I can't believe I initially indexed this rubbish. I've moved it to the regional section because it is not a review.
Asking the WG if they want to be reviewed is both pointless and entirely unhelpful for punters - especially if you then go on to post a review without including any details.
To say she's "Possibly the most beautiful girl I have ever seen not just on Adultwork" is ludicrous. Yes, you did say "possibly" and yes it is subjective but having seen her myself, I must say that unless you're blind or partially sighted there's no way what you said is actually true - at best you've genuinely kidded yourself/you're not being truly honest with yourself (unless of course you just mean she's the most beautiful girl you've shagged but that's definitely not what you said).
I definitely do think she's very good looking and I do think her pictures are mostly accurate however they are also slightly flattering as they are clearly professionally taken and are almost certainly airbrushed . You also neglect to mention the fact that she's a little bigger/certainly has a bigger belly than her pics suggest. I brought this up in my review, as did her other most recent reviewer. I'm not saying it's bad or that's it's near being a deal breaker (of course that's subjective) but it's not something you should ignore, especially if you want you be helpful for other punters.
There is no information on the services and your description of her appearance is not balanced or complete and is way over the top. As such, this review is of no help/use to punters and it simply cannot be classified as a proper review (however there's no explicit rule about that so anyone who thinks I've overstepped by moving this thread should feel free to report it).
For future reviews, here's a useful guide:
External Link/Members OnlyRegarding your other positive review - did you ask her if she wanted a review as well?
