Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Why you should ALWAYS use a punting phone and punting name!!!  (Read 27420 times)

Made an arse of modifying that last post. Meant to say:
"Okay Sasha is banned, but Cindy ain't, and both still have my AW details."
« Last Edit: November 28, 2013, 06:50:56 PM by KingCharming »

Offline Festisio

Kingcharming - you should report their location to the police saying that you are concerned it is a brothel.

Offline CurvyKinkyVixen

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 297
My punting phone looks like something from the early 90s! Sure all WGS that see it think i'm a pauper :) Did stupidly tell one my name the other day. Doh!!!!!!

My work phone is the same , a £10 basic samsung. Does the job.

Nothing but trouble comes from  using  smartphones , with all the facebook , whatsapps and other crap linked straight to your partner/boss/mates on it.

Offline CurvyKinkyVixen

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 297

Things like this make a total mockery of the Saafe warnings system.   Its bad enough AW feedback cannot be trusted anymore due to girls being malicious against clients but to bring Saafe down to that level is terrible as it is a trusted site that we tend to believe.  Listing attacks with fake details is just going to bring down the validity of what is a great warning forum



+ 1 .

Offline Ali Katt

REALITY CHECK

They said it wasn't them who did the post, but the reality is who else would have done it?

They got caught red handed and still denied it  :scare:

Either they haven't contacted Saffe to get it removed or Saffe have an agenda  :hi:
Saafe will never favour the punter, even if he was accused of a (false) murder I doubt they would take it down.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Saafe will never favour the punter, even if he was accused of a (false) murder I doubt they would take it down.

Not true at all.  Last year  I reported a fake report on there and it was removed immediately.  a girl had done it so her BF could not book local prossies anymore as she accused him of beating and raping her.  As soon as I reported it as fake and explained how I knew it was not genuine Amy removed it within minutes.

Believe it or not they don't want fake reports on there anymore than anyone else as it would then make the whole reports system a waste of time. 
It is there to help keep us safe in work and false reports tend to stop people believing any reports so they do remove them once they have confirmed they are fake.

There is no point blaming Saafe as a mod was asked to make a warning post and took it on good faith.  They are trying to find out the truth behind it and once it has been established they will either remove the post completely or leave it up depending on what they are told.

Blaming safe is like blaming UKP when that troll came on stating that a prossie had HIV even though it was obviously a malicious post it was left up for a short while.  Its was UKPs fault that the post was made same as it cannot be Saafes fault when they post a report from the horses mouth

Offline James999

There is no point blaming Saafe as a mod was asked to make a warning post and took it on good faith.  They are trying to find out the truth behind it and once it has been established they will either remove the post completely or leave it up depending on what they are told.

Of course they are to blame if it is false and they know it, he said it's false and both women involved say it's false, what other evidence do they need ?

Offline CurvyKinkyVixen

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 297
Of course they are to blame if it is false and they know it, he said it's false and both women involved say it's false, what other evidence do they need ?

Hopefully they will remove it. We shall see.

I know the Mods on there will not want a serious warning system abused so lets see. One of the mods doesnt like the AW notes system , for the reason it can be abused by WGs with an axe to grind. Badmouthing regs in the hope the competition wont want to take a booking is just one example. Id imagine she wouldnt want SAAFE warnings devolving into a similar farce.

As before , now the women have admitted its BS , id hope it will be removed ASAP.

I wish WGs wouldnt do spitefull things like this ( just because the guy walked/reported "older than pics")  , it makes a mockery of serious warnings about REAL dangerous men  :(
« Last Edit: November 28, 2013, 09:28:32 PM by CurvyKinkyVixen »

Offline Olivia

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 66
If the apology is true then why is the warning and his username and phone number still up on Saafe.  Daisy does not write down a warning on grapevine rumours.  None of the mods would do that.  They would check it from the horses mouth so to speak.  They would not take a someone told me that another girl told them that they were told this happened.  Saafe doesn't work that way.  Mods do not post idle gossip.

You make this assertion with incredible authority.  I am astonished by your apparent willingness to make such unambiguous, assured statements regarding this matter without offering any shred of factual support or any detail substantiating your claims as to the moral sanctity of SAAFE. Personally, I could not agree less with your opinion 'NONE of the mods' would do this, 'They would ALL do that...'. Would they?  How do you know?  If 'SAAFE doesn't work that way', how does it work?  In my view/experience 'ide gossip' is just about the level appropriate to mods on that site. 


Quote
Things like this make a total mockery of the Saafe warnings system.   Its bad enough AW feedback cannot be trusted anymore due to girls being malicious against clients but to bring Saafe down to that level is terrible as it is a trusted site that we tend to believe.  Listing attacks with fake details is just going to bring down the validity of what is a great warning forum


TOTALLY DISAGREE.  'Things like this' could be the perfect opportunity for SAAFE and those who are invested in it, to prove their intrinsic value and inherent objectivty and balanced interest.  It is not the actions of one or two individuals (there will ALWAYS be individual fools) that make a mockery of the SAAFE warnings system, but the complte inability of those in charge to think independently, act with initiative and behave maturely instead of like imature children simply incapable of resisting the temptation to revel in their glee at 'holding all the cards'


Offline G-Raw

I've been using my personal phone and what a big mistake and the smack on my face when one of the WGs I saw started texting me about tours, stopped seeing her after that pretty much.

Offline berksboy

Still showing 
This warning was posted on behalf of another escort and is currently under review to establish it's legitimacy. - Daisy_

So why is "Daisy" taking so long to look into this ? And should she not just pull it until she does make her mind up ?

She has had the best part of 3 days so far and does not look like she as had a chat with Kingcharming who is one of only 2 maybe 3 who know what has happed.

Offline Olivia

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 66
EXACTLY.  It is a farce and those allowing it to continue are as culpable as the original perpetrators, in my view.

Offline wilderbeast

My theory is that the original warning may have been raised by LouLou37 (aka Sasha aka GlasgowGirl) and now that it has been challenged by King Charming (and verified by Sasha and Cindy) then the whole warnings procedure on SAAFE and credibility of some senior members and even mods has been blown apart.

This delay in rectifying an obvious wrong is not helping things at all with regards that site!
Banning reason: PM tout

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
My theory is that the original warning may have been raised by LouLou37 (aka Sasha aka GlasgowGirl) and now that it has been challenged by King Charming (and verified by Sasha and Cindy) then the whole warnings procedure on SAAFE and credibility of some senior members and even mods has been blown apart.

This delay in rectifying an obvious wrong is not helping things at all with regards that site!

If a guy had been violent he's hardly going to say so.

I personally (and this is what I said from the start) think it's some sort of mix up with the booking, but without being there, and also knowing you can never be sure who is who on the internet I do not know 100%. I just wish it was sorted out one way or the other.

If a guy had been violent he's hardly going to say so.

No he probably wouldn't, but I doubt he'd bring it to everyone's attention that an anonymous punter being discussed on saafe for being violent was actually him either.

It's worth noting that on her AW feedback where KC (spankfan77) reports what happened she makes no mention of him being violent or aggressive - she accuses him of being a time waster.

Offline finn5555

This thread is fucking tedious now  :dash:

Offline Ali Katt

If a guy had been violent he's hardly going to say so.

I personally (and this is what I said from the start) think it's some sort of mix up with the booking, but without being there, and also knowing you can never be sure who is who on the internet I do not know 100%. I just wish it was sorted out one way or the other.
It's hard to say, but she has had two accounts on here, used pictures of another girl, they claimed they didn't write the report on Saafe - so, who did? In other words they're liars. I believe KC given the evidence.

Bloody hell, really sorry to hear about all of that, and am glad nothing worse came of it.

I've just noticed in her interview that she states:

Which is a bit of a sign that she's a bit of a cunt! ;)
Pmsl

The wheels of motion clearly work extremely slowly. SAAFE are still reviewing that report. How long does it take to decide one way or the other? I think they will just leave it because god forbid they actually admit that an escort told a big porky out of spite.  :wackogirl:

Offline Jimmyredcab

Kingcharming - you should report their location to the police saying that you are concerned it is a brothel.

I would actually go much further.

If the location is a block of flats I would send a letter to every other flat in the block, if it is a house I would send a letter to every other house in the road.

If she wants to be a cunt then we can do the same.    :hi:

Offline NIK

Saafe is a pro$$ie forum, they don't give two fucks if the warning is true or not ----- they put pro$$ies first just as we put punters first.  :hi:

Exactly they couldn't give a monkey's chuff about punters, apart from what's in their wallets.

And they actively condone rip offs and scams.

Offline Cornish sub

This thread is fucking tedious now  :dash:
So don't fucking read it then  :dash:


Offline blue

Moral of this whole thread, use a punting phone and don't give out your personal details. JOB DONE!  :music:

Booked a girl for a meeting last  Thursday she messages me on a/w asking me to send her a full face picture i said show you full face in your a/w profile and Il send you a pic never heard a thing back she had more chance of stepping in rocking horse shit then me sending her a pic


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)