Author Topic: xxkikixx - Manchester City Centre - TS Review  (Read 4810 times)


1 review(s) for xxkikixx (0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline NigelF

Link: External Link/Members Only

Price: £85 for 1 hour (including DFK, OWO, CIM and swallow)

Comms: Sounded pleasant and very feminine on the phone. However she seemed to be too lazy to top up her phone because she said she was unable to text and asked to communicate via WhatsApp but I have no interest in such stupid things, particularly for punting. So we couldn't text but she told me everything I needed to over the phone and I just called her when I arrived (which was bang on time). It took a minute for her to direct me to her flat and when I was stood outside she then informed me her intercom was broken and that she'd come down and open the door for me.

I waited for over 3 minutes standing outside like a lemon, on what was a very busy street  (particularly in terms of pedestrians, never mind traffic). At the 3 min mark I called her but she didn't pick up. About a minute later she eventually opened the door and let me in. To be fair, it takes a while to get to her flat from the front door but not 4 minutes, especially since she already knew I was very nearby.

Location: Flat near Piccadilly Gardens. Bathroom was OK but but I was informed that there was limited hot water. I was also advised to wear the bathrobe on my way out because she didn't know when her flatmate (a guy) was getting back! There seemed to be enough hot water for me but apparently there wouldn't be enough for much more than a couple of showers per day! The towels were all used and fucking damp. The one that I chose (least damp) smelt fine but of course it wasn't hygienic and it took me longer than normal to dry myself because it was so damp. The bedroom and bed weren't great but they were OK.

Looks: She's now changed her main profile pics since I saw her. If you go into her public gallery, at the bottom the photo entitled "Pic 5" is what used to be her main profile pic. Even though she's changed them, the 3 main pics on her profile still almost look like a different person compared to her in reality. I don't think they are though because of the tattoos that you see in some of them and one of them looks like it was taken in her flat/on her bed (as well as other ones in her gallery). As such, they're certainly photoshopped/heavily airbrushed. At best, they're very old (although probably not given that she's a TS). Basically, they're unrepresentative. I'd recommend going into her gallery, looking at all the pics and choosing the one where she looks the worst - that will be the most representative one but it will still be flattering. Before booking I had done a reverse image search (GRIS and TinEye) and got no hits but despite that I was still expecting her pics to be misleading because they looked too good to be true. Regardless of whether I was expecting it - it's still unacceptable. In person, her face is not as youthful or as thin/well defined, it's much more round. It's a shame because perhaps (although very unlikely) she did look like that once upon a time (although the stupid pics with the dog stuff/fluffy ears overlaid on them suggests at least some of the pics aren't that old - unless that's me being an old git).

Unlike in her pics, in person she looks a fair bit bigger (but not massive though) and I'd say she was around a size 14. She does have around D-DD cup size tits. They're fake of course and they are quite old-school and firm but they do look pretty good. She has a few tattoos. She had shoulder length straight blonde hair. Facially she was certainly decent/fairly good looking but not amazing and definitely not as good looking as her pics. She also looked a lot older. Her profile says she's 29 but I think she looked around mid 30s.

Her dick (as if that's a phrase that makes total sense) was below average in length and around average in girth (mainly at the base). I personally don't care about size or shape, I just like the fun factor of it being there but I've included the description for those who are interested/find it helpful.

She did wear stockings/tights but her some of her upper thigh was quite hairy. The hairs were fairly fine and were hard to see (due to being blonde) but they were long and noticeable to the touch. She'd trimmed her pubic hair very short but not totally shaven nor stubbly or scratchy. She had moderate length hair on her balls (again, a brilliant phrase).

Overall, she definitely looked feminine (I'm almost certain you wouldn't notice if you passed her in the street, unlike with a number of other TS escorts) however she doesn't look nearly as good as her pictures.

Service: Started off with good FK which progressed to DFK. OWO was good both in terms of technique and depth. She was also happy to receive oral. There was no sex (as it's not listed on her profile) but there was plenty of DFK, mutual masturbation and OWO. I asked for her to cum first - it took a while (didn't take her long to get hard though) and she blew a small but decent load onto herself. Back on to me and she resumed some more OWO where I finished in her mouth and she swallowed the lot. We started fairly late (mostly her fault) but I didn't feel rushed and I did get the full hour, slightly more in fact.

Overall: Very misleading pics but still fairly good looking. She was friendly, had a good attitude and delivered her service well. I think a neutral is a fair score overall but others may well feel that's generous.

Online Steve McQueen

Thanks for another comprehensive review Nige. I have been tempted to meet a  TS, however the majority of the reviews are not very encouraging and the prices advertised are quite high, apart from this girl which look reasonable. I’ll keep researching for the moment. J

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Sounds a bit hairy for my liking

Maybe you should have booked fabaceous.   :sarcastic:

To VW. I already have the man boobs. All I need is a frock and I’m in the business:-)

Online Excalibur

Thanks for the review Nigel.  I’m back in Manchester next week and fancy a bit of TS but I will give this one a miss.

Offline Werewolfofliverpool


she looks stunning.  but doesnt offer sex?  lol wtf. 

Offline Fast and Bulbous

Even though she's changed them, the 3 main pics on her profile still almost look like a different person compared to her in reality. I don't think they are though because of the tattoos that you see in some of them and one of them looks like it was taken in her flat/on her bed (as well as other ones in her gallery). As such, they're certainly photoshopped/heavily airbrushed. At best, they're very old (although probably not given that she's a TS). Basically, they're unrepresentative.

Her previous AW profile used the name xxbabytdollxx. Her breast enhancement is relatively recent so the photos that show substantial cleavage or the one 'topless' public gallery photo also must be recent. As she doesn't look like these photos in reality then, yes, photoshopping or similar manipulation must be the reason.

she looks stunning.  but doesnt offer sex?  lol wtf.

Reflected in her price of £85/hour.

Offline frankc

Her previous AW profile used the name xxbabytdollxx. Her breast enhancement is relatively recent so the photos that show substantial cleavage or the one 'topless' public gallery photo also must be recent. As she doesn't look like these photos in reality then, yes, photoshopping or similar manipulation must be the reason.

Reflected in her price of £85/hour.

I've been very tempted in the past by xxbabytdollxx , think she worked up in Bury at the time, but was always put off by her, TGTBT low prices..... I'm also' always wary of the English TS's as in my experience there never quite as convincing as the dusky foreign TS's.

Thanks for the review Pal and off the back of it, I'm going to give this TS a swerve.... :thumbsup:

Offline Fabaceous

Sounds a bit hairy for my liking

Maybe you should have booked fabaceous.   :sarcastic:
Ha ha. If only i was 6 months younger:-)

Offline shaven4you

kiki has moved , a short tram ride and a little walk.

met her around a month or so ago and wish i went else were.

was took to the bedroom what was full of dirty underwair  , clothes , shoes , make up hair brushes blowdryers and wet wipes all over the floor
you could only see around 20% of the floor i had to move loads with my feet to make room to get undressed.

next to the bed was a bin full of spunky wetwipes and rubbers , there was even a rubber on the floor onder the bed .

as for kiki im not going to waste my type doing full details all i can say she is alot fatter than her photos , she is hairy , legs , belly , she has a smelly ass it was all i cud smell when giving her oral . cock is around 6" got some girth to it tho

I had owo gave her oral , had a crap massage she didnt even have any oil ,  came over her face and she didnt like it as she would have to do her make up again .

dont waste your money