Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Black men  (Read 10875 times)

Offline Persie

I edited my post after thinking about it. She must presumably insist on full face and body photos of ALL her punters. She said she hadnt met one she didnt find attractive, thats totally different to just offering ALL punters a good service being a good WG.

I think thats the point behind this post
Most WGs do the job, not because they wake up with a sense of purpose and desire to do some good, but for the money.

If a WG says at outset I won't see a black guy, brown guy, uncircumcised guy, or a bloke with a left side parting, she is limiting her market. Limiting her market means limiting her revenue. Limiting her revenue defeats the whole point of being a hooker.
Having said that I support her right to do that. Afterall if your job entails letting all and sundyr who phones you up come and do all sorts of stuff you may not want to do but for the money, one way of having some semblance of control is to say you won't see this or that because it repels you.

Ahmen

I am going for a pint and I look forward to reading this thread when I get back
Banning reason: Stalking prossies on Facebook and threatening to out them

Offline Mystique46m

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 372
But this is not what she posted though of course. She said she hadnt met a punter she hadnt been attracted to, thats totally different to just giving a good service to ALL punters.

Yeah I agree, it's a different thing completely.

Offline ynothgnis

Haven't read any of this monster thread but found this snippet when looking for info on a diff thread:

http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-Statistics.aspx

By the end of 2011, an estimated 96,000 people were living with HIV in the UK,

In 2011, an estimated 30,800 African born heterosexuals were living with HIV in the UK


So black/mixed-race people account for around 5% of the UK population but at least 30% of HIV+ people (so about 10x more likely than non-black people). If I was a WG that would probably do it for me.

It makes more sense to simply assume that the next punter they encounter may have some kind of STD and thus use protection. This makes sense regardless of race because the WG won't know what that punters sexual history is.

Offline Jason

Shut up  :dash:

James999. I really thought you were cleverer than this. What I stated is another (silly) excuse of how a girl can refuse to have sex with a punter from a certain race.

Offline smiths

Girls advertise on adultwork and other websites as escorts. This means that they are getting paid only for their time and they “only” have sex with clients after mutual consent because they are “attracted” to them. And attraction in this case may just mean to not dislike the punter.

I assume this is irony, if so a smiley would of helped, otherwise what an absolute load of bollocks.
« Last Edit: November 17, 2013, 09:14:24 PM by smiths »

Offline jackdaw

No point really on me commenting on main topic of thread itself...it's been done to death eons ago on many a former thread.

But limiting the market can be a darn good option for a business man or woman operating their own business. Yes, of course, making money is main point of doing business...but there are other considerations.

Certainly in my final years of business I turned away a few customers...on basis that they "grinded my gears", and I could make enough money to live comfortably and got benefits by working less.

Can't see the point in being richest man in the graveyard.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Girls advertise on adultwork and other websites as escorts. This means that they are getting paid only for their time and they “only” have sex with clients after mutual consent because they are “attracted” to them. And attraction in this case may just mean to not dislike the punter.

Jason, mate, you are talking nonsense, girls on Adultwork sell sex -------------- not their time.    :hi:

Offline Jason

I assume this is irony, if so a smiley would of helped, otherwise what an absolute load of bollocks.

Of course is irony. Note the use of inverted commas.

Offline Mystique46m

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 372
Jason, not your best work.
Must try harder.

;)

Offline Jimmyredcab

No point really on me commenting on main topic of thread itself...it's been done to death eons ago on many a former thread.

But limiting the market can be a darn good option for a business man or woman operating their own business. Yes, of course, making money is main point of doing business...but there are other considerations.

I agree 100%.
I often refuse jobs ------------- and not because of race, do I really want a drunken 19 year old girl who is going to throw up or fall into a deep sleep, not really.    :thumbsdown:

Offline smiths

I think thats the point behind this post
Most WGs do the job, not because they wake up with a sense of purpose and desire to do some good, but for the money.

If a WG says at outset I won't see a black guy, brown guy, uncircumcised guy, or a bloke with a left side parting, she is limiting her market. Limiting her market means limiting her revenue. Limiting her revenue defeats the whole point of being a hooker.
Having said that I support her right to do that. Afterall if your job entails letting all and sundyr who phones you up come and do all sorts of stuff you may not want to do but for the money, one way of having some semblance of control is to say you won't see this or that because it repels you.

Ahmen

I am going for a pint and I look forward to reading this thread when I get back

Of course its about making money and why not. As i posted earlier a WG can maybe afford to exclude say ALL Black punters but couldnt afford to exclude ALL White punters so they make a pragmatic decision when it comes to White punters that doesnt affect her income. Thats why i havent seen no Whites welcome on a profile.

I personally find that people with "inherited" hangups regarding their fellow man are generally less outward looking in their attitude, compared to those who see themselves as "citizens of the world" first and nationalists second.

That is a generalisation - like I don't see black men because they are going to rape or mug me- so not necessarily a universally accepted opinion. That is what makes us all individuals. There are enough of us on this planet for the "citizens of the world" to find soul mates and the racists to find soul mates. All I hope for is that neither group tries to limit or overthrow the other by reverting to violence or in forum, regressing to harsh language. My advice to all is...choose who you associate with according to your personally arrived at and firmly held beliefs.

If you believe that a black person is going to rape or mug you or give you aids, why should you be criticised for not seeing them, even if one hasn't actually done any of these things to you personally? If you believe that all white people are evil because they have a historical tendency to enslave black people, steal their humanity and generally exploit them, then why as a black man would you want to fuck their women...who are all white, even if a white person hasn't actually done any of these things to you personally?

Like Michelle Independent suggests inherited cultural viewpoints, stretching back over the years provide the most dependable instincts for many, who live by them totally without adjustment in todays world. Hitler knew how to work the room, knowing that this was the way certain people are inclined to think and would continue to think. His legacy lives on across certain european cultures. He did invade Poland, so why are we surprised that Aryan attitudes remain intact there? He didn't make it to the UK but with increased freedom of movement across European borders could it turn out that he left unwitting "foot soldiers" who hold his viewpoint at the centre of their existence even today? It may be that in the end he only lost the battle, but the war still rages on the outcome of which is still undecided? There are always those trojans within the UK who would be happy to open the door whilst everyone sleeps the politically correct sleep.

Black men not being able to shag certain white women is the least of our worries, in fact it shouldn't be a worry at all. In terms of a pro$$ie's likely mindset and personality it could be a useful guide and filter in you finding your "soulmate"

Really i find that amazing. You have never met a punter you werent attracted to. Am i right in saying you insist on ALL punters sending you their full face and body photos?

my preference is young guys so most are under 40, no I dont get pix from them, I get some arseholes probably like everyone else, just never take another booking off them, as I'm 16st I rarely get anyone overweight as it clashes when trying positions

as I said before my face would betray if someone repulsed me & I couldn't go through with the booking & I'm not the most tactful person as I say what's on my mind, I'm not sociable until it comes to sex, so when a punter walks in they are told to strip straight away dont fuck about with chat


Offline Jimmyredcab

my preference is young guys so most are under 40, no I dont get pix from them, I get some arseholes probably like everyone else, just never take another booking off them, as I'm 16st I rarely get anyone overweight as it clashes when trying positions

as I said before my face would betray if someone repulsed me & I couldn't go through with the booking & I'm not the most tactful person as I say what's on my mind, I'm not sociable until it comes to sex, so when a punter walks in they are told to strip straight away dont fuck about with chat

So you are grossly obese but fussy about who you see ----------------- this has got to be a wind up surely.   :rolleyes:

So you are grossly obese but fussy about who you see ----------------- this has got to be a wind up surely.   :rolleyes:

nope its not a wind up, what's wrong with being fussy

Offline Jimmyredcab

nope its not a wind up, what's wrong with being fussy

If you are really 16st you should be thankful for whatever business you get ---------- no offence meant.    :hi:

If you are really 16st you should be thankful for whatever business you get ---------- no offence meant.    :hi:

no offence taken, I have an out of control orange lucozade addiction so that's to blame, though boxing & weightlifting are helping

I get plenty of business, along with my phonesex & game testing gives me a comfortable life

Offline smiths

my preference is young guys so most are under 40, no I dont get pix from them, I get some arseholes probably like everyone else, just never take another booking off them, as I'm 16st I rarely get anyone overweight as it clashes when trying positions

as I said before my face would betray if someone repulsed me & I couldn't go through with the booking & I'm not the most tactful person as I say what's on my mind, I'm not sociable until it comes to sex, so when a punter walks in they are told to strip straight away dont fuck about with chat

Thats not what you posted though, you said you hadnt met a punter you werent attracted to, now your saying you get some arseholes who you never see again. Now that sounds perfectly normal to me.

Thats not what you posted though, you said you hadnt met a punter you werent attracted to, now your saying you get some arseholes who you never see again. Now that sounds perfectly normal to me.

yess thats true, the part about the a holes has nothing to do with looks but attitude. i dont want to see any guy again who keeps asking for things i never offer

Offline theotherside

I agree if they are saying that they don't see black men because they are not attracted to them then that makes sense to me.  To say it is because of they are worried that they will get attacked just seems lazy to me. Rather then vetting clients properly they just blanket ban. It's up to them how they run their business but it doesn't sit well with my crazy liberal politics. Also being in an very multicultural city where there is no majority it would mean not seeing 70% of my clients. So far not had a problem but that because I try and vet as well as I can.

Personally I think that the ladies that do not see men that they are not attracted to are missing out. I have had some incredible sex with clients who in my civvy life I wouldn't look twice at and its really opened my eyes. Perhaps its because I am a massive pervert myself, or I just get off on whoring I don't know.


being in an very multicultural city where there is no majority it would mean not seeing 70% of my clients.

I dont know if I want to laugh or cry  :dash: :rolleyes:



Offline smiths

yess thats true, the part about the a holes has nothing to do with looks but attitude. i dont want to see any guy again who keeps asking for things i never offer

Fair enough of course and you obviously arent attracted to punters with such an attitude, as i am not with WGs with bad attitudes.

Offline Daffodil

It is absolute bollocks that the only difference between a black person and a white person is the colour of their skin. The same can be said for the differences between any races. There are pros and cons that can be applied to all races. That doesn't mean that all members of that race will adhere to all stereotypes.

Black people seem more likely to commit more crime (as supported by numerous statistical sources) that might impact direct upon the prossie. As such, it seems sensible to exclude on that basis.

They're not saying that every black person will comit the crime, just that they're more likely to.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)