Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: New Girls In Cambridge  (Read 7724 times)


Offline 8a8ylon

All very nice looking girls...But would exercise caution as I'm sure extra are going to be asked so ask before hand, girls will be giving you all the I don't do this/that so get everything in writing / face to face before £ is handed over...


Poor NaughtyHellenSweet does Bb which I hope is just crap but caution is needed

Offline xxshadxx


Offline CBPaul

A few of them seem to do bb. Agree, they look nice but exercise caution.

The only one I'd be tempted by is External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only she doesn't list penetration on her likes list so even though she mentions it I'd make sure it's on offer if you want that.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only - been several profiles with those pictures. Not the first time it's been in the area and zero fb since being on from April - not for me.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only - horrific fb

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only - I think the pictures have been on other profiles but not 100% sure.

This area is flooded with shite profiles, they have dominated for most of this year, so bear that in mind.

RossStephen

  • Guest

Offline 8a8ylon

Some have left Cambridge... I'm wondering how the lives of these girls are...in my town my 2nd bad punt was telling me she did this job 24/7 and moves around like nomads or something.

My fav of the above NHS seem to be doing the same.  I wonder what their must be going thou seem like a lot of TV movies like taken is more real than fantasy :scare: :scare:

bobbles1945

  • Guest
Bit of a nerd me. I have been noting the girls on AW who list Cambridge as their working venue on almost a daily basis and noting their details (AW number, member since , name and price and phone number) and entering them on a “hot list”for over a year now and would like to share some observations .
As you have probably noticed there always seem to be a vast number of girls  who are “new” each day, some with very recent “member since” dates (new that day or a few days old) but others with older “member since” dates. Often the profiles hang around for a short time in Cambridge and then the profiles will list other work locations before disappearing entirely from AW. The half-life of an AW profile seems pretty short. Mostly these girls have zero feedback, and only private galleries when they do have feedback often it is from members who are no longer active or are obviously fake (from members with no feedback themselves or from women no longer active) I find it unbelievable that 61 girls worked in Cambridge with an October 2013 “member since” date. What is the explanation-are they all photo scammers, or bait and switches? Or are they from genuine workers who come to this country for a brief period tour around for a bit then return to their homeland?
Sometimes profiles seem to be taken over, a new photo and new telephone number is substituted on an older profile (so the AW number and the “member since” date is the same but the girl looks different and the phone number is different). Perhaps more interesting is the analysis of phone numbers;-the same number will appear on different profiles usually for a period of a few months before vanishing from AW. This suggests either that sim cards are being passed around different girls which suggests some degree of organisation or that a single girl is  putting up a number of  different sequential profiles. So for instance so far in this month (November) out of the  45 “new” girls listed until the 20th 16 phone numbers have been used before on other profiles. (there seems to be a lot of this this month for some reason).
Anyway perhaps the wisest policy is to stick to women who have a relatively long “member since” dates and who have good and genuine feedback. Mind you I have found some great providers amongst those with no feedback…-the things I do in the name of research!

Offline mh

Bit of a nerd me. I have been noting the girls on AW who list Cambridge as their working venue on almost a daily basis and noting their details (AW number, member since , name and price and phone number) and entering them on a “hot list”for over a year now and would like to share some observations .
...
Mind you I have found some great providers amongst those with no feedback…-the things I do in the name of research!

Well done - I think! You've just confirmed what we all suspect but aren't conscientious enough (or nerdy enough) to keep any track of. Clearly "the girls" are not organising themselves and passing on SIMs/phones to their "friends", it has to be an organised group with a pool of phones getting recycled all the time.

Very often the girls are eager anyway as they are earning money and can't afford to get any complaints/hassle as their boss wouldn't be happy. And of course among those not being pimped around in this way they always start with no feedback!

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Bit of a nerd me. I have been noting the girls on AW who list Cambridge as their working venue on almost a daily basis and noting their details (AW number, member since , name and price and phone number) and entering them on a “hot list”for over a year now and would like to share some observations .
As you have probably noticed there always seem to be a vast number of girls  who are “new” each day, some with very recent “member since” dates (new that day or a few days old) but others with older “member since” dates. Often the profiles hang around for a short time in Cambridge and then the profiles will list other work locations before disappearing entirely from AW. The half-life of an AW profile seems pretty short. Mostly these girls have zero feedback, and only private galleries when they do have feedback often it is from members who are no longer active or are obviously fake (from members with no feedback themselves or from women no longer active) I find it unbelievable that 61 girls worked in Cambridge with an October 2013 “member since” date. What is the explanation-are they all photo scammers, or bait and switches? Or are they from genuine workers who come to this country for a brief period tour around for a bit then return to their homeland?
Sometimes profiles seem to be taken over, a new photo and new telephone number is substituted on an older profile (so the AW number and the “member since” date is the same but the girl looks different and the phone number is different). Perhaps more interesting is the analysis of phone numbers;-the same number will appear on different profiles usually for a period of a few months before vanishing from AW. This suggests either that sim cards are being passed around different girls which suggests some degree of organisation or that a single girl is  putting up a number of  different sequential profiles. So for instance so far in this month (November) out of the  45 “new” girls listed until the 20th 16 phone numbers have been used before on other profiles. (there seems to be a lot of this this month for some reason).
Anyway perhaps the wisest policy is to stick to women who have a relatively long “member since” dates and who have good and genuine feedback. Mind you I have found some great providers amongst those with no feedback…-the things I do in the name of research!


Ditto..

Well done for keeping track of these. I did this a long while back, even went further with my notes to note down which areas they visited, changes in Mobile Numbers and movement in the number of PG pics (eg, set up a fake profile with no PG for a few days, giving impression that it is a genuine profile, then add PG few days later.

Having joined this board, and with the usage of Reverse Image on Google, I have stopped making loads of notes that I previously did.

Also, a "New" profile in your area may be a few weeks old, and you ask yourself "how did I miss that". In reality, they were set up for a different location initially, and only "moved" into your area recently.




Offline CBPaul

Bit of a nerd me. I have been noting the girls on AW who list Cambridge as their working venue on almost a daily basis and noting their details (AW number, member since , name and price and phone number) and entering them on a “hot list”for over a year now and would like to share some observations .
As you have probably noticed there always seem to be a vast number of girls  who are “new” each day, some with very recent “member since” dates (new that day or a few days old) but others with older “member since” dates. Often the profiles hang around for a short time in Cambridge and then the profiles will list other work locations before disappearing entirely from AW. The half-life of an AW profile seems pretty short. Mostly these girls have zero feedback, and only private galleries when they do have feedback often it is from members who are no longer active or are obviously fake (from members with no feedback themselves or from women no longer active) I find it unbelievable that 61 girls worked in Cambridge with an October 2013 “member since” date. What is the explanation-are they all photo scammers, or bait and switches? Or are they from genuine workers who come to this country for a brief period tour around for a bit then return to their homeland?
Sometimes profiles seem to be taken over, a new photo and new telephone number is substituted on an older profile (so the AW number and the “member since” date is the same but the girl looks different and the phone number is different). Perhaps more interesting is the analysis of phone numbers;-the same number will appear on different profiles usually for a period of a few months before vanishing from AW. This suggests either that sim cards are being passed around different girls which suggests some degree of organisation or that a single girl is  putting up a number of  different sequential profiles. So for instance so far in this month (November) out of the  45 “new” girls listed until the 20th 16 phone numbers have been used before on other profiles. (there seems to be a lot of this this month for some reason).
Anyway perhaps the wisest policy is to stick to women who have a relatively long “member since” dates and who have good and genuine feedback. Mind you I have found some great providers amongst those with no feedback…-the things I do in the name of research!

Good stuff and thanks for posting. This confirms a lot, 16 out of 20 numbers is a very high proportion.

I tend to keep track of using my hot list and don't go for the very new profiles, but sometimes keep an eye on those which interest me. Quite a few times I have gone to my hot list only to be presented with a girl I've never seen before, new name, new pics....

It's not spotting the fakes that bothers me, it's missing out on a decent, genuine new one that does.

bobbles1945

  • Guest
Just a follow-up on my last post I notice that the phone number (7786947963 ) used by Nancy N an Aw member since  03/12/2013  (External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only) has been used by seven girls stretching back to October last year  and that used by Katty (7583710356) (by three girls  the earliest in December last year.( External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only)

Interestingly there were a total of 744 girls who had AW profiles listing their member since date between March and December 2012 and with Cambridge as their location. (The bumper month was October with 105 new girls listed.).Of the 744 girls 103 (13%) still have AW profiles (although mostly not listing Cambridge as their location) and only 65 of the total have logged in in the last month.

The conclusion is that many girls are on the site for a relatively short time, they may visit other locations and then leave AW, possibly they are here to make a quick buck or the life does not suit them-less than 10% are active 8 months later. I have noticed that while most who stay retain the same phone number there are a subset (many listing nationality as Romanian) who are phone number hoppers. Make of that what you will

Offline CBPaul

It's good to put some figures to the suspicions regarding the two new profiles. Thanks for posting.

Spotted them this morning and the Katty profile immediately got my attention. They both have CB5 as the postcode as have several other profiles over the last few months. No doubt a couple of profiles that will vanish in a few weeks.

Cambridge does seem to be one of the landing sites for new profiles, makes the minefield even harder to navigate !

Simplysimon

  • Guest
I have developed the habit of phoning the numbers on AW when booking , if they're unanswered and I recieve a text asking me to text instead I save the number as a no no so when the number is used by a different profile it shows as no no on my phone.

Offline xxshadxx

Are we gonna get any decent girls cambridge? Its been almost 5 months i have not had a punt in cambridge. :angry:

Festisio

  • Guest
Are we gonna get any decent girls cambridge? Its been almost 5 months i have not had a punt in cambridge. :angry:

Fella, if you haven't got up to your nuts in this one's guts (External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only) then you can't complain about the situation!

Offline 8a8ylon

Have you checked out her mates 700 FB's :kissgirl:

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Have you checked out her mates 700 FB's :kissgirl:

We termed these girls as Louise's Girls (approx ten of them in this group at the moment). Some guy manages their profiles, and each girl insists on a booking first prior to seeing you or providing you with a contact number, so they end up with huge FB within a short time. They tour all over the country.



Offline CBPaul

We termed these girls as Louise's Girls (approx ten of them in this group at the moment). Some guy manages their profiles, and each girl insists on a booking first prior to seeing you or providing you with a contact number, so they end up with huge FB within a short time. They tour all over the country.

Thanks for the explanation. At least they are genuine though, I've wanted to get my grubby hands on Annabelle  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only for a while, eventhough she's out of my self imposed price range.
I doubt Nicole has much time to be an air stewardess though  :lol:

Offline eyeseebee

Why oh why do they come out with nonsense like 'I am an air stewardess' - She's got over 250 feedbacks in 10 months - I won't expect her to be serving me my G&T on my way to New York next week....I think girls saying things like this just sounds ridiculous.... :dash:

Offline CBPaul

Why oh why do they come out with nonsense like 'I am an air stewardess' - She's got over 250 feedbacks in 10 months - I won't expect her to be serving me my G&T on my way to New York next week....I think girls saying things like this just sounds ridiculous.... :dash:

I think the idea is that because she moves about so much we'll think that she's off serving the G&Ts when she not in Cambridge. Some dozy buggers will actually fall for it too   :crazy:

z_o396

  • Guest
i know some have reservations re. agencys but can guaranteed zoe from agency cens  will gIve u an unforgettable experience... she clearly genuinely loves her job...enthusiastic, enegetic and incredibly highly sexed but also capable of intelligent conversation...this girl...there is most definetly more to her than meets the eye...and on the eye...wow!!!

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
i know some have reservations re. agencys but can guaranteed zoe from agency cens  will gIve u an unforgettable experience... she clearly genuinely loves her job...enthusiastic, enegetic and incredibly highly sexed but also capable of intelligent conversation...this girl...there is most definetly more to her than meets the eye...and on the eye...wow!!!


z_o396, thank you for your 1st post, on Zoe from agency cens!!


aspire

  • Guest

Offline xxshadxx



z_o396, thank you for your 1st post, on Zoe from agency cens!!
[/quote]


 :lol:

Offline Rock123

Anyone ever seen the girls who advertise on vivastreet? Saw Louise once and it was horrible experience!

Offline xxshadxx

Anyone ever seen the girls who advertise on vivastreet? Saw Louise once and it was horrible experience!

any link?



Offline CBPaul

And also discussed here on the thread 91Louise.

bobbles1945

  • Guest
I have been keeping track of the girls who listing as in Cambridge on AW during 2013. All together there were 817 entries listing 2013 as their member since date only 222 (27%) still have AW profiles (although now only a small fraction still list Cambridge as their current location). For comparison in 2012 only 14% of profiles are still listed. I enter every girl on a Cambridge hot list (now standing at 629) but when I do a search for those profiles listing Cambridge I get 124-so  less that 20% of the girls who mentioned Cambridge as their work location still have profiles  as Cambridge based. This implies that about 80% girls  tour to some extent. What is more striking is the removal (“death”) of AW profiles.
The “death” of profiles from AW can be very rapid so less than a quarter who joined in December were still up at the end of the month. Of the 817; 595 (72%) ever listed a phone number, the comparable figure for 2012 is 68% (a few of those insisted on email contact first) but one can assume that the remainder were not genuine-possibly picture scammers. Of the 595 with phone numbers 190 (32%) still have profiles up at the end of 2013 of the 222 without phone numbers  57 (26%) still have profiles up (the comparable figures for 2012 are 12% and 20% respectively) -so the presence of a phone number is not a good guide of profile longevity. Some of the phone numbers were used on multiple profiles as I have noted before.
None of this helps choose a reliable working girl-I would suggest those with older “member since dates” and some genuine feedback are the bst bets-but you knew that already.

Offline Rock123

Thanks for the information.

The way I pick the girls on AW is by the method you stated i.e. when they joined but also if they had a lot of feedback.

I'd hardly ever bother with a girl on AW if they are zero feedback or only had 2 or 3. Unless they are british and at least a 9/10 looks wise I'd discard them as choices if that had say less than 10 feedback.

If a girl on AW in the cambridge region had more than 40 feedback then I'd be inclined to read the profile and see if I should take a punt - excuse the pun haha.

maxim

  • Guest
i know some have reservations re. agencys but can guaranteed zoe from agency cens  will gIve u an unforgettable experience... she clearly genuinely loves her job...enthusiastic, enegetic and incredibly highly sexed but also capable of intelligent conversation...this girl...there is most definetly more to her than meets the eye...and on the eye...wow!!!

Zoe now with Stansted Escorts. Saw her a couple of weeks ago. Sensational! Sadly, SE are so inefficient with website updates that she doesn't yet appear on it. She's very tall, slim and very willing! Cross between PSE and GFE. I didn't find any limits and doubt she has any.

Gavin

  • Guest
Stansted not good at updating website . Anyone seen Isabella from stansted escorts. Was thinking of trying to book her .

maxim

  • Guest
Just confirmed what you say re updates on your other thread!

Offline Rock123

There isn't much about really atm.

vt

  • Guest
I have been keeping track of the girls who listing as in Cambridge on AW during 2013. All together there were 817 entries listing 2013 as their member since date only 222 (27%) still have AW profiles (although now only a small fraction still list Cambridge as their current location). For comparison in 2012 only 14% of profiles are still listed. I enter every girl on a Cambridge hot list (now standing at 629) but when I do a search for those profiles listing Cambridge I get 124-so  less that 20% of the girls who mentioned Cambridge as their work location still have profiles  as Cambridge based. This implies that about 80% girls  tour to some extent. What is more striking is the removal (“death”) of AW profiles.
The “death” of profiles from AW can be very rapid so less than a quarter who joined in December were still up at the end of the month. Of the 817; 595 (72%) ever listed a phone number, the comparable figure for 2012 is 68% (a few of those insisted on email contact first) but one can assume that the remainder were not genuine-possibly picture scammers. Of the 595 with phone numbers 190 (32%) still have profiles up at the end of 2013 of the 222 without phone numbers  57 (26%) still have profiles up (the comparable figures for 2012 are 12% and 20% respectively) -so the presence of a phone number is not a good guide of profile longevity. Some of the phone numbers were used on multiple profiles as I have noted before.
None of this helps choose a reliable working girl-I would suggest those with older “member since dates” and some genuine feedback are the bst bets-but you knew that already.

Interesting stuff...just shows how shockingly full of scams and unreliable AW really is! It's why we need UKP so we can sort the wheat from the chaff.

vt

  • Guest
Zoe now with Stansted Escorts. Saw her a couple of weeks ago. Sensational! Sadly, SE are so inefficient with website updates that she doesn't yet appear on it. She's very tall, slim and very willing! Cross between PSE and GFE. I didn't find any limits and doubt she has any.

I'm sure the one-post-wonder you quoted is the girl touting herself...z_o396...Zoe96.  I hope you're not doing the same!!  :unknown:

Good girls don't need to tout themselves on forums.