Jessice69 + Anna 22 - Stratford E15

[MrMohican]

Is it just me - but a duo BJ presumably with the option to CIM for £100 for half an hour seems pretty good value to me. Irregardless of whether Jessica made it clear that it was a BJ only service or not at the time of booking it seems that you'd struggle to find a service like this at this price-point anywhere else in London.

As a result I think the OP still got value for money.

Personally Ive been wanting to see Jessica for months now but our calendars never seem to align. My last attempt was Friday night when she told me she was working that evening. I then attempted to book her for 7.30pm but travel time to her place is about an hour for me so I told her needed a response within half an hour to confirm so I knew whether to set off or not. Predictably enough she didn't respond for nearly an hour forcing me to suggest rebooking to a later time - 8.30pm which apparently was too late?!!... arghh.

Clearly communication is not one of Jessica's strengths... that said she's always been pretty clear to me when she's offering a minimised service.

Still going to keep trying. personally a scruffy flat and the smell of weed are not enough to put me off

[unus669]

Your screenshots confirm what he said, he wasn’t happy, he couldn’t have penetrative sex. So are you saying he lied about, the smelling weed and other people in the property etc. Why would he make this up

[unus669]

Is it just me - but a duo BJ presumably with the option to CIM for £100 for half an hour seems pretty good value to me. Irregardless of whether Jessica made it clear that it was a BJ only service or not at the time of booking

Why?

[doc friend]

AS i said at the start   The negatives were on 3 points - The girls were very sexy and the BJ was very good - I have stated that i did not have any issues with the girls - I really cant remember about her AW profile info that it was a BJ service only for £100 But  Im sure if i did read it correctly that it was ONLY a duo BJ only then i would have not booked.  However my 3 main points and only points for the Negative was as said.

1. The 2 or 3 guys/people in the living room watching TV or talking ? As i entered her flat to go into her bedroom i clocked at least 2 people gong into a room.
2. I had read that weed was smoked in the flat somewhere before  but not prepared how strong the smell was throughout the bedroom & flat
3. The untidy and messy bedroom with a full bin of tissues etc, 

These 3 points above made it a negative for ME -

I gave the benefit of doubt with the girls AW profile that may or may not have suggested a BJ only service ,  Perhaps i did not read all her profile on the day - Again the services of the girls are NOT the issue and i have said in my review that the reason for my Negative was the 3 points. People/Guests/Friends hanging around in the flay ( I did read that there has been reviews mentioning this But I assumed that as it was a late meet there would be no one there except us )   The very strong smell throughout the flat of weed and the messy untidy bedroom.

If people feel that this review should have been a Neutral or Positive then thats fine - Everyone has an opinion and they can voice this on the site   

Not going to spend any more time on this review trying to justify myself. Im not changing the negative due to the 3 points made.

Best to move on and deal with other business.

[doc friend]

Yes in Hindsight 100% I should have walked -

But no point going over now same issues.  I should have walked as soon as i entered the bedroom but didn't,

[punk]

AS i said at the start   The negatives were on 3 points - The girls were very sexy and the BJ was very good - I have stated that i did not have any issues with the girls - I really cant remember about her AW profile info that it was a BJ service only for £100 But  Im sure if i did read it correctly that it was ONLY a duo BJ only then i would have not booked.  However my 3 main points and only points for the Negative was as said.

1. The 2 or 3 guys/people in the living room watching TV or talking ? As i entered her flat to go into her bedroom i clocked at least 2 people gong into a room.
2. I had read that weed was smoked in the flat somewhere before  but not prepared how strong the smell was throughout the bedroom & flat
3. The untidy and messy bedroom with a full bin of tissues etc, 

These 3 points above made it a negative for ME -

I gave the benefit of doubt with the girls AW profile that may or may not have suggested a BJ only service ,  Perhaps i did not read all her profile on the day - Again the services of the girls are NOT the issue and i have said in my review that the reason for my Negative was the 3 points. People/Guests/Friends hanging around in the flay ( I did read that there has been reviews mentioning this But I assumed that as it was a late meet there would be no one there except us )   The very strong smell throughout the flat of weed and the messy untidy bedroom.

If people feel that this review should have been a Neutral or Positive then thats fine - Everyone has an opinion and they can voice this on the site   

Not going to spend any more time on this review trying to justify myself. Im not changing the negative due to the 3 points made.

Best to move on and deal with other business.

It seems that you were unhappy at not being able to Shag either Woman rather than the smell of skunk and the blokes.

[thecat250]

AS i said at the start   The negatives were on 3 points - The girls were very sexy and the BJ was very good - I have stated that i did not have any issues with the girls - I really cant remember about her AW profile info that it was a BJ service only for £100 But  Im sure if i did read it correctly that it was ONLY a duo BJ only then i would have not booked.  However my 3 main points and only points for the Negative was as said.

1. The 2 or 3 guys/people in the living room watching TV or talking ? As i entered her flat to go into her bedroom i clocked at least 2 people gong into a room.
2. I had read that weed was smoked in the flat somewhere before  but not prepared how strong the smell was throughout the bedroom & flat
3. The untidy and messy bedroom with a full bin of tissues etc, 

These 3 points above made it a negative for ME -

I gave the benefit of doubt with the girls AW profile that may or may not have suggested a BJ only service ,  Perhaps i did not read all her profile on the day - Again the services of the girls are NOT the issue and i have said in my review that the reason for my Negative was the 3 points. People/Guests/Friends hanging around in the flay ( I did read that there has been reviews mentioning this But I assumed that as it was a late meet there would be no one there except us )   The very strong smell throughout the flat of weed and the messy untidy bedroom.

If people feel that this review should have been a Neutral or Positive then thats fine - Everyone has an opinion and they can voice this on the site   

Not going to spend any more time on this review trying to justify myself. Im not changing the negative due to the 3 points made.

Best to move on and deal with other business.

£100 would be amazing value for a full threesome with two hot Brazilians in London, unfortunately I think the little head did the thinking here.

No need to change the review from negative, you've given your reasons and most people can read this and decide whether or not they would visit. Thanks for the review 

[MrMohican]

Why?

errr... because market value for a bj with cim tends to start at £70 and upwards anywhere in London - Just been quoted that by 3 WGs today. He's effectively paying them £50 each so that represents pretty good value in my book.

[Sinz]

errr... because market value for a bj with cim tends to start at £70 and upwards anywhere in London - Just been quoted that by 3 WGs today. He's effectively paying them £50 each so that represents pretty good value in my book.

I guess you got no issues with stinking smell of weed, mess and blokes hanging around and staring at you when you are turning up to punt. Not the same for everyone.

[unus669]

errr... because market value for a bj with cim tends to start at £70 and upwards anywhere in London - Just been quoted that by 3 WGs today. He's effectively paying them £50 each so that represents pretty good value in my book.

Please provide your recognised survey, for market value BJ. OP booked and expected a service, which he was then told is not available, in the middle of the punt. Irrespective of what you think is value, OP didn’t mention value. He listed the negatives and you decided to deflect by bring up market value, which you have no proof of

[InstaPunt]

I guess you got no issues with stinking smell of weed, mess and blokes hanging around and staring at you when you are turning up to punt. Not the same for everyone.

Tbf neither does the op according to his text and if he really did try booking again.

[NightKid]

All I'm saying is, that if most of his complaints are about the mess/smell/guys in the room, then it's 100% a reason to walk right? So if it turns out that he fabricated or exaggerated these complaints because he was disappointed from getting no sex, it discredits the accuracy of the review.

Tbf neither does the op according to his text and if he really did try booking again.

Hear, hear. As much as we don't take the side of prossies here ... I would also advise other punters to take the word of the OP with a pinch of salt, as I'm aware he's a former member under a new ID (which seems to have been allowed by Admin, so I'm not going to bother disclosing it since my previous post was deleted)

Anyway, the fact that he mentioned the 3 main negative points in his review but still didn't walk is quite telling, and if the WG in question is telling the truth about him contacting her again recently (and I think she might be, considering she backed up her claims about him with the screenshot) then I believe that shows a rather disingenuous character as well who has absolutely zero credibility to me. 

[punk]

How do you know that he is a former member?

[NightKid]

How do you know that he is a former member?

I recognise the writing style instantly. And the pattern of girls he reviews.

[punk]

I recognise the writing style instantly. And the pattern of girls he reviews.

Ok.

I thought it was bull as soon as the prossie in question posted the sms and his reply to questions on here.

[LLPunting]

So did OP confirm the screenshots are of his comms with SP?

As SP is doing business with OP isn't the comms covered by GDPR?

What's her purpose for retaining the messages for over a month or at all?

Publishing comms without consent is a breach right?

Fun times ahead...

[unus669]

I recognise the writing style instantly. And the pattern of girls he reviews.

And we are supposed to believe your gut instinct, that he is a returner Are you a qualified expert in these things. Wouldn’t be the first time, someone been incorrectly  accused of being a returner.

If my mind serves me correctly, this WG said there are other messages, maybe there is a hint of the other negatives in the unpublished messages, who knows. Let’s say the negatives were not enough to put him off, isn’t it good to mention, so other punters will take note?

[punk]

It does come across as he got pissed off that he only got a blow job.

If i went into a place that smelt of weed,had other blokes that lived there and i could plainly see them. If the place was a dump.I would've walked out.

SMS text can be faked on the other hand.

So unless there is conclusive evidence then its a question of who do you think is more truthfully.

[magnetico]

SMS text can be faked on the other hand.

I don't see why Miss Pakistan would have faked an SMS which is incriminating her, it's showing that the punter didn't get told that it was BJ only.

She only listed somewhere on her AW page something like "today BJ only" which most people won't see obviously.

[Hackneylad1]

I don't see why Miss Pakistan would have faked an SMS which is incriminating her, it's showing that the punter didn't get told that it was BJ only.

She only listed somewhere on her AW page something like "today BJ only" which most people won't see obviously.

In fact I don't think she even stated "today BJ only"
I think it said something along the lines of "DUO £100 with Anna or "other girl" DFK, OWO, CIM" 

[Kev40ish]

Hear, hear. As much as we don't take the side of prossies here ... I would also advise other punters to take the word of the OP with a pinch of salt, as I'm aware he's a former member under a new ID (which seems to have been allowed by Admin, so I'm not going to bother disclosing it since my previous post was deleted)

Anyway, the fact that he mentioned the 3 main negative points in his review but still didn't walk is quite telling, and if the WG in question is telling the truth about him contacting her again recently (and I think she might be, considering she backed up her claims about him with the screenshot) then I believe that shows a rather disingenuous character as well who has absolutely zero credibility to me. 

All the points he has raised are similar to what others have shared with us. In his mind it’s a negative for those points rather than service.

Only time will tell if it continues to tie in with subsequent reviews.

[somedouche]

Who is actually Jessica's duo partner/roommate at the moment? This review claims it's Anna22 but a review from a month ago that also claims it was Anna22 now leads to an AW profile renamed Lucy20 with pictures of a different girl.

[NightKid]

And we are supposed to believe your gut instinct, that he is a returner Are you a qualified expert in these things. Wouldn’t be the first time, someone been incorrectly  accused of being a returner.

I’ve already made my points so feel free not to believe me if you choose to, for all I care. I know for a fact that the OP is who he is, as evidenced by my post in a previous thread of his being deleted so that’s enough proof for me.

All the points he has raised are similar to what others have shared with us. In his mind it’s a negative for those points rather than service.

Only time will tell if it continues to tie in with subsequent reviews.

Yes, I’m aware that she has a history of such antics going by her previous reviews obviously - which I have no trouble believing.

However, without defending her, the counterpoints raised about OP experiencing his supposed negatives and not walking despite that casts some aspersions on the situation, since the WG in question was also willing to back up her claims by showing the screenshot she did ... that, coupled with what I know about the OP through our exchanges here before makes me think there’s a certain level of disingenuity on the OP’s side as well.

Edit: Anyway, it is as you say. Time will always tell. 

[unus669]

I’ve already made my points so feel free not to believe me if you choose to, for all I care. I know for a fact that the OP is who he is, as evidenced by my post in a previous thread of his being deleted so that’s enough proof for me.

You do care, that’s why you made the claim. You have confirmed what I said, you have no evidence, it’s your gut feeling about OP. Until you can provide the evidence, you’ll remain a failed Mystic Max

[Dicky]

Noticed that Jessica is now only listing 30 min appointments and charging £20 more for CIM. Thats a pretty steep £80/30 min price point. She's slowly slipping off my HL with this price rise, same day booking only...and 30 min only. Who would go all the way to bloody Stratford for a 30 min/1 pop?

Hope she sees some sense soon.

[LLPunting]

Noticed that Jessica is now only listing 30 min appointments and charging £20 more for CIM. Thats a pretty steep £80/30 min price point. She's slowly slipping off my HL with this price rise, same day booking only...and 30 min only. Who would go all the way to bloody Stratford for a 30 min/1 pop?

Hope she sees some sense soon.

Local passing trade who are less discerning about the experience and don't care about reviews probably far more profitable for her at this new price point.  She is a (sex) business woman after all.  The porn experience double header is probably a bit of a money spinner with the millennials who survived puberty thanks to Pornhub, etc.

[og123]

who do i go for jessica or anna?

[LLPunting]

who do i go for jessica or anna?

Neither, stay home and keep tossing yourself off to Pornhub.
When your balls drop pick a few girls you fancy from the listing sites and see who's got the best and most appealing reviews.

Look forward to your first review in 2021.

[punk]

who do i go for jessica or anna?

 

[0mard3000]

Neither, stay home and keep tossing yourself off to Pornhub.
When your balls drop pick a few girls you fancy from the listing sites and see who's got the best and most appealing reviews.

Look forward to your first review in 2021.