Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: £3250 per year as a hooker?  (Read 8731 times)

Offline James999

This story http://www.thisishampshire.net/news/8892207.Mums_made___13k_running_city_brothel/
mentions £13000 income for two girls over 2009 & 2010 so if thats divided equally thats £3250 a year each, not exactly a good income considering the website mentioned £440 for 4 hours, or 15 mins for £15 Note the typical whore maths

£15 x 4 = Hour = £60 x 4 hours = £240 so they quote £440 for 4 hours !

Online Jimmyredcab

As you pointed out on another thread, WG's never tell the truth, why on earth would they reveal their true income and risk being pursued by Inland Revenue. ????????

Offline Matium

I rather think the true figure is £130,000 not £13,000.

Offline James999

True but even the big fat ones must get more than that a year, if they were on AW for a couple of years their FRs and feedback could probably show income greater than that declared

Offline James999

The "Children" appear to be used as an excuse by the women,
"getting into prostitution to pay bills and provide for their children"
but at 53 it is likely that her children would be grown up and left home, it appears that children are just used as an excuse in the chase for the tax free income.

Offline Mellow

The "Children" appear to be used as an excuse by the women,
"getting into prostitution to pay bills and provide for their children"
but at 53 it is likely that her children would be grown up and left home, it appears that children are just used as an excuse in the chase for the tax free income.
Maybe it would be a good idea to remove the children the girl has in her care and sterilise any woman that becomes a hooker. Using children as excuses, quite frankly, is disgusting.

Offline Lucy chambers

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 350
Maybe it would be a good idea to remove the children the girl has in her care and sterilise any woman that becomes a hooker.

Good grief.

Offline James999

Maybe it would be a good idea to remove the children the girl has in her care and sterilise any woman that becomes a hooker. Using children as excuses, quite frankly, is disgusting.

Sterilisation is an awkward one due to human rights, and would it cause more girls to offer bareback?

The children in care, does a prostitute make an appropriate role model for a child, that is for social services to decide.

Maybe it would be a good idea to remove the children the girl has in her care and sterilise any woman that becomes a hooker. Using children as excuses, quite frankly, is disgusting.


The children in care, does a prostitute make an appropriate role model for a child, that is for social services to decide.

A woman being a prostitute does not make her unfit mother FFS!

Offline James999

A woman being a prostitute does not make her unfit mother FFS!

By the same token it does not MAKE her a fit mum, that is why it is for the appropriate authorities (Social services) to decide.

By the same token it does not MAKE her a fit mum, that is why it is for the appropriate authorities (Social services) to decide.

But by your argument that means social services would have to decide that EVERY mother of ANY profession is fit to bring up her children.

Offline James999

Not aware there is an argument,

if there is concern over a childs upbringing then social services decide what action is required, in the same way if a crime is reported the police are charged with dealing with it, it is just how things are done in this country.

Offline Fannytastico

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 508
It is not illegal to be a prostitute, so why should someone being a prostitute automatically have their children removed.

A mum of five got into difficulties and became a prostitute to pay some bills. She is no longer a prostitute and has met the man of her dreams.  Why should her children have been taken away? Her children weren't aware of her occupation, she did nothing that would impact them.  How would it benefit society to have 5 more children in foster care, when there aren't enough carers already.  The number of foster carers who would be able to take 5 children is minimal as well.

Offline Lady Poppy

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 514
Some of you guys are prehistoric.  What is prostitutions other than having sex, everyone has sex (well most of us do) just because it is out of wedlock does not making it abnormal and most adults do not discuss their sex lives with their children.  Now if the Mother was trying to include the children, too right, they are better off in care, but as far as you know the Mother in the eyes of the children is loving, providing and caring for them, which is a damn site more than some kids get.

Oh and my Mum had my sister when she was 43, so a 53 year old could easily be the Mother of a 10 year old daughter, so do not assume just because she is middle aged she does not have geniune responsibilities to her offspring.

Offline smiths

As you pointed out on another thread, WG's never tell the truth, why on earth would they reveal their true income and risk being pursued by Inland Revenue. ????????

As i posted on the thread regarding tax if a WG isnt completely stupid she wont tell anyone what she really earns including posting on forums.

Personally as what a WG earns doesnt impact on my punt with her i couldnt care less what she really earns. Numerous self employed people are responsible for informing the tax authorities of what they earn and i have no way of knowing if they pay any, some or all that they legally should. Its the job of the authorities to check and take the appropriate action, i pay them out of my taxes to do this.

If a WG gets caught by the taxman or the benefits people or both and gets done i would have no sympathy, she should of thought about the possible consequences beforehand.

Taking a child from its mother is not a good thing for the child unless its clear the child is not being looked after properly. Unless this is the case being a non drug addict WG shouldnt be the reason for seperating mother and child in my view. One of the problems of course is god knows how many people would think a child couldnt be getting looked after properly if the mother was a WG as all they know about prostitution is the media image of streetworkers and drugs.


Offline Daffodil

I certainly don't think that being a WG precludes being a mother and sometimes, as has been mentioned, the extra source of income becomes a neccesity in raising a child. In some ways a child raised by a WG might have better opportunites due to increased money in the family.
But I also think that, in general, a family supported by a WG has a greater risk of falling foul of social services. Can it really be good for a child to be aware of lots of strange men coming into their home to have intercourse with their mother? There is also a real risk of inviting the 1% of dangerous punters into the home when the child is there.
I am sure that many WGs make excellent mothers and set a good example in their homelife but there will be others who do not and that the percentage of 'those who do not' is greater than in other walks of life (just my opinion). I would consider a WG to be a 'red flag' to social services but not a contraindication to having children.


But I also think that, in general, a family supported by a WG has a greater risk of falling foul of social services. Can it really be good for a child to be aware of lots of strange men coming into their home to have intercourse with their mother? There is also a real risk of inviting the 1% of dangerous punters into the home when the child is there.


I doubt any decent WG would take incalls with her child in the same house & I also imagine that the WG would keep her activities as discrete as possible so her kids wouldn't have a clue what was she did for a living.

Offline Fannytastico

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 508
...I also imagine that the WG would keep her activities as discrete as possible so her kids wouldn't have a clue what was she did for a living.
Not just her kids, but her neighbours, the mums at the school gate, her friends etc.  It may be legal, but it's not socially acceptable, so why advertise the fact?

Offline Daffodil

I doubt any decent WG would take incalls with her child in the same house & I also imagine that the WG would keep her activities as discrete as possible so her kids wouldn't have a clue what was she did for a living.

I'm only speaking from personal experience but I have seen at least two WGs in their own home with children in the house. One only does incalls after 7pm as that's when her child has gone to bed (admittedly a toddler so probably doesn't know what is going on).
The other was something of a regular (had seen her 3 times previous) before I had an incall with her when her child was in the house. I think this child is older.
Not the norm perhaps but does happen.

Offline Daffodil

I doubt any decent WG would take incalls with her child in the same house & I also imagine that the WG would keep her activities as discrete as possible so her kids wouldn't have a clue what was she did for a living.

I'd just like to add that I think both girls I mention are decent and probably make good mothers. I can't say for sure of course but that is my feeling.

Offline Fannytastico

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 508
...I had an incall with her when her child was in the house. I think this child is older.
Can't see how this makes her a decent mother.  Anyone with any nouse would have childcare in place and do an outcall.  Or have their child at a stayover, so they aren't in the house.
I can understand why WG mothers would keep their private mobiles on for emergencies - same as in any normal job.

Offline Mellow

I doubt any decent WG would take incalls with her child in the same house & I also imagine that the WG would keep her activities as discrete as possible so her kids wouldn't have a clue what was she did for a living.
Most children of the wgs I know, figure it out by the time they reach about 9 or 10 years old. Children are not stupid.

Offline Daffodil

Can't see how this makes her a decent mother.  Anyone with any nouse would have childcare in place and do an outcall.  Or have their child at a stayover, so they aren't in the house.
I can understand why WG mothers would keep their private mobiles on for emergencies - same as in any normal job.

It doesn't make her a decent mother, and is not what I said. It wasn't cause and effect, she's not a decent mother because she incalls with a child in the house. It was just in other ways I get the impression that she is a good mother. Nice house, very clean, doesn't smoke or do drugs, down to earth. Obviously I don't know her outside of a punting relationship but is just my feeling.
What is the consensus? Are WGs who incall when their children are in automatically bad parents?

Offline Fannytastico

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 508
...What is the consensus? Are WGs who incall when their children are in automatically bad parents?
Well, yes. I can't see any good reason for having a kid in the house when the mum is working/shagging.
I'm not a mum, so can't speak from first hand experience.  I do have friends/guests/students to stay and would never work while they were in the house - unless it was for an outcall and I was happy for them to be alone.  This means I suspend WG work whilst others are in residence.  As the people I have staying are older, you can never be certain when they are going to come home unexpectedly.

Children are not stupid.

They certainly aren't.  It all depends on how the WG works.  If she takes incalls in her family home outside of school time I agree it is possible for a smart kid to figure it out.  I can only talk about my experiences & the girls I've seen but as they don't want their kids to find out they either only take incalls during school times, do outcalls only or they rent somewhere else to work from.  This keeps the chances of her ever being sussed out extremely remote.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)