Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Selfish so no review  (Read 10778 times)

Offline Olivia

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 66
I'm not apologising for being stupid ,that's something I'm just going to have to live with.

The WG that sparked this discussion has fucked off back to Poland , no profile on AW anymore , hence no link and a complete waste of 4 pages of comments :dash: :dash: :dash:


How do you know where she went if she is no longer advertising on AW?

Offline Daffodil

Hi Nik,

If the purpose of a forum is to promote discussion then surely this subject was worthwhile  ??

The subject is worthwhile.

Your approach to it was bollocks. I think you should bow out of this thread.

Offline Jimmyredcab

The subject is worthwhile.

Your approach to it was bollocks. I think you should bow out of this thread.

+100 

The subject is worthwhile.

Your approach to it was bollocks. I think you should bow out of this thread.

I don't think so , it's far too much fun.   :rolleyes:

Offline Jimmyredcab

1) We have had the subject posted about before though of course and the answer remains the same as then in my view. Its for punters to decide whether to share or not. This is entirely different to Jesus Jones mentioning punters actually advocating doing no reviews which i dont agree with at all.

Can I make my position crystal clear.
I have never advocated doing no reviews, what I said was if I found a real gem I would keep her to myself, why on earth should I give that information to hundreds of non-members and lurkers who never contribute, I know for a fact that some other members have the same policy.  :hi:

Offline Jimmyredcab

I don't think so , it's far too much fun.   :rolleyes:

That is exactly what a Troll WOULD say.      :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

You now have a bullseye on your back.     :bomb:

Offline rnrn636

 Clearly he is a troll fishing for bites and you have all taken the bait.

Just ignore him and this thread  :dash:


Offline Jimmyredcab

Clearly he is a troll fishing for bites and you have all taken the bait.

Just ignore him and this thread  :dash:

I fear you are correct.     :hi:

What fun! But we did get something from it: the definition of 'troll' that was given earlier is inaccurate and too broad.

The crucial feature of trolling is that the poster doesn't believe what he/she says. If this were not the case, you would end up with a situation (e.g. Mumsnet) where anyone who speaks 'against the grain' on a controversial topic gets labelled a troll and hey presto, the majority 'thinks' it has 'won'. In order to find that someone is trolling, they must either out themselves (as Londondave did when saying 'might try this again') or when questioned about their views they must be unable to explain them reasonably.

Offline Sailormack

Dave, I know you don't want to name the pro$$ie in question in case she gets booked up and you miss out.

But, would you consider just passing some flyers outside the local pub as these don't generally have as good a response rate as forum advertising  :unknown:

That is exactly what a Troll WOULD say.      :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

You now have a bullseye on your back.     :bomb:

Avatar updated so I'm more readily identifiable :rolleyes:



Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)