Author Topic: Karina - Karina_Sweet1 Paddington, Sussex Gardens  (Read 3492 times)


11 review(s) for Karina_Sweet1 (5 positive, 1 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]
2 review(s) for Curvy_Jessica_BL0 (0 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by peter purves]
3 review(s) for Ranya_ (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by peter purves]
4 review(s) for Joanna_New (2 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Heph]

Online Heph

Karina -  Karina_Sweet1   Paddington, Sussex Gardens  

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
07379285894

Quoth she: "My moral in life is simple: you treat me good and (sic) I'il definitely treat you better"

But then, profile talk is very cheap.

Background
the itch-that-must-be-scratched began to make itself known as the train, destined for Paddington, eased out of Reading station. I had a sense that by the time I arrived, it would need urgent remedy and that left only 40 minutes or so to make all of the arrangements. So I'll give Karina credit for a fast turnaround and unproblematic, easy-to-comprehend communications en-route.

Location
Several minutes walk from Paddington Station concourse, towards London's own Hooker Alley. The chances of someone on this street not being either a working girl, or a punter pretending they are strolling out for a promenade, must be near negligible. As I arrived at the given spot, there was one of the increasingly commonplace instructions to stand at a certain spot and wave, so that she could get a look at me, and anyone on the street still in the slightest doubt that I might not have been a John, was finally disabused. The door and flat number were then conveyed, to the entrance of what looks to be a cluster of short-term letting apartments, not more than a few steps away from the Days Inn hotel. Once inside, I clambered over the usual mound of unopened utility bills, and was greeted at the studio door by the girl in the current AW profile pics.

First impressions
She was wearing a light dressing gown, partly revealing a full regalia set-up of fancy-ish underwear underneath. She padded quietly about, head bowed, hushed and with only the smallest interruptions of eye-contact, as if we had both found ourselves accidentally complicit in a manslaughter, and had to discuss where to hide the body*. (*the corpse of my libido)

Her face, to my eyes, is mousey, or hamsterish in character. The current pics show borderline Oompa Loompa brows, but I don't recall them being quite so comic on the day. As I slowly gathered all of this in, standing in the dim-to-dark hallway, I realised that I what had looked perfectly attractive enough on the small screen, did not stoke my ardour in person. Nonetheless, she did have a slim, appealing figure, and that won the toss.

Karina's English was good enough, I think, to be able to make our way through most matters without issue, although those who enjoy a good and entertaining back-and-forth natter might not be too thrilled. Her profile says she is Romanian, but her looks reminded me of Moldovan or Transnistrian girls that I've seen before.

The bathroom, by the way, was a delight - recently re-fitted; tasteful, uncluttered, clean, and with a spacious and strong shower. I later gloomily reflected that my time in there had proved to be amongst the most satisfying of the entire jaunt.

The Bedroom.
Again: nicely done, and a pleasant enough space to spend a stolen hour or two up to no good with your paramour du jour... if you've been thorough or lucky enough to ensure that you are with a girl made from the right stuff.

I gave her a massage: this much I know. She has the kind of body that most of us would be very happy to find ourselves on - although it was marred for my personal tastes by a few tattoos here and there. Most likely, at some point when I'd enjoyed the view for long enough, and had made a respectable 30 or minutes effort to relax her and gently warm her up, I'd have mentioned or gestured to the effect that we'd be moving into a more reciprocal mode. Large, perhaps artificial breasts hove into view for the first time, and were a surprise to me, perched upon such a petite, slim-framed girl. I can't blame anyone but myself, as hers ought to have been evident to me whilst I was scouting her profile on the train, but I much prefer slight-to-cupcake boobs. That said, they didn't in themselves detract, and I'm sure that fans of inflatable entertainments might be very pleased to make their acquaintance.

Action addicts ought to skip this next bit, because I'm afraid I really can't recall a sequence of events; nothing memorable comes to mind, only the recollection of high-hopes being dampened and left for a soggy mess. What I can recall, is thinking that this lady really isn't skilled in the arts of being a good whore; being sexually hospitable; entertaining; charming; engaging, or any of that good stuff. And whilst I can forgive her for those, if I allow for a mutual absence of any in-person animal attraction which makes such things easier to conjure up; what really annoys all heck out of me is that she just wasn't making anything like a half-decent effort at all. Clearly, I was eccentric in my belief that, if we were going to spend the remainder of the allotted time together, we jolly well ought to try and make it enjoyable; and she might as well leave a halfway-satisfied customer.

For those intent on detail stuff; these crumbs are all I have to offer you:

DFK:    normally such an intense pleasure, I can't recall at all, and I therefore infer it didn't happen, as often the case á la Romaine.

OWO:  lacking tease or momentum, uninspiring.

Riding: that awful less-than-halfway house where she contrived to angle herself to slip the top third in, and not a sausage more.

CIM:    her profile lists CIM + CIM at discretion. I have the distinct impression it was swerved, though actually I'm in the unhappy position of being unable to say with any certainty if I actually climaxed or not.

Clockwatching: there was gentle nudging to 'finish' around ten minutes before.

Cost:
Her AW rates say £120 per hour, and that seems to tally with memory. Naturally, I do not think this didn't represented good value of any sort.

Conclusion:
Looking now, I notice that I broke my own tacit rules of avoiding prossie write-ups which are illiterate, include lots of exclamation marks or where they refer to themselves as being "passionate". I've come to convince myself that these have usually been good contra-indicators of quality; as proved to be so in this instance.

I also note that even on the less than reliable AW feedback, I'm not the first to remark on a lack of effort. I formed the impression that she was there under her own volition, and so there's little scope to let her off the hook. And even if she taking home only half of the headline hourly rate; she should've tried to make a good fist of it.

Nothing I saw that day would encourage me to revisit. Accordingly, I can't recommend that you try a first visit. In summary: she is inadequate to the task, and this made for a very dull encounter. Boring.



 



« Last Edit: July 04, 2018, 09:33:49 pm by Heph »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
She has very good firm knockers far as I could see..
Raised my voice at her for wasting my time and left.
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac


Online Heph

She has very good firm knockers far as I could see..
Raised my voice at her for wasting my time and left.

I can't dispute either point, (but the first two didn't do much for me) :D



And... Thank you Sinz as always.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2018, 09:38:10 pm by Heph »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
It's women like her who give romanian hotties a bad name
( from my own personal very 👅👅👅👅 good experiences / can't account for others shit experiences)
« Last Edit: July 04, 2018, 09:44:25 pm by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
This scammer also listed as:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=206875.msg2124721#msg2124721

Your on the ⚽

Good she is being bought to justice on here
Past and present
Scamming bitch
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Interesting you thought her boobs might have been enhanced - whilst others her have thought it was natural.

Excellently written review.
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Online Heph

Interesting you thought her boobs might have been enhanced - whilst others her have thought it was natural.

Excellently written review.

Thank you and you're welcome. I hope it averts you the regret it caused me.

On boobs, I'd have to defer to big-boob connoisseurs, since I pay far more attention to tits which are barely there at all. I didn't notice any obvious sign of boob-jobbage on her, like scarring; it's more that they seem unduly over-large compared to her overall frame. That, and that she has the kind of vanity and poor judgement that often goes with such decisions (see her 'enhanced' eyebrows).

---

I've noticed any number of typos since posting, but the one which really stood out as producing a meaning the opposite of that intended was this:

Cost:
Her AW rates say £120 per hour... Naturally, I do not think this d̶i̶d̶n̶'̶t̶ represented good value of any sort.

and, whilst I'm at it...
 
I also note that even on the less than reliable AW feedback, I'm not the first to remark on a lack of effort. I formed the impression that she was there under her own volition, and so there's little scope to let her off the hook. And even if she's taking home only half of the headline hourly rate; she should've tried to make a good fist of it.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2018, 01:39:57 am by Heph »

Offline 4by4

My god she's got some plates on her!
« Last Edit: July 05, 2018, 03:07:40 am by 4by4 »

jake345

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Interesting you thought her boobs might have been enhanced - whilst others her have thought it was natural.

Excellently written review.

Her boobs are real.

However don't think £ will get u anywhere near them  :lol:

JAG4555

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
i visited her almost a year ago. she has lovely breasts, ok face but thats it. service was so so poor. she listes dfk but she doesnt do it. boring personality, shit blowjob, i cant touch her hair and she wanted me to leave after 35mins when i booked a hour. it was the one time i actually refused to leave to see what she does. her english was bad, i tokd her why she lied in her profile about kissing. i showed her time and carried on lying on bed. at the time, i gave her a negative feedback on aw. i then saw she started getting fake positive ones but then someone gave her another negative. she then changed profiles.
but im glad this waste of space has been reviewed correctly here

Online Heph

...service was so so poor. she listes dfk but she doesnt do it. boring personality, shit blowjob, i cant touch her hair
...her english was bad, i tokd her why she lied in her profile about kissing. i showed her time and carried on lying on bed. at the time, i gave her a negative feedback on aw. i then saw she started getting fake positive ones but then someone gave her another negative. she then changed profiles.
but im glad this waste of space has been reviewed correctly here

Yes - much of that rings true. There are almost no circumstances that would persuade me to return above £40 p/hr and I would urge all punters with any decent alternatives to use them instead.

Online Heph

She has now shifted profiles and is Curvy_Jessica_BLO

Her new profile is External Link/Members Only

Could someone update or link the old to the new, to help the unwary avoid? (and /or point me to something showing me how to)

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
She has now shifted profiles and is Curvy_Jessica_BLO

Her new profile is External Link/Members Only

Could someone update or link the old to the new, to help the unwary avoid? (and /or point me to something showing me how to)

Just put the new AW number in this case 4836504 in the 'index review box' above.

She changes profile even more than the Brazilian escort's whose name I cannot remember but whose bum I can see very clearly in my mind's eye  :P
« Last Edit: September 05, 2018, 09:14:06 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Isn't there a blacklist we can put this SP on and just keep linking her ever increasing aliases?

Online Heph

Isn't there a blacklist we can put this SP on and just keep linking her ever increasing aliases?

I'm angling for something like that and it does seem that a decent number might agree in her case. The continual morphing to new profiles speaks for itself.

I note that her rate has dropped from £120 to £100. Most likely that's a greater reflection on cheaper rents in Croydon from Paddington, rather than an attempt to compensate for reputational damage, but it's a start.

« Last Edit: September 06, 2018, 02:07:45 am by Heph »

Online Heph

And she changes yet again!
Her latest incarnation to avoid is Ranya: External Link/Members Only

Again, could someone knowledgable in these things please take a few minutes to show me /us how to help link the latest of her AW IDs to the hall of infamy?


« Last Edit: October 16, 2018, 02:55:52 am by Heph »

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
And she changes yet again!
Her latest incarnation to avoid is Ranya: External Link/Members Only4825308

Again, could someone knowledgable in these things please take a few minutes to show me /us how to help link the latest of her AW IDs to the hall of infamy?

Just type the AW ID 4825308 into the box above where it states Index Review, Adultwork profile ID above
« Last Edit: October 16, 2018, 03:03:54 am by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Online Heph

Just type the AW ID 4825308 into the box above where it states Index Review, Adultwork profile ID above

Thank you. Previously I wasn't sure if that might entail some sort of over-ride to the others.

Is it worth joining the punting wiki platform to add her extra AW profiles to the sole one currently featured? (and presumably its possible to use the same ID as UKP?)
« Last Edit: October 16, 2018, 10:59:23 am by Heph »

Online Heph

Four profile name changes. Now trading as Joanna_New

Current cumulative UKP review score:
Pos:   8
Neu:  1
Neg:  10

Which tells you all you need to know.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 12:58:54 pm by Heph »