Maybe the tax obsessive punters should demand to see proof that the girls is paying tax before parting with their hard earned cash.... But I doubt their cock would let them !!!
Rather amusing. Would that be included in paid-for punting time? Actually it probably wouldn't apply to James - as far as I know he's never claimed to be a punter. Jimmy & Nik, as far as I gather, have mostly just complained about a large number of girls saying they pay tax when they probably don't and assuming we're daft enough to believe it. Only one or two complain on principle that it's taking money out of taxpayers pockets.
No one has the right to demand to see someone's tax returns as an individual as far as I'm aware. The system relies more on a rather bitchy culture of shopping people suspected of not paying the proper tax. As someone has already mentioned, prostitution is quite a bitchy area. Women shop each other, with or without James' help, so I would imagine that, of those prostitutes that pay tax, the large proportion do it as a defensive measure, for survival, against a day when someone has a go at them.
The punter has to protect himself by making reasonable decisions. Both staying within the law and in most cases, avoiding exposure to himself or upset to others. Punters generally have little reason to want to question a WG's tax returns as it could expose him as a punter. Punters have to learn 'not to be taken in' by deceitful WGs, but it's on matters to do with punting - whether she lies about services, time allowed, honest photographs - not whether she pays tax. It's for this reason that I fail to see how continually berating a WG over whether she pays tax is "putting the punter first."