I saw Miss Scarlett OWO a few weeks ago. There are a large body of reviews singing her many praises and whilst I am in complete agreement with them (on the basis of service alone), I have a few reservations which I will outline later on. I would be interested to see if the community thinks I'm being over-cautious or not.
Comms: I had planned to meet Scarlett on a Saturday for an hour. Normally I would have booked half an hour with a new WG, however her glowing reviews meant that I threw all caution to the wind and eagerly signed up for an hour. My communications with her via text were extremely promising. Unlike other WG's who provide one-line, monosyllabic answers she seemed extremely friendly and forthcoming. A good sign already! A few days before we were due to meet her profile changed - as some have noticed - I texted her about this fearing a bait and switch. She responded very quickly saying that she lived with a friend and they both escorted part-time so they shared a profile. Whilst this does defy basic logic, I have no reason to doubt the sincerity of this explanation. She has since set up her own profile, so hopefully this clears up any future confusion.
Location: Flats which are a three minute walk away from South Quay DLR station. For those who like their discretion and privacy this could be something of a problem. The apartment block at which I met her is one of those newfangled developments which is a mix of private ownership and council tenants. Consequently, there were lots of children around. As I went up to her apartment I shared the lift with a mother and her son who was in school uniform. As I left, a group of kids were milling around outside kicking a football around. So, in sum a lack of discretion but I reckon nobody really notices you and if they do I doubt they give a monkey's about what you're up to.
Flat: Like many flats co-opted such purposes, the flat was sparsely decorated yet clean. There was a well-stocked bathroom full of shower gell deodorant and I was handed a clean, fresh towel. I found the bed was to be very flimsy. After hammering her, I found that it had moved out of position. However, all in all, no complaints.
The girl: You get what you see, pretty much. I consider Miss Scarlett very attractive. She has quite a striking-looking face, a slim body and nice ass as well as a neat pussy. I felt that her tits were a tad smaller than the pictures on her profile imply but this wasn't a problem. What I liked about Scarlett was her extremely unique, dry sense of humour. She made conversation and I never felt awkward for a moment. In one review, someone described her as being 'raunchy' and I would agree with this.
The deed: As soon as I was out of the shower, I met Miss Scarlett in the bedroom and we were quickly locked in an embrace passionately kissing one another. After I helped her remove her dress - making sure that I used the opportunity to feel her contours. We then lay down on the bed. She delivered excellent OWO. I'm on the larger side, yet this didn't limit the depth - she took most of my cock in her mouth, lubricating it with spit. She also sucked my balls which was a very nice touch. After a while I came. We had a bit more play on the bed which gradually became more and more steamy. Herein lies the first red flag. She offered to slide her pussy on my cock. I genital-to-genital contact for me is an absolute no-no. Perhaps I am being a little bit wet, but this really threw me off and makes me think that I shouldn't visit her again. After a while I put a mac on and on her suggestion flipped her over and fucked her in doggy grabbing her ass and looking at myself in the mirror - very nice. Then, I flipped her over to fuck her in missionary. As I had been hammering her very hard, I temporarily withdrew to check whether the condom was still in tact. She asked whether it was broken and said "it didn't matter" if it was. For me, this combined with the above indicates a slightly casual attitude towards using protection and sets the alarm bells ringing (again, I'd really appreciate other peoples feedback). Ultimately, I didn't finish inside her. She told me that it "wasn't very pleasurable for men if they were wearing a condom". Now I am very much reading in between the lines, but I felt that with a push she could have been persuaded to bareback. I opted to finish via more oral.
Conclusion: There's no doubt about it. Scarlett is an attractive, enthusiastic and gregarious service provider. I left feeling emptied and satisfied. This would warrant a positive. However, the three things which I described above make me feel that she has an extremely laid-back attitude with regards protection and make me somewhat reluctant to return.
I would appreciate hearing what other members have to say. I really would like to go back for another meeting. I've met a number of girls in the local area and the service delivered by Miss Scarlett was the best thus far. However, until I can get a second (or third) opinion I think I'll hold off.