To simplify Punther's position: we are all equally irresponsible because we pay pro$$ies and any criticism of choices is hypocritical and delusional?
The flaw in the argument is that when someone takes part in a risky activity they take reasonable precautions to avoid a negative outcome, that is a responsible approach. For skydivers that would involve whatever safety procedures are appropriate.
My thinking is that to be able to say you take reasonable precaution you need to be able to explain why receiving unprotected oral sex from a 'Clean, respepectable' WG is reasonable and taking a precaution, in its own right
in its own right, its difficult for anybody to do this....as we have seen when asked this question its not been possible for anyone to give a straight answer
now a lot of us do it because we enjoy it.....but to be able to say receiving unprotected oral from a prostitute is taking precaution, in its own right....no
if anyone was taking a reasonable precaution at best they would receive
protected oral and not engage in any unprotected activity regardless of who the WG was
If the punter that gave the advice or was making criticism received only protected oral and protected penetration then it would be a different story
A punter that engaged in protected penetration ONLY and nothing else with Kiirie IS taking less risk than a punter that received OWO from a 'clean, respectable,non-barebacking' WG - if you think contrary to this, genuinely, it would be interesting to hear your rational
One who takes her personal sexual health seriously is less risky than one who doesn't, neither choice offers a guaranteed outcome of whether you catch an STD or not.
One of the reasons Miss Saafe has a risk attached to her is a punter seeing Miss BB before he sees Miss Saafe which is why it attracts such criticism
the main risk attached to miss safe is her CHOICE to give unprotected oral sex..and entering 'the Pool'.
The moment she starts to offer unprotected oral sex to multiple men over a short period of time, it is impossible to describe her as safe...irrespective of whether she uses mouthwash after every blowjob or doesn't bareback
Miss safe is the WG that provides only protected oral
my opinion is if a person is unable to rationalise unprotected oral sexual activity with a 'responsible' sex worker, in its own right(without comparing it to something esle) it is not possible for them to say they are taking precaution (as by doing so you have now exposed yourself to 'the pool'...which includes people like kiirie) - this is where the delusion/hypocrisy part comes in, IMO