Says she is 5ft 6 in profile, but some of her fluffy AW reviews say she is 5ft 10 but 6ft in heels??

5. Highly stylised studio photos with face hidden, how can they be trusted to be accurate or even her?

The timing of the planting of this review certainly appears to be a marketing ploy for upcoming tour. We have seen this sort of stuff before from members previously banned.

[Name Not Found]

I wonder if Biro will be popping back any time soon to defend his 'review'.  I suspect not.

[Matrix]

She does look real fuckable in that bikini.

[The Man With No Name]

No, I have legitimate concerns about this review, which I can expand upon, and which the original poster took in good humour. I do not find arguing entertaining,  I merely responded to pointless abuse from a troll. The original question does not make much sense either, especially in the context of a prostitution forum. I am not sure what he means, and with a sense of him being not the sharpest tool, neither does he.

1. You have the hypocrisy to label me a troll, when your forum name is "Loser" and your avatar is that of what could easily be a mentally disabled child. You then open your contribution to the thread with the shite sarcastic comment "Does she have a clitoris up her arse?" - implying women couldn't possibly enjoy or climax from anal sex because there isn't enough clitoral stimulation involved.

2. You then have the hypocrisy to imply stupidity on my part when Name Not Found has already identified you as a complete fucking idiot for the following reason:

Why would any woman voluntarily engage in anal sex for her own pleasure, if there was no sexual stimulation resulting from having a dick in her ass?

See the words "voluntarily," "own" and "pleasure"? That means I was speaking of sexually liberal women in 2018, who aren't prostitutes, and genuinely enjoy being fucked in the arse in their private lives. Now, read carefully, because here's a little bit of education for you: They don't do it to avoid pregnancy or simply to please their sexual partners. They do it, because they genuinely like the sensation of a cock in their arse which can help being them to sexual climax (WITHOUT the presence of a clitoris in their rectum, just in case you were still confused). This might not be the majority of women on the planet, but there's still a good few hundred million of them.

Despite such obvious facts, you still replied with:

£200 an hour perhaps? Would you care to answer to answer your own question?

Presumably you were still somehow clinging to the assumption that the only women who like anal sex are prostitutes who can charge money for it, despite me already clearly explaining to you otherwise. Lest we even mention the possibility of prostitutes who offer anal sex enjoying both the money and the sensation it brings them. 

Now you've read this, fuck off back to the remedial corner, where you belong. Cretin.

[The Man With No Name]

She does look real fuckable in that bikini.

Agreed. Would need to have gone a couple of days without a wank to get enough pleasure to justify the cost, and would probably struggle to live with myself, even if I did.

But assuming so, and she happened to be local and available when I wanted, wild horses would struggle to stop me. As going by all reports, rattling her arse, with her taking it in her usual 5th gear of enthusiasm, would be an experience you'd never forget.

I also don't really buy any of the suspicion over this review either. Mainly because there's no motive for it (being the key to any alleged conspiracy). She already has 13 glowing reviews between this and her old profile. Her only negatives are one rather dubious-looking entry from over two years ago, and another where the punter got huffy that she kept puking over his cock, because he repeatedly kept face fucking her too deep, (yet despite the fact it obviously made her sick, he inexplicably kept doing it). So all in, I can't see the need for her to post a fake review.

[Matrix]

Agreed. Would need to have gone a couple of days without a wank to get enough pleasure to justify the cost, and would probably struggle to live with myself, even if I did.

But assuming so, and she happened to be local and available when I wanted, wild horses would struggle to stop me. As going by all reports, rattling her arse, with her taking it in her usual 5th gear of enthusiasm, would be an experience you'd never forget.

I also don't really buy any of the suspicion over this review either. Mainly because there's no motive for it (being the key to any alleged conspiracy). She already has 13 glowing reviews between this and her old profile. Her only negatives are one rather dubious-looking entry from over two years ago, and another where the punter got huffy that she kept puking over his cock, because he repeatedly kept face fucking her too deep, (yet despite the fact it obviously made her sick, he inexplicably kept doing it). So all in, I can't see the need for her to post a fake review.

The selection at the the moment is so fucking poor that I'm considering smashing her next week. Like you've indicated, I don't think she could have so many positives here, at the price she charges, without being a good fuck.

[Name Not Found]

I do think there are some suspicious aspects to the appearance of the review, but not enough to indicate anything serious enough to put anyone off seeing her. Maybe just a bit of lightly encouraged touting. That doesn't mean she couldn't be a damn good fuck. I'm not a fan of bum-fun myself, but I'd still like to get my hands on that ass if the price was more reasonable.

Loser, on the other hand, has contributed fuck all to the discussion by posting obscure comments, then pretending they were motivated by genuine concerns, which he has yet to offer an explanation of. TBH, he's just made himself look a bit of a dick (or a Loser if you prefer).

Would still be good if the OP returned to validate his report. He's been logged in often enough since.

[The Man With No Name]

Loser, on the other hand, has contributed fuck all to the discussion by posting obscure comments, then pretending they were motivated by genuine concerns, which he has yet to offer an explanation of. TBH, he's just made himself look a bit of a dick (or a Loser if you prefer).

Loser's just a wee toss-pot that can get tae shite. I only bothered making my reply that long as I wanted to humiliate him for having the gall to try and label me an ignorant troll, when that's exactly what he is himself.

The selection at the the moment is so fucking poor that I'm considering smashing her next week. Like you've indicated, I don't think she could have so many positives here, at the price she charges, without being a good fuck.

Interesting. I look forward to hearing your perspective, if it goes ahead.

[Matrix]

Loser's just a wee toss-pot that can get tae shite. I only bothered making my reply that long as I wanted to humiliate him for having the gall to try and label me an ignorant troll, when that's exactly what he is himself.
 

One thing about Loser is, he's a braver man than me! 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=173713.0

I wouldn't fuck that if she paid me.

[The Man With No Name]

One thing about Loser is, he's a braver man than me! 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=173713.0

I wouldn't fuck that if she paid me.

Perhaps the aftermath of that is where he takes his name from.

I certainly agree with your comments about her looking like a badger-shagging, homeless (male) alcoholic . Or what might anal-probe you if you were unlucky enough to get beamed up by a white light on an abandoned country road.

[Name Not Found]

I wouldn't fuck that if she paid me.

OOF! The further down you scroll, the more stomach-churning it gets... and that's just the first post.

I have a new respect for him.....Oh no, wait a minute, I still don't; he's still a cunt. Just a cunt with really poor taste in women 

[loser]

Can you expand upon it then, instead of talking in riddles!...

When I first posted I was thinking about the vintage porn film Deep Throat. Just a flippant remark, no need for some people to get nasty. Questioning reviews is part of the site ethos. 

Inducing an orgasm in any woman is difficult. Prostitutes having orgasms from customers are rare - even from ones who are "still young, decent-looking and charming enough". Women enjoying anal sex are even rarer. It may be possible for women to orgasm anally, I don't know. Someone with a cowboy avatar would probably know more about receiving anal pleasure than I do. The statistical probability here is getting pretty small. I had a vague recollection of multiple profiles and the service provider being banned but could not find the link easily. Added to that a relatively unknown/dormant reviewer (now AWOL) and unusually high charges. With subsequent posts it looks on balance of probabilities that I may have been vindicated.

[Clattypats]

When I first posted I was thinking about the vintage porn film Deep Throat. Just a flippant remark, no need for some people to get nasty. Questioning reviews is part of the site ethos. 

Inducing an orgasm in any woman is difficult. Prostitutes having orgasms from customers are rare - even from ones who are "still young, decent-looking and charming enough". Women enjoying anal sex are even rarer. It may be possible for women to orgasm anally, I don't know. Someone with a cowboy avatar would probably know more about receiving anal pleasure than I do. The statistical probability here is getting pretty small. I had a vague recollection of multiple profiles and the service provider being banned but could not find the link easily. Added to that a relatively unknown/dormant reviewer (now AWOL) and unusually high charges. With subsequent posts it looks on balance of probabilities that I may have been vindicated.

Don't know why you're spouting all this shit to me  ...That's not what I asked you...I asked you to expand upon your "legitimate concerns about this review"...

And BTW...You don't need to tell me about the ethos of this site...

[loser]

Don't know why you're spouting all this shit to me  ...That's not what I asked you...I asked you to expand upon your "legitimate concerns about this review"...

And BTW...You don't need to tell me about the ethos of this site...

I am spouting this shit for the benefit of other members.

[Clattypats]

I am spouting this shit for the benefit of other members.

Try quoting the right person then!...

[TKovac]

I am spouting this shit for the benefit of other members.

Which other members cause right now your shit is just contamination of this site

[LittleMac]

Ok so first of me coming back on for a while only to discover the the comments here.
For those questioning the legitimacy of this review, I honestly don't know what you would want me to say to trust the review.
The meeting was on the 19/04/18 if the date is what is in question.
I stand-by the review and if you feel it's fabricated then I'm sorry but there is very little I could say to convince you at this point and I don't feel I have to.
GLHF

[Name Not Found]

I've rarely read such a load of bullshit as Loser has come up with, compressed into such short space

When I first posted I was thinking about the vintage porn film Deep Throat. Just a flippant remark, no need for some people to get nasty. Questioning reviews is part of the site ethos. 

What does a flippant remark have to do with questioning a review? Maybe you need to spend less time thinking about ancient porn and study modern logic instead?

Inducing an orgasm in any woman is difficult.

Utter bollocks. 96% of women claim to be able to achieve orgasm, and in excess of 60% say the achieve orgasm every time, or most times, they have sex. Maybe you're doing it wrong?

Prostitutes having orgasms from customers are rare

Got any facts to back that up, or is it just from personal experience? My personal experience is that may WGs experience orgasm, showing all the signs that can't really be faked. Maybe you're doing it wrong?

Women enjoying anal sex are even rarer.

Enjoying anal sex and having orgasms are not dependent on one another, so your point makes no sense. You really must be doing it wrong.

It may be possible for women to orgasm anally, I don't know.

So we can add that to the long list of things you don't know about. Research shows that orgasm though anal stimulation is rare, but up to 40% of women can achieve orgasm though other, concurrent, stimulation. I'm now pretty sure you're doing it wrong.

The statistical probability here is getting pretty small.

Looks like we can add statistics to the list of things you know nothing about, since all you've come up with is a random collection of propositions and no numbers to back them up.  If you think that counts as 'statistics', you are DEFINITELY doing it wrong.

... it looks on balance of probabilities that I may have been vindicated.

It looks, on the balance of probabilities, that you may be a dumb fuckwit. But at least you seem to have got that one down to a T.

[loser]

OOF! The further down you scroll, the more stomach-churning it gets... and that's just the first post.

I have a new respect for him.....Oh no, wait a minute, I still don't; he's still a cunt. Just a cunt with really poor taste in women 

And I have a new respect for yer da...

[Happy99]

Ok so first of me coming back on for a while only to discover the the comments here.
For those questioning the legitimacy of this review, I honestly don't know what you would want me to say to trust the review.
The meeting was on the 19/04/18 if the date is what is in question.
I stand-by the review and if you feel it's fabricated then I'm sorry but there is very little I could say to convince you at this point and I don't feel I have to.
GLHF

You say you have seen her twice, but you have actually seen her 3 times, the others being in Nov and Feb 2017, but you wait 3 months after latest meet in 2018 until just before her next return tour to post a review? That's why it looks like touting. The fact you also refuse to address any of the points of suspicion above just confirms it.

You say you paid 200 for 1 hr, but her minimum advertised rate is 300 for 1.5hrs?  Taz discount perhaps?

[Name Not Found]

And I have a new respect for yer da...

I'd take that as a compliment, if I knew what the fuck you were on about.

[The Man With No Name]

She does normally have £200/hour on her profile. I'd never have considered her myself otherwise.

You say you have seen her twice, but you have actually seen her 3 times, the others being in Nov and Feb 2017, but you wait 3 months after latest meet in 2018 until just before her next return tour to post a review?

I can see the AW feedback from April and November, together with him confirming the date of the former. But what's your evidence for this supposed meet in February 2017, that would make it three in total?

Genuine apologies if I've missed something, but just don't see where you're getting this info from.

[SI2018]

I can see the AW feedback from April and November, together with him confirming the date of the former. But what's your evidence for this supposed meet in February 2017, that would make it three in total?

Genuine apologies if I've missed something, but just don't see where you're getting this info from.

It's on his AW feedback... he has feedback from her for a meet in Feb 2017.

[Clattypats]

I'd take that as a compliment, if I knew what the fuck you were on about.

Exactly  ...See people that bring maws n da''s into posts...They are absolute fuckwits IMO...I don't agree with it...and Taz used to do it alot. ..Pathetic!...

[Clattypats]

She does normally have £200/hour on her profile. I'd never have considered her myself otherwise.

I can see the AW feedback from April and November, together with him confirming the date of the former. But what's your evidence for this supposed meet in February 2017, that would make it three in total?

Genuine apologies if I've missed something, but just don't see where you're getting this info from.

Yip...It's on his FB not all on hers...If you ask me, the OP is an idiot for giving his AW username away on here 

He's gave it away, otherwise I done believe it's permitted on here... 

[LittleMac]

You say you have seen her twice, but you have actually seen her 3 times, the others being in Nov and Feb 2017, but you wait 3 months after latest meet in 2018 until just before her next return tour to post a review? That's why it looks like touting. The fact you also refuse to address any of the points of suspicion above just confirms it.

You say you paid 200 for 1 hr, but her minimum advertised rate is 300 for 1.5hrs?  Taz discount perhaps?

I have seen her twice. Other responses on my profile are from cancelled bookings due to issues on my end.
This was review was for a meeting on 19th April. I decided to post because I had been using this forum for a while with contributing to it.
I paid £200 for an hour but stayed for 1.5. It was never discussed, she never called time or ask for extra money since I stayed longer
It’s nice to see that when I actually try to contribute this is what happens. Not exactly a great incentive for me to try in the future.

[Clattypats]

I have seen her twice. Other responses on my profile are from cancelled bookings due to issues on my end.
This was review was for a meeting on 19th April. I decided to post because I had been using this forum for a while with contributing to it.
I paid £200 for an hour but stayed for 1.5. It was never discussed, she never called time or ask for extra money since I stayed longer
It’s nice to see that when I actually try to contribute this is what happens. Not exactly a great incentive for me to try in the future.

Nothing on your FB (which you have gave away, of your own accord)look like they are from cancelled bookings...

If you want your AW name to stay separate from this one, you should be more discreet, otherwise use the same handle..

It's not allowed on here to guess punters usernames in relation to their AW ones...But you have clearly given it away...A silly move IMO...

[LittleMac]

Nothing on your FB (which you have gave away, of your own accord)look like they are from cancelled bookings...

If you want your AW name to stay separate from this one, you should be more discreet, otherwise use the same handle..

It's not allowed on here to guess punters usernames in relation to their AW ones...But you have clearly given it away...A silly move IMO...

So believe or not. That’s down to you. I didn’t say anything about them being cancelled because I honestly couldn’t give a shit if they do or not since I know they were. What would the point in me lying about how many times I’ve seen her in a review unless it was the first time?
I had the same handle on here and AW for transparency and laziness on my part. If that’s not allowed then fine I’ll change it, as I’ve said already, I’m not on here often so if that’s a rule I missed it

[Clattypats]

So believe or not. That’s down to you. I didn’t say anything about them being cancelled because I honestly couldn’t give a shit if they do or not since I know they were. What would the point in me lying about how many times I’ve seen her in a review unless it was the first time?
I had the same handle on here and AW for transparency and laziness on my part. If that’s not allowed then fine I’ll change it, as I’ve said already, I’m not on here often so if that’s a rule I missed it

Read my posts fucking properly...You can give your AW name away all you want...Other members can't guess it, in relation to who someone might be on here...But you have given it away, so that's irrespective now...

If they weren't cancelled, why is there 3 Positives on FB...Usually on AW if anything occurs regarding cancellations etc...You leave FB only, or don't leave anything..

[LittleMac]

Read my posts fucking properly...You can give your AW name away all you want...Other members can't guess it, in relation to who someone might be on here...But you have given it away, so that's irrespective now...

If they weren't cancelled, why is there 3 Positives on FB...Usually on AW if anything occurs regarding cancellations etc...You leave FB only, or don't leave anything..

Ok so my name is not important then. If anything it shows that I’m not trying to hide something.
I gave her positive feedback on those non-meetings because I didn’t think anything of it. There’s no reason behind it other than they fell through and I wanted to be rid of the notification and I didn’t look any further than that.

[The Man With No Name]

It's on his AW feedback... he has feedback from her for a meet in Feb 2017.

Cheers. Knew there was something I must've overlooked.

I have seen her twice. Other responses on my profile are from cancelled bookings due to issues on my end.

As Clatty suggests, this bit of info is a bit suspect, given that the feedback from Marley for the contested (supposedly cancelled) booking was, "A really cute, young guy, good looking and turned me on a lot. Amazing kisser too xx"

Are we supposed to presume Marley took it so hard and far up the arse that cold, rainy day back in February last year, she mixed up who cancelled, and who actually fucked her? Not impossible I suppose, if the booking was never officially cancelled and she was intending to give the OP positive feedback in return for him doing the same. Isn't this permitted? It's certainly widely and openly done. In the OP's defence, I don't see why he'd lie about how many times he's actually seen her. To make him seem less of regular, and therefore less likely to tout? Possible, I guess. But also completely unnecessary and leaving us a big hole in his story to uncover, as we have.

Biro's profile and reviews (although not many) go back too far for it likely to be a fake controlled by Marley, having not made use of it till now. So the consensus seems to suggest that she's contacted an Edinburgh (semi) regular and asked him to give her return a little publicity, in exchange for a little discount? It is possible, given some (but not all) of the circumstantial evidence above.

Hard to tell whether Marley is pulling the strings (and Biro's cock) behind the scenes here or not. But I reiterate my previous point with regard to motive, and why she'd bother to instigate this when she already has so much good word on here, from so many established punters. Put in the most basic Edinburgh search on AW and she's nearly at the top of the list already. Add anal as a preference and she's 2nd top of one page, only behind Devon Breeze who charges 100 extra for the same service at twice the size, twice the age and twice the bad press. Furthermore, despite being on tour with expenses to cover and supposedly working till 10 tonight, she hasn't had her green light on (at least since late afternoon) today, or yesterday, if memory serves. None of this fits the profile of a desperate hooker with the need to drum up fake or rose-tinted reviews.

[LittleMac]

This will be my last post on this matter and I have no intention to responding to anything on this going forward.

I have never and will never agree to, write a review or post anything in return for anything else.
My review is 100% accurate to the meeting that took place and everything I have posted has been the truth.
My intention behind posting the review was purely out of wanting to contribute to this site.
Any so-called discrepancies between my profile, reviews or feedback is down to pure laziness and me not really giving a shit.

I can understand that people have been disloyal in the past on this site.
However, despite me being as transparent as possible, I feel that every single comment I have made is being dissected to pick holes and find "evidence" to fit a story that I have posted this review in a dishonest fashion.
If there is one thing I hate most is being called a liar. People can talk whatever shit about me as they want but saying things that are simply not true or calling me a liar are the only things I can't stand.

At this point you can believe my review or not. I stand by it and everything else that I have since it is the truth. If you want to believe in something dishonest then go ahead but it's a waste of energy. Have fun with your conspiracy theories. And yes I am aware there will be people that will then pick through this, maybe they find it fun or something but, like I said, I have no intention of responding.

I am not angry, simply disappointed that good intentions can be taken in such a way that has put me in no mood to post another review anytime soon. Which is slightly ironic (maybe, I dunno, its something) since I posted one a yesterday of a more recent punt.
GLHF   
 
 

[The Man With No Name]

If there is one thing I hate most is being called a liar. People can talk whatever shit about me as they want but saying things that are simply not true or calling me a liar are the only things I can't stand.

Bit touchy for a member with little-to-no content on a prostitute punter forum no? Are you really that concerned for your reputation in hooker cyber-world?

I have never and will never agree to, write a review or post anything in return for anything else.

Why not? If Marley offered me a £50 discount to shove my dick in her ass for an hour and my profile was this old, with this little contribution, I probably would.

This will be my last post on this matter and I have no intention to responding to anything on this going forward.

I think this'd be best. As even I, who had more sympathy for you than anyone else on this thread, am finding you increasingly suspect with every new post.

[Happy99]

Also highly suspect is:

1. According to this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=95415.0   it seems she changed her AW profile name after getting negative feedback on here. Was then seemingly banned from here after spouting off and allegedly threatened to 'out' certain punters who gave her negatives. She is described in the thread as 'unhinged'.

2. She has 400 AW escort feedback over 2yrs which is a ridiculously suspect amount.  Many of them are by same user names, including 2 with 'biro' in name. Sounds like offering some incentive for positives or else fakes.

3. Claims to be 20, but if you do the maths on date of her 1st negative review on here, that age is bull.

4. Says she is 5ft 6 in profile, but some of her fluffy AW reviews say she is 5ft 10 but 6ft in heels??

5. Highly stylised studio photos with face hidden, how can they be trusted to be accurate or even her?

The timing of the planting of this review certainly appears to be a marketing ploy for upcoming tour. We have seen this sort of stuff before from members previously banned.

OP has still managed to side-step addressing any of these issues above, most of which he could easily clear up for the benefit of other punters if he was genuine, but instead just whinges and throws toys out the pram??

Look forward to your mutually positive rating for any future cancelled meets  (however in fact if a meet is not confirmed by the girl as having taken place, then you can't leave a positive or negative on AW, only feedback..so both of you were at it)

[The Man With No Name]

I've rarely read such a load of bullshit as Loser has come up with, compressed into such short space

What does a flippant remark have to do with questioning a review? Maybe you need to spend less time thinking about ancient porn and study modern logic instead?

Utter bollocks. 96% of women claim to be able to achieve orgasm, and in excess of 60% say the achieve orgasm every time, or most times, they have sex. Maybe you're doing it wrong?

Got any facts to back that up, or is it just from personal experience? My personal experience is that may WGs experience orgasm, showing all the signs that can't really be faked. Maybe you're doing it wrong?
 
Enjoying anal sex and having orgasms are not dependent on one another, so your point makes no sense. You really must be doing it wrong.

So we can add that to the long list of things you don't know about. Research shows that orgasm though anal stimulation is rare, but up to 40% of women can achieve orgasm though other, concurrent, stimulation. I'm now pretty sure you're doing it wrong.

Looks like we can add statistics to the list of things you know nothing about, since all you've come up with is a random collection of propositions and no numbers to back them up.  If you think that counts as 'statistics', you are DEFINITELY doing it wrong.

It looks, on the balance of probabilities, that you may be a dumb fuckwit. But at least you seem to have got that one down to a T.

I'd have been far more condemning and insulting myself, but cheers for doing this as it saved me the pain.

This fuckshit really has no clue. I often wonder if he's actually ever met a woman, never mind shagged one. Wouldn't be surprised if he completely made up his 6 reviews from all that 70s vintage porn he watches.