**THICKER Edition** BIG ASS, BIG BOOTY, BIG BUTT, PAWG... Plus-Size allowed!!!

[peter purves]

he is asking a question as things get clouded with many voices speaking in different interpretations of the same topic. I dont know about you but when two people are making claims about 1 thing ... most times the bystander just wants "okay okay fine...so what exactly are we doing..is it this? or that?"

DineKid7 mentions bellies, i dont know why exactly.... infact he needs to answer that as well rather than us batting back and forth what he meant LOL

I think he mentions bellies in relation to BBWs and whether BBWs (if they have big stomachs) should they be allowed in this thread?

As for me I am a letter of the lawman . So what anyone writes down in their OP then I'll do my best to follow the words closely on the page as possible.

I am aware that is not always possible to convey what one is thinking in one's mind and then translate it here on the silverscreen of the pc . Nonetheless it's only the words we have to go by unless the OP comes back and clarifies his position.

[last_days_of_logan]

As for me I am a letter of the lawman . So what anyone writes down in their OP then I'll do my best to follow the words closely on the page as possible.

yes of course, once you cut out the part you want to listen to.

Listen, you do you as far as what you truly believe this thread is about.... i wont hammer you for it...i never have. Only when you literally ask me to get into a round and round circle type dance

[last_days_of_logan]

I think he mentions bellies in relation to BBWs and whether BBWs (if they have big stomachs) should they be allowed in this thread?

lets wait for him to say what he meant and why he felt that he should/needed to ask that.

[peter purves]

lets wait for him to say what he meant and why he felt that he should/needed to ask that.

Very good thinking!! 

.....dont over think it, dont let PP get in your head 

 

[last_days_of_logan]

Very good thinking!! 

 

LOL, trust me i am glad i came to that realisation first. i just dont have time for it. Its like the matrix.... a cycle of the same song.

[Dinekid7]

I mentioned "bellies" coz I recently seen Logan say no to two WG who indeed have big round bums, but because they didn't have small waist or smaller waist compared to there hips he says they wasn't allowed, listen my ideal s is a big round soft ass with tons of jiggle and somewhat of flat stomach, and as a lover of the bbw shape I have accepted that the majority of "BBW" woman have larger then average stomachs, so for it to say BBW allowed but sa no to woman who are BBW's “WITH" big bums and thick thighs is a little confusing.

[peter purves]

I mentioned "bellies" coz I recently seen Logan say no to two WG who indeed have big round bums, but because they didn't have small waist or smaller waist compared to there hips he says they wasn't allowed, listen my ideal s is a big round soft ass with tons of jiggle and somewhat of flat stomach, and as a lover of the bbw shape I have accepted that the majority of "BBW" woman have larger then average stomachs, so for it to say BBW allowed but sa no to woman who are BBW's “WITH" big bums and thick thighs is a little confusing.

Last_days_of_Logan

Dare I say it...as I am embolden   

...if you don't mind I think I will 

I think that causes the confusion
 

Though if I am being honest, I think I understand what you were trying to get at when you created this thread - long before your charter was created 

[Dinekid7]

Thing is I get what he was trying to do too, the emphasis must be on the arse, if the WG HAS huge bum, but the rest of the body is also huge and I can see why he may decline and entry, but the "bbw allowed" does leave that abit up in the air

[peter purves]

Thing is I get what he was trying to do too, the emphasis must be on the arse, if the WG HAS huge bum, but the rest of the body is also huge and I can see why he may decline and entry, but the "bbw allowed" does leave that abit up in the air

Personally, I think pp1920 was very close.

Can't believe I am defending him here, Last_days_of_Logan I mean 

I think Last_days_of_Logan is looking for big bums, bubble butts etc but here is the caveat it must be curvy, shapely etc.

So:

If a WG has no VW then her bum cannot be curvy,

Equally if her hips are larger than her rear then this is not going to work also.

If the WGs rear is gargantuan (ie just exceptionally large no shape) this will not work either.

These are the reasons I believe some of the WGs have not been accepted because from the Punther Charter though not mentioned in Logan's Charter (LC), they lack 'impeccable shape'

P.S Bellies are not once mentioned in the LC

[last_days_of_logan]

I mentioned "bellies" coz I recently seen Logan say no to two WG who indeed have big round bums, but because they didn't have small waist or smaller waist compared to there hips he says they wasn't allowed,

listen my ideal s is a big round soft ass with tons of jiggle and somewhat of flat stomach, and as a lover of the bbw shape I have accepted that the majority of "BBW" woman have larger then average stomachs, so for it to say BBW allowed but sa no to woman who are BBW's “WITH" big bums and thick thighs is a little confusing.

Waist to hips ration OR VW....why did you forget the VW? (it seems like its always that people miss that)
i said no to them because they didnt have one or the other. its not to do with the stomach. there needs to be some form of shape to the bum in at least some kind of immitating bubble time to some degree

you are simplyfying it down to the BBW allowed things...did you read the original post? be honest cause i know you dont like to read long ones

[last_days_of_logan]

Last_days_of_Logan

Dare I say it...as I am embolden   

...if you don't mind I think I will 

Though if I am being honest, I think I understand what you were trying to get at when you created this thread - long before your charter was created 

trust its fine. Dinekid sometimes doesnt read stuff so one cant be sure if he read the orginal charter. you did and you dissected it in parts that suited you... i am very well adpeth and doing the same but dare i say that there isnt any need to do that in the original as the needle already shifted for the reason that this thread was made

i created this thread cause you were rejecting women that indeed i felt had Big asses and smaller top halfs and asses that stuck...there needed to be a place for them here....even in some cases where you would reject them cause them called themselves BBW even though their pics suggested something else entirely like big bubble butts

even when you quote "i think that causes the confusion"..... its only cause it says BBW.....Dinekid if he reads the original post in full i trust will understand what this place is about. there is soooo much information there to show what the way is that for someone to ignore vast amounts of data in favour of just one word is a clear indication of either bias or they dont want to take in all the information

[last_days_of_logan]

Thing is I get what he was trying to do too, the emphasis must be on the arse, if the WG HAS huge bum, but the rest of the body is also huge and I can see why he may decline and entry, but the "bbw allowed" does leave that abit up in the air

   , you are killing me man

you get what i am trying to do but things are still up in the air? her body can be the size of earth but her ass needs to have some kind of shape to it

Good hips to waist and a bit of VW
or
Good VW and a bit of hips to waist

i didnt mention bellies and i didnt mention big tops as being the reasons for not agreeing with those women suggest...one of which i felt was a cheeky seedy plant by PP

the single word "BBW" really throws you off completely doesnt it. what about the rest of the original post?

[last_days_of_logan]

Personally, I think pp1920 was very close.

Can't believe I am defending him here, Last_days_of_Logan I mean 

I think Last_days_of_Logan is looking for big bums, bubble butts etc but here is the caveat it must be curvy, shapely etc.

So:

If a WG has no VW then her bum cannot be curvy,

Equally if her hips are larger than her rear then this is not going to work also.

If the WGs rear is gargantuan (ie just exceptionally large no shape) this will not work either.

These are the reasons I believe some of the WGs have not been accepted because from the Punther Charter though not mentioned in Logan's Charter (LC), they lack 'impeccable shape'

P.S Bellies are not once mentioned in the LC

my lord, this is like the twilight zone now....why have you suddenly had a light bulb moment?

*i mention the above like 1000 times* but when the assault wave reckon they have caused destruction they extend an olive branch to the remainder to stop rebellion 

i just , i cant with you  ...but i have indeed seen what it is you are doing now. i think i will play too    

[last_days_of_logan]

Thing is I get what he was trying to do too, the emphasis must be on the arse, if the WG HAS huge bum, but the rest of the body is also huge and I can see why he may decline and entry, but the "bbw allowed" does leave that abit up in the air

"the WG HAS huge bum, but the rest of the body is also huge and I can see why he may decline and entry"

where have i said that?

"but the "bbw allowed" does leave that abit up in the air"

'that bit' was never an issue ..... so the 'bbw allowed' doesnt actually leave it in the air....and why does the 'bbw allowed' overrule everything else in that original post?

again, have you read the original post? i dont think you have DineKid i will be completely honest... and if you have and you still think that shapeless booties are still allowed then unfortunately i dont know how to explain it to you in particular.

i mean if stomachs were an issue, why do you think i put bella big booty xxx here?

[Dinekid7]

This sentence right her clears it all up for me
" her body can be the size of earth but her ass needs to have some kind of shape to it"
I did briefly read the original post ages ago, but it clear I need to read it again.
But yh I have a much better understanding now.
Let's get back to regular schedule.
 

[last_days_of_logan]

This sentence right her clears it all up for me
" her body can be the size of earth but her ass needs to have some kind of shape to it"
I did briefly read the original post ages ago, but it clear I need to read it again.
But yh I have a much better understanding now.
Let's get back to regular schedule.
 

so not only was is aaaaages ago but it was also a brief read. Then you open this pandora's box LOL. bellies and reasons that i have never mentioned (still dont know where you got some of those exclusion reasons from)

[Mr Sinister]

Probably going to trigger non BBW lovers but until Last_days_of_Logan files a complaint I'm going to keep posting. 
Hidden Image/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

BUSTY BABE XXX

External Link/Members Only

That is Vicky bbw, best, something she was around a while couple years back. Sure she's been reviewed here a few times. I'd say her ass is lacking.

Bella

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=166400.msg1781611#msg1781611

[punther]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[last_days_of_logan]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

yes punther my booty demi-god , she is already in here. Glad you approve

[pumps]

yes punther my booty demi-god , she is already in here. Glad you approve

Who is she?

She Looks like a prossie I've fucked before

[last_days_of_logan]

Who is she?

She Looks like a prossie I've fucked before

that doesnt really narrow things down for you now does it 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=166400.msg1781611#msg1781611

[peter purves]

i didnt mention bellies and i didnt mention big tops as being the reasons for not agreeing with those women suggest...one of which i felt was a cheeky seedy plant by PP

 I give up 

Especially along with the Illustrious FCB  as being the initiators of this thread even before you. Then subsequently after I nominated you to create such a thread.

[pumps]

that doesnt really narrow things down for you now does it 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=166400.msg1781611#msg1781611

 

[PapaSmurf]

I mentioned "bellies" coz I recently seen Logan say no to two WG who indeed have big round bums, but because they didn't have small waist or smaller waist compared to there hips he says they wasn't allowed, listen my ideal s is a big round soft ass with tons of jiggle and somewhat of flat stomach, and as a lover of the bbw shape I have accepted that the majority of "BBW" woman have larger then average stomachs, so for it to say BBW allowed but sa no to woman who are BBW's “WITH" big bums and thick thighs is a little confusing.

You're not the only one that's confused. One man's BBW is another mans PAWG I guess. A BBW with no belly is basically Plus sized imho.

[Dinekid7]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I will investigate further tomorrow if I can 

But looks pretty fucking decent

Hidden Image/Members Only

[last_days_of_logan]

You're not the only one that's confused. One man's BBW is another mans PAWG I guess. A BBW with no belly is basically Plus sized imho.

okay thats a completely different issue outside the realm of booties. needless to say...bellies are not a problem...its booties that are paramount.i am not sure where did this belly issue come from? i never mentioned it once.

[last_days_of_logan]

I give up 

Especially along with the Illustrious FCB  as being the initiators of this thread even before you. Then subsequently after I nominated you to create such a thread.

LOL...i dont know what most of that means.
girls that i wanted to see in the original were getting rejected,
others felt the same way...
thread was created to be able to accommodate them
i know what kind we are looking for and so do many others
those confused most likely didnt read the charter or the thread title "BBW" is messing up the charter (incredible that just that one word can destroy the whole long detailed post)

pretty straight forward

[last_days_of_logan]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I will investigate further tomorrow if I can 

But looks pretty fucking decent

Hidden Image/Members Only

well done

her private gallery looks promising

[PapaSmurf]

I give up 

Especially along with the Illustrious FCB  as being the initiators of this thread even before you. Then subsequently after I nominated you to create such a thread.

With all due respect, why do you even visit this thread? You have your own very successful thread, you time is better spent there. This is Logans project. Whatever he says goes weather whether you like it or not.

Even I have a few issues with this thread, (For different reasons though) but it really isn't either of our place to tell him how to manage it.

[Dinekid7]

You rekon....... The private gallery was a bit of a let down for me, was expecting more bum pics, she looked abit on the skinny side,
I rekon the pics on her front page are more recent and so I will hope that's what I see when I visit.

[last_days_of_logan]

You rekon....... The private gallery was a bit of a let down for me, was expecting more bum pics, she looked abit on the skinny side,
I rekon the pics on her front page are more recent and so I will hope that's what I see when I visit.

ah i see...if you are talking of her being bigger then no...on the contrary....she looked smaller

but there were signs of some ass there

if i am perfectly honest i think someone has taken over the PROFILE and forgotten to remove BBW status

edit: where it said thread i meant profile

[last_days_of_logan]

With all due respect, why do you even visit this thread? You have your own very successful thread, you time is better spent there. This is Logans project. Whatever he says goes weather whether you like it or not.

Even I have a few issues with this thread, (For different reasons though) but it really isn't either of our place to tell him how to manage it.

cheers papasmurf. All are welcome to contribute obviously....its just the constant derailment time and time again due to wording that's knackering. funny enough on PUNTHER's thread...when i sense i am occupying too much time arguing that certain escorts should be there....i actively surrender my view so as to not hijack it

i am more than willing to discuss issues with this place.....either here or PM.

where is you SBBBW thread anyway? thought you were championing that one?

[PapaSmurf]

okay thats a completely different issue outside the realm of booties. needless to say...bellies are not a problem...its booties that are paramount.i am not sure where did this belly issue come from? i never mentioned it once.

I'm not part of the belly debate. You just lost me when you graded this one as a "hell naww". This is the definition of a BBW to me.
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
And how is she any different from BBW Bunny, a lady you posted yourself ...
Hidden Image/Members Only
Or April Foxx..
Hidden Image/Members Only
This is where my confusion comes from. But it's no big deal man.  I'll probably be posting less or just do seperate thread for girls that fit my taste.

[last_days_of_logan]

I'm not part of the belly debate. You just lost me when you graded this one as a "hell naww". This is the definition of a BBW to me.
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
And how is she any different from BBW Bunny, a lady you posted yourself ...
Hidden Image/Members Only
Or April Foxx..
Hidden Image/Members Only
This is where my confusion comes from. But it's no big deal man.  I'll probably be posting less or just do seperate thread for girls that fit my taste.

all valid points. i think i let loose to the trend and tidal wave of entrants....mixed in with constant attack from certain people might have made me contradict myself in opposing directions
BBW bunny was initially someone i thought "yes i like this girl and i am sure others would like it too." after what can only be described a migrane attack from others quoting a charter that got me sued ..... i thought "is the VW cause she is fat? maybe i shouldnt let her in cause of this and this?"

make no mistake though....you can be a BBW but you must have either good hips to waist with some vw or good vw with some hips to waist

[PapaSmurf]

all valid points. i think i let loose to the trend and tidal wave of entrants....mixed in with constant attack from certain people might have made me contradict myself in opposing directions

Fair enough.  I'll try and get this BBW/SSBBW thread started asap. 

[last_days_of_logan]

Fair enough.  I'll try and get this BBW/SSBBW thread started asap. 

you know what , the girl that you said is a definition of a BBW from that picture looked promising

but the other pics showed a distinct lack of VW

BBW Bunny and April fox i think have both better VW dont you think?

but.....you have been straight forward with good evidence......with that in mind one thing i am going to do is changed the title from BBW to Plus size allowed. i would prefer to have any restrictions on the size but if BBW / SSBBW is to be successful then we should probably have a size guidance of some sort here?


lets collaborate......a committee of people that appreciate bigger size women?

[last_days_of_logan]

Fair enough.  I'll try and get this BBW/SSBBW thread started asap. 

just so you know, i added more to the post you quoted

[PapaSmurf]

you know what , the girl that you said is a definition of a BBW from that picture looked promising

but the other pics showed a distinct lack of VW

BBW Bunny and April fox i think have both better VW dont you think?

What's "VW"?

[last_days_of_logan]

What's "VW"?

 

okay it becoming more and more clear that no one could be arsed to read the first post

VW is the back-arch...the coccyx that highlights booty...the shelf test ... curvature .... slope ...etc etc

the weaker the VW the flatter the angle between back and booty

[PapaSmurf]

okay it becoming more and more clear that no one could be arsed to read the first post

VW is the back-arch...the coccyx that highlights booty...the shelf test ... curvature .... slope ...etc etc

the weaker the VW the flatter the angle between back and booty

Guilty! haha I assumed it was just a copy past from Peter Purves thread,
I thought VW meant "Voluptuous Woman" haha.

[last_days_of_logan]

Guilty! haha I assumed it was just a copy past from Peter Purves thread,
I thought VW meant "Voluptuous Woman" haha.

far from it bro.

the confusion stems from people not actually reading that first post

[last_days_of_logan]

I'll probably be posting less or just do seperate thread for girls that fit my taste.

let me know when you are up and running, i'll be happy to contribute to it. i think we could find some gems in that category

[peter purves]

With all due respect, why do you even visit this thread? You have your own very successful thread, you time is better spent there. This is Logans project. Whatever he says goes weather whether you like it or not.

Even I have a few issues with this thread, (For different reasons though) but it really isn't either of our place to tell him how to manage it.

I think you have missed a few things

1. It was part of my input which helped to create this thread
2. I nominated Logan to create this thread
3. You will see in the charter reference and Logan seeking for my opinion
4. After the thread was created you can see me giving my own thoughts to make it successful
5. I have no thread of my own - as The Illustrious FCB  has rightfully pointed out that the OP is not always the owner of the thread. On a forum no-one really should be considered as the owner in the way you suggest.
6. Closely linked to point 5 there is nothing wrong in pointing out the inherent contradictions within this or any other thread

Nonetheless with Last _Days_of Logan perception that I am deliberately putting in false WGs to spoil the thread and you believe I am undermining it.

Much of what you wrote I could not consider as being of use except the above in bold which I believe is good advice 

[peter purves]

What's "VW"?

Vertebral Wedge - scientific term

Hidden Image/Members Only

[YoungOGPunter]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Anybody seen this girl... theres a new profile for her: External Link/Members Only

[last_days_of_logan]

Anybody seen this girl... theres a new profile for her: External Link/Members Only

hi mate,i have the utmost faith that someone will give you info if you give a little

[YoungOGPunter]

hi mate,i have the utmost faith that someone will give you info if you give a little

Lol I’m planning on doing some reviews on past punts, if that’s what you mean.

[last_days_of_logan]

Lol I’m planning on doing some reviews on past punts, if that’s what you mean.

LOL..that is exactly what i was referring to

its not really about reviews ...not like you have to do a review to get help.

more that your first post showed you are in the game and the second post was a request.....just dont want you to ffall into a negative comfort zone of constantly getting assistance but not contributing kind of thing

at this point its no big deal...start to get to 100 and no assisting others or engaging with other on various topics then it might get a little weird

[Triangulate]

that doesnt really narrow things down for you now does it 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=166400.msg1781611#msg1781611

I saw her pop up again in N. London. I still stand behind that review.

[last_days_of_logan]

I saw her pop up again in N. London. I still stand behind that review.

i believe you buddy. have seen her myself and it was a neutral thanks to your review otherwise i might have been expecting a bit more

i basically flipped her over for the entire 15 mins and did what i had to do.....didnt get the dead starfish treatment mainly cause she made quite a bit of varying noises (not loud) due to the fact she couldnt take my size....cupping her tits while in doggy and catching that in the mirror was a decent memory

but yeah, your review is pretty good

Dinekid also backs it up from his experience