Big Booty Delight Black Ebony Catford (SE6)

[Dark_Gable]

External Link/Members Only

07852899292

I have seen her twice, both times in April.

Price/Duration: £50/15mins.

Communication was solely via text with quick replies.

Location. First floor flat on a main road in Catford. It is opposite a bus stop so there may be eyes on you especially during peak daytimes. I visited at night, it was quiet in general and there was no one at the bus stop.

Looks. Roughly 5"8, thick build with generous proportions all round and wonderful smooth dark skin. I found her facially attractive but your mileage may vary.

Services received: Oral with a condom, penetration (protected).
After stripping down I positioned myself on the bed and she went to begin OWO however I asked for OW. After putting the condom on me she gave me a really solid blowjob. After a few minutes I asked if we could begin penetration, she obliged and we started in missionary before moving to doggy and I eventually reached a very satisfying climax in the condom.

Conclusion-Very positive, I was very happy with this punt. I think that £50/15 minutes represents good value for a black British WG with a good attitude. The only slight negative was that she played some very loud music during the punt to cover the sounds of sex from the neighbours.

I have attached the pics from her Vivastreet advert. There is also a video on the advert.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Dark_Gable]

Second punt with her.

Price/Duration: £50/15mins.

Services received: OWO, penetration (protected).
On the strength of the covered blowjob on the first punt I opted for OWO this time which is rare for me (I'm paranoid about gonorrhoea). The blowjob was again very enjoyable and went on for a bit longer than on the first visit. After a while she suggested we should start to fuck, a condom was applied to my package and like on the first visit we started in missionary before moving to doggy concluding with what was probably one of my most intense orgasms.

Once again a positive experience

[RegionalAndy]

Good comms: English ?

[Dark_Gable]

Good comms: English ?

Yes, she is English.

[Mr Farkyhars]

Second punt with her.

From the site rules:

"Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads."

[Brazilian Martian]

Second punt with her.

Price/Duration: £50/15mins.

Services received: OWO, penetration (protected).
On the strength of the covered blowjob on the first punt I opted for OWO this time which is rare for me (I'm paranoid about gonorrhoea). The blowjob was again very enjoyable and went on for a bit longer than on the first visit. After a while she suggested we should start to fuck, a condom was applied to my package and like on the first visit we started in missionary before moving to doggy concluding with what was probably one of my most intense orgasms.

Once again a positive experience

Good review

[Sunny]

Is her age accurate?

[Dark_Gable]

From the site rules:

"Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads."

Also directly from the rules:

"Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after a positive review). During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply."

[Dark_Gable]

Is her age accurate?

I have no reason not to believe the stated age of 28.

[Mr Farkyhars]

During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply."

Given that you also said

I have seen her twice, both times in April

you were not replying or updating, because you had the information to hand when you began typing the OP.

Don't try to get clever with me - it's beyond your pay grade.

[Dark_Gable]

If it bothers you that much, feel free to report the review to Admin

[Cunning Punt]

Given that you also said

you were not replying or updating, because you had the information to hand when you began typing the OP.

Don't try to get clever with me - it's beyond your pay grade.

You really are a patronising dick, aren't you?

You've managed just three reviews in five years of being a member here and you're acting like Admin and lecturing members who are contributing a lot to this site.

Firstly, even if had drawn on a couple of experiences in a single review post, is it really worth getting het up about it even if it is technically against the rules? A more rounded view of a WG provides greater perspective, IMO. At least some people actually write some regular reviews.

Secondly, he didn't actually do this. He put it in a separate post. So what if he's done it shortly afterwards? The reality is we don't all have to time to write a review straight after a punt and have to write up some close together.

So you were trying to be clever by quoting the rules when, actually, technically, you're wrong anyway. 

[Beesman]

+1
Well said.

[Brazilian Martian]

You really are a patronising dick, aren't you?

You've managed just three reviews in five years of being a member here and you're acting like Admin and lecturing members who are contributing a lot to this site.

Firstly, even if had drawn on a couple of experiences in a single review post, is it really worth getting het up about it even if it is technically against the rules? A more rounded view of a WG provides greater perspective, IMO. At least some people actually write some regular reviews.

Secondly, he didn't actually do this. He put it in a separate post. So what if he's done it shortly afterwards? The reality is we don't all have to time to write a review straight after a punt and have to write up some close together.

So you were trying to be clever by quoting the rules when, actually, technically, you're wrong anyway. 

He's a grade A Prick, but you can't blame him he does have a avatar pic of a gay man from those stupid carry on films so that says it all I need to know about the guy 

[BoShek]

Good review thanks!
A decent black British wg at those rates is a rare find these days

[BoShek]

You really are a patronising dick, aren't you?

You've managed just three reviews in five years of being a member here and you're acting like Admin and lecturing members who are contributing a lot to this site.

Firstly, even if had drawn on a couple of experiences in a single review post, is it really worth getting het up about it even if it is technically against the rules? A more rounded view of a WG provides greater perspective, IMO. At least some people actually write some regular reviews.

Secondly, he didn't actually do this. He put it in a separate post. So what if he's done it shortly afterwards? The reality is we don't all have to time to write a review straight after a punt and have to write up some close together.

So you were trying to be clever by quoting the rules when, actually, technically, you're wrong anyway. 

+100

[Dark_Gable]

I recently went back for a third and final helping-I still haven't found a WG I want to sleep with more than 3 times...

I previously described her as thick but would like to modify that to chubby/BBW. I'm not sure if she's put on weight or I have just assessed her more accurately to be honest.

As for this final meeting it followed a similar pattern as others but with position variations. Still a positive experience but this time around I don't feel any need to see her again.

For those who are interested, she has since moved to Ladywell (SE13) and rebranded as "Bootylicious" according to her new ad:

External Link/Members Only

I've not seen her at the new location so I have no information to offer about it.

[Mr Farkyhars]

You really are a patronising dick, aren't you?

You've managed just three reviews in five years of being a member here and you're acting like Admin and lecturing members who are contributing a lot to this site

There's no minimum rate of review. If it bothers you so much, which it shouldn't because it's none of your fucking business, I'm a carer as well as a part-time employee, and get little time to punt. If you think.. no, you don't think - if your opinion is that I should punt more, send me some money.

Firstly, even if had drawn on a couple of experiences in a single review post, is it really worth getting het up about it even if it is technically against the rules? A more rounded view of a WG provides greater perspective, IMO. At least some people actually write some regular reviews

Rules are rules. There is no point in the rule existing unless it's enforced. If you would prefer Admin to revise the rules, message him.

Secondly, he didn't actually do this. He put it in a separate post

No, he did do it. He put it in a separate comment, not a "separate post".

The reality is we don't all have to time to write a review straight after a punt and have to write up some close together

Nothing to do with the point at issue.

So you were trying to be clever by quoting the rules when, actually, technically, you're wrong anyway

No, you obviously can't read the rules.

[Mr Farkyhars]

He's a grade A Prick, but you can't blame him he does have a avatar pic of a gay man from those stupid carry on films so that says it all I need to know about the guy 

You're a formerly banned member and a grade A troublemaker - not worth bothering with.

[Stealthmode]

You're a formerly banned member and a grade A troublemaker - not worth bothering with.

Still more valued than you to be honest.

[Brazilian Martian]

You're a formerly banned member and a grade A troublemaker - not worth bothering with.

Yes im a former banned member, what else is new  is that the best you can throw at me    dont get in your feelings because a few people have called you out on your bullshit 

[Cunning Punt]

There's no minimum rate of review. If it bothers you so much, which it shouldn't because it's none of your fucking business, I'm a carer as well as a part-time employee, and get little time to punt. If you think.. no, you don't think - if your opinion is that I should punt more, send me some money.

Rules are rules. There is no point in the rule existing unless it's enforced. If you would prefer Admin to revise the rules, message him.

No, he did do it. He put it in a separate comment, not a "separate post".

Nothing to do with the point at issue.

No, you obviously can't read the rules.

What the fuck are you on about? 

You're the one who's taking issue, so therefore if what the OP has done bothers YOU so much, YOU contact Admin.

I can read the rules, thanks:

During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply.

Separate comment and post are the same thing.