Whenever a negative is posted it will generate interest in the girl's profile and some saps might even book.
However, this prossie has been shown time and again to be a time waster and I'm sure it has cost her money by making guys not book her or bail at the first signs of being messed about.
I think the issue here is that her feedback is causing many a punter to weigh up the risk to reward factor. She is clearly a fantastic punt if and when you get to see her...so in terms of her sexual services, she can't really be faulted. However on the comms side she is clearly unreliable. But I feel as though, and I maybe wrong in this, bad comms do not necessarily deter punters as much as bad sexual services or a someone who is not who they've claimed to be in terms of their physicality. In the looks department, she doesn't disappoint.
I also believe that any future negative feedback done on Jenni, or Paige Green or whatever her alias' maybe should be done so in a manner which doesn't have that vitriolic edge which some of the past negative reviews may have contained and as such, those 'vitriolic' statements stand out more so than the fact that she could potentially waste your time on the first, second, third or fourth meet (if anyone has gotten to that stage).
