So Mr Access ... You must have for a very long time pulled out this bottle of water out of the trunk and to be honest to see my door very clearly, You had to park your car at the bus stop. Because right after meeting with you, I had another client after 25 minutes. You can believe me
or not , I had enough time to take a shower, replace the bed covering, change the towels on clean one and I even had a sandwich.
I agree with your reasoning about the shower, hence why it's a silly accusation to make in almost all circumstances, unless you're confident that you've just seen the next punter go in (although that's still not guarantee and of she could shower on his arrival - but as you said that's unlikely because you'd leave them all alone to do whatever in your flat). You say you had 25 mins between them (assuming you've correctly identified who access was) but he says:
I’m only going to guess. You can make your own mind up. She wiped herself with tissue and put her shorts and top back on. Escorted me to the door, where I left. I was parked pretty much outside bar a few doors. By the time I’d opened my boot, and got a bottle of water out, the next guy was going in.
Now I obviously don't know the truth but I do know you have much more of a reason to lie than he does, you have a reputation to protect whereas he
should just be here to help other punters. Maybe he is a fantasist who's ego was hurt, that has definitely happened before in a small miniroity of cases (and those members banned and had some posts removed etc) but what's been seen a lot more on this forum is WG's lying to protect their reputation/business. Of course though, maybe he was just mistaken (he did seem to suggest that was a possibility).
And now please tell me if your slander me is a results from your offended ego or you work for an agency, and you slander all other girls who do not work for that agency.
I regret that I can not read your all posts because then I would certainly know why you want to destroy my reputation so badly.
Because normally a dissatisfied client issues negative feedback and do not deal with it any more because he want to waste his energy on something he did not like it
I had earlier cases that after a massage I was offered work in some agencies because it turned out that the client whom I was massaging was the owner of such agency and if I refuse them, it is began to start to happen very unpleasant situations and they try to destroy my reputation .
You started your private vendetta on me . And I would like to know the reason why ..
I haven't read anywhere near all his posts but a quick look at his reviews suggest pretty categorically that he doesn't work for any agency, so you can rule that out. He's also never posted a negative until now so he's not exactly "harsh". Indeed he even recently white knighted (unfairly stood up for a WG against a punter) a WG on here (one he hasn't seen), although to be fair white knights are frequently proven to be deluded bullshitters and hypocrites. I also don't actually don't think he is a white knight because it was only one "blip" that I've noticed.
Anyway, you state he has started a vendetta against you but if he has, he's really bloody subtle about it because he seems pretty fair/balanced and mentions plenty of positive points about you:
Obviously pretty much the whole first half of his review was very positive:
External Link/Members Only
Already a hot topic on here. I tried to see her a few weeks back but got let down. But thought I’d try again.
Comms were good. Text me the postcode and I turned up and she guided me to her flat above the shops.
Answered the door in skimpy shorts and top. Very prettt girl. Cute accent too.
Was shown to the room, no offer of a shower, and was told to strip and lie down on the bed face down once I’d paid up.
Duly lying on my front she now strips to her knickers. Sexy g string then the massage commenced. Now she’s had some comments about the massage being shit, but, she was ok I thought and was putting quite a bit of effort to make it something that would relieve tension. Lots of oil as previously mentioned too.
She climbed on top and started the body to body. Was “ok”. Kissing my neck and ear though, was very sexy and I do like her accent. I was then told to turn over and she still had her g string on. Body to body carried on and she had her arse toward my face and I could see the rip cord, so she was obviously having her period. Knickers stayed on throughout but she did clamp my cock between her legs and wanked me with her thigh grip. Interesting technique and got me close a few times switching between that and using her hand. Lots of kissing throughout. And I mean lots. It got very passionate several tiimes as she treated me like a long lost lover. Great kisser and just enough tongue.
He admitted he couldn't be certain:
I’m only going to guess. You can make your own mind up. She wiped herself with tissue and put her shorts and top back on. Escorted me to the door, where I left. I was parked pretty much outside bar a few doors. By the time I’d opened my boot, and got a bottle of water out, the next guy was going in.
He even posted this after you posted here (however he may not have seen your post prior to this post, especially since SP posts often appear later than when they were actually posted/when the time stamp suggests, because they require admin approval first):
It was more that I told her I was going to cum and she made sure it was between her legs. I’d have rather she carried on by hand with the oil.
I decided to see her because I’m pretty bored of Thai women. I only really go for massage and HE these days with the occasional full service punt, but finding a decent non Thai woman (promassage aside) for massage and HE isn’t that easy.
For me, as you say, it’s all about comfort levels. Kate is very pretty, and is an amazing kisser so it’s very tempting to go back. But I won’t be.
This seems perfectly reasonable:
That’ll be me chap. Exaggerating? No. Cautious? Definitely. Over cautious? I don’t think so... you can get STI’s from genital contact without penetration. Everyone has different comfort levels when it comes to this. Mine is obviously less than the OP of this review as he openly asks her to remove her thong knowing there will be bare genital contact. Be interested to know where the money shot was? Between her legs or by hand. For what it’s worth I don’t think she’d actually participate in B.B. sex...
You might think he's posted an awful lot about you but you are a current "hot topic" and since he has seen you it does make sense to post. Also, the other review which he posted in (the one by bigbilly22) did reference him/his review and even more so, the person he was replying to very directly made a comment about him so it made perfectly sense for him to respond (which as I said, his reply sounded perfectly reasonable). His posts don't come across like someone with a vendetta.
Because normally a dissatisfied client issues negative feedback and do not deal with it any more because he want to waste his energy on something he did not like it .
As I've just explained, he's not really "wasted much energy" on this and it doesn't take long to post. Also, most people do like to be pro-active about warning others (i.e. they don't just leave a review and forget about it) because that's often one of the most helpful things you can do on here. It doesn't mean he hasn't moved on, it just means he's trying to help others (or at least in most cases on here that's been true).
As well as I do not offer French kisses.
You say you don't offer that and one tactic some very underhand people have used in the past is to say the WG did something (a service that's usually considered a positive/good thing) that they don't actually do - this serves to stroke ego, make them sound like they're being positive (to deflect from accusations of being too negative) but also to undermine the WG, possibly due to her other clients and future clients pestering her for services she doesn't actually do and then they get annoyed when she refuses (because they think other punters do get that service). Those cases are rare though and as I've said, WG's telling lies is the most common scenario. Some of your reviews don't mention any kind of kissing (possibly because they didn't want it or didn't try to initiate). However this one obviously does and also this one:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=205016.0 But only "a little bit of very light kissing" (which I presume is pretty much what you claim to offer).
In this review (
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204913.0) the reviewer says (later on in the thread):
Some light pecking really mate .. I wasn't being too persitant with it, but I'd imagine french kissing would be on offer 👍
In this review (
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=201629.0), the reviewer says: "kissing my face and eventually even some gentle French kissing."
And despite the fact that I informed you about my condition and explained why I still have panties, before we started you somehow tried to strip my underwear during the massage and force me to do what you planned unfortunately without success. So I understand your anger.
I presume your "condition" was a one off/infrequent thing, because your other reviews (such as the one directly above) suggest you're happy to take them off even at the start.
Beside positive feedback that is in the majority truth .I noticed a few that did not take place at all.
But there will always be those who want to build their ego at every suitable situation
That's a very serious allegation. I presume you're aware that the reviews could have come from literally anyone you've seen and that some/many punters on here wait a while before they post a review (so the timing of the review doesn't always correlate with when the meet actually took place). Which of your reviews are not true?
