lonelywifeplaytime - nr. Chester

[funky83]

External Link/Members Only

Afternoon gents ,
My first review on UKP so please be gentle:)

Have met Gayle on 2 occasions recently and both visits was excellent service.
Located near Chester. Safe parking
Went for 1 hr service, OWO
Massage was very good and OWO was just amazing. Her hand technique is something you have to experience. Felt very relaxed throughout our meeting.
She is a lovely & genuine person and was very welcoming.
Highly recommended.

Cheers
Ash

[frankc]

Dusty phone Gayle ?..........

[jimmytick]

Interested in seeing her, did she swallow?

What was the price?

[bbois77]

Dusty phone Gayle ?..........

Took me a sec to catch on 

[funky83]

No she didn’t mate.. no CIM on offer but she allowed me to cum twice in one hour booking.
£90 for an hour I paid

[Golovkin]

No she didn’t mate.. no CIM on offer but she allowed me to cum twice in one hour booking.
£90 for an hour I paid

At £90 for a blowjob not surprised your quiet.

[Beamer]

No she didn’t mate.. no CIM on offer but she allowed me to cum twice in one hour booking.
£90 for an hour I paid

Two blow jobs??
Absolute BLX 

[goldwing1]

£90 and no sex?

[jimmytick]

Dusty phone Gayle ?..........

Bit thick here, explain

[merseyrob]

People on here moan about members not doing reviews but then as soon as someone posts their first some smart arse immediately jumps in and questions if it is genuine just because it is all positive!

[NigelF]

Bit thick here, explain

He's implying that this review was actually written by Gayle herself (pretending to be a punter) and has done so because she's not busy and as such, her phone has been gathering dust.

People on here moan about members not doing reviews but then as soon as someone posts their first some smart arse immediately jumps in and questions if it is genuine just because it is all positive!

Bollocks. It's a shit review and it's very suspicious. The vast majority of first time reviews don't get questioned. If the review is good and balanced, first time reviewers are thanked not questioned. Regardless, questioning is very healthy as it helps weed out the many undesirables who try to mislead and pollute this site (there are many hundreds of examples).

[funky83]

Take it easy guys..
I wanted massage with HE & OWO and she delivered on them very well.
This is my first review so I included what I felt would help others.
It’s a completely genuine review from my end and I also left feedback for her in AW.

However you can take it as you like
But it really discourages people to post reviews when you get negative comments and come to conclusion without giving someone a chance.

[jimmytick]

Don’t see point of owo from a girl who has cumshot videos in her movie section showing her swallowing.


May visit next week for a review

[NigelF]

Take it easy guys..
I wanted massage with HE & OWO and she delivered on them very well.
This is my first review so I included what I felt would help others.
It’s a completely genuine review from my end and I also left feedback for her in AW.

However you can take it as you like
But it really discourages people to post reviews when you get negative comments and come to conclusion without giving someone a chance.

Trust is earned. Just post more honest, detailed and accurate reviews and you'll be fine.

Also, if these are the types of reviews that are discouraged then I personally couldn't give a shit. However in this instance that does somewhat reflect my preference for FS meets (and usually younger women). However my main issue is the quality of the review - there's no mention of her appearance or a comparison of her pics to her in real life. There's also no explanation of why the OWO is good although it is tricky to convey but you could try (although I admit I very rarely do) and you could  certainly mention the depth, any attention to the balls etc.

Anyway, her profile is funny, she says she only sees over 25s because she prefers "real gentleman, not idiots" which is both retarded and reflects very poorly on any children she might have.

[merseyrob]

Trust is earned. Just post more honest, detailed and accurate reviews and you'll be fine.

Also, if these are the types of reviews that are discouraged then I personally couldn't give a shit. However in this instance that does reflect my preference for FS meets (and usually younger women).

Anyway, her profile is funny, she says she only sees over 25s because she prefers "real gentleman, not idiots" which is both retarded and reflects very poorly on any children she might have.

Who’s to say it isn’t honest and accurate?! Just coz it’s not written the way you’d do it. It’s horses for courses. Don’t criticise someone for having a go. Too much willy waving in this forum, pardon the pun.

[NigelF]

Who’s to say it isn’t honest and accurate?! Just coz it’s not written the way you’d do it. It’s horses for courses. Don’t criticise someone for having a go. Too much willy waving in this forum, pardon the pun.

I didn't say it wasn't honest and accurate. When I said "more", I was simply referring to more reviews. I said he needs to post more reviews that are like that so people are much more likely to trust what he says. I also think reporting any negative and neutral experiences is the best way forward as well as they're often the most helpful reviews and there's no excuse not to do them. If someone has had more than just a few punts I'd be very surprised if they'd had no poor/not great experiences.

I have updated my post to reflect the specifics that I'm criticising. I'm not criticising the actual effort compared to doing nothing.

[funky83]

Nigel- it was my first review so sorry if it was very brief
Would like to add few more points:
Pics- accurate, better looking in person
Lots of attention to balls and slow sensual technique
Massage also also very good with warm oil and relaxing

Will def keep in mind when posting future reviews
Cheers
Ash x

[NigelF]

Nigel- it was my first review so sorry if it was very brief
Would like to add few more points:
Pics- accurate, better looking in person
Lots of attention to balls and slow sensual technique
Massage also also very good with warm oil and relaxing

Will def keep in mind when posting future reviews
Cheers
Ash x

Great, cheers 

To be honest, that's pretty much all the info that can be expected for a meet like this so good job 

When you get time, do try to post your other experiences as well (which also helps to allay concerns that you might be a particular WG).

[funky83]

Thanks Nigel
Sure will do🍻

[cerealpunter]

Great, cheers 

To be honest, that's pretty much all the info that can be expected for a meet like this so good job 

When you get time, do try to post your other experiences as well (which also helps to allay concerns that you might be a particular WG).

She even signed off with a kiss for you in the last post 

[NigelF]

She even signed off with a kiss for you in the last post 

Shit, well spotted. Suspicions are definitely valid.

[funky83]

Lol.. I think that was typo error on my part
Give me a break guys and may be another positive review from someone else will confirm my review
U can check her AW reviews which are all very positive

[shaft10]

People on here moan about members not doing reviews but then as soon as someone posts their first some smart arse immediately jumps in and questions if it is genuine just because it is all positive!

Who’s to say it isn’t honest and accurate?! Just coz it’s not written the way you’d do it. It’s horses for courses. Don’t criticise someone for having a go. Too much willy waving in this forum, pardon the pun.

You are coming across as a bit of a fanboy IMO, and in a previous thread below you mention a favourite of yours called 'ash' .... now call me suspicious ....

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=183822.msg1929399#msg1929399

If you don't like the site, fuck off

[NigelF]

Lol.. I think that was typo error on my part
Give me a break guys and may be another positive review from someone else will confirm my review
U can check her AW reviews which are all very positive

AW feedback is meaningless. It can usually (but even then not always) tell you if a girlactually exists/does escort meets but that's about it. It's almost impossible to distinguish between genuine feedback and rubbish (of which there is a lot out there). Many guys leave positive feedback so they can get some in return and/or because they're afraid of getting negative feedback. Negative feedback would usually harm a punter's ability to get bookings much more than it would for the escort (especially if they otherwise have lots of positives).

Out of curiosity, roughly, how many punts have you had?

You are coming across as a bit of a fanboy IMO, and in a previous thread below you mention a favourite of yours called 'ash' .... now call me suspicious ....

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=183822.msg1929399#msg1929399

If you don't like the site, fuck off

Well spotted.

[GorillaWarfare]

Quite frankly £90 for an hour when you only get a blowie or two is terrible. You can get an hour's worth of sex in other places for £80. Awful value for money - either do more or offer less.

+1 on suspicions from me. When your only review (and your only posts) are in your brief "she's bloody great this one get there quick" review you do raise eyebrows. If you are legit I'm glad you had a good time but I'm not paying £90 for that.

Every reviewer on here has done a first review. 99% of them were better than this.

[onelasttime]

As a newbie on here, I must admit, even I felt that the OP is a bit suspect!

Can't beat the "Ash x" who does that on a forum?

[Haruki]

Lol.. I think that was typo error on my part
Give me a break guys and may be another positive review from someone else will confirm my review
U can check her AW reviews which are all very positive

Oh come off it!! I was prepared to take the review on face value until this reply......."a positive r view from someone else will confirm".   Blatantly fishing for more bookings!!

[Haruki]

At least Gayle is true to her username, it certainly sounds like she is lonely at the moment!!

[threechilliman]

Nigel- it was my first review so sorry if it was very brief
Would like to add few more points:
Pics- accurate, better looking in person
Lots of attention to balls and slow sensual technique
Massage also also very good with warm oil and relaxing

Will def keep in mind when posting future reviews
Cheers
Ash x

It's not normal on here to end your message to us lot with a kiss. It's something lasses do......

[shaft10]

Careful fellas you'll upset 'merseyrob' , he's a sensitive chap who indulges in passionate lovemaking (in his review)

both the OP and merseyrob are sus

[OakTree]

Lol.. I think that was typo error on my part

Not really... A typo error is where you stick a U in where an I should be and a different word is spat out due to predictive text. This was a habitual error. You normally end your messages with a X.... a kiss. It’s what women do, especially women in this field. I’m pretty certain that almost every message I’ve received off a WG has ended with a X.

That error, the review and additional info from shaft10 makes you very suspect.

[frankc]

Careful fellas you'll upset 'merseyrob' 

Out of his 15 post's , three are complaining about post's being too harsh.....

[merseyrob]

So many warped conspiracy theories!

[funky83]

Hi Nigel
I did make further additions to my review as suggested by yourself..
I am quite new to punting but have done couple of punts last year in Chester.
Regarding the service £90 for 1 hr massage with HE & OWO with a good attitude from lady is not bad IMO. I know you can have sex for the same amount but I wanted to experience something different.

[frankc]

So many warped conspiracy theories!

What the fuck are you on about?.....The OPs opening review reads like an advert for a WG with a dusty phone, something that happens all the time on this forum and something you would be aware of if you'd been a member on here for longer than five minutes.... Weeding out the pimps, and self promoting prossies is something we all need to conscious of and if that means upsetting a few sensitive souls then tough, so Id suggest you start building up some credibility on here first, before you start calling members smart arses

[merseyrob]

What the fuck are you on about?.....The OPs opening review reads like an advert for a WG with a dusty phone, something that happens all the time on this forum and something you would be aware of if you'd been a member on here for longer than five minutes.... Weeding out the pimps, and self promoting prossies is something we all need to conscious of and if that means upsetting a few sensitive souls then tough.

I am on about it because I have now twice been accused of being a fake - a WG and another reviewer. And seen others receive the same treatment. I am all for outing fakes but just because someone doesn’t write a review the way you like it or is very positive about a punt doesn’t make them a fake, fantasist or a WG. I have been punting for 30 years - I’ve forgotten way more punts than I can remember. That’s a lot of experience and I have now decided to come on here and share future punts to give something back. So when you have your contributions thrown back in your face by keyboard warriors who know nothing about me except for their own misguided suspicions then forgive me but I am going to object to it.

[frankc]

I am on about it because I have now twice been accused of being a fake - a WG and another reviewer. And seen others receive the same treatment. I am all for outing fakes but just because someone doesn’t write a review the way you like it or is very positive about a punt doesn’t make them a fake, fantasist or a WG. I have been punting for 30 years - I’ve forgotten way more punts than I can remember. That’s a lot of experience and I have now decided to come on here and share future punts to give something back. So when you have your contributions thrown back in your face by keyboard warriors who know nothing about me except for their own misguided suspicions then forgive me but I am going to object to it.

That's exactly my point, this place is full of bullshitters, pimps and fucking notrights hence why I said build up your credibility on here before you start slagging off fellow punters.

[softlad25]

What the fuck are you on about?.....The OPs opening review reads like an advert for a WG with a dusty phone, something that happens all the time on this forum and something you would be aware of if you'd been a member on here for longer than five minutes.... Weeding out the pimps, and self promoting prossies is something we all need to conscious of and if that means upsetting a few sensitive souls then tough, so Id suggest you start building up some credibility on here first, before you start calling members smart arses

+1 well said frankc

[merseyrob]

That's exactly my point, this place is full of bullshitters, pimps and fucking notrights hence why I said build up your credibility on here before you start slagging off fellow punters.

At least give people a chance rather than jumping on them aggressively straight away. I shouldn’t have to prove anything to anyone. By acting in this way you’re as bad as those you’re trying to out.

[funky83]

As I said before this was my first review and I did add further points  as suggested by Nigel
I am quite new to punting and have done couple of punts in Chester last year

[Beamer]

That's exactly my point, this place is full of bullshitters, pimps and fucking notrights hence why I said build up your credibility on here before you start slagging off fellow punters.

+1 

[Haruki]

As I said before this was my first review and I did add further points  as suggested by Nigel
I am quite new to punting and have done couple of punts in Chester last year

Who else have you seen in Chester?

[frankc]

I am on about it because I have now twice been accused of being a fake - a WG and another reviewer. And seen others receive the same treatment. I am all for outing fakes but just because someone doesn’t write a review the way you like it or is very positive about a punt doesn’t make them a fake, fantasist or a WG. I have been punting for 30 years - I’ve forgotten way more punts than I can remember. That’s a lot of experience and I have now decided to come on here and share future punts to give something back. So when you have your contributions thrown back in your face by keyboard warriors who know nothing about me except for their own misguided suspicions then forgive me but I am going to object to it.

The first guy you so gallantly tried to defend has subsequently been banned by the boss for being a " pathetic white knight " ... On this thread you've again jumped in to defend a very suspect review, from someone with a very low post count hence, no credibility, who you know nothing about, who signs off his post with a kiss and you wonder why your getting grief, are you really that naive?

[merseyrob]

The first guy you so gallantly tried to defend has subsequently been banned by the boss for being a " pathetic white knight " ... On this thread you've again jumped in to defend a very suspect review, from someone with a very low post count hence, no credibility, who you know nothing about, who signs off his post with a kiss and you wonder why your getting grief, are you really that naive?

I guess I should be jumping in on every new poster and questioning their motives and I’d be hero worshipped. These forums really do bring out the worst in some people.

[bigthickdick]

I guess I should be jumping in on every new poster and questioning their motives and I’d be hero worshipped. These forums really do bring out the worst in some people.

Although i agree that this forum can sometimes be a bit harsh to new members but you're obviously a bit of a prick mate.

In this particular case the OP is more than suspicious so as the review (or should i say advert?)

[merseyrob]

Although i agree that this forum can sometimes be a bit harsh to new members but you're obviously a bit of a prick mate

It seems I am in good company then. 

[bigthickdick]

It seems I am in good company then. 

But for how long?

[funky83]

Haruki-  I have seen Katie Cheshire in Chester last year

[Haruki]

Haruki-  I have seen Katie Cheshire in Chester last year

what did you think of her? Can you do a review for us?

[NigelF]

Hi Nigel
I did make further additions to my review as suggested by yourself..
I am quite new to punting but have done couple of punts last year in Chester.
Regarding the service £90 for 1 hr massage with HE & OWO with a good attitude from lady is not bad IMO. I know you can have sex for the same amount but I wanted to experience something different.

Well at least only having had a handful of punts could well explain why you think that AW feedback is reliable (indeed that's why I asked).

The first guy you so gallantly tried to defend has subsequently been banned by the boss for being a " pathetic white knight " ... On this thread you've again jumped in to defend a very suspect review, from someone with a very low post count hence, no credibility, who you know nothing about, who signs off his post with a kiss and you wonder why your getting grief, are you really that naive?

+1 (and to everything else you've previously said).

At least give people a chance rather than jumping on them aggressively straight away. I shouldn’t have to prove anything to anyone. By acting in this way you’re as bad as those you’re trying to out.

Why should people be automatically believed, especially when they do get a chance - they can write a review which is balanced or they can write one which reads like an advert. You can write a very positive review without it sounding like an advert. It would help if people could actually be a bit more discerning than your first review for example, which happened to be for the perfect prostitute - as you rated her 10/10.

Anyway, I have no idea why you're taking things so personally. You're either here for your ego or your here to help other punters. If you can't understand why people get challenged and why it's very healthy that happens then you're literally too thick to be here. We're not perfect but it is clearly much better to be too sceptical than too trusting.

On another note, negative and neutral reviews are often the most helpful but it seems very rarely do people bother posting them.

I guess I should be jumping in on every new poster and questioning their motives and I’d be hero worshipped. These forums really do bring out the worst in some people.

But that's bollocks because the majority of new posters actually don't get questioned.