If the apology is true then why is the warning and his username and phone number still up on Saafe. Daisy does not write down a warning on grapevine rumours. None of the mods would do that. They would check it from the horses mouth so to speak. They would not take a someone told me that another girl told them that they were told this happened. Saafe doesn't work that way. Mods do not post idle gossip.
You make this assertion with incredible
authority. I am astonished by your apparent willingness to make such unambiguous, assured statements regarding this matter without offering any shred of factual support or any detail substantiating your claims as to the moral sanctity of SAAFE. Personally, I could not agree less with your opinion
'NONE of the mods' would do this, 'They would ALL do that...'. Would they? How do you know? If 'SAAFE doesn't work that way', how does it work? In my view/experience 'ide gossip' is just about the level appropriate to mods on that site.
Things like this make a total mockery of the Saafe warnings system. Its bad enough AW feedback cannot be trusted anymore due to girls being malicious against clients but to bring Saafe down to that level is terrible as it is a trusted site that we tend to believe. Listing attacks with fake details is just going to bring down the validity of what is a great warning forum
TOTALLY DISAGREE. 'Things like this' could be the perfect opportunity for SAAFE and those who are invested in it, to prove their intrinsic value and inherent objectivty and balanced interest. It is not the actions of one or two individuals (there will ALWAYS be individual fools) that make a mockery of the SAAFE warnings system, but the complte inability of those in charge to think independently, act with initiative and behave maturely instead of like imature children simply incapable of resisting the temptation to revel in their glee at 'holding all the cards'