Author Topic: Bianca at Massage Northampton  (Read 1075 times)

Offline Charliehutton

There's no fool like an old fool. I've been punting for a year now, so I'm not wet behind the ears. I know parlour profiles are there to sell, and have to be taken with a huge pinch of salt and are only ever a rough guide at best. But MN's rota has needed freshening up for a while, so when I saw new girl Bianca on the rota, at £60 all-in for half an hour, I thought it worth a gamble.

External Link/Members Only

It wasn't. She bears absolutely no resemblance to her profile. She's a tubby little 5'2" Romanian with badly bleached blonde hair. If I'd turned up on spec and she'd been one of the girls on parade I'd never have picked her, but I'd pre-booked, so felt obliged to stay.

Her attitude was very different to what we've read in so many reviews of Romanian girls, though. She was bright, bubbly and full of enthusiasm - much more than I was - and spoke very good English.

She offers kissing, RO and OWO, but no, thanks. I stuck to the bare essentials. The warm up consisted of playing with her tits a bit and bending her over my knee to give her backside a good, firm spank, which she took without complaint. Then a decent blow-job, for which she positioned herself so I could carry on playing with her arse. At one point, giggling, she started wiggling about; 'shaking her booty' is the phrase, I believe. As I say, there was nothing wrong with her attitude, in fact there's a bit of fun about her. Sessions of 'heels-to-heaven' missionary and doggie-style rounded things off.

Afterwards she got me nicely cleaned up, which I like. I've had girls just toss a couple of Kleenex at me before now and leave me to get on with it. I can't have been there 20 minutes all told, and she was very keen to give me a massage, to give me my moneys worth. I declined, but appreciated the offer.

So the negative rating is not for her attitude or performance. It's for blatant misrepresentation by the parlour itself. That's down to them, not her. Often the girls here have no idea what's on their profile. This went way beyond acceptable 'artistic licence', which we expect. Even if photo's are old and airbrushed, they should at least bear some resemblance to the girl in the flesh. If I hadn't recognised the tattoos I'd have said it was a completely different girl. What really disappointed me is that I've seen a dozen or so girls here and this is the first time I've felt completely stitched up. So many UKP members seem to have no faith in parlours for this reason. I don't have much faith left in this place, after this, either.






Offline L554mmj

Was she pretty though? And how big were her boobs?

Offline MajorPayne

Should you be giving a negative review if the parlour is considered solely to blame?   Aren't reviews supposed to be instead a reflection on the prostitute?


Offline Charliehutton

Should you be giving a negative review if the parlour is considered solely to blame?   Aren't reviews supposed to be instead a reflection on the prostitute?

"She bears absolutely no resemblance to her profile photo's." I'd say that's entirely relevant to any prospective punter. Whether she's responsible for the deception of punters, or the parlour is, is pretty academic. I wish somebody had told me beforehand, that's for sure.

Offline MajorPayne

Going to see Sasha there soon. It will be interesting to find out if her pictures are accurate (or not).


Offline doughboy

Going to see Sasha there soon. It will be interesting to find out if her pictures are accurate (or not).

I wouldn't bother if I were you lad. Saw her when she worked at the HotBox last year. She has stretch marks from child birth, small saggy breasts and a bit of a bashed up pussy. I was massively disappointed when I saw her but she was the 'freebie' after I'd got all the stickers for the loyalty card.