I appreciate you coming on here to explain your side of things; it would have been very easy for you to just ignore this whole thing, to go with the aggression version of events (whoever came up with them) and put the blame on me, or otherwise just avoid it. Hopefully you've contacted the mod of the SAAFE thread too to clear things up on both sides. Anyway, on to the meat of the matter...
If Mr KC had simply contacted after the fact to express his dissatisfaction with what happened (the next day we realised it had been a mix up with the diary and phones - who has appointment with who etc) then we could have explained what had happened. However since Mr KC walked out so quickly (which is understandable!), and we do not contact clients outwith bookings then we had no way of letting Mr KC know it was an accidental mistake. We would have apologised for Mr KC's wasted journey.
You suggest I should have contacted you to express my dissatisfaction with what happened, but I disagree with this. There is no mention of a second person on your AW profile, no second person had been mentioned prior to the meet, and (contrary to the SAAFE post) I never saw a second person in that flat. As far as I was aware there was only ever one person I had been dealing with (I mentioned in the review that "Cindy" said "WE", suggesting there was someone else involved, however this was something that occurred to me looking back, and was only one very small indication). From what I knew there was one person, one phone, one profile; why would I then give that same person a phone call the following day just to repeat what I had said on the day I met her- that she was not the person in the photos? I would counter that it was you (or her) who had the responsibility to contact me and inform me of the mix up. I understand you do not like to contact punters unarranged via their phones, however you could have done so via an AW email. [/quote]
As for the false warning letter linked to by KC, we GENUINELY are not responsible for this. Mr KC did not abuse anyone in any way in person. I can only think this has come through the grapevine somehow
Appreciate you saying this and helping me to clear my name; it's a very serious accusation and not one to be thrown around lightly. As I say, it would have been easier to just hide away from all this and ignore it rather than tackle it head on. My only concern is that it the post was made Nov 4th, and it is now Nov 26th, although perhaps like me you just didn't see it until now, which is entirely possible if you weren't the one who made the accusation and aren't involved with SAAFE either.
since Cindy did share with a few massage friends who work nearby in the City Centre the phone number of Mr KC, NOT for any malicious reasons at all, but because these ladies are also what would be considered "mature" masseuses, being in their 40s and 50s, and would be rather upset as Cindy was to also have their names lambasted on a public forum beside the description of "little old lady" !!!!
I don't know that it was necessary to warn others of this; I'm sure it's clear from the fact that I walked out that I was not interested in a booking with Cindy, with the only reason I came to the flat to see her in the first place being because the private gallery indicated that the booking was with someone else. I understand the mixup, however to my mind at the time it looked like a bait and switch, and there was nothing to indicate otherwise for me. As such, any women wishing to avoid me would only have to worry if their profiles did not match the reality.
If everything is as you say, I apologise for upsetting Cindy over my "little old lady" comment. Not everyone has the same tastes, and I'm sure if she has many regulars as you say, then she shouldn't worry about what one person's view of her is. I'm sure you can understand that having waited such a long time outside, then to be met with someone completely different and significantly older than I was led to believe, I was not exactly in a generous frame of mind when writing the review.
It is unfortunate that this matter could not be explained and resolved without KC coming onto this forum to post a negative review. Cindy has good reviews over at the auto-censored and we are only interested in providing a good service and making money, not in "scamming" people in any way. Unfortunately this was a complete accident and we will be sure to be more careful with pencilling in appointments from now on - re this phone , this person, this time.
I hope that in the future Mr KC you will seek to resolve issues with the provider themselves first rather than just automatically assuming the worst (ie "Bait and Switch!") and reporting to AW, coming on here to write reviews etc.
As above, I don't think it was my responsibility to contact you guys and explain; as far as I was aware I had only ever been dealing with one person, from one AW profile (and I'd like to point out that Cindy did not deny that it was her profile at the time). You could have easily sent me an AW message to explain a mixup that I could not have been aware of, but you were. You had all the facts at your disposal, while I did not.
It is also unfortunate that Mr KC felt the need to have my AW profile suspended for 5 days and to post a private picture of me here - thankfully AW responded to my explanation of the situation and reinstated my profile.
I would not otherwise have posted a private picture of any girl on AW, however as I mention in the review, I did so only because the girl in the pictures was a different person from the girl who (from my own meeting) would be at the booking. I had paid to access that private gallery in order to see who I was booking, so was more than a little put out to find out it was a total waste. My report to AW was perfectly justified from what I had experienced; paying for a private gallery, then finding that the girl in the private gallery is not the one on the profile (as far as my experience had proven), and there is a report function specifically for that purpose. Your explanation here says this is not the case, and you were able to explain yourself to AW without having anything removed, so no permanent harm has been done.
Perhaps this kind of attitude is why, and I'm going from quotes from your own posts here, escorts will rarely reply to you again after you have seen them once, you only get replies to a small percentage of your emails etc. Again, we do apologise for the inconvenience and will make sure that in future we will be more careful to record which bookings are with which girl.
Very funny. I think you'll find though that a front page post on SAAFE's warning page that's been read 594 times and counting, saying I'm an aggressive punter who'll barge into your home and assault your friend, has the effect of somewhat putting people off.